Q: Similar to above, can you comment on where the ADEL was set during your review? From your comments about the aound being a bit boomier when fully sealed i take it you had it open a small amount? Thanks for the review, especially getting it here before the KS funding deadline!
A: The impressions were done with the ADEL module open partway. One of the things that’s still being worked on is the ease of adjusting it – right now it’s a bit difficult to do – so I only tried an open state (knob rotated a bit from closed position) and the fully closed state (and again it’s not easy to switch between them quickly for A:B purposes at this point because each earpiece is adjusted independently, the knobs rotate in opposite directions (on the Beta modules), and you have to keep them balanced, etc).
So, I don’t know if I was getting the full/optimal ADEL experience but the goal was to try it with the technology active, which I think I was able to do.
Q: Joker – Was your evaluation done with ADEL module closed or open? A lot of us KS backers are curious what the real world affect of opening the ADEL module is. Thanks!
A: Discussed a little in another answer above. Can’t really A:B open with closed very easily because it takes a good amount of time to switch with the current implementation, but my feeling at this point is that (aside from slightly reducing the isolation) opening the module has the effect of reducing overall bass quantity but boosting bass quality, bringing the midrange more forward (which also leads to an increase in perceived loudness), and increasing treble crispness a bit. There’s also a net positive effect on presentation (depth/layering and openness), though the magnitude is a little hard to judge at this point.