I agree...sourcing it just removes any doubt and everyone is happy. I thought that info was excellent, so he certainly deserves to be acknowledged for it.
Just read Asr's comments on the new Audeze lineup. I appreciate the detailed response. The initial reviews seem to be all over the place. The very first reviews last week seemed to be that the XC had noticeably less bass slam then the LCD 3, and now more recent impressions are the exact opposite. I'm not questioning anyone's opinion I just find it a little odd. I guess we will find out when headfier's finally have them in their possession. Personally I'm interested in the XC because my LCD 3's cranking out at night are basically equivalent to computer speakers, I have been looking forward to a isolated Audeze sound. Hopefully this fits the bill.
I agree...sourcing it just removes any doubt and everyone is happy. I thought that info was excellent, so he certainly deserves to be acknowledged for it.
The initial reviews seem to be all over the place. The very first reviews last week seemed to be that the XC had noticeably less bass slam then the LCD 3, and now more recent impressions are the exact opposite.
Seems to happen a lot when people are posting first impressions of headphones, someone will say it is the bassiest thing since sliced bread and then someone will say it is lacking bass etc etc. This will go on for a month or so and eventually you will be able to get some sort of consensus lol... Considering that Audeze's trademark is the awesome ruler flat bass they would be silly to change this.
I've read a couple impressions now saying the XC tends to be bassier than the X, which makes sense to a degree. What I don't get is why Asr would liken that bassiness of the closed Audeze to the Audio Technica AD2000. I've not tried that headphone but I've never heard anyone describe any of the open air Audio Technicas as bassy.
I've read a couple impressions now saying the XC tends to be bassier than the X, which makes sense to a degree. What I don't get is why Asr would liken that bassiness of the closed Audeze to the Audio Technica AD2000. I've not tried that headphone but I've never heard anyone describe any of the open air Audio Technicas as bassy.
One Question I have : Does the XC "leak sound" outside ? Does it isolate well ?
Indeed, many "closed headphone" in fact do not isolate very well !
I myself have a TH-900 that I love, but it is totally impossible to use it near someone that try to sleep or listen to the TV, and for this reason I am tempted to buy a SIG Pro or Edition 8 that do NOT leak like my TH-900 does ! But... if the XC also isolate well this will be for me a better choice than e SIG PRO I believe...
Sponsor: EarMen | HeadAmpMember of the Trade: Bricasti DesignFormerly known as Mshenay
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Posts
15,788
Likes
2,331
With all this talk of Orthos... why is no one mentioning the mids or treble? Is there not a thickness associated with Orthodynamic [or Planar Magnetics]... there is more to music than Sub Bass
That said... eww I was hoping for a LESS Bassy [but still ruler flat] Auzude... another headphone I'll have to hear my self
With all this talk of Orthos... why is no one mentioning the mids or treble? Is there not a thickness associated with Orthodynamic [or Planar Magnetics]... there is more to music than Sub Bass
That said... eww I was hoping for a LESS Bassy [but still ruler flat] Auzude... another headphone I'll have to hear my self
ooooh that's good to hear <3 but oh wait it's OPEN -.-
I don't want another open can... well actually I do. I wouldn't mind the X as an upgrade to my HE 400 but LAWL seeing as teh HE 6 is cheaper... I might skip the X [or not actually as I need a new amp for the HE 6] so that said... TO EXPENSIVE. The only headphone to warrent spending upwards of 2,000 is something that would UPGRADE MY FREAKING w1000x -.- [which will soon be balanced]
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.