General Information

Overview:​

Flagship Headphone that offers ultimate True Sound using an Orthodynamic® driver.
  • Yamaha True Sound allows you to immerse yourself in a world of sound and music
  • Yamaha Orthodynamic® driver provides sonic accuracy and enables ultra-responsive performance
  • Ultra-lightweight, thin-film diaphragm faithfully recreates varying musical dynamics
  • Large housing features Japanese-made, rolled plain Dutch weave stainless steel filter and an arch-shaped protrusion
  • Magnesium body is lightweight and has outstanding rigidity
  • Two-layer headband and smooth stepless slider provide maximum comfort
  • Two types of earpads included (Leather and Suede)
  • Two types of silver-coated OFC cables included: 3.5 mm (3-pole plug cable) and a 4.4 mm (five-pole plug balanced cable)
  • Includes dedicated aluminum headphone stand
  • Produced at the Yamaha Kakegawa factory in Japan, which handles flagship models of grand pianos and audio components
https://jp.yamaha.com/files/Image-Index_YH-5000SE_2000x2000_cb08b6ee02acc7cae0abcfd6149addb3.jpg?impolicy=resize&imwid=2000&imhei=2000
https://jp.yamaha.com/files/YH5000_front_8be31696d2432604fd78fa821ada12f7.jpg?impolicy=resize&imwid=2000&imhei=2000?imbypass=on
https://jp.yamaha.com/files/YH5000_side_55175f0f08d023a9f5083f057aa8041c.jpg?impolicy=resize&imwid=2000&imhei=2000?imbypass=on
https://jp.yamaha.com/files/YH5000_swivel_1ea4568ec260dc3bb2dc0ad62e144a1c.jpg?impolicy=resize&imwid=2000&imhei=2000?imbypass=on

https://jp.yamaha.com/files/YH5000_top_0436c5d97f6de95a019d4096d55ec6c4.jpg?impolicy=resize&imwid=2000&imhei=2000?imbypass=on
https://jp.yamaha.com/files/YH5000_bottom_f0748696b050ddfcdd3a3466842d2790.jpg?impolicy=resize&imwid=2000&imhei=2000?imbypass=on

https://jp.yamaha.com/files/YH5000_standset1_3ebaf45c2eb05c6cdc97daca6ea423d0.jpg?impolicy=resize&imwid=2000&imhei=2000?imbypass=on
https://jp.yamaha.com/files/YH5000_stand_side_4744990356c3cc5fdf022bf97cf416c4.jpg?impolicy=resize&imwid=2000&imhei=2000?imbypass=on
https://jp.yamaha.com/files/YH5000_cable3_1fd244fa4d5dc16eaf871bad88b2ffde.jpg?impolicy=resize&imwid=2000&imhei=2000?imbypass=on
https://jp.yamaha.com/files/YH5000_cable4_7cf2e7be6c4fa7fe58ef6b49f211406d.jpg?impolicy=resize&imwid=2000&imhei=2000?imbypass=on

https://jp.yamaha.com/files/YH5000_cable2_16cb0f28a7e8b36f9a255bfc2c310d5c.jpg?impolicy=resize&imwid=2000&imhei=2000?imbypass=on
https://jp.yamaha.com/files/YH5000_cable5_9e8cd446191b7512dd1e2838cbe75ddb.jpg?impolicy=resize&imwid=2000&imhei=2000?imbypass=on

ACCESSORIES​

We have included a variety of high-quality accessories that allow you to fully appreciate and enjoy the flagship YH-5000SE. This includes a machined aluminum headphone table stand, audiophile cables using silver-coated OFC, and two types of earpads using the finest materials.

Feature image


Specifications​

Screen Shot 2022-11-17 at 11.39.54.png

Latest reviews

Bored Balloon

New Head-Fier
Vocal monarch of a forgotten dynasty
Pros: Unmatched vocal clarity. Unparalleled comfort. Beautifully crafted design. Need I say more?
Cons: Sub-Bass slam is merely decent. Instrument separation in poorly mixed tracks can be muted in favor of a presentation that allows one to simply enjoy the music.
Fair warning, I am not a reviewer, and I don't have any structured reviews. I will simply be presenting my thoughts & opinions on this product in the form of a rant, as anything otherwise would be disingenuous. My goal for this is to add, constructively, my two cents on what I feel like other reviews haven't covered from the perspective of a long-term buyer of a product.

For background, I've owned the Yamaha's for almost a year now, and after spending an extended period with them, I can say that they are most certainly a TOTL pair of headphones, and can indeed perform at their price point.

And for complete disclosure, and the purposes of this review, I will be comparing them with the other products that I have purchased, all at market prices, & new. My gear consists of a Gustard X-16 Amplifier, a Fiio Q9, a Hifiman EF-400, an iFi Zen Dac, and a Shanling M8T (purchased more recently as a source, and portable all-in-one tube-optional solution). For my listening gear, I have a Focal Stellia, an oriolus szalayi, and of course, the Yamaha YH-5000 SE's. I also have a home theatre system, featuring a Pioneer VSX-LX805, and Klipsch speakers. However, I will not be referencing their performance as I believe they both (personal audio vs home theatre) set out to achieve different goals.

1746095517213.jpeg
1746095530962.jpeg
1746095549153.jpeg


To be very honest, my journey with audiophilia had started out with a pair of Audeze LCD-X's, that I had tried out at a showroom from a local Indian supplier: shoutout to headphonezone (.com). Since then, I've spent quite a bit of time with IEM's, before eventually being blown away by the Stellia's. This is important, since I believe the Yamahas are the perfect complement to those that own the Focals, as they each present the same song in what seems to be the exact opposite way, while still retaining TOTL performance. As such, after owning the Stellia's, when trying out other products, I've always felt that the delta was not enough to justify a spend on another headphone. Despite this, when I got the opportunity during a recent trip to Japan where e-earphones (.com) had a pair on their regularly discounted sale, I jumped the gun after listening to them for a few hours in the store.

The Yamaha's are unique. They are designed with what I believe is the typical Japanese admiration for all things natural. They do not work great with synthesised instruments. Electric instruments similarly cannot provide the same degree of appeal as on the Stellia. But natural instruments, tones, voice? Incredible! These headphones bring out nuance, separation & detail in a cappella recordings that the Stellia's fall far short of. Imaging on the other hand, is simply as expected at this price point. No room for complaints, but it's not like imaging is their drawing point either, since they don't have a huge soundstage (Please hold up and don't shoot me yet, read below, where I elaborate on this).

I believe that audiophiles differ from music listeners in that we have it all wrong, in that we use music to listen to our gear, instead of the other way around. So, please, if you ever do get the chance to demo these, listen to these two tracks:
1746077505630.png
1746077581259.png


For the first, you'll notice the immediate incredible feel the drumset frum 0:54 bring in as they gradually pull down the audio from the electric guitars. In all the headphones & earphones I've tried, I simply haven't heard a similar, natural presentation. For the second, the layer of nuance and texture in George Ezra's voice across the album (my favorite song in this being Benjamin Twine) comes across with unheard precision. You can hear the slight cracking in his voice, the spittle that flies out of his mouth whenever he's adding any emphasis, and connect to the tune in a way that I find impressively unique (Please use the suede pads for George Ezra, due to it's harsher front-&-centre tuning).

Another great set of tracks to listen to while comparing units is the entire Hamilton musical (Lin-Manuel Miranda & Co.), where vocal lyrics come forward with a soul-stirring presentation. I find that these work better on a transistor based amplification architecture, since tubes tend to take away the special sauce in the vocals, and push an already distant presentation back further. Please note: This pair does not have a huge soundstage, It instead has a far-away presentation. I've found a lot of people to confuse the two. Soundstage is the ability to push music closer, and farther away from you. This is something that the Focal Stellia's have in spades. A distant presentation is that characteristic that makes all music sound like it's playing from a pair of speakers, and gives you an expansive feeling. No sound feels like it's being generated right next to your ears. They do however have the characteristic of a 3 dimensional audio-space, where music can be presented from above, below front and back relative to you're ears that is typically considered a characteristic of more premium headphones. This also coincidentally means that the Yamahas are amazing for extended listening sessions, avoiding any & all fatigue coming from heat, weight, or harshness in presentation (when using the suede pads).
1746091514048.png


More to the actual headphone review then:
The 5000's come with two pairs of pads: a leather one, and a suede one. I'm generally more partial to the leather, since it brings forth a wee-bit more bass-impact, and has vocal's cut a little bit harsher, while the suede pads simply smoothen out the audio characteristics to one that sounds great across any music. The downside of the suede therefore is that music simply sounds "great", and not phenomenal.

The other finding, as has been mentioned repeatedly in the discussion thread, is that this is not a headphone where we can simply pump up the volume. Not only will the headphone be prone to distortion, but it also loses its own sense of character. As such, this is a headphone that you drive easily, with its low impedance and high sensitivity further exacerbating this issue. As such, high-power amps are a bad pairing, since you're often stuck between 10 and 25% of the volume. Generally, I find that the headphones sound much better at softer volumes, which makes them extremely finicky. THIS is what makes these a tough sell in my opinion. The best pairing I have found so far is with DAP's rather than desktop units, and moreso something like the M8T, which offers a great deal of customization on overall presentation. The combination of the incredible acoustic transparency of the actual unit, combined with its tuning for lower decibel levels, means that there is a surprisingly low number of instances where I've found I can use this. If quiet environments are not a concern to you however, this is a fantastic option for general music enjoyment.
For the build, it's built using injection-moulded magnesium to fantastic effect in achieving a robust yet extremely lightweight body. It took me quite a while to personally get over the cognitive dissonance from considering such a light and flexible (by design, through hinges) frame to be sturdy, but over the past year its been subject to it's fair share of stress through daily wear, without looking any the worse. The grill cups add a clean, transparent look to the overall piece, and the yellow plastic accents with chrome finishes serve to highlight the careful symmetry in detailing even further.
The pads themselves have a cloth cover inside to protect the otherwise exposed driver unit through a dust catchment that has been moderately effective in my experience, but are easily removable for regular cleaning. The leather headband has a thin sponge layer sandwiched in between, resulting in exceptional comfort over long hours, and generally avoiding hotspots due to its almost weightless contact. Overall, I love the attention to detail in the design, and have no complaints in the looks department.

While others might have had different experiences with cables, I am personally not a big believer in optimising my gear to such an extent, even if there are differences in final presentation, since I consider them minor at best. As such, I am quite pleased with the included cables in the kit and have not felt any particular need to go out in search of better cables. I am a huge fan of the dark grey finish of the cables and their loose weave, while remaining nice and flexible in the long run. Have yet to experience any microphonics in the cables based on regular usage, however, YMMV. Regardless, the plugs are regular 3.5mm terminations, and you get 2, 2-meter-long cables terminating in 4.4mm and 3.5mm, respectively.

The additional accessory in the form of the headphone stand looks stunning and makes for a great addition to the kit as a collector's edition. Hence, once you get over the fact that something this light can indeed be made of quality materials, you realise you are getting the premium solution that you're paying for.

