Audio-GD NFB-11.32 & NFB-11 (2014) (Delivery & Impression Thread)!!!
Oct 11, 2013 at 6:54 PM Post #1,051 of 3,093
  is it possible that the 2 ports on the left are not usb 2.0?  I originally also had a lot of problems installing my 11.32 until I realized that the USB ports on the back of my computer weren't usb 2.0, while the 2 front ports were.  Once I plugged it into 2.0 ports, installation went fine.

Hi GaryPham,
 
Thanks for the help.
 
Oh I didn't know that 11.32 required USB 2.0.
 
In any case, is there a way to tell what USB version the physical ports themselves are?
 
I do know that when something is plugged into the left port it shows up under the "Generic USB Hub" and also "Enhanced Host Controller" in device manager under power/advanced respectively.
 
Oct 12, 2013 at 1:17 AM Post #1,053 of 3,093
I ran a program called USBView and according to it all my ports are in fact USB2.0; the left port(s) that the NFB11.32 was not recognised by Windows was actually a USB2.0 port [Intel 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller - 3B3C].
 

The 'unknown device' in the image is apparently the NFB11.32; it is shown under the Enhanced Host Controller grouping.
 
Oct 14, 2013 at 9:48 AM Post #1,056 of 3,093
I just received mine :D

Question: When I use the DAC out for my Audioengine 5+ I should set it to Fixed output, right?


I use variable with my bx5d2 but thats cuz there are two volume knobs, both at the back of a speaker. If you only have 1 volume knob with the a5s and its convenient then go with fixed, if using the dac to change the volume is easier, i havent noticed any problems.
 
Oct 14, 2013 at 12:11 PM Post #1,058 of 3,093
I have mine set at 50%, do you think its better to go to max? Its definitely easier to get both knobs set at the same volume that way, i just didnt want to risk giving them too much juice
 
Oct 14, 2013 at 12:47 PM Post #1,060 of 3,093
I was thinking of getting the Audio-GD NFB-15.32, but is there a really noticeable improvement of the 11.32 over the 15.32, or is it just a different type of sound.
Anyone here directly compared the 11.32 to the 15.32?
 
Oct 14, 2013 at 1:04 PM Post #1,061 of 3,093
  I was thinking of getting the Audio-GD NFB-15.32, but is there a really noticeable improvement of the 11.32 over the 15.32, or is it just a different type of sound.
Anyone here directly compared the 11.32 to the 15.32?

 
Compairson 1
Comparison 2
 
There's not much out there to compare them. I will say that I love my 11.32 with everything I've tried so far. 
 
Oct 14, 2013 at 1:59 PM Post #1,062 of 3,093
From what Ive read about the two most people think the sabre chip is better techically and is more neutral with a wider sound stage. The wolfsons in the 15 have a warmer sound and a little bit narrower sound stage. I imagine the most noticable differences would be a slight lack of sparkle and detail in the treble and a warmer less analytical sound from the 15. The differences mentioned are probably pretty small since the amp stage is the same
 
Oct 21, 2013 at 8:04 PM Post #1,063 of 3,093
Audio-GD NFB-5.32.. it's a little more expensive than the 11.32 or the 15.32. In your opinion anybody, would it be worth the $50 increase in price?
 
Oct 21, 2013 at 8:14 PM Post #1,064 of 3,093
  Audio-GD NFB-5.32.. it's a little more expensive than the 11.32 or the 15.32. In your opinion anybody, would it be worth the $50 increase in price?
 
For some reason, Audio-GD's website lists the Audio-GD NFB-5.32 at $900, but I can get it from a European website for  280.62 EUR/ $380 USD/ 237 GBP??? 

 
That's the Reference 5.32, a balanced DAC with 4x PCM1704UK chips.  It appears that audio-gd has discontinued the 5.32, and the closest equivalent is the Compass 8741 for 429 + shipping.
 
http://audio-gd.com/Pro/Headphoneamp/Compass%202/Compass2EN.htm
 
Oct 21, 2013 at 8:47 PM Post #1,065 of 3,093
Thanks for clearing that up evilhippie :)
 
I'm aiming to match the warm Fidelio X1 with the 11.32 as suggested by people here - seems it would add detail to the sound which sounds about right. The 15.32, by all accounts sounds like it would work better with more analytical headphones namely the Q/K701's etc. Does that make sense?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top