- Joined
- Jan 30, 2011
- Posts
- 13,315
- Likes
- 24,354
Not that strange mate. If you have one louder than the other, the louder one will sound better. You're also comparing from memory where I have the added advantage of being able to precisely volume match and quickly switch from one to the other, plus I can measure - when you know something is conclusively right it helps remove the bias that was there previously. The only problem is that you now have bias the other way - but it doesn't really matter if the facts are correct. Again - it just shows you're human.
The way to do things properly is remove as many conflicting bias as possible when you're testing. Volume matched, unsighted - solely rely on your ears with no other stimulii. And when you do that you'll find a lot of "myths" disappear. The problem has never been with our ears - its with how the brain interprets the inputs. And if those inputs are audible + physical + visual - it will use them all. We just want to isolate the audio though
.
I know this is off-topic, but might help you understand. I have an iFi iDSD - absolutely love it. And I can upsample up to DSD (basically upsample a redbook signal to DSD and send that to the iDSD DAC - all on the fly). The iDSD then lights up a small aquamarine light. I've blind tested myself countless times, and I know there is no audible difference to me. But for some strange reason the music sounds better when the light is on. I know it is placebo - but I can't help my brain telling me there is a difference - even though I know there isn't
The proof of the machine is in the pleasure it brings you. But the last thing I would do is suggest people upsample to get a better sound. I know its not true. Doesn't stop me enjoying it myself though.
The way to do things properly is remove as many conflicting bias as possible when you're testing. Volume matched, unsighted - solely rely on your ears with no other stimulii. And when you do that you'll find a lot of "myths" disappear. The problem has never been with our ears - its with how the brain interprets the inputs. And if those inputs are audible + physical + visual - it will use them all. We just want to isolate the audio though
I know this is off-topic, but might help you understand. I have an iFi iDSD - absolutely love it. And I can upsample up to DSD (basically upsample a redbook signal to DSD and send that to the iDSD DAC - all on the fly). The iDSD then lights up a small aquamarine light. I've blind tested myself countless times, and I know there is no audible difference to me. But for some strange reason the music sounds better when the light is on. I know it is placebo - but I can't help my brain telling me there is a difference - even though I know there isn't
The proof of the machine is in the pleasure it brings you. But the last thing I would do is suggest people upsample to get a better sound. I know its not true. Doesn't stop me enjoying it myself though.