For pairings, I love their work with portable units with AKM chips, and it's relaxed sound, since it matches the effortless nuance that the Yamaha's aim to achieve quiet well. However, something about an R2R DAC system with this just makes my ears salivate (in a matter of speaking). The Hifiman EF400/600 therefore are a great match with these. I personally did not find them to merge well with the Sony NW-WM1ZM2, but again listening preferences mean that YMMV. These change in presentation greatly with source, so do try a few while at a store to see if there's any combination that you really enjoy. These are NOT a blind buy. They need to be a well-thought out, well-researched buy for one who already has everything fun he/she wants, and simply wants something natural. This is an end-game solution simply because you don't take a natural-sounding product as your first, or even your tenth, unless that's where you draw the line. One ought to see what differing presentations can do for music, since thats the core draw of this hobby. We love using our gear to explore different parts of music that were suppressed, hidden & unheard of. To hear exactly what you were meant to? That's, well, it's a different thought process than any other manufacturer.

Finally, onto the graphs, and it's presentation accordingly, I can try to give my own two cents. These headphones have incredibly strong natural magnets in their orthodynamic system, which means that they're held together under very high pressure. The physical driver unit is sandwiched between two gear-shaped pieces of metal that it repels with a lot of force. I had the chance to see this in person in Japan when it was being demoed to me due to a concern with dust on the driver. As such, I have my concerns that the microphone systems used to record the impact of these headphones might show some magnet-induced distortion. Furthermore, as large, wide & open headphones, placement, & pressure become key factors. These headphones have carefully placed squares of foam within each earcup that is measured to resonate & absorb varying frequencies. Furthermore, a frequency response merely dictates volume levels. It does not detail how a headphone deals with audio textures, since music is very rarely ever going to resemble a sine wave in its shape. What we need to be concerned about is its overall responsiveness to the complex superpositions of sound waves as instrument sounds mix, and the ability of a driver to modify its movements accordingly. With respect to this, I believe that the Yamahas have no issue, and that's why I say without any doubt that they can indeed perform in their price segment. There is a lot more to a headphone's sound than a simple graph can dictate in my opinion, which is why I try to keep multiple products at hand, since each approach is different, unique & special in its own way. It's what keeps the hobby alive & interesting. Not to romanticize it, but I'd hate for everything to simply sound the same. Humans are unique, while the Harman curve simply measures volume sensitivities of different frequencies that the average human would like. There is no information provided on the degree of dispersion of this chart, and I think that, as it stands, most audiophiles would fall far from the average regardless...

Therefore, when I am considering complementary products, I feel like the Focal Stellias are indeed to ying to this yang. They have an incredible bass shelf that extends deep into the lower frequencies. While they have a narrow presentation, they do have a great soundstage. They are the more detailed set, and can be driven at higher volumes naturally. However, they are far from the texturing capabilities of this set.

Where the Stellias can capture the softest of instruments played, they don't bring forth the natural thrum of a guitars strings, or the echo of a trumpet. They comfort at higher volumes, and narrow presentation means that even an untrained ear can hear more stuff in a track on them, but, that can't be everything.
For those familiar with the matrix movie series, it's like if Morpheus gave you two pills, one: to allow you to see new colors that represent the colors behind the universe (Yamaha), and the other, one that gives you a 360 degree view, allowing you to see what's happening all around you, in places you never thought to look before (Focal). Both different, and both useful in their own scenarios. [I use the matrix example to show that this felt like a life-changing decision].

On the matter of the build, I feel like the Stellia's similarly get a bad reputation. Oh sure, everyone says it's great, its leather & french, and hence fancy blah, blah, blah... But no, far from it. It's in the way they've designed the hinges in a standard headphone shape & body. The careful attention to detail in the usage of foam in the pads and the headband. The layering & usage of the leather (It does look very pretty, sue me). Look at it carefully the next time you visit the store. The yolk's dont just wobble due to a loose screw. They are designed to hinge left and right to match your facial shape. (See below) The pads have 2 layers of foam, with differing densities to provide a better seal. The leathers used have different thicknesses based on comfort, and wear & tear considerations. To simply say they slapped on some leather and used beryllium as a fancy material is to do a major disservice to the efforts of the brains behind Focal's masterpeices. Again, not sponsored. Please, believe me, I'm just really passionate.

1746094196640.jpeg
1746094215258.jpeg
1746094241971.jpeg

Please, feast your eyes (not on my feet, I see you right there). The cutout for the yolk swivelling mechanism is matched to the angle they wished to let it move, without compromising the overall structural integrity. The shape is like that of a wide 'W'. Take the chance the google the internals of this headphone. There are quite a few marketing materials where the insides of the driver are shown. It is beautiful. The metal in the headband is curved concave from the side of the head, to accommodate a deeper layer of foam inside [Coincidentally, this is also what results in scalp oils reaching the edges quicker than the centre of the headband]. But that doesn't take away from the Yamahas. The Yamaha's design is no less. It features a yolk connecting the headband and the actual speaker structure at an angle, making the headphones naturally lean forward based on the centre of gravity when on their stand. This ensures their back doesn't collide with the stem of the stand, or have their pads be squished when stored. There is a usage of matt paint wherever your fingers may touch it to prevent the accumulation of fingerprints. The few untreated, shiny regions, therefore, are places where one can easily avoid smudges to retain a pristine look. The leather pads are perforated in a way that doesn't compromise sonic characteristics, but allows airflow to ensure no hotspots on the leather contact area. It also prevents pressure imbalances from the driver to your ear. The fabric in the pads is an ultra-soft, super-thin elastic membrane-like structure that is as unobtrusive as possible, but also ensures that ears remain open and receptive to the angle of the headphone's drivers. This matters if your pinna & helix are straight & wide, naturally spreading out.

What about the Oriolus, then, you ask? It's, in my opinion, the perfect transition piece. It features a balanced armature, a dynamic driver, and a planar magnetic driver. It's tuned to be audibly pleasant no matter the song one is listening to, and it lands somewhere in between in the argument of texture vs detail. It, too, features a soft, careful fabric woven silver cover OFC braided cable. It has a narrow presence, of course, as it's an IEM, and is thus physically smaller, but it has a great soundstage, and punches far above its price-based weight class. I love it's versatility, and it's easy acceptance of any music & source, simply focused on delivering as nice a presentation as possible.

In conclusion, I think another post had pinned these headphones down best, right down to a T. They are a pair made with love in another language & culture, and must therefore be treated and considered as such.

Anyways, there you have it. My thoughts and opinions in a short (somewhat) rant. Please, don't hesitate to @ me for any questions, thoughts and discussions. Thank you all for your advice, and I consider everyone here an unsung hero that played a crucial role in my journey through audiophilia. Hopefully this has helped someone on the fence make a call on whether they want to go ahead with this, or atleast give it a chance at an audio show / exhibition / store near you.

Sincerely,
A serial lurker.
  • Like
Reactions: HiFiDJ and voja

HiFiDJ

100+ Head-Fier
A Stunning Re-Entry!
Love at first sight…

It was love at first sight the moment I saw a picture of the YH-5000 (YH5K for short), and it was then that I knew I had to own a set, despite the eye-watering $5k price tag. Maybe it was the dark steampunk vibe, the Focal Utopia and Sennheiser HD 800 S hybrid, or the exciting news that a venerable company like Yamaha would re-enter the audiophile scene that drew me to them. While I am enthusiastic about these headphones it’s more important how they sound overall, so I won’t hold back. I am not a reviewer. This is the sole opinion of one person on the Internet, who wants to share his experience with his shiny toy. But before that, I want to emphasize that the YH5K did change a lot over time so, like with any piece of audio gear, give them a lot of ear time!

The BIG Picture

hifiDJ’s audio chain:

Auralic Aries G2 (PSU mod) via AES —>
LinnenberG Satie DA Converter (IIR filter) —>
Crayon Audio CHA-1 (balanced in balanced out) —>
Yamaha YH-5000 (stock leather pads / Brise Audio YATONO-HP Ultimate via DHC adapters)
[all connected to a PS Audio Power Plant 3 outfitted with Allnic ZL Technology cables (from digital to analog to power) / all components are isolated with Gingko isolation products]

Side note: So far, the system used here is the best I’ve heard the YH5K. Thus, the following impressions were made using this system. Although I’ve tried my best to generalize, it’s impossible to get the same experience on an entirely different chain. So, YMMV.


Generally, the YH5K takes an “analytical clean” approach, meaning their goal is to showcase clarity and resolution to the max. While not the most natural-sounding or true-to-life, they’re impressively faithful to the recording while giving deep insight into the music. That’s not to say they don’t impart personal character and color (they do), but their ability to extract the minutiae in a recording is, simply put, the best I’ve heard (so far)–it’s a 1:1 representation. And that hint of expression prevents them from sounding uninspiring or boring. The natural downside of such remarkable accuracy is the notion that garbage-in equals garbage-out. In terms of tonality, I would label the YH5K as slightly W-shaped tuned headphones on this setup.

One of the YH5K’s standout traits is their impressively textured, engaging, life-like, and accurate treble presentation. They’re supremely extended, energetic, and airy coupled with a tasteful dose of delicacy, and sprinkled with a bit of sweetness. While the treble is front and center, it’s neither harsh nor piercing, assuming synergy is on point. Thus, I think the YH5K handles organic music very well granting it a great sense of energy and life. There’s almost this sense of “heightened clarity” but without sounding artificial as to cause any problems and, in effect, leads to a damn engaging experience with classical and acoustic music in particular. The timbre, energy, and bite of cymbals and stringed instruments, such as the violin, are accurately conveyed on these headphones, sounding incredibly life-like, distinct, and clear. How they pulled off this kind of tonal balance and refinement in the treble region while delivering so much is quite an achievement in my book. It’s treble done right!

The YH5K’s traditional yet open and accurate stage presentation is the next standout trait. Very defined stage boundaries are placed firmly on your left and right, following a direct line of sight toward the center stage. And within the center stage is a very open, deep, and layered view. Although their stage presentation isn’t that wide, the depth, height, positioning, accuracy, and focus more than make up for it. To clarify, the staging doesn’t always sound open and grand all the time (like an HD 800 S) but is greatly dependent on the material source. Using a simple analogy, it’s like looking through a set of binoculars, which leads you to look forward and into the stage rather than around you. It feels similar to properly placed monitors where the “phantom center” is positioned a few inches in front of you.

Finally, on the lower end of the spectrum (ie. the low frequencies), you’ll find clean and textured fundamental notes. The YH5K doesn’t have the kind of mid-bass boost found in some other headphones but instead offers a very linear and extended low-end, with perhaps a touch of added warmth in the very low frequencies. While they don’t beat the Final Audio D8000 Pro in terms of mid-bass timbre, texture, and shape (which I’ll elaborate further later), they dominate them in the sub-bass and, in addition, extract more low-end resolution. Being able to hear low-frequency energy oscillate between my ears is an impressive and insightful experience, provided your system is highly resolving enough–garbage-in equals garbage-out. The piano, for example, is an instrument capable of utilizing the full range of frequencies (well most of it), and the YH5K are the only headphones I’ve heard that reproduce everything from the highest to the lowest of octaves with complete accuracy, linearity, and control (piano sounds near perfect).

To briefly address their weaknesses, the YH5K’s stage width isn’t as wide-reaching compared to other flagships, so those who prioritize that may be left wanting more (I think it’s just right). Additionally, the YH5K decays a bit too quickly at times (ie. drier-leaning), but this is a personal preference as some will like it dry, and some will like it wet (I like how it is). Lastly, it seems that the YH5K is a bit too sensitive to quality amplification, specifically in the bass. I’ve noted my (limited) experience with this in further sections.

