Now, if the question proposed was "how are those tubes" or "could you advise on some tuberolling options" then i think the statement "those tubes are crap" would be more welcomed; however, considering i was not asking for tuberolling options or the quality of the tubes, and sacd lover replied that they were crap without me asking whether they were or not, it seems that sacd is implying that its not only the tubes that sound like crap, if you know what i mean...
No I dont know what you mean. How do you do a reach that because I dont like philips 5687's I am implying the amp is no good? Thats paranoia. When are the stock tubes on any tube amp the best? The amp builders cant find or afford to put the best tubes in their amps. They use the best combo of low price and availability. My point was there are some extremely good 5687's that IMO are much better than the philips... so if the sound is good with the philips it will likely be even better with the premium 5687's.
Given that I researched the 5687 for weeks before I had an amp built using the tube, given I own an amp using 5687 as outputs (currently the ONLY owner), given that I have hunted down (for months) and used every 5687 made.... I probably know as much or more about this tube than anyone on this board. I praised the tube except for the philips. If I wanted to be negative towards the raptor I would attack the 5687 as a piece of junk tube period. Wouldnt that make more sense if I wanted to diss the amp? Reread my post. I said the best 5687's are a special tube. Your erroneous assumptions are just that; wrong. I apologize if I offered you information you didnt ask for. But members taking my post and turning it into some sort of attack is foolish.