I don't understand the concept of exaggerating minor differences in audio, but maybe that's just me. It doesn't help anyone who searches the threads for advice on headphones, amps, DACs, cables or any pairings, synergy, etc.
By making hyperbolic claims, you might cause people to think that it's not a good purchase. If they already own something (like the HDVA600, for example), they then begin to worry that they made a mistake and need to upgrade to something "better" and/or more expensive to unleash the full potential of the item of interest.
I own the Oppo HA-1 and a Schiit Ragnarok/Yggdrasil stack. I would say that, when using the LCD-X with the HA-1, the bass is very tight and punchy, the midrange is forward and the treble is a bit rolled off, but not overly to the point where it sounds dark and compressed. It seems to be a good pairing because I know that the HA-1's Sabre DAC can be considered bright and should balance out the LCD-X's warmer sound.
When using the LCD-X with the Ragnarok with the Oppo HA-1 as the DAC, the LCD-X does seem to have a more weighty and authoritative bass and I can't tell much of a difference, if any, with the midrange and treble. However, I wouldn't say that it is a night and day difference and I wouldn't say that the HA-1 makes the headphone's bass seem weak. It's a noticeable difference, but not extreme enough to warrant a ridiculous claim.
Even though this is technically off topic, I'm just saying that it would be nice to see posts where the language is carefully worded so that the statement or claim appears to be grounded and accurate.