What I think are standouts:
  • top-notch separation and a natural sense of dynamics
  • treble texture, timbre, energy, extension, and air
  • super clean, textured, extended, and linear bass
  • impressive resolving power and microdynamics
  • open and accurate stage presentation
  • extremely clean response
  • great sense of energy
  • depth and focus
  • accurate timbre
  • precise imaging
What I think could be improved:
  • stage width
  • decay time/RT (ie. a bit more)
  • sensitivity to quality amplification
I know what you might be thinking… “That’s a lot of standouts!” I thought so too, but I’ve gone back and forth trying to narrow it down (for months), and this was the best I could do. Keep in mind these standout traits were not made in isolation but in comparison to other flagship headphones mentioned in this article. The next section is an in-depth look at that.

Comparisons are Key

The following are a few select comparisons against the YH5K. These impressions are limited to what chains I’ve experienced these headphones with, so please keep in mind that they do NOT capture the nuance behind other peoples’ experiences with these cans on their chains. That being said, I think some generalities can be shared even on different chains but, to emphasize, YMMV. Also, it’s worth mentioning that my priority is (now was) to optimize around the MYSPHERE, but that doesn’t mean the chain here doesn’t work well with the other cans (it does but it depends on what you’re after).

Last thing I’d like to mention before these comparisons… There will be no “vs HiFiMan Susvara.” I am interested in comparing the two but, unfortunately, I don’t have one on hand. I have heard one briefly, but it isn’t enough to draft a full comparison. Maybe someday.

The YIN to my YANG (vs MYSPHERE 3.1/3.2)

I grouped the 3.1 and 3.2 in the title because it will largely depend on what amp you drive these with. Generally, tube amps work best with the 3.1, while solid-state amps work best with the 3.2. But in this specific comparison, only the 3.2 (with T frames) was used because they worked best with the CHA-1 amplifier I have. Although both have their sonic differences, they inherit the same kind of presentation and have the same set of goals. For more useful information and context, check out M0N’s MYSPHERE article on the site (or click here).

System used: same as above

Main takeaway: naturally true to life with exceptional midrange resolution/texture

Standouts: extremely natural presentation, anything midrange, realistic transient response, speaker/monitor-like staging (for headphones), low-level listening

Meh: absence of sub-bass, can be picky with recordings, not the most comfortable, very picky with placement/positioning of driver frames

What happens when you get something that’s uber natural and realistic, and pair them with something that’s extremely faithful and accurate? The result is two greatly complementary headphones that belong together as a set. The 3.2 and YH5K couldn’t sound any more different, so choosing between them boils down to a matter of taste and priority. Any of the two could serve as a substitute to the headphones mentioned here but in no way can they be alternatives to each other. Focusing on the bigger picture, the 3.2 do their utter best to present the music to you in the most realistic manner at all times. It’s as if the artist is performing TO you, outside, where there is no physical room to get in the way. Alternatively, the YH5K reveals all with stunning accuracy, much like how it was in the recording. It’s as if you’re performing WITH the artist in the current space they’re in. You’re fed with so much insight into the music that you know what microphone is being used, the brand of the instrument being played, and the type of room being occupied (exaggerated slightly for illustrative purposes). Tonally, the 3.2 are comparatively laid-back while the YH5K are comparatively energetic.

Midrange is the 3.2’s main strength so it’s no surprise that they have a good advantage over the YH5K. They have more resolution, texture, weight, and liquidity. That being said, the YH5K aren’t too far behind technically and I would still consider them one of the best, if not the best I’ve heard had the MYSPHERE ceased to exist. Comparatively, their midrange is on the cooler, leaner, sweeter, and upper-mid “focus-er” side of things. On the far two ends, the highs and the lows are technically superior on the YH5K. Hands-down they have the best treble I’ve ever heard, so it’s natural they would dominate the 3.2 in this area. While the 3.2’s treble is no slouch, the resolution, timbre, air, texture, extension, cleanliness, sweetness, and linearity of the YH5K are all at a higher level. The one thing I would caution about is the boosted treble response over the 3.2. Switching to the low end, the 3.2’s sub-bass extension is non-existent with the frames angled out. It’s a non-issue when you look at the bigger picture, but I understand why it would be a deal-breaker for some. Meanwhile, the majority of the mid-bass is excellent with a nice punch, superb grip, and great realism–three traits that slightly edge out the YH5K. As I mentioned earlier, one of the big strengths the YH5K has is its bass linearity. With a very neutral slope down to the very fundamental frequencies (ie. sub-bass), a more complete (and warmer) bass is what you get over the 3.2. They’re overall more resolving, extended, accurate, separated, and satisfying. It’s hard to put the 3.2 ahead of the YH5K from a performance standpoint as they’re better in most technical aspects. But from a presentation standpoint, it’s all up to preference and priority. The timbre on both are excellent with the 3.2 being more realistic and the YH5K being more accurate. I think the majority of what makes timbre accurate is the interaction between the instrument or voice, and the room it’s being played in. For example, a violin played inside a tiny room will sound vastly different when played inside a concert hall, or even outside. The 3.2 is like playing that violin outside a room while the YH5K is like playing that same violin inside a room. This is what I mean when I say timbre is realistic (outside the room) versus timbre that is accurate (inside the room). For my taste, I prefer how the YH5K conveys it. In addition, for overall tone, the 3.2 has a richer tinge over the lighter shade of the YH5K. Moving on, the staging capabilities of both headphones are very impressive with the 3.2 taking the cake in terms of stage coherency, placement (within the given space), and width while the YH5K beats them out in depth, verticality, imaging, boundary (stage limits), openness, and airiness. Tying this into stage presentation, the 3.2 reaches closer to that of typical speakers or monitors. The YH5K goes for the more traditional and focused approach. However, I find that the YH5K has a more convincing “phantom center” similar to properly placed speakers out in the room. In the end, the staging capabilities and presentations of both headphones are unique, impressive, and complementary. Touching on dynamics, the 3.2 treats both macrodynamics and microdynamics equally in a more balanced way. The YH5K, on the other hand, is tilted towards microdynamics. Thus, the 3.2 edges out the YH5K in macro but not in micro. For best volume play, the 3.2 excels at low levels while the YH5K wants it at moderate levels.

Choosing between these two headphones is an easy task once I factor in my taste. The YH5K is the more complete, all-rounded, technically capable, comfortable, and engaging headphones–they’re hard to fault. And although a lot of the things I’ve said about the 3.2 make them seem like they fit a very niche and specialized experience (they do to a certain extent), the main points are (1) the things they compromise on aren’t deal-breakers unless you’re super picky, (2) the presentation is so natural and authentic, and (3) the experience is worthwhile once you’ve dialed in everything. Like I said, it’s an easy pick–YH5K FTW! But even taking all that into account, it’s harder for me not to recommend both because they go so well together.

What the 3.2 does better:
  • stage coherency, placement, and width
  • black background/low noise floor
  • natural speed/transient response
  • natural/life-like presentation
  • midrange resolution
  • low-level listening
What the YH5K does better:
  • imaging
  • microdynamics
  • treble resolution
  • low-end resolution
  • extension both ways
  • resolving power/overall technicalities
  • stage depth, verticality, boundary, openness, and airiness
  • comfort (I usually care more about sound, but this is an exception)
Same Roots, Different Masters (vs Final Audio D8000 Pro)

System used
: same as above

Main takeaway: clean and natural with a sharp but wide stage, energetic coupled with quality bass, and somewhat U-shaped depending on the chain

Standouts: anything bass, textural prowess, great all-rounder, pretty good timbre (especially brass), relatively forgiving

Meh: lack of airiness and treble refinement, can sometimes be a bit too energetic depending on pairing, not the most resolving, not as dynamically alive as the other two, have to crank up the volume a bit (ie. not good at lower volumes)

This is a comparison I was eager to do and had many questions about. To my surprise, the D8KP and the YH5K are different sonically, despite my initial hunch that both might share some commonalities. To get straight to the point, the D8KP’s main selling point is their unique ability to present bass–mostly mid-bass–naturally with a defined shape and texture. This and their forward and hyper-textured presentation make them distinct from other TOTL headphones in the space. In addition, their more natural-focused and forgiving presentation makes them a departure from that of the YH5K, which goes for the more “analytical clean” and faithful approach. Performance-wise, the YH5K is a step ahead of the D8KP in almost all categories when pushed high with gear. The two headphones are somewhat similar tonally but are very different when it comes to presentation. They’re both somewhat U-shaped (YH5K closer to W-shaped), the main difference being the intensity at which the two ends are skewed. In other words, the YH5K extends lower and reaches higher, the D8KP is comparatively more compressed.

Starting with the bass, which was interesting to compare, the D8KP has the edge over the YH5K in realism, timbre, and texture… Well, only in the mid-bass. Instruments such as bass guitars and kick drums are effortlessly conveyed as if you’re imagining the instrument’s “shape.” But even then, the YH5K aren’t far off and they get close. The area where they one-up the D8KP is the sub-bass, likely due to the YH5K’s larger physical housing which provides ample space/volume for low, middle, and high frequencies to move. The byproduct is a more resolving, extended, defined, and controlled low-end. On tracks with very low bass notes, the YH5K reproduces them cleanly and accurately allowing each fundamental to breathe with ease. The entirety of their bass is linear in both presentation and extension with ample warmth down low. Meanwhile, the D8KP gives you an additional mid-bass boost, which seems to be a common trend on some headphones, perhaps to compensate for the sub-bass. Moving up to the midrange, it’s primarily the YH5K’s win here. While the D8KP can fill the lower midrange a bit better, the entirety of it is still recessed and laid-back by comparison. Factoring that and the already resolving and neutral-tuned midrange of the YH5K, they’re a clear winner. Climbing up to peak treble, there’s great texture and realism in the D8KP’s presentation, although they can sometimes come across as slightly too energetic, hot, and unrefined. On the other hand, the YH5K gives you a much sweeter, airier, delicate, textured, resolving, and accurate representation of the treble. It’s another clear win for the YH5K. The dynamics, both micro and macro, are more capable on the YH5K while the D8KP are more compressed overall. For staging, the D8KP are sharp and more capable in width, but in everything else, the YH5K are markedly superior in depth, verticality, focus, accuracy, placement, boundary, openness, and airiness. One final note I’d like to mention is the appropriate volume required for these two headphones to sound their best. The D8KP likes being played loudly otherwise, they sound a bit dead and flat. I’m not suggesting cranking them to the roof (please don’t) but just a bit more than you are used to. Alternatively, the YH5K is best played at moderate volume. Although each of us generally listens at various levels, take this as a general guideline.

While the YH5K stands head and shoulders above the D8KP from a performance standpoint, the D8KP’s unique ability to extract texture and convey mid-bass shape is their special trump card. Additionally, they’re also a great all-rounder and less demanding headphones to satisfy (ie. forgiving). However, if you crave performance and accuracy, the YH5K has them in spades, but if you want a more natural-sounding type of presentation the D8KP is the better pick. Just be aware that the performance of the two will largely depend on how resolving your system is. So, if you compare both headphones on lower-level offerings expect them to perform at a similar level. Without a doubt, I’d pick the YH5K over the D8KP for their stellar performance and worthwhile overall package. That being said, both are excellent headphones.

