[mochill]

Need b320

 

[moon20160404]

B 160 and B 320 were completely different from B 200.
It's not sweet.
The sound of B200 is a very vivid and delicate sound (sweet vocals) compared to B160 and B320.
I am confused by the powerful sound.

 

[golov17]

B 160 and B 320 were completely different from B 200.
It's not sweet.

The sound of B200 is a very vivid and delicate sound (sweet vocals) compared to B160 and B320.

I am confused by the powerful sound.

you tried beta Asura? ( bass monster)

 

[moon20160404]

you tried beta Asura? ( bass monster)

I do not know that.

 

[jant71]

  B 160 and B 320 were completely different from B 200.
It's not sweet.
The sound of B200 is a very vivid and delicate sound (sweet vocals) compared to B160 and B320.
I am confused by the powerful sound.

 
Sounds good! Powerful is good if I want to go with a brighter source esp. w/o amp. Good outside in the blustery winter  weather. Good for lower volume listening to still sound full and not like something is missing. Good to not have to worry about finding/going with thicker foams. Doesn't confuse me

but sounds like a winner. Perhaps even the B160 would be even better for me if less bright up top than the 320 cause my Cowon brightens at higher volume unamped and radio reception noise and certain old school podcasts can sound worse on brighter phones.
 
Heck even the Qian 39 could use some more power than it has at times because they are so small some of it does escape or doesn't stay sealed in.
 
Not sure if they are totally different Woo should have made them a different series. Now B160, B200, and B320 makes you think certain things that may not be true. Like maybe they would sound similar(sounds like no) or B200 is better than B160(not sure of that at all).

 

[moon20160404]

   
Sounds good! Powerful is good if I want to go with a brighter source esp. w/o amp. Good outside in the blustery winter  weather. Good for lower volume listening to still sound full and not like something is missing. Good to not have to worry about finding/going with thicker foams. Doesn't confuse me

but sounds like a winner. Perhaps even the B160 would be even better for me if less bright up top than the 320 cause my Cowon brightens at higher volume unamped and radio reception noise and certain old school podcasts can sound worse on brighter phones.
 
Heck even the Qian 39 could use some more power than it has at times because they are so small some of it does escape or doesn't stay sealed in.
 
Not sure if they are totally different Woo should have made them a different series. Now B160, B200, and B320 makes you think certain things that may not be true. Like maybe they would sound similar(sounds like no) or B200 is better than B160(not sure of that at all).

I imagined B 200, so I was surprised to hear B 320 and B 160 but it is a good sound.
What I'm looking for is medium performance earphone. The highest is not necessary.
In case of BLOX, in my case, BE 3 may be the most suitable earphone (indoor use).
At the moment
When listening on B 200, the forum's writing stops. I concentrate on music.

 

[jant71]

  I imagined B 200, so I was surprised to hear B 320 and B 160 but it is a good sound.
What I'm looking for is medium performance earphone. The highest is not necessary.
In case of BLOX, in my case, BE 3 may be the most suitable earphone (indoor use).
At the moment
When listening on B 200, the forum's writing stops. I concentrate on music.

 
Well, me too in certain ways. I certainly would like the lower impedance and slightly higher sensitivity of the 160 over the 320 to grab and go better w/o the need of an amp. And, of course, if the 320 is trying to be more refined and separated that may not be for me since a bit smoother would be better.
 
Clicking on the picture I see 30-20,000 on the B160. B200 and B320 are 20 on the low end. Did you happen to notice if they rolled of earlier in the bass??

 

[golov17]

must have double MP foams for b200

 

[moon20160404]

   
Well, me too in certain ways. I certainly would like the lower impedance and slightly higher sensitivity of the 160 over the 320 to grab and go better w/o the need of an amp. And, of course, if the 320 is trying to be more refined and separated that may not be for me since a bit smoother would be better.
 
Clicking on the picture I see 30-20,000 on the B160. B200 and B320 are 20 on the low end. Did you happen to notice if they rolled of earlier in the bass??

I did not mind.
sorry. Maybe I can not distinguish less than 70 Hz.

 

[vapman]

Which of these do people think is the most bass-heavy, from the new ones? Undecided on picking one up or waiting for the new flagship

 

[Joy Boy]

Which of these do people think is the most bass-heavy, from the new ones? Undecided on picking one up or waiting for the new flagship

From the first impression of the prototype, B320 has more bass quantity and better bass extention. B160 a little bit thinner (bot not too thin) and sounds more agressive

 

[Mommerman]

looks good with the B200, where can I get one, what are the price intervals?

 

[Joy Boy]

looks good with the B200, where can I get one, what are the price intervals?

Just send them an email.
Around $45 for B160 and $60 for B320

 

[Mommerman]

Just send them an email.
Around $45 for B160 and $60 for B320

Awesome. thank you very much

 

[Frederick Wang]

I know this might a long shot, but anyone have both Blox B320 and Red De'mun care to make a comparison?