AKG K702 vs AKG K240 MKII
post-7692345
Thread Starter
Post #1 of 10

shiorisekine

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
756
Reaction score
78
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Posts
756
Likes
78
Hi I'm new here and I was wondering what headphones would be better to get. I am debating between the AKG K702s or the K240s MKII can you guys that have had either pair give me the pros and cons of the headphones thank you
 
     Share This Post       
post-7692359
Post #2 of 10

MalVeauX

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
7,000
Reaction score
714
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Posts
7,000
Likes
714
Heya,
 
The K240 MKII is a lot like the K702, but a bit more bassy, it's only semi-open, and over $100 less.
 
What's your budget?
 
Very best,
 
     Share This Post       
post-7692383
Post #3 of 10

Acix

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
6,485
Reaction score
70
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Posts
6,485
Likes
70
The K-702 are the extended version, but maybe you should get them both. You'll need a good DAC and hps amp as well.
 
     Share This Post       
post-7692411
Post #4 of 10

shiorisekine

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
756
Reaction score
78
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Posts
756
Likes
78
The K-702 are the extended version, but maybe you should get them both. You'll need a good DAC and hps amp as well.

I was thinking about getting the 702s now and in like a month get the 240 MKIIs
 
     Share This Post       
post-7712986
Post #5 of 10

KimLaroux

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
1,090
Reaction score
69
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Posts
1,090
Likes
69

 
Quote:
The K-702 are the extended version, but maybe you should get them both. You'll need a good DAC and hps amp as well.


I listened to the AKG 240 MKII at a local shop last week. The comfort is impressive, but the frequency response is all over the place. The mid-bass is around 10dBr, it goes down from there to around 5khz and then spikes from there to the high frequencies. 
 
Considering that the 702 have a flatter frequency response, I am curious as to why someone would want to buy both of them. Could you elaborate on your recommendation?
 
Right now the only reason I can see is : Using the 240 to listen to Electronic music while keeping the 702 for everything else. Is that close to what you had in mind?
 
     Share This Post       
post-7713015
Post #6 of 10

Acix

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
6,485
Reaction score
70
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Posts
6,485
Likes
70


Quote:
 


I listened to the AKG 240 MKII at a local shop last week. The comfort is impressive, but the frequency response is all over the place. The mid-bass is around 10dBr, it goes down from there to around 5khz and then spikes from there to the high frequencies. 
 
Considering that the 702 have a flatter frequency response, I am curious as to why someone would want to buy both of them. Could you elaborate on your recommendation?
 
Right now the only reason I can see is : Using the 240 to listen to Electronic music while keeping the 702 for everything else. Is that close to what you had in mind?

At the beginning I thought you got confused with the K271. But I've checked the headroom graphs and you're right they do boost the new MKll with 8-to-9db on the 100hz.  Sorry man, is very strange for me... this is not who I remember the 240MKll. The sound that you've described at first remind me the old K-240 studio. Also the K271 have a strong lower mid presentation. But now maybe is time for you to check out the K-702.
 
BTW, for electronic music I prefer the K702.
 
 
     Share This Post       
post-7713225
Post #7 of 10

Zombie_X

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
4,630
Reaction score
336
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Posts
4,630
Likes
336
Both have very different presentations and signatures. They sound nothing alike.
 
The K702 having a pretty bright signature with the treble being smooth on good material and downright strident on modern music. The midrange is slightly recessed but detailed and resolving and seems to make guitars and acoustic guitars stand out more than vocals.The bass is very tight and controlled but does not offer much in terms of impact or deep bass as it rolls off early. The K702 soundstage is very wide but does not have much height or depth. The K702 has very nice transients and nice attack, but not fantastic or top notch. Now the K702 does require a bit more power than it's impedance would suggest. I nice solid sate amp with about a voltage swing of 20V to 30V would be just fine for it.
 
Now the K240 is the very opposite. It have a smoother and I'd say darker signature. Dark might not be appropriate but I felt the K240 sounded very similar to a HD600 or even a HD650. The treble is smooth and not that articulated with not much extension (rolls off) and there is no peaks. The midrange is a ton fuller than the K702's but not nearly as resolving or detailed. I'd say it's a tubey, slurred type of midrange where it emphasizes voices and guitars equally. The bass is entirely different from the K702. It's punchy yet not extended nor very tight. It's can be somewhat flabby or ill defined on bass heavy music but anything with less bass sounds great. It's just that if you pump something bass heavy, such as rap, the bass becomes sloppy. The soundstage is quite small and doesn't offer anything special in terms of depth, width, or height. I will say it has nice separation of instruments but not great as they can blend together. As for powering it you won't need much. Even a simple Bravo amp would be more than enough for it.
 
Hope this little comparison helps you out a bit :wink:
 
     Share This Post       
post-9818729
Post #8 of 10

Phishin Phool

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
580
Reaction score
74
Location
Ohio
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Location
Ohio
Posts
580
Likes
74
a friend of mine just got k702 the other day and love them and that's been raving about them so I thought about giving them a listen. I went to audition them but the only thing in stock were the K240 studios which sounded OK but then I put on some beyerdynamic 770´s and I like the sound of a whole lot more. now I'm actually looking at a pair of 990 pros are premiums instead as I typically like open headphones
 
     Share This Post       
post-9818893
Post #9 of 10

viralcow

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Mar 1, 2012
Messages
1,617
Reaction score
89
Joined
Mar 1, 2012
Posts
1,617
Likes
89
a friend of mine just got 70 Tuesday other day and love them and that's been raving about them so I thought about giving them a listen. I went to audition them but the only thing in stock were the K240 studios which sounded OK but then I put on some beyerdynamic 770´s and I like the sound of a whole lot more. now I'm actually looking at a pair of 990 pros are premiums instead as I typically like open headphones
 
 
You mean T70, right?
 
     Share This Post       
post-9818948
Post #10 of 10

Phishin Phool

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
580
Reaction score
74
Location
Ohio
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Location
Ohio
Posts
580
Likes
74
oops I meant k702 damn autocorrect typing on phone. above fixed
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top