Guppy_
100+ Head-Fier
the gsm arena review of the v20 is dissapoiting
http://www.gsmarena.com/lg_v20-review-1498p7.php
http://www.gsmarena.com/lg_v20-review-1498p7.php
I take a more pragmatic than purist view of these things but there are a few basics which I'm sure others will expand on:
above all...
- stick with music you are familiar with, but try to use a variety of styles (female vocal, orchaestral, jazz, it doesn't matter as long as you say)
- tell us about the sources (file type, bit rates etc, any amplification, make/model of headphones or IEMs)
- try to keep volume at the same level between devices
- tell us about any equaliser use
- check headfi fora for more detailed discussion on all these
- remember this IS subjective and your views are perfectly valid whether you regard yourself as audiophile or not
I think we would all appreciate whatever you are willing to do in the way of a review. Don't get intimidated by the idea of some kind of major review. You can just post your impressions of the sound and whether you personally like the sound. It's essentially subjective and it's only your ears that we care about. A comparison with the Touch would be great if you have the time and also the more details you can give about the nature of the sound the better. I think you should just choose your favorite music to listen to rather than trying to listen to a wide range of genres. Although listening to at least a few different types of music would be a good idea. Presumably if you are here you have read at least a few product reviews. Just take note of some of the sound quality adjectives thrown around in such reviews and decide for yourself whether any apply. Warm/cold/detailed/muddy/clear/sparkly etc. Also pay attention to the tonal balance and whether it sounds natural/neutral or EQ boosted or altered in some way. Hopefully you already have headphones or IEMs that are popular here, but definitely specify what you are listening with.
Thanks for the tips guys will let you know when it arrives
the gsm arena review of the v20 is dissapoiting
http://www.gsmarena.com/lg_v20-review-1498p7.php
The Letv x800 has nearly the same specs aside from the AMOLED display and sells for half that price. How much more expensive could an AMOLED WQHD panel be compared to an IPS LCD WQHD panel? $50 more? $100 more? Take your pick. Either way $400 could be seen as overpriced in comparison and that is just one example. Letv isn't generally very price competitive. If anything they seem to want to compete with Apple more than other Chinese manufacturers. The Meizu Pro 5 and the Vivo X5 Pro are both the same price. The Meizu MX4 Pro has been discontinued I guess but it seems that pricing when it was available was more like $289 to $330. Admittedlly the specs are quite a bit lower on that phone but not because it was a budget phone. It is just old and at the time those specs were comparatively high and expensive for Meizu. I'm only comparing phones that are *known* to be among the best sounding ones and it seems to mostly lose in terms of price. Calling it a 'great value' doens't seem at all justified to me. I think they could sell it for $300 or less and still make a fat profit. I wouldn't go so far as to call it gouging but I don't think calling the pricing aggressive or high value is justified when it isn't cheaper than *any* of their close competitors. The only way to make it look like a good value is to compare it with Apple, Samsung, LG, Sony, Motorola etc. IOW non-Chinese manufcacturers which are obviously going to be more expensive and for good reason.
Regarding Axon 7 pricing, my guess would be that they added like 100 US$ on top just because the device turned out to look so good.
And they did the same thing with Axon 7 mini just because it looks so much like Axon 7.
@artpiggo
Did you (or anyone else) had the chance to compare the sound quality of the Le max x900 to ZTE axon 7? I´m starting to hate the Le max, mainly because of the buggy software and abysmal battery life.
Arbitrarily adding money to the price doesn't make you more money. It will usually make you less. In economics you either charge at the market clearing price, or you don't. If you don't, you loose money whether it is cheaper or more expensive than that price.
They were clearly setting their sites on competing with the One+ and thus slotted in for the same price point.
The LeTV X800 is quite competetively priced but has one major drawback, no 800 MHz LTE, It has no stereo speakers, seems to lack an NFC and a fingerprint scanner and it uses an older less energy efficient SOC, the 810 instead of the 820. You always pay a premium for such features.
But just copying the prices of your competitors doesn't make you more money either or we wouldn't have price wars would we? Everyone would just collude and all would have the same prices for a given product. Yes in theory there is one exact price that will sell enough units while still keeping the price as high as possible, but figuring out that price is nontrivial. It's possible that ZTE might actually make more money if they actually try to compete with Meizu and Vivo in terms of price and sell the Axon 7 for something like $299 or whatever. Or maybe they would make more money copying whatever Apple is asking for the latest iPhone. They likely don't know and neither do you or I. And this doesn't even get into the value of your relatively new brand getting into as many hands as possible. The higher your price the fewer people are going to buy your product. Full stop.