Hopefully Aune releases a successor at some point without all the "quirks" of the S17 pro. Very intrigued by the sound descriptions, but having to even think about the operating temperature seems like a massive flaw in product design.
For some people, the mere fact that they would have to think about temperatures is too much and disqualifies the product. I understand and respect this.
The question is - do these temperatures lead to increased wear and reduced reliability? If not, why should we care?
In general and for me personally, it's not a problem. After lifting my unit, it stabilizes at 59-61 degrees after a several hours in 100mA. Is it too hot? I don't know, I do know it is still within 10°C headroom until thermal protection kicks in at 70°C. Which should have even more headroom before the components start to degrade, as is the case with any other heat-generating device, like graphic cards and CPUs.
I'm waiting for Aune's response about the optimal operating temperatures. I did my best to sound like I'm interested in their expert opinion regarding the class A amplifiers, rather than criticizing their product. So I'm hoping for an honest answer, not just some some marketing "pierdololo".
If they tell me it's best to keep it relatively low, then I'll use my USB fan placed underneath, which on the lowest speed is inaudible. Already tested it, and it doesn't exceed 50°C, which is just slightly warm to the touch and safe without any doubt. Again, some may say it's way too much hassle and bad design, and that's ok.
Otherwise, if they tell me anything below 70 degrees is 100% safe with reliability in mind, then i won't bother and just forget about the whole thing.
Also, while I don't want to use "but is sounds good!" argument - this is actually a fact that should be considered speaking about the product as a whole. As long as I'm confident the temperatures aren't a problem, I don't mind it being warmer than other amplifiers if sonic performance is superb and punches above its weight.