Had to share this with you guys, I've been using the Elegia as my daily drivers for a good 2 weeks now, and thought I'd compare them to the good ole P9 this morning, going back and forth with Aurora, Lana Del Rey & some EDM.
Very interesting stuff, honestly i didn't expect the P9 to hold up to what is a newer, much more technologically minded headphone. The Elegia just has so much R&D with focals high end headphone background.
The Elegia highlights details more strongly, amplifying them, and is more detailed, no doubt about it. It sounds more open and bigger.
The P9 feels fuller. Some vocals on the P9 just have more 'energy' if that makes sense, and body, while on the Elegia they can fall flat (Aurora -dance on the moon). The midrange on the Elegia is more spacious and ethereal, on the P9 more fleshed out intense.
Vocals wider on Elegia though. They're very close in how they present vocals most of the time, the P9 just has this extra dollop of goodness I can't describe, some secret sauce.
An example of how they present music differently, Sweet Child o Mine, when Axl first sings, Slash plays arpeggios in the background, tiny details.
On the Elegia these details are boosted right forwards, and they actually seem more pronounced than the vocals, it's a bit odd to me. On the P9 Axl's voice is brought forward and the details are still there just in the background as accents, which I think is the intention with the track.
Honestly over the past 3 weeks i thought I'd found my favourite closed back in the Elegia. But side by side I think I prefer the P9 presentation. It feels more fun, but also I think has a better sense of emphasis in the mix, while retaining the detail of the Elegia for the most part. I can see why people would prefer the Elegia too, these are absolutely on the same tier imo.