desertstrike
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2013
- Posts
- 48
- Likes
- 10
Yeap, going to order from tubes.tw/shop/product_info.php?manufacturers_id=14&products_id=521 , they are back in business!
Get mullards you will not be disappointed especially if you really like warm sound
Besides me, anyone using Sylvania? I remember there was someone asking for them and I think he ordered them. I wonder what are his thoughts.
In case anyone wondered, Pan Am pairs very well with NAD PP2 2i. Just listening to some records
Also it did pair very well with my EQ. Is there anything that Pan Am would not pair well?
+1. You should try a pair. They are a great complement/counterpoint to the brighter Russian tubes.
I had demo the HD800 couple of times with the Pan Am. Though it sounds good but its not spectacular unlike the pairing with the LCD-2. Pan Am is not able to tame the highs of the HD 800.
It might be true, as I read everywhere on head-fi that HD800 are bright-ish. I don't have HD800 (yet..or ever..dunno), however I can say I can feel the difference in sound signature between different tubes. I tried three types, and with my latest choice (Sylvania) Pan Am sounds very strong in HF range, so HD800 would probably lack body if used without EQ. But If you switched to Mullards, then maybe situation would change? They are much darker and they sound very forward. I think best match for Mullards could be some Grados or AKG. But for HD800, I dunno... I would probably stay with Sylvania and EQ in S/W maybe...
What do you think? Maybe there is some other tube (that I haven't tried yet) that would make HD800 sing?
PanAm match better with LCD-3 or LCD-X? This PanAm will be my 1st tube amp to go with my 1st Audeze. It's really hard to make choices for this hobby. Anyone can give some recommendation?
I have both, and they are each excellent with the Pan Am. The LCD-3 is, characteristically, slightly warmer in sound signature, but the difference is subtle.
If I listen mainly to vocal, which would u recommend?