[plakat]

Could you try? I heard on thus threaf they fit. About to order but will wait for your response.

This case fits the DT1770:
http://europe.beyerdynamic.com/shop/hah/accessories/dt-hard-case.html
 
It was included with the T90 Anniversary Edition, which I own so I tried it with that one.

 

[On The And Of 1]

Possibly buried deep if memory, recollection serves, but search yields a negative - is there a cable of 1.5m approximation that can be accompanied and purchased for greater portability for the Dt1770?

 

[pietcux]

Possibly buried deep if memory, recollection serves, but search yields a negative - is there a cable of 1.5m approximation that can be accompanied and purchased for greater portability for the Dt1770?

All cables for AKG K702 are compatible.

 

[On The And Of 1]

All cables for AKG K702 are compatible.

Many thanks, will look into those.

 

[Jingo Lingo]

I've just taken delivery of some DT 1770's. It's early days but I have to say I'm extremely impressed. I've been away from the head-fi scene for a few years and I was after a new pair of closed cans. I auditioned the PM-3 and really liked it but I thought the bass was lacking a little bit in definition, also vocals were really nicely presented but felt really close in a strange way. After doing a bit of research and seeing a reasonably priced second hand pair I bought DT-1770s on impulse.
 
Loving them so far. I think they're really well balanced. The most impressive thing for me is the texture and definition of the bass. Really outstanding. I sold off most of my headphones a few years ago and my favorite setup was probably my HD-600's connected to a Woo Audio 3. I have to say I think the DT-1770 edge them out in most areas for me but probably not soundstage. These have a nice sense of space between instruments but its not quite so easy to position them in your mind. I am aware that your are going to get a bit of a compromise on soundstage with closed cans.
 
I'll do a better review of them in the coming days. 
 
Oh and I'm powering them with a Fiio Q1 

 ( might have to do something about that.. but it still sounds great!)

 

[nordkapp]

I've just taken delivery of some DT 1770's. It's early days but I have to say I'm extremely impressed. I've been away from the head-fi scene for a few years and I was after a new pair of closed cans. I auditioned the PM-3 and really liked it but I thought the bass was lacking a little bit in definition, also vocals were really nicely presented but felt really close in a strange way. After doing a bit of research and seeing a reasonably priced second hand pair I bought DT-1770s on impulse.

Loving them so far. I think they're really well balanced. The most impressive thing for me is the texture and definition of the bass. Really outstanding. I sold off most of my headphones a few years ago and my favorite setup was probably my HD-600's connected to a Woo Audio 3. I have to say I think the DT-1770 edge them out in most areas for me but probably not soundstage. These have a nice sense of space between instruments but its not quite so easy to position them in your mind. I am aware that your are going to get a bit of a compromise on soundstage with closed cans.

I'll do a better review of them in the coming days. 

Oh and I'm powering them with a Fiio Q1   ( might have to do something about that.. but it still sounds great!)

Couldn't agree more w/you. Just sit back and enjoy now.

 

[Townyj]

  I've just taken delivery of some DT 1770's. It's early days but I have to say I'm extremely impressed. I've been away from the head-fi scene for a few years and I was after a new pair of closed cans. I auditioned the PM-3 and really liked it but I thought the bass was lacking a little bit in definition, also vocals were really nicely presented but felt really close in a strange way. After doing a bit of research and seeing a reasonably priced second hand pair I bought DT-1770s on impulse.
 
Loving them so far. I think they're really well balanced. The most impressive thing for me is the texture and definition of the bass. Really outstanding. I sold off most of my headphones a few years ago and my favorite setup was probably my HD-600's connected to a Woo Audio 3. I have to say I think the DT-1770 edge them out in most areas for me but probably not soundstage. These have a nice sense of space between instruments but its not quite so easy to position them in your mind. I am aware that your are going to get a bit of a compromise on soundstage with closed cans.
 
I'll do a better review of them in the coming days. 
 
Oh and I'm powering them with a Fiio Q1 

 ( might have to do something about that.. but it still sounds great!)

Good to see you around still

 

[headwhacker]

Just had a quick comparison of DT-1770 and Ether-C. So far I'm getting more impressed with DT-1770. I listened to a few Eagles songs tonight. The Ether-C is overall thinner sounding than DT-1770. The bass quantity and texture in DT1770 is greater and pronunced than Ether-C to a point that makes Ether-C bass deprived.
 
Also the DT-1770 has a noticeable wider soundstage. It's like I'm seated on row 1 while the music is being performed in an imaginary stage. Whereas with Ether-C it feels I moved back at least 5 rows back. I also notice the depth of the stage is well defined on DT1770 while Ether-C in comparison is a bit flat or compressed.
 
This impression is done with Samsung GalaxyS4 and Hugo as the source.

 

[zzzmonster]

Hi, how many of you prefer pleather over velour using mojo? I have never changed pads before - noob here. Preference is for something that sounds different from Nighthawk

 

[dryvadeum]

Hi, how many of you prefer pleather over velour using mojo? I have never changed pads before - noob here. Preference is for something that sounds different from Nighthawk

I use pleather with my DT1770s and my mojo. I found using the velours reduces the bass and brings the treble out and gives the sound a more fluffy texture. The bass with the pleathers is rock solid.

 

[zzzmonster]

I use pleather with my DT1770s and my mojo. I found using the velours reduces the bass and brings the treble out and gives the sound a more fluffy texture. The bass with the pleathers is rock solid.

 


Can explain what is fluffy , I bought this headphones looking for either neutral or a HAH signature

 

[dryvadeum]

I use pleather with my DT1770s and my mojo. I found using the velours reduces the bass and brings the treble out and gives the sound a more fluffy texture. The bass with the pleathers is rock solid.

 


Can explain what is fluffy , I bought this headphones looking for either neutral or a HAH signature

The sound has less impact and a softer edge to it in regards to the bass at least. The treble sounds a bit sibilant on some songs with the velours.

 

[zzzmonster]

The sound has less impact and a softer edge to it in regards to the bass at least. The treble sounds a bit sibilant on some songs with the velours.

 


Have you heard the Nighthawk with Mojo, don't want the 2 of them to sound too similar, can I say with velour the sound is brighter?

 

[Skampmeister]

Mine have gone up for sale, I tried to like them, but they are just to dark, to much of a contrast to my home system. Only a week and a half old too.

 

[pietcux]

Mine have gone up for sale, I tried to like them, but they are just to dark, to much of a contrast to my home system. Only a week and a half old too.

If the DT1770 is too dark compared to your home system, then that home system of yours is not my piece of cake for sure