Is Astell & Kern AK70 MKii good enough to properly drive Audeze LCD-2C headphones?
Last edited:
As I listen to more, I notice that there isn't a lot of bass quantity to these headphones, but there is somewhat of a bass impact and the decay being more in the subs. It feels like low-mids bass is kinda sucked out. Bass is pretty damped, but not hard like I recall the Focal Clear bass, but a bit softer. It's just that it's not the warm type of bass with much quantity that has a bit of a decay. It seems most of the bass on the low-end side rather than upper, which seem minimal. I don't know if this will be the type of sound for those that like a bit of warmth or mids-body to the sounds.
I could understand when people see this headphone as a bit on the dark side, it seems lower treble is a bit dulled, in which gives the perception that upper-mids to be more noticeable, especially the 4-5k, and if there is sibilance, it will be there. Not that sibilant will be prominent with this type of treble tuning.
I'm starting to notice the mids to sound a bit weird as I've experienced Audeze headphones in the past. Just the vocals seems off to me, doesn't seem like all the harmonics of the vocals are there for male vocals. Mids vocals sounds like there a bit of tunneling sound effect.
I don't find the resolution(or detail retr is forte, but the more relaxed lower treble. But, it seems the treble is a bit too relaxed that mixed with mids, creates a bit of tunneling effect, and a bit dull'd. Vocals seems to be not so defined, not as defined it should with all the harmonics. The treble quality seems to be similar to Sundara as for definition.
Sundara sounds like bass is flatter with LCD2C having more prominent in the lower bass region. Sundara is more prominent in the upper-mids, so the female vocals comes out more due to the more lifted 4-5k I believe. Upper mids vocals pop out more with the Sundara due to the greater level of treble in the upper-mids. I think the difference in vocals is LCD2C is 2-3k sounds more prominent, whereas for the Sundara, the 4-5k(which makes vocals come out more certain tracks). So, LCD2C upper-mids sounds more dulled compared the Sundara. LCD2C in comparison to Sundara doesn't sound like 2k mids is dipped(as for the Sundara, not all vocals pop out as the mids sounds recessed, particularly the 2k). Some tracks, the Sundara sounds like it doesn't have much bass impact as the LCD2C, which impacts with the lower-end bass. I think Sundara's impact is felt more when the track has upper bass quantity(and when it impacts, it hits harder). Due to this 4-5k region emphasis, upper-mids vocals pops out more with the Sundara, sounds fuller tonality(for treble) for those vocals.I was always curious about how lcd2c sounds. Great to hear your impressions about it. How can you compare its sound to Sundara? Which one do you prefer if you value high quliaty of mids to lower treble?
There are several things to consider regarding LCD2 bass:
The only way to get the full potential of those actual qualities is to have a very fast and generous amp. That's why the LCD's love balanced amp.
- the LCD2 has nearly no bass distortion, particularly when you play it loud. So it gives the impression of tamer / less punchy bass.
- it goes flat very low, which gives the impression of softer / less tight bass.
The same goes for the mid/trebles, if you have fast and precise amp, darkness is over.
In fact, the LCD's can easily scale up to an amp 10 times of its price.
My claim are true experience with various Audeze including the LCD2C.Unfortunately, your claim is not true, at least regarding lcd2c. LCD2c does not require a powerful amp to drive it. All kinds of amp arguments must be backed by some evidence.
According to measurements about lcd2c from Innerfideity,
"..With 110mVrms needed to achieve 90dB at the ear, these headphones will be driven to useable levels with a portable source."
In regards to HiFiman Sundara,
"Needing 245mVrms to drive these headphones to 90dBspl at the ear indicates it will not be easily driven to loud levels from portable devices. I'd recomend and amp or dedicated DAP for portable use."
In fact, Focal Clear is also very efficient,
"With about 111mVrms needed to achieve 90dB at the ear, the Clear will be driven to solid listening levels by portable devices."
Truly, a headphone which will scale well is LCD4.
"The LCD-4 needs 482mVrms to reach 90dBspl at the ear. These headphones will run quite a bit more towards the top of your volume dial than most."
My claim are true experience with various Audeze including the LCD2C.
Sensitivity/power doesn't give you the all story. When you talk about "With 110mVrms needed to achieve 90dB at the ear" I can tell you it's not for a bass note at say 32hz. To achieve 90dB for that frequency you need much more than 110mVrms.. If you have the material, try it by yourself. You will see that in order to go properly deep down you need a good amount of juice.
There is not a lot of hp that goes that low particularly without distortion. So it means more power for the subs will add distortion on other cans while it will brings more subs on the audeze.I know, but these things are all relative. Your argument also applies also to other cans. I mean, scalability of lcd2c would not be any better than other cans.