Are you seriously comparing early adopters who want for this product to be the next coming of the iPhone for the headset to the guy who measures every single headphone in the industry and who has a widely recognized systematic evaluation criteria for headphone and IEM rankings? I'd say this thread is a textbook case of confirmation bias.It is also quite interesting that he thinks the LCD-2 Classic are far better than the APM while on head-fi, the APM is considered better than the LCD2-C.
Just shows how reviews are meaningless in the end as they are all over the place.
I've heard these headphones. They are not even close to as good as the perception you get when reading this thread. They are good noise cancellation headphones. What Crinacle did was paired them up with the headphones in its class.
The ratings may improve when he does the full review of the APM with an iPhone instead of an Android device. But, one could argue that the true objective test of sound quality is in an environment where the sound isn't modified by the ecosystem and all its trappings. If you buy a product for its trappings, then that's fine, but you should be aware of it.