Mr.Sneis
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2004
- Posts
- 3,355
- Likes
- 372
Hold on a minute here, when I buy cd's off of amazon it's still at least 3 bucks extra to ship...
CDs have never been an investment. An investment is some that accrues value over time.
2) More importantly, the quality of the source! From my recent experience: from a Head-Fi thread on female vocals, I came across Lana Del Rey (apparently pretty popular these days), kinda liked a couple of songs and decided to give her album a shot. Did the usual when I want a HQ version: ordered the CD & ripped it lossless. Songwise pretty blah but OK, but mastering-wise a brickwalled disaster. I don't tend to obsess over DR, but this sounded so bad, I ran DRmeter: average 5, most tracks over limit. What's the point of a technically HQ file when the content is so mangled?! I ended up transcoding to VBR MP3 to save 2/3 of wasted space, and in hindsight might have just as well downloaded it from iTunes or Amazon, and saved myself the extra money, time for shipping and effort to rip & transcode...
Well obviously a brickwalled mastering is going to sound like crap no matter what format you have it on. But you bring up a good point, in that a lot of music today sounds like crap and isn't even worth owning in a lossless format. When you realize this, you become more picky in your taste in music. You start buying albums that you think (or hope) have a good recording and mastering and you begin to pass over the ones with bad reputations. For this exact reason, I'm more willing to drop money on a random LP from the 70's than a random CD from the 00's. Why waste your time with bad quality music? Buying physical copies becomes a method to filter out the loud stuff.
<snip> I think music lovers, as opposed to gear lovers, will put up with a poor recording of old and new music, if they love the music. And listen to it on more forgiving set ups.
Ok, this is a point of view I've seen in other audiophiles that I simply do not understand. I buy music because I like the music. That means that sometimes the only recording I can get of a performer or piece I like is poorly recorded. I'm not just talking about loudness wars CDs. There's a composition by Richard Strauss called Metamorphosen. The only recording of it I've been able to find was by the Berlin Symphony for (or off from the sound of it) the radio. The sound quality? Crap. The performance? Pretty amazing.
I think music lovers, as opposed to gear lovers, will put up with a poor recording of old and new music, if they love the music. And listen to it on more forgiving set ups.
Funny timing: rumours circulating Apple are about to introduce higher quality audio to iTunes. Maybe my CD buying days will be numbered...