![1650727414987.jpeg 1650727414987.jpeg](https://cdn.head-fi.org/a/11752773.jpeg)
![]() |
![]() |
Stay updated on FiiO at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stay updated on FiiO at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There’s a peak which is why I sold mineAnyone else find Blur’s a bit too aggressive? Mine is tuned warm but it’s still fatiguing and overwhelming. The bass is good but it’s just too bright for me. Anyone else finding this the case or just me?
Anyone else find Blur’s a bit too aggressive? Mine is tuned warm but it’s still fatiguing and overwhelming. The bass is good but it’s just too bright for me. Anyone else finding this the case or just me?
hi bro, yeah, they were a bit aggressive compared to all my other gears at first, especially if you are using a bright source. IMO, it helps if you have a more analogue-ish/ warmer source. Having found the right pairing, I still reach for my blurs more than any of my other gears/buds due to its transparency and live-like signature.
May I ask what model you have? If ever you decide to get rid of them let me know, maybe I can help with that.![]()
Concur with @sonicfanatic, it very much depends on the model. There are a number of models/editions/lines that I too find to be very aggressive (too forward in the upper mids and lower treble) and/or even too bright for my sensitive listening tastes.@jao29 I only have one pair, but I'd expect it all depends on model and tuning. Mine are not bright, or aggressive, but warm and soothing. Maybe too soothing, so I have to be careful with volume.
![]()
I do find my MX400 to be rather aggressive and fatiguing, but my Wraith PK and MX32 are tamer and can listen to them all day (and I do). I think it really depends on the model, but Wong's house tuning (mid forward) lends itself to being aggressive and in-your-face. Like Woody mentioned, this can be accounted for so long as you communicate it to Wong.Anyone else find Blur’s a bit too aggressive? Mine is tuned warm but it’s still fatiguing and overwhelming. The bass is good but it’s just too bright for me. Anyone else finding this the case or just me?
Well I sort of did that and he said that he will tune them on the warmer side. But I still find them fatiguing and abrasive. I do like what the Blur offers but maybe it’s just not for me.Concur with @sonicfanatic, it very much depends on the model. There are a number of models/editions/lines that I too find to be very aggressive (too forward in the upper mids and lower treble) and/or even too bright for my sensitive listening tastes.
I have owned many Blurs and now am down to the three (3) that fit me perfectly. For example, my Blur 256 PK16 White Face and Blur OFC PK150 Wraith are far from being aggressive or even bright, as well as my specially made and tuned Blur 266R MX400 Non-aPs Reference which is very friendly mid/treble wise.... but these were carefully discussed and tuned to my needs.
The issue at hand is that the Blur House Sound is naturally strongly mid-centric and mid-forward with many of the models, editions, series, and lines tuned specifically for "vocals" and "details" (e.g. Beautiful Witch) with some of these even exhibiting secondary or tertiary sound signatures that reach out towards Asian "female poison" type tuning which can be quite aggressive for some listeners and certain types of music.
When ordering earbuds from Blur one needs to clearly state the tuning that they are after as if they do not they will receive the base house tuning which is forward, aggressive, and bright. Also, be aware that some models simply can not be tamed or retuned to your liking however Blur will guide you in this regards if you communicate thoroughly and well.
Well I sort of did that and he said that he will tune them on the warmer side. But I still find them fatiguing and abrasive. I do like what the Blur offers but maybe it’s just not for me.