What the D8KP does better:
  • texture forwardness (except treble/sub-bass)
  • genre compatibility (ie. better all-rounder)
  • command/grip (mid-bass only)
  • mid-bass resolution
  • high-level listening
  • stage width
What the YH5K does better:
  • imaging
  • comfort
  • overall timbre
  • overall dynamics
  • extension both ways
  • treble & sub-bass texture
  • black background/low noise floor
  • resolving power/overall technicalities
  • stage depth, verticality, boundary, openness, and airiness
Similar Goals, Different Paths (vs Focal Utopia pre-20)

System used
: same as above

Main takeaway: forward analytical yet somewhat smooth presentation that’s focused solely on the recording

Standouts: exaggerated dynamics, plenty of slam, unique holographic/spherical staging, treble refinement/energy/extension, slightly extended decay

Meh: bass quality is just “fine” (more “one-note”), can sometimes smooth over texture a bit too much on some instruments (mainly brass)

Insight is the word that comes to mind when I think of these two headphones. They both do an excellent job of spoon-feeding you everything in a recording, providing you with a more micro-focused perspective. While not exactly true-to-life, they’re still a worthwhile experience for people that want a more analytical take on things. The two share a somewhat similar goal, but it’s in the execution where they differ the most.

Immediately, the Utopia evokes a more romantic, wetter, and richer tone over the YH5K. The contrast between their exaggerated dynamics and smooth profile is something I’d reference as “analytical-smooth.” Meanwhile, the YH5K’s raw and delicate personality is something I’d call “analytical-sweet.” These labels also extend towards both of their treble presentations. While both headphones have great extension, energy, refinement, and airiness the YH5K’s treble is on a higher level than the Utopia. Likewise, the story is the same when assessing the midrange and low frequencies–the YH5K outperforms the Utopia in almost all aspects. Tonally, the Utopia lays down a wetter and more intimate midrange while the YH5K are drier yet more faithful to the recording. Comparably, both share a slight upper-mid focus that draws more attention to female vocals. Down in the bass, the Utopia can offer extra hard-hitting slam over the more reserved but natural, YH5K. Other than that one aspect, the YH5K’s “ortho bass” slaughters the Utopia’s “dyna bass” any day of the week in extension, texture, grip, command, realism, timbre, and resolution. Moving on to more intangible things, the macrodynamics of the Utopia can be more capable than the YH5K, but their microdynamics take a back seat compared to them. Both headphones can be very dynamic but the Utopia exaggerates this more than the YH5K, which are more natural in their presentation. Lastly, the staging presentation is where things become more interesting to compare. One of the main selling points and reasons I find the Utopia charming is its unique spherical-shaped and holographic stage. It’s a very cool party trick that adds to the “engagement factor” of these headphones. Meanwhile, the YH5K takes the more traditional approach with hardly any wild tricks. However, their ability to convince the listener that the stage is beamed towards you is also unique. A quick mention of volume play reveals that both perform best when played at moderate levels.

Based on raw performance, it’s evident there are many things the YH5K does better than the Utopia. However, there’s always more to the story, especially when you factor in synergy and taste. There’s a lot of charm to be had with the Utopia for their great contrast and unique stage further enhance the listening experience, and their slightly wet (ie. extended decay) character makes them very engaging for genres such as classic rock. While I still appreciate the Utopia’s charm and strengths, my desire for them has run its course. Looking back and reflecting on this audio journey revealed and solidified many likes and dislikes. For instance, my priority for quality, linear, and extended bass unknowingly became a pillar for quality sound (to me), and the Utopia doesn’t provide that. Of course, there are many more factors to consider when striving for your ideal sound, but there are some parts you can’t ignore. Perhaps my view would change on a different system, but currently, my soul yearns for the YH5K.

What the Utopia does better:
  • holographic stage
  • macrodynamics
  • smoothness
  • contrast
  • slam
What the YH5K does better:
  • imaging
  • comfort
  • overall timbre
  • microdynamics
  • traditional stage
  • energy and texture
  • extension both ways
  • overall resolution/technicalities
  • black background/low noise floor
  • stage depth, verticality, placement, boundary, openness, and airiness
Good Artists Copy (vs Sennheiser HD 800 S)

System used
: same as above

Main takeaway: super wide and open-sounding with great resolution and delicacy

Standouts: impressive wide and grand stage, resolving power, microdynamics, delicacy, speed

Meh: stage can be too diffused and lacking in focus, timbre that is not-so-great, can sometimes sound a bit too lean/dry, lacking in engagement

I’ll make this comparison short and sweet. While all the headphones mentioned above can be meaningful upgrades to the 800 S (depending on the chain) in most aspects, the YH5K are the ones that copy some of their distinctive traits the best. So, if you are coming from an 800 S and are looking for a direct upgrade, the YH5K might scratch that itch the closest. Just be aware of the associated costs to optimize that naturally come from upgrading to flagship headphones. Don’t expect the YH5K to immediately wipe the floor with the 800 S without putting in some work on your system. To clarify, the YH5K does NOT sound similar to the 800 S but instead shares some of their sonic characteristics. To cut to the chase, both headphones are on the leaner, drier, cooler, quicker, airier, tighter, and analytical-er side of the rainbow. Both are also very open-sounding headphones, the main difference being the direction of how the stage presents itself. The 800 S focuses on a much wider and diffuse stage while the YH5K prioritizes depth and center focus. In addition, the 800 S sounds grand and open all the time. The YH5K, on the other hand, accurately presents how it was in the source recording. That’s about all for similarities, and as for everything else, the YH5K outperforms the 800 S in all aspects, as they should for the price. Even the comfort, one of the more compelling reasons to own an 800 S for some people, is bested by the YH5K (on my head at least). That being said, after all these years, the 800 S are still value-driven headphones that will remain a legendary classic deserving of respect and one that will continually reward you the more they scale with highly resolving gear. Some loyal people love them for what they are, quirks and all. To them, that won’t change.

What the HD 800 S does better:
  • a wide and grand stage (all the time)
What the YH5K does better:
  • everything else
Other Gear

Much like the comparisons section, I won’t be able to capture the nuance behind the strengths each amplifier carries with various DACs, headphones, and cables. So, this will be an exclusive commentary on ONLY the YH5K. While these amps can work well with the headphones I mentioned earlier, depending on what you want, they won’t be accounted for when evaluating the YH5K. The LinnenberG Satie DAC is the only DAC I’ve used for the following amps. If you have specific questions on any one particular pairing here, join us in the forum (sign up here).

Warmth, Speed, Resolution, & Control (Crayon CHA-1)

Generally, the CHA-1 is on the warmer and smoother end of the spectrum while showcasing impressive technicalities, liquidity, speed, and control. So, pairing the CHA-1 with energetic-sounding components would give it appropriate bite and energy. In addition, bypassing its volume pot as much as possible (ie. turning it close to max) and cranking it to high gain (+6dB) tones down a bit of that ingrained smoothness which can be a tad overdone. A DAC with a built-in quality pre-amp would be a solid way to go like the Satie DAC used here. I swear, I hate how some of these high-dollar amplifiers cheap out on such small, yet important, components such as the volume control. They can annoyingly hold things back to their full potential… Anyway, I digress.

The pairing with the YH5K is fantastic and one of the finest examples of synergy I’ve heard thus far. It balances these headphones well resulting in a straight neutral-warm, yet soulful, experience with awesome energy, speed, and control. The one lacking sonic trait is that this amp doesn’t slam as hard as others. So, if you’re specifically looking for that look elsewhere. While the CHA-1 works well with the other headphones mentioned here, the YH5K has the edge in synergy and performance to put them out on top.

The big downside is availability and rarity. The CHA-1 has since been discontinued, and good luck trying to find one in the used market. Unfortunately, this pairing is something most people won’t get to experience. I’m sure there are other amps in the market that will do the YH5K justice, so it’s not like this is THE headphone amplifier to get. Nonetheless, the pairing has left me satisfied in many ways and I’d be reluctant to let them go, unless I hear something better, of course.

Worthwhile tweaks: This is a dangerous rabbit hole to fall into and there are a myriad of tweaks to explore, but I’ll mention what I’ve tried anyway. If you’re into power cables, the Allnic ZL-8000S is stupidly good. It’s a neutral and very clarity-focused cable with impressive amounts of detail, control, dynamics, blackness, and directness while being extremely natural and organic. It’s a cable whose sole purpose is to please and impress. This cable takes advantage of the YH5K’s strengths by doubling down on its energy-driven sound and full-range capabilities. It’s certainly an expensive cable so I would caution those who have not heard a difference in power cables (yet).

Straight down the middle / A solid all-rounder (Modwright HA 300)

The HA 300 is smack down right in the middle of everything. Its sonic character avoids leaning or catering towards one side over the other. It’s not overly wet, dry, cool, or warm but very balanced and organic in how it presents things. While it doesn’t have the most directness, it has a great tonality that I think the majority of audiophiles will find pleasant. It’s also fairly dynamic overall with ample slam/impact.

The HA 300 pairs well with the YH5K giving extra meat on the bone, particularly in the midrange. Those who want a more heavy-handed and weighty presentation that’s not too overbearing will appreciate this pairing. There’s a bit of softening, but it’s not to the point where it causes issues. So, if you want maximum directness this is not the amp for that. Another criticism is that the HA 300 fails to fully bring out the potential bass quality possible from the YH5K. While there’s good slam/impact, it’s somewhat lackluster in grip, extension, command, definition, and control. As a result, the entirety of the bass can come across as flabby, but fortunately, it doesn’t encroach on the mids and the highs. Coming from the CHA-1 was a noticeable step down in resolution, blackness, extension (both ways), tightness, cleanliness, control, texture, and staging. It makes sense as the CHA-1 is the technically better-performing amp. There’s also something extra special about the YH5K and CHA-1 pairing when it comes to synergy–there’s less in the way and more of a connection to the music. That being said, the YH5K and HA 300 pairing still offer solid synergy (from the midrange up), and I enjoyed it more than I thought I would. To be clear, the flabbiness I mentioned only applies to the YH5K, and not the other headphones in this article.

Unfortunately, at the time of this writing, Modwright seems to have exited out of the headphones space as the HA 300 is no longer being offered. It’s another amp that the majority won’t get to hear, and I’ve also never seen one on sale in the used market. For reference, I think the HA 300 pairs well with all the headphones mentioned here, the Final Audio D8000 Pro being the standout pairing. They all perform similarly to each other when paired with this amp, meaning no one pulls ahead over the other, but it’s a different story with the CHA-1.

Worthwhile tweaks: This amp takes in 2 types of tubes: 300B and 6BM8/ECL82. I didn’t roll a ton because 300B tubes are expensive and I didn’t want to fall into tube-rolling hell like I did last time. So, for the final configuration, I went with RCA/Philips Holland 1968-1969 6BM8/ECL82 and Elrog ER300B. I also have a WE300B and it was nice, but it is less to my preference which leans toward more balanced, clean, and clarity-focused things.

Herbie’s SuperSonic Stabilizers are another tweak I’ve tried and with great results. With a single stabilizer placed atop all 3 transformers, the sound image becomes much more focused, the bass tightens up noticeably, and the presentation leans more natural. But be careful when stacking and adding more stabilizers to avoid deadening the sound and flattening the stage–three is enough for the HA 300, specifically. This tweak requires some experimenting because it doesn’t work for all components and in all scenarios. It’s a subtle difference, but once you know what to listen for it becomes hard to “unhear” it.

Clean, Dynamic, Forward & Technical (Allnic HPA-3000 GT)

The Korean-based company, Allnic Audio, is well known in the 2-channel scene but not so much with head-fi gear. The 3000 GT was my first entry into tube gear, and it has served me well for a long time. A big reason for that is its ability to scale well with higher-end equipment. Out of the three amps, this Allnic fits my taste best as it has a squeaky clean, and dynamic sound that’s forward and direct in its presentation. If it weren’t for the meaningful gap in performance between it and the Crayon CHA-1, I’d still be driving this amp as my daily. Fortunately, I have an Allnic HPA-10000 headphone amplifier to save up for (it’s sexy)!

