- Joined
- Jan 27, 2006
- Posts
- 4,156
- Likes
- 66
Quote:
Are you kidding me! Boomy, grainy and unnatural is not something I would attribute to the 780s, quite the opposite. What you might be finding boomana is that the Ultrasones are picking up on details you are otherwise missing, and the 'boom' is the bass, welcome to the lower end of frequencies. The other day I took a listen to the new Whitney Houston album I Look To You and the Ultrasones revealed what a bad recording it is, her voice sounds raspy and the dynamics are flat. The D2000s are much more forgiving however I find them dull and boring, no resolution, monotone bass, nothing more than $30 headphones.
Originally Posted by boomana /img/forum/go_quote.gif I seriously dislike the HFI-780s, and I've heard them a few times stock, modded, new and with a few hundred hours on them. They're boomy, grainy, and with an unnatural tone. The D2000s are slightly better, but also have a sloppy bass that improves a bit only when amped. I'm going to recommend the ATH-ESW9s (read up on them), but if you decide on that route, avoid buying from ebay as you'll find more fakes than not. |
Are you kidding me! Boomy, grainy and unnatural is not something I would attribute to the 780s, quite the opposite. What you might be finding boomana is that the Ultrasones are picking up on details you are otherwise missing, and the 'boom' is the bass, welcome to the lower end of frequencies. The other day I took a listen to the new Whitney Houston album I Look To You and the Ultrasones revealed what a bad recording it is, her voice sounds raspy and the dynamics are flat. The D2000s are much more forgiving however I find them dull and boring, no resolution, monotone bass, nothing more than $30 headphones.