ucanuup
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2014
- Posts
- 65
- Likes
- 14
Edition X V2 for $1300? Now that's very tempting.
I'm wondering if that's a typo on their website.
Why would they improve the design and then cut the price by almost 1/3rd? Makes no sense.
Yes and not, this move (V2 version 6 months after launch of HEX and 1 year after HEK) would be correct if they didn't do the beta testers program.
This is the product that the beta testers wanted, so this "V2 versions" should've been released one year ago, that's the purpose of a beta testers program, to know what your customers want.
Is normal to improve products, Sennheiser launched HD800S six years after and without public beta testers program...what Hifiman did is reserve the opinions of the beta testers to save the R&D for a V2 version, and of course to make more money of that second revision, not a very honest way to do things.
Focal was the wisest company, I'm sure they hired someone to read Head-fi one entire year, recollected info, and they said: OK, a headphone like this and another like that, and...boom, totally disrupted everything. Oh, and very wise pricing decisions, they have a nice opportunity to collect feedback of the 1kusd and the 4kusd headphone and release a 2kusd headphone that suits another part of the market...that's how you do things right, what Hifiman is doing is laughing at customer's face.
Dudes, let's be reasonable...
There is nobody laughing at no one.
There is mostly competition and sales that drives companies.
That being said, I believe you have a few points that need correction.
1- HiFiman seems to be going for increased sales, while Focal seems to be satisfied with making a "statement product" with Utopia.
So the marketing plans of both are neither dumb or "laughing".
Just different.
2- It is impossible for the HE1000 V2 to be in any way the same as the prototypes,
which did not have anything the same.
Niether the pads, or the cup depth, or the same drivers, as was thread already noted in this thread.
What you stated doesn't make sense unless you are implying the possible similar tonality to prototype drivers, and that is still speculation.
I could make a much stronger argument with the Ether Flow, in which the recessed driver dimensions is equivalent to the "Flow" add-on changes.
So while I could understand price changes a cause of concern, the fact is everyone benefits from better models at lower pricing.
If anyone wants to stay mad and save up FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS, for a Utopia,
That's certainly their prerogative, but not the smartest move.
As you stated, Focal did leave a price gap in between models.
Very good point that they may come out in future with another model, although still speculation.
Yet Most likely the only one laughing at your raped wallet will be Focal on a Utopia purchase..
Edit**
The Elear is the obvious value there..
3k chinese headphone is cheap, ("increasing sales") lol hahahahaha dude you're better than Eddie Murphy
There is nothing cheap on the HE1000 V1 or V2.
All metal & wood exterior.
All metal headband.
Leather headrest, no pleather or protein leather.
No cheapo plastics or squeaky carbon fiber.
Nothing is more quality feel than metal.
That's why rings, bracelets, chains earings and other jewelry are metal.
There is a stigma that Chinese always make cheap stuff.
btw. HEK does not use genuine leather on their headband. It is a process leather made from shaved leather and mixed with other synthetic materials.
I stand corrected on this but that's what I observed (my HEK is in deep storage now :confused_face: )
do you see anyone wearing stainless steel rings, bracelets etc with pride?
Dam, not real leather?!
Also, while I do agree carbon fibre is light and expensive,
it still feels like plastic or polyurethane because of the resin it needs to hold it together..
P S., I not one of those that say "mad" and already noted their "moves" are just different.
Laughable statement esp for this argument...do you see anyone wearing stainless steel rings, bracelets etc with pride? or do you think HEK are made of precious metal such as silver, gold, platinum etc? and which do you think are more expensive and technically challenging to manufacture...a thin sheet of metal or a light weight carbon fibre?
And why are ALL expensive sports cars manufacturers started making parts (tubs, hood, body, even rims) with expensive carbon fibre? Is it to make their end-products feel cheap? or is that for a fact that it is to save weight, and having a better strength to weight ratio?