Side note: The 3000 GT uses a 41-step attenuator built in-house which means sensitive-to-drive headphones won’t get much volume play. To manage this, you either (1) need a DAC with a relatively low output, (2) need a DAC with a built-in pre preferably of good quality (an external one works fine too), or (3) need to acquire some attenuators (I have Rothwell XLR attenuators).

Anyway, the pairing with the YH5K is excellent. It capitalizes on the already analytical and accurate headphones without being too pushy in its presentation. It has a neutral-clean and no-nonsense sound with expressive dynamics and a fairly forward disposition. For those who want something richer and more relaxed look elsewhere as the 3000 GT might be too clean for your palate. In addition, the staging presentation has satisfying space, depth, and coherency. On occasion, the treble region can veer a bit hot so sensitive listeners be wary, although a good chunk of it is also gear-dependent. Ah, the bass… Is OK and more desirable than the Modwright HA 300. The mid-bass is competent with sufficient grip, texture, definition, and control. While the sub-bass extension is quite good on the 3000 GT, the YH5K is still susceptible to some bloat and muddiness which results in the sub-bass intruding on the mid-bass slightly. For the price of the amp, I don’t think it’s a deal-breaker and I’d still be somewhat satisfied pairing the two (I enjoyed it), but it seems like the YH5K are too sensitive to the bass quality of amplifiers. I guess you need something with outstanding control and texture in the bass to bring out their potential. To clarify, this only happens on the YH5K and not to the other headphones when paired with this particular amp.

The 3000 GT has also been discontinued much like the other two headphone amps. However, the silver lining is that they pop up in the used market from time to time. If you see one for a good price, make sure to snatch it up. I can assure you that it’s a quality amp that won’t disappoint despite its unpopularity, granted you like what it has to offer. If you’ve heard of the Allnic brand then you know they’re well respected and they make quality stuff. Allnic makes almost all its components in-house for optimal integration, synergy, and control, which I think is impressive and respectable. The 3000 GT goes well with warm and rich leaning gear, although you can also double down on what it’s already great at. For standout headphone pairings, I like the Focal Utopia, the MYSPHERE 3.1, and the Yamaha YH-5000 which makes them lean technical and clean. It also works well with the others provided its sonic profile fits your taste.

Worthwhile tweaks: As I’ve mentioned, the 3000 GT scales well with higher-quality gear and it will reward you accordingly. To no one’s surprise, all the Allnic ZL Technology cables synergize well with this amp (I’ve tried most of them). The ZL-5000 power cable, in particular, is a very nice pairing to inject some warmth, body, and smoothness without sacrificing its technical ability, into its already clean nature. The ZL-8000S power cable, on the other hand, doubles down on the amp’s directness, extension, dynamics, and technical ability while maintaining great naturalness. Their Mu-7R and Mu-8Rs interconnect also provide great synergy. The latter is much like its power cable counterpart, the ZL-8000S, where it emphasizes what the 3000 GT is great at. The former is similar to the ZL-5000 which pulls back the amp a bit and imparts desirable qualities on it.

I’ve rolled a LOT of tubes on the 3000 GT, but I only found three 6EM7 tubes that were worthwhile over the stock Zenith I had: GE, RCA, and Sylvania. The GE tubes are worth it if you want something more forgiving and mid-focused, the Sylvania tubes are great if you want something more analytical and lean, and the RCA tubes are fantastic if you want something that has it all. So, RCA all the way, trust me on this.

Miscellaneous

This section is for any random thoughts or observations I might have about the headphones, basically anything not worth writing a whole section for.

Quick Notes:
  • The yellow accent is a nice touch, and I don’t fancy the color yellow all that much (I know, not important)
  • Their comfort is as good as they look, that is to say, they’re exceptional and hands-down the most comfortable headphones I’ve put on my head
  • Likely not the best for individuals with larger heads, the YH5K are quite smol
  • Unboxing the origami-style box was also a nice touch, but I’d also like it if they included a fancy briefcase (really not important)
  • Stellar for classical, acoustic, and electronic music but not so much with classic rock, depending on how you listen
  • They can be very unrelenting and brutal if you feed them crap recordings, but when they hit they reward (garbage in equals garbage out)
  • Good at lower volumes, great at moderate volumes, and just OK at higher volumes (ie. similar to a Utopia, if you know what I mean)
  • They’re the least isolating open-back headphones I’ve tried, about on par with the MYSPHERE
  • I don’t usually specify specific tracks in a write-up (for many reasons), but I think the track, GLBTM (Studio Outtakes) by Daft Punk, encompasses everything the YH5K does so well
  • I’ve seen the graph for these headphones, but it’s not what I’m hearing, so YMMV
“SE” Special Edition:

Headphone Earpads

You get 2 sets of pads–one leather pair (HEP-5000LE) and one suede pair (HEP-5000SU).

This one’s easy… My advice is to skip the suede. Sure, if you wanted a more relaxing, forgiving, warmer, and smoother presentation maybe you might like it. However, compared to the leather, the suede pads aren’t as airy and the imaging suffers slightly, which leads to a bit of haze. My main criticism is that the suede overdampens and recesses the midrange too much which, in turn, deadens the sound. As a result, it’s not as natural-sounding as it can be, especially in human voices. Suede, as a material, didn’t offer any worthwhile sonic benefits in this case, so it seems like comfort (which is superb) on the skin was Yamaha’s main priority when it came to the suede pads. Regardless of preference, I think the leather pads play to the YH5K’s strengths better than the suede.

Headphone Cable Pairings

Yamaha HBC-SC020 (Stock) – In my opinion, it has OK performance off the bat and is a solid stock cable, although I wish it was more technical for the price. However, depending on how resolving your system is, I felt this cable was a significant bottleneck to the YH5K. It might be enough for most people but since these are flagship headphones, they deserve better.

Danacable Lazuli Reference (via DHC adapters) – This is a solid option if you want a warm, rich, and relaxed tilt. It has good grip in the bass, an organic sound, and solid stage depth, although the stage width is on the narrow side. While it’s on the more colored side of what I consider neutral, it’s still an OK match. And I’m sure many will enjoy the Dana “house sound.” I felt this cable didn’t take full advantage of the YH5K’s strengths and noticeably upset their tonal balance, but it was still a “fun,” albeit exaggerated pairing.

Brise Audio YATONO-HP Ultimate (via DHC adapters) – A cable that is on the neutral, ever so slightly relaxed side. The YATONO elevates the YH5K from top to bottom, taking excellent advantage of their strengths (ie. stage openness, treble texture, sub-bass texture, resolving power), and it provides a more coherent stage with improved width and insane depth, adding even more to their openness and blackness. This pairing is superbly balanced, controlled, mature, dynamic, and refined with awesome energy and sweetness. On top of that, the entirety of the bass has excellent heft, texture, and command. In my mind, this cable completes these headphones well and there’s nothing for me to complain about. It’s a worthwhile pairing in my opinion, and worth its cheddar (assuming everything else in your chain is up to snuff).

Brise Audio OROCHI-HP Ultimate (Custom) – Same as above but better. The OROCHI has a bolder and more confident sound, especially in the low frequencies. While it’s a touch more neutral than the YATONO, the additional body and weight in the midrange offset the slightly dry and lean nature of the YH5K. The trade-off is a slight reduction in their sense of air but in exchange, a more natural and organic sound is achieved. The OROCHI creates a very solid foundation for the YH5K and demonstrates a mastery of balance and refinement. The YATONO pairing was so good that I decided to get a custom version, the OROCHI. I also wanted to get rid of using DHC adapters which degraded the sound a tiny bit. This pairing is sublime, and one of the finest examples of synergy that I’ve heard.

Headphone Stand

It’s a well-built and sleek-looking headphone stand (HST-5000). No major complaints, though I wish it were adjustable.

A statement piece, these Yamaha headphones are.

In my opinion, the YH5K are the best I’ve heard and are headphones with hardly any glaring flaws, gaps, or compromises. Regardless of personal preference, the YH5K are exceptional performance-driven headphones that don’t neglect the “soul of the music.” I’m not so naive to call them perfect because they’re not, but they’re the epitome of what I consider an outstanding performer.

After almost a year of ownership (at the time of this writing), I’ve contemplated why I adore these headphones so much. I think the reason is the sense of “energy” the YH5K brings to the table. Because of their clarity-focused approach, clean response, and full-range capabilities (for headphones), a solid foundation of sound that allows each fundamental and harmonic to live and die of its own volition is built, leading to that “energy” I mentioned earlier–a feeling only encapsulated through live performances (good-sounding ones). The result is an incredibly engaging and addicting experience that makes other headphones (mentioned here) boring by comparison. It’s as if I’m hearing the purest sound devoid of any distortion, which also makes adjusting to other flagship headphones slightly challenging. The only thing I find lacking is that sense of “power,” but that would be extremely difficult for headphones to reproduce convincingly because of their current limitations. Go to speakers for that or better yet, a live performance (the good-sounding ones). I know this paragraph here is an “in my head” (and subjective) explanation, so it’s not practical or relatable, but I hope it might help some people imagine where I’m going with this.

So, what’s the big catch to all this?! Your taste and your gear. Don’t skimp out on your electronics because these aren’t headphones you turn to when you want something convenient or forgiving–there are better options for that. They reflect the characteristics and nature of an audio chain more than any flagship headphone I’ve heard to date, but they will reward you the more capable and resolving your system is. Naturally, the synergy between your gear also plays a substantial role. Not everyone will fancy the YH5K’s presentation, which is a given. However, if you crave performance, energy, focus, clarity, accuracy, insight, comfort, and completeness there are no others than the Yamaha YH-5000. Sweet words of flattery, I know. But the proof is in the pudding, and if I hear something better I’ll update this. Do listen to one, they’re worth the effort… And investment.
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hunetly and voja
voja
voja
So much detail!!! Thank you so much! This is what I was talking about in my article.
You made all this information so easy to read =)
  • Like
Reactions: HiFiDJ
HiFiDJ
HiFiDJ
Yours is great! So much history I didn't know about. Thanks for sharing as always.
  • Like
Reactions: voja

voja

1000+ Head-Fier
An Engineering Marvel: A Yamaha
There are a few companies around the world that could be placed in the same cup as Yamaha. Not only is it a global household name, but it’s also one of the most recognizable names to come from Japan. Pianos and motorcycles are likely the first things you’ll associate it with, but Yamaha is involved in more industries than most realize. Yamaha, the piano company, is the world’s largest manufacturer of musical instruments, not just pianos! It also makes professional audio equipment, music production equipment, golfing equipment, semiconductors, robotics machinery, and even automotive interior parts thanks to its woodworking knowhow from pianos. As for Yamaha the motorcycle company, it also manufactures snowmobiles, ATVs, PWCs, boats, industrial robots and machinery, unmanned aircraft, swimming pools, and automobile engines. I was aware of its instruments, consumer audio products, and boat engines, but golfing clubs, robotics, snowmobiles... boats?! It’s like dozing off during a quiet part of a lecture and the next moment you wake up to a board covered in incomprehensible equations or formulas. Before trying to take on the present, I naturally wondered how we got from pianos to motorcycles in the first place

Disclaimer: The YH-5000SE was provided to me free of charge solely for the purpose of reviewing it. This The Full Story article was independently conceived and executed under my own creative direction as a passion project over the course of 9 months. I have not, am not, and will not receive any monetary compensation from Yamaha Corporation Co., Ltd. or its affiliates, and I have no affiliation with the aforementioned. There are no affiliate links associated with this review. The opinions expressed herein are my own, based on my personal experience and independent research, and they are freely expressed as such. My intention is for this article to serve as an educational resource for readers. While I strive for accuracy, please note that, as a human, I am prone to error.
I thank Yamaha for its patience and for organizing the shipment. If it weren’t for Yamaha, this article would’ve never happened!

