Beat By Dre: The Exclusive Inside Story of How Monster Lost the World
Feb 7, 2013 at 5:42 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 20

Snowgoose

New Head-Fier
Joined
May 24, 2012
Posts
40
Likes
11
Mods, this seemed like the place for this, but if it's really more of a lounge thing, by all means, I'll move it.
 
Here's a snippet of the article from Gizmodo
 
"You might know this; you might own a pair of beats that still has Monster's tiny, subjugated logo printed on them. But what you don't know is how, in inking the deal, Monster screwed itself out of a fortune. It's the classic David vs Goliath story—with one minor edit: David gets his ass kicked and is laughed out of the arena. This is the inside story of one of the all time worst deals in tech."
 
The rest at
http://gizmodo.com/5981823/beat-by-dre-the-inside-story-of-how-monster-lost-the-world?utm_source=lifehacker.com&utm_medium=recirculation&utm_campaign=recirculation
 
Interesting peek behind the curtain.
 
Feb 7, 2013 at 6:02 PM Post #2 of 20
"In true Silicon Valley fashion, Lee started out in his family's basement: taste-testing different varieties of copper wire until he found a type that he thought enhanced audio quality. Then, also in Silicon Valley fashion, he marketed the **** out of it and jacked up its price: Monster Cable....  His son, Kevin, describes it differently: "a cure for no disease."" Awesome line. 
 
Kind of a sad tale but I don't feel too bad for Monster.  The article almost made it seem like Monster actually cared about the audio quality having spent millions in r&d.
 
Feb 8, 2013 at 1:37 AM Post #3 of 20
Good read.  I always wonder how the R&D are divided between Monster and Beat.
 
Feb 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM Post #4 of 20
If you wonder why the "music business" is as cutthroat as it is, it is because of people like Iovine, who place profit above everything else. I suppose this is "just business" but if you look at the collapsing "music business" it is because the industry is not focused on the music.
 
Feb 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM Post #5 of 20
How ironic that a company with a reputation for trying to forcibly licence anyone who makes cables by throwing patents at them gets shafted legally.
 
Feb 10, 2013 at 11:28 PM Post #7 of 20
Quote:
How ironic that a company with a reputation for trying to forcibly licence anyone who makes cables by throwing patents at them gets shafted legally.

 
What was even worse was their thug lawyers going around suing any business that used the word "Monster," even though the business had absolutely nothing to do with what Monster was doing, like Snow Monsters, a ski class for children.
 
As moodyrn says, KARMA!
 
se
 
Feb 16, 2013 at 11:16 PM Post #10 of 20
Agreed. An interesting read. Thx 4 posting it.
 
Some thoughts...I've negotiated technology-related contracts and even small companies don't sign (execute) the contract until a separate legal rep reviews and approves the contract. Even if they need to get a tempo lawyer. Also, no matter how complex a contract reads, if you really read it, the language that says 1 of the parties owns exclusive rights to some important aspect of the product will stand out. In fact, that sort of statement or paragraph is often in all Capital letters. IDK for sure, but suspect the son had an idea of what he risked, but went there because he had already given away most of his negotiating position. Didn't the article say he had inventory before signing? It's like biz contract 101 that it's critical to find out the interests and situation of the other party. Iovine's people prob did and knew...
 
What really caused me to stop and reflect while reading this thread was gkanai's comment about the music biz's cutthroat nature and that they're "not focused on the music." Crap, it's sad to consider that.
 
Mar 7, 2013 at 2:49 PM Post #13 of 20
Let me get this straight, a company known for ripping people off has now been ripped off themselves. Sounds like karma to me. Getting what they deserve for selling people $150 hdmi cables. Monster can burn in hell!
 
Mar 11, 2013 at 9:18 AM Post #14 of 20
I really enjoyed this article which backs up pretty much everything I ever thought about the brands product lines. Having dealt with them in both the car audio industry and now headphone, I totally agree with many other comments.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top