Audio-GD NFB-11.32 & NFB-11 (2014) (Delivery & Impression Thread)!!!

Apr 27, 2015 at 2:46 PM Post #1,861 of 3,093
Just got my NFB-11 with TCXO upgrade and I'm having some strange behavior. 

I use Windows 10 and Mac OS X with optical via my onboard sound and USB via a USB 2.0 port. 

In both OSes, when I use the device over USB it seems to shut off or go to sleep every time there is no sound. This causes a half second delay in hearing new sound, which basically means I can't use it as my external sound card because no notification sounds will ever be heard. Is there some way to get it not to go to sleep? 

Also, I had significant popping when I tried to play a 16-bit / 44.1 file while in DAD 32-bit / 384 mode. Also YouTube videos basically had no sound when the OS was set in this mode in Windows 10. In Mac OS X it seems to work sometimes. I set the bit rate in the Audio MIDI Setup utility to the 32-bit 384 and it either works, or I get significant popping. I'm guessing the USB can't timing sync with the computer? 

Anyway, I mostly use Mac OS X (Hackintosh setup) but on both OSes I'd love to be able to shut off the onboard audio completely and just use the NFB-11 as my USB sound device in both OSes for all system sound.

On the plus side, I don't mind the 24-bit/96khz optical, which works flawlessly and the sound is incredible to be sure. 

Here's my part list: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/JcQkP6

Motherboard is an Asus Z97 Sabertooth Mark 1 with the latest BIOS. 
Nice post, I have to say the sound from usb is inferior than optical even though usb has much better threshold on paper.
 
May 3, 2015 at 11:28 AM Post #1,864 of 3,093
i tried. That will make hd800 sound thin and harsh


Why is that? The NFB-11 seems to be neutral. One would expect it to produce an accurate sound. If the HD800s sound thin and harsh to you with them, then that means the HD800s are harsh and thin, which seems contrary to what most people think.
 
May 3, 2015 at 12:02 PM Post #1,867 of 3,093
I can't tell why, but I know nfb11 is not a good mate for hd800.


The HD800s are rated 102db at 1 volt RMS. NFB-11 is rated 10V RMS. That's enough power to cause pain. So your problem is not lack of power.

It seems more likely that (a) you don't actually like the HD800s with a transparent amp and/or (b) for some reason, you have an expectation bias that the HD800s should not sound good with the NFB-11.
 
May 3, 2015 at 12:28 PM Post #1,868 of 3,093
The HD800s are rated 102db at 1 volt RMS. NFB-11 is rated 10V RMS. That's enough power to cause pain. So your problem is not lack of power.

It seems more likely that (a) you don't actually like the HD800s with a transparent amp and/or (b) for some reason, you have an expectation bias that the HD800s should not sound good with the NFB-11.
Well if you equip nfb11 with nordost Valhalla power cord and nordost power conditioner. Then nfb11 is not harsh and thin. Very smooth and lovely sound from nfb11. But how many nfb11 users can afford an expensive power cord?
 
May 3, 2015 at 12:47 PM Post #1,869 of 3,093
Well if you equip nfb11 with nordost Valhalla power cord and nordost power conditioner. Then nfb11 is not harsh and thin. Very smooth and lovely sound from nfb11. But how many nfb11 users can afford an expensive power cord?


Sorry. I don't buy into power cord upgrades since expectation bias it the most likely reason for perceived differences without ABX testing.

Power conditioners could certainly help, though, if the power at your home is bad. But then that's not the NFB-11 that needs the power conditioner but your home wiring that is the problem.
 
May 3, 2015 at 12:57 PM Post #1,870 of 3,093
Sorry. I don't buy into power cord upgrades since expectation bias it the most likely reason for perceived differences without ABX testing. I said the words harsh and thin are based on actual practice.

Power conditioners could certainly help, though, if the power at your home is bad. But then that's not the NFB-11 that needs the power conditioner but your home wiring that is the problem.
my expectation is not biased. Harsh and thin is based on what I actually heard. I don't care abt the specs I only care abt the sound. Since they sound harsh and thin through my original setup macbook original usb cable power cable and nfb11.
 
May 3, 2015 at 1:09 PM Post #1,871 of 3,093
my expectation is not biased. Harsh and thin is based on what I actually heard. I don't care abt the specs I only care abt the sound. Since they sound harsh and thin through my original setup macbook original usb cable power cable and nfb11.


Please don't mispresent my quote by adding your own words into it like you did. It also makes it very difficult to reply to you.
 
May 3, 2015 at 1:22 PM Post #1,872 of 3,093
Zaiki, this isn't a forum to brag about your power cables. Please give actual details of comparisons or something rather than saying this is thin and harsh without explanation. I also don't buy into power cord especially when you are putting a cord that costs thousands into a gear that costs at most $400.
 
May 4, 2015 at 9:37 AM Post #1,874 of 3,093
Hi guys,
 
How does the DAC section of the NFB11 (or 11.32) compare to the Rega DAC (the old one, not the DAC-R)? I mainly listen to EDM (Dubstep, Chillstep, Trap, Drum & Bass etc.). I'm not a basshead, but I do enjoy it, so I lean towards a slight warm sound I guess. My library is mostly MP3 (various bitrates) and some FLAC and I listen to a lot of youtube music too. I also intend to buy a pair of headphones, most probably a HE-400 and/or DT990 Pro 250Ohm (maybe both in time, one pair for home and another for office). In the case of the Rega i'll need an amp also, so the price would be much higher (the Rega is twice the price of the NFB11, both units SH). I've read good things about both, the Rega being warmer in sound (might be better for the bassy EDM?) and the NFB11 being more neutral/accurate sounding. The NFB11 has a clear advantage in supported high-res files (Rega's USB is the main culprit here). I'll try to listen them both, but first I wanted to hear your opinions.
 
Thank you in advance
Dragos
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top