saxelrod92
100+ Head-Fier
I just spent a few hours comparing wasapi event to asio, using foobar and the schiit uberfrost dac on a usb connection, in windows 7. Honestly I can say there is definitely a difference in sound, but not a very big one at all, and in general both technically sound good, as long as your dac works with both just fine, as mine does. But after many hours of going back and forth, I noticed a difference in sound. its in the tone and signature, not so much in quality. both are top quality, but they definitely have a different tone to them. Again its minor, you have to listen to both side by side to start noticing it, but even on my equipment (which is all under 1k) you can totally hear its there.
The difference:
asio is basically an ever so slightly darker sound, but with better PRaT. What I mean by dark, is simply on sharp high sounding instruments like cymbals or electronic screeches and clicks, they sound just the slightest bit softer, still sharp, but in comparison to wasapi its not as sharp. Just slightly though, these differences took me a few hours to confirm and figure out after all lol.
wasapi is ever so slightly brighter and airer sounding. But it seemed to have the tendency to make something that had slight listenable sibilance sound too sibilant and just ever so slightly over the edge of not fully enjoyable. but of course with a warmer, more dulled recording, wasapi sounded nicer becaue of the extra brightness. It doesnt have as nice of PRaT though, thats the one thing you will definitely notice if you switch back and forth on the same song you know very well. even if you dont notice the tone changes, you will notice the change in PRaT slightly. especially if you sit for long sessions.
So ultimately, I honestly still san't decide which one to use lol. Some songs sounded better with wasapi event, and others better with asio. As of right now, I've left on asio because of the PRaT. If you didn't have the direct comparison to wasapi event, you wouldnt be able to notice anything different about asio, but with wasapi event theres definitely a few songs (the brighter ones) where you just feel like something isn't 100% correct about this (too bright). but ultimately, its going to come down to your personal preferance, the rest of your chain, and the quality of your recordings. Both output methods have optimal sound quality, just different sound signatures. take you pick, or switch between them depending on the song (if you dac can do it, mine apparently can lol).
Also I have no idea how its possible that a difference in tone exists between them. If anyone knows how to scientifically explain how thats even possible, please let me know, because I promise the difference exists, and I made sure to keep the variables indentical when switching between the two.
one last note I should mention, on my asio driver options menu inside foobar, it gives a check box to use 64 bit drivers, and when I tried that it just made the sound worse. slightly louder, less of a black background, less separation, it just seemed like the volume was turned up slightly on all the instruments so they bled into each other more, making the sound overall seem just more noisey, instead of pleasant and clear and separated. So idk why that happens in 64 bit operation, but I just keep at default 32 bit and it sounds just fine.
The difference:
asio is basically an ever so slightly darker sound, but with better PRaT. What I mean by dark, is simply on sharp high sounding instruments like cymbals or electronic screeches and clicks, they sound just the slightest bit softer, still sharp, but in comparison to wasapi its not as sharp. Just slightly though, these differences took me a few hours to confirm and figure out after all lol.
wasapi is ever so slightly brighter and airer sounding. But it seemed to have the tendency to make something that had slight listenable sibilance sound too sibilant and just ever so slightly over the edge of not fully enjoyable. but of course with a warmer, more dulled recording, wasapi sounded nicer becaue of the extra brightness. It doesnt have as nice of PRaT though, thats the one thing you will definitely notice if you switch back and forth on the same song you know very well. even if you dont notice the tone changes, you will notice the change in PRaT slightly. especially if you sit for long sessions.
So ultimately, I honestly still san't decide which one to use lol. Some songs sounded better with wasapi event, and others better with asio. As of right now, I've left on asio because of the PRaT. If you didn't have the direct comparison to wasapi event, you wouldnt be able to notice anything different about asio, but with wasapi event theres definitely a few songs (the brighter ones) where you just feel like something isn't 100% correct about this (too bright). but ultimately, its going to come down to your personal preferance, the rest of your chain, and the quality of your recordings. Both output methods have optimal sound quality, just different sound signatures. take you pick, or switch between them depending on the song (if you dac can do it, mine apparently can lol).
Also I have no idea how its possible that a difference in tone exists between them. If anyone knows how to scientifically explain how thats even possible, please let me know, because I promise the difference exists, and I made sure to keep the variables indentical when switching between the two.
one last note I should mention, on my asio driver options menu inside foobar, it gives a check box to use 64 bit drivers, and when I tried that it just made the sound worse. slightly louder, less of a black background, less separation, it just seemed like the volume was turned up slightly on all the instruments so they bled into each other more, making the sound overall seem just more noisey, instead of pleasant and clear and separated. So idk why that happens in 64 bit operation, but I just keep at default 32 bit and it sounds just fine.