ericp10
Sits up all night comparing IEMs.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2009
- Posts
- 7,465
- Likes
- 1,063
can anyone compare IM70 with CKS1000?
I did earlier. Please do a search.
can anyone compare IM70 with CKS1000?
I did earlier. Please do a search.
Okay. I wrote like December 3. I pretty hold to everything I stated. I would say the IM70 is just a tad shy of being a basshead phone (bas is very strong, but the mids and highs balance it out). I feel more balanced than the typical basshead earphone (especially after significant burn in).:
Okay, ATH-IM70 vs. ATH-CKS1000:
Both are full sounding, but the IM70 how sound spectrum is more forward, yet the soundstage sounds a bit wider than the CKS1000. The CKS1000's mids are a somewhat recessed compared to the Im70.
The IM70 has an airier sound than the CKS1000. Remember I said earlier that the IM70 is an "almost basshead" iem? Well the CKS1000 is DEFINITELY a basshead iem. You clearly hear the difference, But where the CKS1000 gives you thicker bass, it also gives you notes that are a bit syrupy and muddy. It has excellent detail, but it's pushing toward muddy.
The IM70, on the other hand, is airier and breathes better throughout the whole sound spectrum. The IM70 is more balanced in its sound, where the CKS1000 is unique in how it throws sound into your ear. Some instruments sound clearly out of your head. The IM70 doesn't do that, but it give a rich full airy sound within your ears. So both may be equal in fullness of sound, but throw the sound into your ears in their own unique way. I think the CKS1000 may be technically superior than the IM70, but the new AT is funner and easier on the ears to listen too. The CKS1000 gives you thick notes, but it makes you pay attention to the bass. In contrast, the bass is deep and rich in the IM70, but it doesn't demand that you pay attention to it as the bass does in the CKS1000. You can appreciate the whole sound better with the IM70. And the IM70 is definitely more mid-focused.
I haven't listened to the CKS1000 in awhile, and almost forgot how good it really is, but it's a basshead earphone. You're a basshead, this is one of the best to own. The IM70 IS NOT a basshead earphone, but it happens to have some terrific bass. The CKS1000 pushes into a bit of muddiness compared to the IM70. This will come down to sound preference, because really to my ears is not better than the other.They're both excellent, but I prefer the more open and airy IM70. I think technically the CKS1000 is a bit more superior. Drums and acoustic guitars sound wonderful with CKS1000. Strings, electric guitars, piano, and horns sound wonderful from the IM70. Vocals are nice in both (more forward in the CKS100). I think imaging is better in the CKS1000, but instrument separation may be better in the IM70. What's the difference? Imaging is more about where the instruments are placed than separation (which is more about the space surrounding the instruments). So both are great for different reasons, which makes them nearly a tie. This is more about how good the IM70 is than how bad the CKS1000 is (and the CKS1000 isn't by any stretch of the imagination bad).
With the Monster hybrid tips the IM70 is somewhat more refined than the CKS1000.
The ATH sound meant the highs were a tad much for me on the cks1000, how did the im70 fair in that regard?
Anyone mind doing a comparison between this and the RHA MA750i? Looking to get either one of them soon...
Wow thanks for your impressions there The IM70's seem great.
Just gotta decide between the IM70 and the MA750. I'm looking for an upgrade to my CKN70's especially in the bass (quantity) and mid range but not sure which one to go for. The CKS1000 has been in my thoughts for a while but the IM70 and MA750 are cheaper and I'm assuming both are nearly or just as good so...