- Joined
- Dec 30, 2013
- Posts
- 14,525
- Likes
- 9,514
I asked that in the comments on the review site, and I suggest that others do, too. The more interest we show, the more likely ljokerl is to answer that question.
So I don't want to sound ungrateful, but that review isn't very helpful. 1964Ears is promising a revolution with the ADEL tech and ljokerl didn't even attempt to quantify how the ADEL changed the sound. Instead we got, "Removing it leaves a gaping hole in the housings and also doesn’t do the sound any favors, completely dropping out the low end as expected with an unsealed balanced armature IEM." & "Coincidentally, taking out the ADEL modules and sealing the holes where they used to be increases bass quantity, but also introduces some bass “boom”. I can see a sealed A12 appealing to some people and it will go toe-to-toe with some of the warmer custom IEMs out there, such as the Westone ES5 and Heir Audio 8.A."
Did the soundstage improve dramatically as 1964Ears claims as the ADEL "vent" was gradually opened? How did the sound change as the ADEL screw was backed off? Did the low end start to roll off? How did the isolation suffer? How open were they when he listened to them?
Frankly, I would have expected more comments about the incredible soundstage if the ADEL tech delivered on the claims. Perhaps I'm just missing the revolution.
It's only a brief review. Given the short time he has with it, and the dateline for the campaign in just 12 hours you can't really fault him for that.
I think @Levanter is right in this case. The review has accomplished one thing only, but perhaps the most important of all things -- the A12, whether or not the ADEL stuff is genius or meh, is an incredible sounding CIEM which hangs with the best of them. That alone will make up the bulk of the justification for the $1.2k price tag, and everything else from there on is a bonus.
In short, the A12 has a bottom level of being regarded as decent value, with very much the potential to be considered amazing value when it's all said and done.
I think @Levanter is right in this case. The review has accomplished one thing only, but perhaps the most important of all things -- the A12, whether or not the ADEL stuff is genius or meh, is an incredible sounding CIEM which hangs with the best of them. That alone will make up the bulk of the justification for the $1.2k price tag, and everything else from there on is a bonus.
In short, the A12 has a bottom level of being regarded as decent value, with very much the potential to be considered amazing value when it's all said and done.
PS, I'm also quite excited by the ADEL tech. I find myself frequently adjusting the volume upwards the longer I listen. I'm pretty sure this is what they're trying to avoid..
Without ADEL, it introduces "boom" in the bass so it seems to do something.
So, are you in for these?
Just bought in ears, haven't even gotten the molds done yet, if I were going in it would be the $500 or so models, they seem like bang for the buck models...but, the big temptation now for me is the Audeze offers from Geek/Light Harmonic, offering a few hundred off the LCD2, 3, and XC for Pulse backers, wife wondering if I need to see a therapist...
Looks like universals of the A10 and A12 are really not available despite what the customer service from 1964 said. So I'm out.
In the Kickstarter comments the Creator said the U8 was the top of the universal line, and the A10 and A12 are available as "demos".
To me this means in the Creator's mind "universal" means the mass produced poly-carbonate shell, and "demo" means the hand-made acrylic shell of the customs made in into a generic fit that uses ear tips (i.e. no impressions used).
Also, since 1964 Ears will be the ones making the A10 & 12 I'll trust what they say over the Creator who is from the ADEL side of the venture.