If you want to read the PDF "Yamaha YH-5000SE: The Full Story" article, feel free to download it. You can also preview the cover I made for it on our Head-Fi thread.

History

Torakusu Yamaha was born to Takanosuke Yamaha, an astronomer of Kishū Domain. The Reddit community was quick to interpret Takanosuke as a samurai astronomer, calling it the most badass title they’ve heard and requesting a Netflix series ASAP. There’s never a dull moment with that bunch! It made for a good laugh, I’ll give them credit for that, but it’s far from the truth. Takanosuke was more of an intellectual than a fierce warrior depicted in Hollywood. Anyhow, Torakusu had access to a rich library of books from his father, a good portion of them being astronomy books. This planted a seed of Torakusu’s interest in Western science and technology. Not long after, the Westernization of Japan arrived with the Meiji Restoration. The fall of the Edo government was hard on the Yamaha family, but Torakusu saw hope in the arrival of imperialistic rule. Three years later, in 1871, he left for Osaka. As watches started gaining popularity in his city, Torakusu decided to pursue watchmaking under the mentorship of an English engineer, so he traveled 750 kilometers to Nagasaki. However, that didn’t keep him occupied for long, as he mastered the craft in a matter of two years. Having completed his studies, Torakusu returned to Osaka, where he spent three years repairing medical appliances at a shop called Kawachi-ya. Though what followed varies from source to source, it’s documented that he was sent to Hamamatsu to repair medical appliances at its local hospital, with the earliest reported date being 1883, when Torakusu was 32 years old. Still keen on establishing himself at the age of 35, he moved to Hamamatsu and opened a medical equipment repair shop. During that time, Hamamatsu was still a small town, and Torakusu couldn’t make a living solely from his repair business, so he served as a local handyman. More notably, at least for his financial security, was being a rickshaw puller for the director of the Hamamatsu Hospital. One day, Torakusu was invited by the local primary school to fix its precious Mason & Hamlin reed organ which had broken when being imported from Europe. Torakusu quickly identified the problem and started studying the complex instrument. He made the replacement springs himself and returned the instrument to its working condition. Whilst repairing it, he sketched out every part and corner of the instrument, hoping to build such an instrument by himself. Thankfully for Torakusu, the director of the hospital, Toyasaku Fukushima, granted him a loan for funding a one-room workshop that operated under the name “Yamaha Fūkin Saizōjo” [Yamaha Organ Factory]. In 1887, Torakusu and Kawai Kisaburō—a colleague from his repair shop—manufactured the first Japanese-made organ. It wasn’t exactly a finished product, but rather a prototype that served as a base for feedback—feedback that would help them create the finalized version of the instrument. Well, after a negative reception from the primary school, the two set out on a long journey to get feedback from the freshly established Tokyo Academy of Music. To give you a better idea of just how determined they were: they crossed the mountains of Hakone and traveled a distance of 250 kilometers on foot, all whilst carrying their organ with a pole over their shoulders! They were welcomed by Isawa Shūji, the president of the Tokyo Academy of Music, who saw great potential in domestically sourcing the instrument for music schools. Dishearteningly, Isawa harshly criticized the tuning of Torakusu’s organ, calling it useless. Torakusu was approaching his 40s and still hadn’t established himself, so hearing those words couldn’t have been easy on him. But it wasn’t all as grim as I made it seem, Isawa admired and complimented the wood craftsmanship of the instrument, and instead of shutting the door on Torakusu, he offered him to attend music lessons at the academy. Torakusu copied the organ he was repairing with immaculate precision, but without any knowledge about musical temperament, he was unable to replicate the most important part of the instrument. After a month of attending lectures at the academy, he returned to Hamamatsu in November with the ambition of applying his newly gained knowledge. Within two months, Torakusu and his Kisaburō completed their second organ and brought it back to Isawa. A huge weight dropped from their shoulders after Isawa expressed how impressive their tonally accurate instrument was, so much so that he outright said it could replace the imported organs. Yamaha now had the green light from the master himself, and Isawa even assisted him in establishing a distribution network. This time, Torakusu returned to Hamamatsu with orders waiting to be fulfilled. He started by gathering a group of 10 loyal employees, and in the same year, the company grew to 50 employees. By the following year, 1889, it had already reached 100 employees, and at that point, the company was relocated to the then-dormant Hōonji Temple, where it remained seated for the next 30 years. Some reports claim that a rival, who also happened to own stock in Yamaha’s company, plotted against him and caused the business to fall apart. Interestingly, these sources claim that only Torakusu and Kisaburō remained, the same team of two that carried their jointly created organs to Tokyo on foot. If true, the claim that the company continued doing well, selling over 250 organs a year, becomes that much more intriguing. This was in large thanks to Torakusu’s close relationship with Isawa, a figure who held multiple high-ranking positions as a government official. A person with great power, to say the least. During the following years, the company won a handful of exhibition awards and produced north of 700 organs per year. In 1893, it received its first international order, exporting 78 organs to Southeast Asia. However, the most important date in Yamaha’s history is 12 October 1897, when Torakusu founded Nippon Gakki Seizō K.K. [Japan Musical Instrument Manufacturing Co., Ltd]. Unfortunately, this date is frequently wrongly marked as 1887, i.e. the founding year of his first organ business venture. This was the beginning of a new era for Yamaha, it signified a shift from being an organ-only manufacturer to becoming a musical instrument manufacturer. Torakusu was the president of the company, and Kawai Kisaburō was appointed as his key manager. At the time, imported American pianos were unjustifiably expensive. According to Professor Margaret Mehl, Yamaha was selling its organs to the Hamamatsu primary school for just 45 yen, whereas American pianos cost 1000 yen. Multiple houses could be built for such a sum of money! Isawa once again jumped to the rescue and arranged for the Ministry of Education to sponsor Torakusu for a five-month-long travel to America. In 1899, Torakusu visited more than 100 locations across the United States, including piano and organ manufacturing facilities, dealerships, and manufacturers of machinery and tooling equipment used for their production. Having completed his mission of gathering the knowledge and the know-how of piano manufacturing, Torakusu returned to Japan with production machinery, tools, as well as some American pianos and organs. He was ready to take on the task of creating Japan’s first domestically manufactured piano, and thus Japan’s first upright piano was born in 1890. The rest is history. Two years later Nippon Gakki manufactured its first grand piano, and in the same year, Torakusu was awarded the Medal of Honor with Green Ribbon. He was also appointed as the director of Hamamatsu Railway. In 1911, he was elected to the Hamamatsu City Council and appointed Vice Chairman. Torakusu Yamaha died on August 8, 1916, and was followed by Kawai Kisaburō just two months later. There was an unmistakable bond and loyalty between them, and it’s quite touching how Kisaburō never left his side. A detail I found particularly heartwarming is that he adopted Yamaha’s first son, Masao (1889). As for Torakusu’s life story, it can be said that he left as an accomplished man. From an early age, he demonstrated a strong ambition and interest in business. Although he was unsuccessful in pushing through the market as a watchmaker, and couldn’t make a living as a medical equipment repair technician due to the then-small market, he continued seeking success in unknown territories. Moreover, it was his drive and will to learn that brought him to success. The man unafraid of learning opens the door to infinite growth. No matter which industry Yamaha entered, he gave it his all to learn it through and through—the same spirit that remains in the company to this day.

Since Torakusu’s return from America, the company never really stopped growing. It pushed through WWI by manufacturing and exporting harmonicas, which it had begun manufacturing just before the war broke out. After the war ended, Nippon Gakki was doing well for the first three years, but by 1926, it was on the brink of bankruptcy. A series of misfortunate events were to blame, with the biggest losses caused by natural disasters that destroyed multiple factory plants. In 1927, board members voted for Kaichi Kawakami to take the presidency. He accepted and eventually brought the company back to its feet, and even created a research department to improve its products. Then WWII broke out, and Nippon Gakki was forced into manufacturing components for airplanes. Mainly propellers, per most sources. Unfortunately, the company was left with only one manufacturing facility, as the rest of them were either destroyed by bombing or were seized. However, what it gained was a team of skilled engineers who had experience with metalworking and machining. It’s said that by 1947 Nippon Gakki was fully capable of in-house production of metal frames for pianos. The company continued growing under Kawakami’s leadership. In 1950, Genichi Kawakami took on the presidential seat from his father. Three years into his presidency, he recognized the potential in motorcycles, as there was an increasing demand for cheap means of transport. Much like Torakusu Yamaha, Genichi embarked on a journey to America with hopes of acquiring the industry know-how needed to make a good product and start domestic production. Upon his return in 1953, he gave out a confidential order to start the development of a motorcycle engine. The following year, the government returned the previously seized metalworking factory to Nippon Gakki. At this point, all the stars had aligned: the company was armed with trained labor power, it gained back access to its metalworking factory, and there was a market demand for motorcycles. Wood supply was unstable, which meant the company couldn’t fully rely on its music instrument manufacturing business. If I had to guess what was going through Genichi’s head, I would say that he didn’t want to risk the company facing the same crisis that it did when his father became president. He was looking for a promising industry that could secure the future of the company. Confident in his strategy, he went all in on the idea of manufacturing the company’s first motorcycle, the YA-1. Regardless of how ambitious this plan was, it stood no comparison to Genichi’s expectation of finishing the model within one year. Fortunately, the team had access to select a German motorcycle patent-free as part of the war reparations. The YA-1 was designed after the DKW RT125 and was completed just eight months after selecting the German base model. The team was able to accomplish this because it didn’t have to design the motorcycle from scratch, with most of its efforts going toward the development of the engine. A few more things were altered on it, and 125 units were ready by the end of 1954. In February 1955, the YA-1 was released to the Japanese market. It wasn’t an immediate hit, but it picked up the pace within a few months. Nippon Gakki already having a team of 150 trained people for the production of motorcycles and engines, opening a new factory for the manufacturing of motorcycles, and the sudden success of the YA-1, all influenced the founding of Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. in July 1955. Genichi Kawakami was appointed as the president of the company, but he also retained his position as the president of Nippon Gakki. At first, the two companies shared a close relationship and were also publicly seen as one company, but not much time passed until Yamaha Motor Company reached the point of operating as a separate, independent company. Genichi was personally involved in the manufacturing of the YA-1, so this was the next natural step for him.

