Bose Triport or Senns PX200
post-837777
Thread Starter
Post #1 of 14

outdoors

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Posts
8
Likes
0
Between the Bose Triport at about $150 or the Senns PX200 at about $59 ? What do y'all think ? I have tried the Triport and thought it sounded good. Does the Senns for only $59 sound as good or better ? Going to plug them in to an iPOD. Thanks everyone !!
 
     Share This Post       
post-837789
Post #2 of 14

tiberian

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
1,423
Reaction score
11
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Posts
1,423
Likes
11
the triport is extremely overpriced, i have never tried the sennheiser earbuds but you can get something better than the bose for less...etymotic ER-6 anyone?
 
     Share This Post       
post-837796
Post #3 of 14

Aman

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
May 12, 2004
Messages
4,475
Reaction score
13
Joined
May 12, 2004
Posts
4,475
Likes
13
No.

Don't make the mistake I did and buy these. They may be comfortable, but DON'T buy the Bose TriPorts - they are not worth the 150 dollars you are going to be paying. The sound quality is awful, and virtually no sound-staging present.

Those Sennheisers will probably sound better.

If you want to spend the same ammount on headphones, but want a GOOD pair, get the Grados SR-125.
 
     Share This Post       
post-837800
Post #4 of 14

terrymx

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 24, 2003
Messages
4,759
Reaction score
12
Joined
Apr 24, 2003
Posts
4,759
Likes
12
well, i think the reaction of everyone here would be that the triport is comfortable, but overpriced and you can get something sound much much better sounding with the same amount.

as for the px200, it is a durable and portable headphone if you want to use it muffle outside noises. 60USD is $20 more than what i would pay for a new pair of px200 though.
 
     Share This Post       
post-837883
Post #5 of 14

EightyEight

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
162
Reaction score
0
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Posts
162
Likes
0
You can find a set of ER4P on our for sale/thread sections from time to time ~$160
 
     Share This Post       
post-837906
Post #6 of 14

SunByrne

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 27, 2003
Messages
899
Reaction score
105
Joined
Jul 27, 2003
Posts
899
Likes
105
I can assure you that the PX200s sound *WAY* better than the Bose Triports. Even if they were cheaper and not 3x the price, I'd still recommend the PX200s over the Triports.

Friends don't let friends buy Bose.
 
     Share This Post       
post-838031
Post #7 of 14

episiarch

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Nov 4, 2003
Messages
2,629
Reaction score
246
Location
London and California, mainly
Joined
Nov 4, 2003
Location
London and California, mainly
Posts
2,629
Likes
246
The Triport blocks a good deal of outside sound, but it's not a really good listening instrument. It's a great step up from stock earbuds and $10 headphones, but its handling of some complex musical passages literally made me grimace. Their price is far out of proportion to their value.

The PX200 is fairly nice for the price (you can do better than $59, though - just click through to a Head-Fi sponsor). It has a musical sound and while it doesn't make me grin with delight, it never makes me grimace. How much outside sound it blocks depends heavily on the wearer. For me it blocks almost none.

For the price of the Triports you could also consider the Sennheiser PXC-250. Essentially it is the PX200 with active noise reduction. I feel it's a better, more musical headphone than the PX200, and the ANR is a nice feature. However some people find the ANR effect uncomfortable and don't like it.
 
     Share This Post       
post-838084
Post #8 of 14

MagusG

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,399
Reaction score
10
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Posts
1,399
Likes
10
Skip em both and get the legendary Koss KSC-35s. Woot, and check my sig to see how I feel about Bose.
-Mag
 
     Share This Post       
post-838106
Post #9 of 14

terrymx

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 24, 2003
Messages
4,759
Reaction score
12
Joined
Apr 24, 2003
Posts
4,759
Likes
12
the ksc35 have a fuller sound and better high frequencies, but it very open so it fully allow noises to come in and out. also it is cheaply built so you have to be careful with it. it is pretty good sounding alright.
 
     Share This Post       
post-838467
Post #10 of 14

seeberg

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Messages
2,619
Reaction score
10
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Posts
2,619
Likes
10
Point of advice that seems all too true lately: Buying anything but Bose will always get you something better than Bose. I go with Grado's, but they don't seem to be right for your situation. I heard those Triports for around 15 seconds, and they sounded as good as my old Aiwa XP222's, a 30$ set of 'phones.

~He's through with bars, now he's eating cars, Cadillacs, Pontiacs, and Subaru~
 
     Share This Post       
post-839114
Post #11 of 14

outdoors

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Posts
8
Likes
0
Thanks everyone - I appreciate your collective thoughts and opinions. This forum is a great source of knowledge !
 
     Share This Post       
post-840110
Post #12 of 14

zeno333

Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 26, 2004
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Joined
Feb 26, 2004
Posts
99
Likes
0
I had the Bose Triports for 10 minutes before they broke...I was very disapointed. I got the Grado SR60s instead for my iPod Mini and they are great, fantastic I would say. The SR60s even sound good at low volumes...the bass in particular.
 
     Share This Post       
post-840147
Post #13 of 14

violeta88

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 30, 2001
Messages
673
Reaction score
11
Location
Spokane, WA, USA Area
Joined
Dec 30, 2001
Location
Spokane, WA, USA Area
Posts
673
Likes
11
I never thought I would actually choose a Bose Triport over something, but the Triport is better than the PX200 which is plainly awful. The triport isn't good either, and I would recommend the Sennheiser HD497 as your best bet for cheap headphones. It sounds similar to the Grado SR225, but with more bass, and less bright treble. The 497's are open, but I've found that you can't really get a decent closed headphone under $200 anyways (that has good bass at least).

EDIT: Compared to the Grado SR60's the HD497 has a wider "headstage" (soundstage) and it's treble is less bright, but more detailed. It's bass also sounds louder due to it having a more balanced frequency response. The 497 is still grainy in the highs, like any lower end Grado (including the SR225), but it's detail and balance can't really be beat by anything under $100.
 
     Share This Post       
post-840158
Post #14 of 14

Eagle_Driver

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 22, 2001
Messages
6,447
Reaction score
25
Joined
Jun 22, 2001
Posts
6,447
Likes
25
Quote:

Originally Posted by violeta88
...I've found that you can't really get a decent closed headphone under $200 anyways (that has good bass at least).


Well, I agree with that for the most part. The trouble with most closed headphones under $200 is that they deliver either weak or bloated/muddy bass response.
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top