Yesterday I spent around 3 hours listening 5 melodies to compare Kann Cube and SP2000.I used many different IEMS : UE Live( mine);Campfire Polaris,Andromeda,Solaris,;Astell And Kern Diana;VE Erlkönig; Both Cube and SP 2000 are amazing but we already know this.
I couldn’t say the SP2000 is better and if, the difference is minimal far away from the price difference, in matter of sound not more then 200 dollars worth.. maybe would be greater with big size cans but then even there the Cube has more power so I don’t see how the SP 2000 can match it..
I find the soundstage great on both Daps and very close, in fact I had the sensation that on some music one had bigger soundstage and on other melody the other( strange actually) but again almost unnoticeable.
The sound difference is in the fact that SP 2000 might be a tiny bit cristal clear and definitely warmer but we talk about small differences and in the same time I find Cube to be more natural sounding and more less forgiving in recording quality and even less distortion on higher volume ,so in the end actually is also a matter of pairing .Campfires all matches better with the sound of SP 2000 ( minimal although) and for me Live,Erlkönig,Diana are better paired with Cube( especially the UE live.
The big money differences are though in the beauty and even in the speed of the processor I think.
There SP 2000 is a class if not 2 more interesting ,more beautiful then the Cube,but then worth it 2000 dollars more?
I even think that A and K could have implemented better the ESS chips( by all means they are not bad implemented)I have the feeling that they didn’t wanna make the Cube the best Dap but in the same time they could have, nevertheless is still an amazing achievement and my favorite toy
.
I am not an expert and these are my 2 cents in the matter so don’t shoot me
.
Speaking of IEMS my favorite are UE Live ,the natural sound they have is for me unbeatable,
I tried to understand why many like so much the Andromeda’s and I understand they are more vibrantly sounding, when listening to classical music all the instruments have a touch of more metal spark in the sound, trumpets sound shinier then usually, actually all the brass instruments and the chords are not so warm as they are on live listening, and I know I sing at least 150 times a year with orchestra’s in rehearsals, concerts ,shows. I can understand the more resolution in the sound is a quality for pop, rock, blues , jazz music. But I cannot listen any vocal with andromeda, most of the voices are too metallic.
Same with Solaris even a higher class then Andrò but the same signature.,
Actually I think people that have Andromeda or Solaris would go to a live concert (pop,Jazz,rock,classical) and after listening to it would believe it didn’t sound as good as And or Solaris do and that is because I feel they create a fake resolution, a strange distortion in making (analytical) the sound more impressive.
I enjoyed Diana even if they are not in the same class as UE Live, and was surprised to find VE Erlkönig so good ( not when thinking at the price though)
I thought the only IEM to beat the UE Live but then just by some hundred of dollars and not by 2500 which is the price difference.
They had more resolution and a perfect balance from very low to very high, amazing middle,natural but enjoyable ( not a quality of Andro or Solaris)
Worth 4700 Swiss Francs? (they cost in Switzerland so much ) I don’t think so though.
I am a beginner but a musician.
I don’t know the terminology so well and my English is not that good so I excuse myself in advance.