To cut the story short, everything worked out just as he envisioned it. I wish there was a single source I could direct you to fully grasp all that followed in the coming decades, but there is none. Both companies went on to experience exponential growth and aggressive diversification. At large, this can be attributed to Genichi’s approach and philosophy. When I sat down and thought about it, Genichi, his father Kaichi, and Torakusu Yamaha, all shared the common belief that metal casting is the foundation of the company. It’s as if this philosophy was passed down from one man to the next. What’s more, all three of these figures reinforced this belief by advancing technology—particularly in casting methods—and prioritizing research. Torakusu did so by traveling to America to gather knowledge firsthand, Kaichi by establishing a research department, and Genichi by founding a dedicated research facility. They were businessmen, engineers of the manufacturing process. Genichi Kawakami famously said, “Treat the factory floor like your own living room.” Yamaha’s manufacturing factories were globally admired for how advanced they were. In 1974, the equivalent of today’s ¥5.6B was invested into building a V-process casting plant, making Nippon Gakki one of the only piano manufacturers in the world with its own casting factory. This allowed it to start the mass production of upright pianos, delivering 10,000 pianos a month.
In October 1987, 100 years after Torakusu Yamaha founded his first organ manufacturing company, Nippon Gakki changed its name to Yamaha Corporation Co., Ltd. Hopefully, that answers how we ended up with two Yamahas.

Design

As much as I drooled over online images, nothing could’ve prepared me for how these look in person. I would say the pictures don’t do them justice, only if it weren’t for the already-stunning pictures. The YH-5000SE sits across from me; I’m staring into it, but the words aren’t forming at my fingertips. It’s like being handed a blank sheet of paper after contemplating a great art piece at a gallery. You could write out a full page describing your emotions, visual dissection of the piece, as well as your interpretation, but it wouldn’t serve as a faithful translation of the interaction between you and the art piece. My sheet is still blank, but there is one thought that keeps cycling through my mind: engineering. No matter which part I look at, I can’t help but notice that form follows function; each part has a clear purpose. It wouldn’t surprise me if Yamaha gave its engineers carte blanche to develop the YH-5000SE, and left the finishing touches to the designers. And don’t get me wrong, it’s a complete masterclass in headphone design. It may very well feature the most intricate design to have graced the headphone industry. Some have already pointed to Sennheiser’s HD800, calling it the source of inspiration for the YH-5000SE. I decided to do a little digging to find how much truth there is to this claim. It turns out the MDR-F1 was introduced by Sony more than a decade before the HD800’s release. Unfortunately, it’s a largely forgotten headphone. The better known, but still far from well-known models that are often brought to the discussion of HD800’s design are Sony’s 2004 MDR-SA5000 and Q010-MDR1, with the latter released as a flagship model under Sony’s short-lived luxury sub-brand Qualia. What these three headphones have in common with the YH-5000SE is the driver enclosure design. They all follow the same concept of a porous open enclosure, but that’s where their similarities end. Each company has its unique approach to this concept.

The YH-5000SE doesn’t try to imitate or adapt; it simply is. So authentically itself that no headphone comparison feels fair. The Millennium Falcon or the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak—designs so iconic they transcend their categories—that’s the caliber we’re talking about. Perhaps YH-5000SE’s true sibling is the Royal Oak ref. 26522CE. The two share more similarities than meets the eye, but that’s a story for another time. A monochrome palette demands perfection. When deprived of color, a design must stand on the strength of its form, balance, and interplay of light and shadow. The YH-5000SE embraces this discipline whether through negative space to define form or surface design to accentuate shapes. Take the ear-cups, where shapes are as pronounced as they get. The skeleton frame steals the spotlight, but if the attention is shifted to the ear-cups as a whole, it can be noticed that the shape of a circle is everywhere: the driver unit, the screws, and even the frame. It also extends to the headband slider, the stadium-shaped sliding element, the cylindrical connector housing, and the semicircular yoke. While it’s nothing new to see circular ear-cups, yokes, and connector housings, Yamaha brought a new dimension to them.

How so, you ask? It comes down to the sublime combination of two principles: motion and chiaroscuro. And let me stop right here to say that this headphone sets a new standard for the depth that can be achieved in headphone design. I’ve spent more time visually analyzing headphones than the average audiophile, the extent of light manipulation on display in YH-5000SE’s design is done at a level unlike anything I’ve seen in this field. It’s the sort of execution to be admired for its quality. Having done just that, I believe I figured it out, so here’s my best attempt at verbalizing it. All motion stems from the small faceplate with Yamaha’s tuning fork logo. We can call this part the epicenter of motion. The trajectory of energy is as follows: a wave is transferred to form a ring around the center, it subsides before forming a second ring which is weaker in altitude, and finally, the energy is carried onto the frame. The six ends of the tuning fork logo shoot out a “beam” through the rings, but its energy is conserved in six screws at each corresponding end. It’s then released, but due to its strength, the mass collapses. Instead of continuing from the beam’s points, the mass drains into a second set of screws. The collapse transfers residual energy outward, forming walls that are offset from the original beams. These walls flow over and form the skeleton frame. It’s as if the energy’s force was redirected into a stable, reinforced framework. In terms of surface design, there’s also a lot going on. Starting from the center, Yamaha’s logo and its surrounding ring are raised and both feature a polished finish, placing them at the top of the design’s hierarchy. The first outer ring features a tall, steep wall on the inside, while the second one has a smoother, more dispersed inner wall. This reminds me of the water ripple effect; as the ripple spreads, each subsequent wave has a shorter crest and shallower trough. Next up, the screws. Unlike other elements, the first set of screws are left exposed in a raw metal finish. This marks a distinct separation between the driver unit element and the ear-cup frame. The rest of the screws are stealthier thanks to a black polished finish. Even with all these elements, the design wasn’t dynamic enough for Yamaha. To complete the desired look, deep chamfer edge profiles were used on the inner side of the skeleton frame. In my opinion, it’s this that brings the ear-cups to life. There’s such a stark contrast between the frame and the mesh beneath, it makes it appear like the headphone’s synthetic flesh is exposed under its exoskeleton. A scene straight out of a Sci-Fi movie!

The headband structure flips the direction around, instead of flowing away from the center, it flows toward it. A standard headband is used, so it’s nothing more than a bent strip of metal. The center-piece [the critical part holding together the yoke, headband, and height-adjustment system] follows the curvature of the headband and bends inward. Together with its length, the fact that it’s only slightly wider than the headband gives it a slim figure. Granted, it has a belly on the inside, but don’t we all enjoy a little belly? Whereas the ear-cups were all about exercising shape, form, and light play, this part has a stronger focus on curvature and fluidity. A beautiful example of this is when it’s viewed from the rear. From here, we can see a movement resembling a brush stroke. At the bottom of this stroke is a cap cover for the yoke joint. Aside from vertically bending inward, at the joint, the center-piece gently bends outward horizontally, at an inward vertical angle. The slider showcases the same quality, though more subtly. The external part smoothly bulges out, like a button, while the inner part contrasts it with a flat face. The same language is spoken through the sliding element; the outer side has a deep bevel, while the inner side is just a cutout in the already-curved center-piece. Up until this point, everything was heading in the same direction... and then there’s the flat, sharply cut-off bottom of the center-piece. Seems completely out of place, right? I wouldn’t blame you if you think that, but believe it or not, there is a good reason for the way it looks. Before I get to that, let’s cover the last remaining part of the headband structure. The yoke. Sandwiched between the ear-cups and the center-piece, it has a special transitional power to bridge their designs. We established that the movement flows away from the center on the ear-cups, and toward the center on the headband structure, and that would make for a logical conclusion that the yoke follows one direction or the other. But what if I told you that it simultaneously flows toward and away from the center? Meet hyperbolic paraboloid, where that’s possible. Its implementation here is a perfect expression of tension, but also fusion. For instance, the way the yoke extends past the two pivot points is a detail that will go unnoticed by many, but it’s yet another element that shows how much thought has been put into each part.

The HP-1 is the main source of inspiration for the YH-5000SE, and Yamaha made that crystal-clear. However, as far as design is concerned, there isn’t much that got carried over. Apart from its trademark headband and headstrap, nothing else was recycled. Inspired by? Yes. Directly reused? No. It’sanother headphone from the company’s vintage lineup that significantly influenced the design. Renowned as the holy grail among planar-magnetic enthusiast circles, the YH-5M was a pair of semi-open orthodynamic earphones... worn over the head. It was too ahead of its time. It even came with detachable cables! It would be indistinguishable from other tools in a dental clinic. YH-5000SE’s cable connector and the sharp angle of the ear-cups both come from the YH-5M. The reason its name isn’t as closely attached to the YH-5000SE as HP-1 is that it was only displayed next to it during early exhibitions. After YH-5000SE’s official launch, it wasn’t mentioned in the marketing material. Honestly, I find it disappointing that the media hasn’t caught on this detail. At the very least, I hope I shined enough light on it and am looking forward to seeing it getting the deserved credit moving forward.

Branding and labeling are kept to the bare minimum—perhaps too minimal. The tuning fork logo on the ear-cups easily gets lost in the darkness of the headphones. The surrounding ring around it is the only visible text from the side profile, and it doesn’t say Yamaha. Instead, it says “Orthodynamic est. 1978” at the top, and “Made in Japan” at the bottom. Both are sans-serif, all caps, printed in white. Technically, there’s some text on the cable connector at the rear, but it’s printed vertically. It’s even less visible because it’s just a shade lighter than the matte black connector housing. Orthodynamic is repeated, and right below it, the model name is negatively printed against a matching shade rectangle. There are no left or right text labels, only “A” in braille on the left side. And with that, all that remains is to flip the headphones to the top. Guess what’s there? Another orthodynamic text label! It has the same characteristics as the one on the driver unit ring, but here it says orthodynamic headphone and the line below it states the model followed by a slash and the serial number [“serial no. XXXX”]. Personally, I would’ve preferred to see the iconic tuning fork symbol accompanied by Yamaha’s bold logotype—exactly as it was on the HP-1. I’m pretty sure I’m speaking in the name of all of us hardcore Yamaha enthusiasts! It makes me chuckle seeing “Orthodynamic” on 3/3 places with text. But, hey, I understand what they were aiming for.

The YH-5000SE achieves so much with so little. The [nearly] all-black color scheme can be a point of criticism, with it being lazy and plain in some people’s eyes. However, this headphone is the polar opposite of that. It takes a while to wrap your head around its design, but once you reach that point, you understand why the lack of color is so fascinating. Lazy... If anything, it’s a design’s ultimate test, and rest assured that it creates plenty of challenges that designers must overcome. A monochrome design is as unmerciful at revealing imperfections as a mirror finish is. This is a design’s most vulnerable state, its naked state. Thankfully, the YH-5000SE looks mighty good without clothes.

This is by far the deepest design dissection I’ve ever written. Why do you think that is? There’s a never-ending number of things to admire. Small details hiding in plain sight: how seamlessly the tuning fork symbol is incorporated into the design, the way all edges are smoothened out to create fluidity, how the shine of the mesh adds depth to the ear-cups, the Torx screws which conveniently resemble the Yamaha star, the absence of exposed screws in the entire headband structure, or even the 15˚ angle of the ear-cups which sets the overall direction. No matter how many elements there are, each one is an extension of the other, and together, they form a unified, continuous whole. My only gripe about the design would have to be the yellow accent piece on the connector housing. There was no yellow on the HP-1, and the color doesn’t have anything to do with Yamaha Corporation either. Why it was chosen, I do not know. A raw metal finish, like the one seen on the screws, would’ve been much more fitting. If it were up to me, I would’ve used a white ceramic coating, like the one seen on performance automotive exhausts, say Pagani Huayra R. Another viable option would be an enamel coating, also in white. Any of these three would not only elevate the design but complete it. When already 99% of the design is monochrome, why not fully commit to this decision with that last remaining percent?

