bedlamite
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2002
- Posts
- 307
- Likes
- 192
So Qualcomm's the bad guy here. Interesting turn of events, thanks for the knowledge drop!It’s a licensing issue pure and simple. Qualcomm’s business model is based on it. They’ll sell you the chipset but you still need to pay additional license fees for their proprietary codec. B&O made a conscious decision not to capitulate to Qualcomm’s double dipping (just as Apple has done) and I for one applaud this.
AptX in all its forms is a closed proprietary protocol. AAC is an open standard and arguably a better protocol (for example it’s audibly transparent at around 260kps or above and can survive multiple re-encodings). Worth noting that with most Android devices supporting AAC (and more recently LDAC) the use case for AptX just isn’t three any more. If B&O we’re going to support any other protocol I’d argue it should be LDAC which Sony have done the right thing for once and chosen to open up to everyone.
LDAC works well on my Sony XM2s, unfortunately only Sony seems to be making LDAC gear for now.