seeberg
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
- Posts
- 2,619
- Likes
- 10
Quote:
Also good to know! My VBR's have the range I quoted, about 112-224, but the main weight is at 192, primarily because I found 192 to sound VERY good for compressed music, but I needed to save space, so VBR is a better option. Also, the one reason why I'm not using Ogg or Flac instead of mp3 is because there's not a DAP out there that won't work with my music, meaning my junk spreads like wildfire. And I like that idea.
Speaking of your SA5000's, I'm very interested in a/b'ing them at the meet, and also comparing their various points, drivers, cabling, build quality, etc.
,
Abe
Originally Posted by devwild Lame on --alt-preset standard (192 VBR - HQ, ~160-210 final bitrt) will probably get you very similar results. That is what most people use for best quality/size ratio. All my older stuff is 256 CBR, so 256 VBR was a natural choice. Lame is an awesome encoder, I can easilly tell the diffence between it sloppier encoders on complex music these days, especially with the SA5000s |
Also good to know! My VBR's have the range I quoted, about 112-224, but the main weight is at 192, primarily because I found 192 to sound VERY good for compressed music, but I needed to save space, so VBR is a better option. Also, the one reason why I'm not using Ogg or Flac instead of mp3 is because there's not a DAP out there that won't work with my music, meaning my junk spreads like wildfire. And I like that idea.
Speaking of your SA5000's, I'm very interested in a/b'ing them at the meet, and also comparing their various points, drivers, cabling, build quality, etc.
Abe