Build Quality

Magnesium is at the center of discussion, and effortlessly so. But with a $5000 price tag attached, scrutiny is inevitable. Material selection alone does little to highlight the level of craftsmanship involved in making the YH-5000SE. Scattered across publications and interviews, fragments of its story exist, though most remain locked behind language barriers. If not for @doctorK53, who selflessly gifted our community word-for-word translations, we might never have understood the true weight of the “Made in Japan” label.

There’s no wood to be found, yet these are manufactured and assembled under the same roof that Yamaha’s flagship grand pianos are. Meeting such uncompromising quality and production demands required nothing less than the most skilled artisans, making the Kakegawa factory not just the best option, but the only one. Magnesium alloy parts are injection molded, emerging as nothing more than cold, unyielding pieces of metal. It’s through the hands of takumi that life is breathed into them. The fine curvature of the skeleton frame? The equilibrium of direction in the yoke? All painstakingly sculpted by hand. There are no shortcuts, no compromises, no concessions to efficiency—only devotion to an ideal. In this case, that ideal is weight reduction. Lifting the YH-5000SE for the first time was... confusing. How can a headphone of this size be so light?! It takes some time to get used to the weight, or better said, lack thereof.

Other parts incorporate materials like stainless steel, aluminum, and plastic. The headband is made of stainless steel, the driver capsule and the sliders are made of aluminum, while the center-piece, the baffle, and the cable connector housing are plastic. It’s safe to assume that the polished accents are also aluminum, just with a different surface treatment. The real feat, however, is how seamlessly these materials blend together. Three materials! At a glance, and even to the touch, differentiating the magnesium frame from the aluminum driver capsule is impossible. The plastic components, too, integrate flawlessly, their distinct surface pattern only discernible upon close inspection. Touching the YH-5000SE is an experience in itself. The surface, strangely, feels like paper, an unexpected but fascinating sensory trick. What sorcery of texture engineering is at play? Whatever it is, it works, adding yet another layer to the intrigue.

Traditionally built headphones convey durability through heft and rigidity, but the YH-5000SE goes in the complete opposite direction. Its flexibility and lack of weight could very easily be mistaken for cheap build quality. But then you realize that every component is securely fixed in place. No rattle, no play. Just structural integrity so assured that it feels like a secret. And that’s the way it really is: strength isn’t worn like armor, it’s woven into the DNA. You, as a listener, are rewarded with the luxury of not bearing all that weight on your head. At only 50 g per driver unit, it’s impressive that the total weight of the headphone is 320 g. To put the sheer weight achievement in perspective: it’s the lightest “planar-magnetic” headphone in its class [by nearly a whopping 100 g]and is otherwise only second to Dan Clark Audio’s 290 g Ether 2. This headphone challenges the hardwired definition of a well-built headphone.

Technical Details

YH-5000SE is an open-back planar-magnetic headphone with a 50 mm Orthodynamic™ driver. For decades, this term has been used interchangeably with planar-magnetic, so, I decided to ask Yamaha for its official definition. An Orthodynamic driver is a planar-magnetic driver that has: a perfectly round shape, a conductive track pattern in a circular spiral, and a concentric circle corrugation. It was never an embellished marketing term, as some believed, but a definition of the driver’s physical design.

Ryo Hadano (acoustic design) and Chikara Kobayashi (mechanical and housing design) worked on the engineering for six years. Needless to say, these are engineered to oblivion.

The driver unit is made up of the housing, the magnets, the micro-perforation air dampers, and the driver. The inner-facing half of the housing has a trefoil section with acoustic felt inside it. Housing aside, the driver is perfectly symmetrical. For magnets, a double-sided magnet array is used, comprised of two separate pieces: a circle at the center, and a ring around it. The dampers are made of stainless steel (painted black to match the rest of the design). The driver features a corrugated ultra-thin film diaphragm with etched conductive traces. They’re dual-sided and arranged in concentric and radial patterns. The reason for using them on both sides is to increase the driving force of the diaphragm.

It’s so easy to skim over all these components and list them, but every single one is acoustically optimized to its core. For example, the goal for the driver was to achieve the smoothest piston movement with the least deformation. Using a corrugated diaphragm meant that each corrugation directly translated to a new sound reflection point. With as many corrugations as the diaphragm has, you can imagine just how much work and consideration was required to get it to perform as intended. Also, the diaphragm is sandwiched so closely between the dampers, that any contact between the two would be audible, hence such a heavy focus on deformation. This was directly addressed by abandoning the original center fixation of the diaphragm, allowing the re-engineered Orthodynamic driver to achieve “uninhibited movement of the entire film” and a lower resonance frequency.

The driver baffle was treated with the same level of attention. The primary concerns here were internal volume and air pressure. The latter had to be kept low due to the delicate nature of the diaphragm. Yamaha’s solution was to make two large cutouts in the baffle and cover them with porous solid filters, marketed as “rolled plain Dutch weave stainless steel filters”. It sure is a mouthful, but that’s its physical description: “rolled” describes the processing method of stainless steel, and “plain Dutch weave” describes the type of weave used. The thickness of its strands is roughly 0.1 mm. This filter allows a controlled amount of air to escape. If you look at these filters, you will notice small squares of acoustic tape placed at the middle of each one. This tape is described to enhance the resolution of vocals. For this next one, you’ll have to get close up, but at the front of the baffle, you will notice two vertically placed acoustic tapes. These are also cutouts in the housing, and their purpose is described to adjust the mid-range resolution and sense of sound expansion.

Just look at the stepless slider patent. Not only was it engineered for functionality, but also for longevity. Should it be necessary to replace any part, it’s designed to be cost-effective and straightforward. And that’s not my interpretation of it, it’s explicitly stated in the patent!

US_2024098400_A1.png

Manufacturing

Never mind a finished product—getting this headphone from a concept to a working prototype was all but straightforward. I would say that the greatest challenges were faced on the manufacturing floor, but Hadano repeated in multiple interviews that everything about this headphone was a challenge. The team would overcome one only to be met with another. A thousand prototypes were made of the driver diaphragm alone. The complexity of the diaphragm largely contributed to such a long development time, and also, manufacturing it was hell. It’s so delicate that it kept severely deforming when taken out of the mold. Eventually, a solution was found, but the technique was kept as a top secret within the company. Many of the components were developed from scratch, involving a similar amount of effort to pull off. Other than the diaphragm, the stainless steel filters were also tested with several patterns before settling on the final one. The thickness of the strands is a mere 0.1 mm, and because the filter is slightly curved, it was also—you guessed it—a challenge.

The total cost of the YH-5000SE project is speculated to be in the millions of dollars. I quote Yamaha, “Everything was newly prepared for this model.” Molding machines, inspection machines, assembly environment, manufacturing equipment, jigs, everything. What wasn’t done in-house was outsourced in Japan, but given that the production standards were so high, many factories turned Yamaha down. The number one manufacturing concern for these headphones was stable production, so it was a great challenge to findmanufacturing partners that could meet this demand. Any elements that could adversely affect product quality had to be eliminated.

While there is no footage of the manufacturing process, there is a video of YH-5000SE’s assembly. A mounting sense of déjà vu crept in as the video unfolded, and then it hit me—Lexus LFA. I couldn’t believe it, these flagship headphones share a virtually identical assembly process with Toyota’s legendary 1LR-GUE engine. Little did you know, this engine is assembled by Yamaha Motor! Not only that, Yamaha Motor was responsible for designing a “100% quality level (no defective parts)” manufacturing system for this engine, and that also included the assembly. Every step is documented—after a single bolt is tightened, takumi stops to document it—something you can also see in YH-5000SE’s assembly. You be the judge: YH-5000SE assembly, 1LR-GUE assembly.

Comfort

Unbeknown to many, Yamaha’s R&D department houses the Sensitivity Measurement Group, which is a specialized team dedicated to scientific affective evaluation. Led by Yasuaki Takano, their approach combines rigorous measurements with data analysis, with the consumer at the center of every decision. For the YH-5000SE, the group prioritized minimal weight and maximum ergonomics.

Take the ear-pads, which underwent refinement through feedback from nearly 100 evaluators and over 60 prototypes. Rather than simply tallying votes, the team pinpointed their target user group, carefully considering their preferences before settling on the two final options. Both ear-pads share a circular shape with an oval opening, an angled design (thickest at the rear), and the proprietary twist-lock mechanism for easy attachment, but diverge in materials. The stock pair comes with a sheepskin leather face, breathable mesh lining, and perforated PU leather outer, while the second employs Ultrasuede®—a synthetic ultra-microfiber invented in the ‘70s by Miyoshi Okamoto of Toray Industries. Fun fact: he is also responsible for the more famous Alcantara®. Both materials were revolutionary for their time, and Ultrasuede’s expiration in 1990 led to affordable global imitations. Butter-soft, cozy, and more durable than genuine suede, it was the perfect choice not just for the ear-pads but also for the lining of the headstrap.

The headstrap itself is wide, well-cushioned, and wrapped with PU leather. Height is adjusted with a stepless sliding mechanism, whose design is intended for the headstrap to rest on your head rather than be tensioned. Adjustments are best made while wearing the headphones, then gently lifting them to relieve any strain. If you aren’t doing any hardcore headbanging, they stay put.

Takano used precision measurement instruments to ensure equal pressure on top of the head and the side of the face, a claim I can confirm firsthand! This obsession with pressure distribution is also evident in the design of the headphones: the curvature and angled placement of the center-piece. This extends to the yoke’s 90˚ horizontal articulation, which adapts to all heads while gently discouraging careless handling, and the ear-cups, which have sufficient tilt.

Known for its strong emphasis on subjective experience, Yamaha didn’t disappoint. No corner was overlooked, resulting in a headphone that ranks among the best of the best when it comes to comfort. It would’ve been a tragedy not to take full advantage of its weight!

Sound

The YH-5000SE is an anomaly. After six months, I still can’t define it. I don’t know what this headphone is. That’s about the craziest thing I ever said in my career! It’s a shapeshifting alien that defies conventional tuning, completely. One alteration in the chain can make its sound jump from one polar end to the other. The market’s reception has mirrored its multifaceted nature: some swear by its unmatched brilliance, hailing it as the best headphone they’ve ever experienced, while others dismiss it as fatally flawed. These divided opinions reveal the crux of the misunderstanding: thinking that this headphone has a fixed sound profile. Other headphones maintain a recognizable character across different systems. Yes, changes in the chain can alter it to a degree, but the core sound always remains present. Prepare for a humble wake-up call with the YH-5000SE, because we’re not talking about a degree of change but a complete transformation. The level of variation in sound you think is possible is nothing compared to the swings between extremes of this headphone. It’s a question how many are even aware of its volatility, and that’s concerning. There’s a good chance that those who hated its sound had it in a system that simply did not work in its favor. Before you rule me out as a shill, I kindly ask you to give me the benefit of the doubt. I am not dismissing people’s reception of these, positive, negative, or anything in between. My goal is to reach a universal understanding, and hopefully allow more people to enjoy these headphones. Look, I’ve experienced both versions of this headphone; the one people like and the one people dislike.

Yamaha presented us with a headphone so radically different that it was getting labeled a mistake. A specimen that the market couldn’t identify at the time of its release. The unwritten industry rules state that a headphone, as a consumer product, should be predictable, consistent, and easily digestible for the mass market—the YH-5000SE is a middle finger to each one. It’s more accurate to say it was designed to have its own sound than to say it was designed to defy convention. Let’s address the elephant in the room, the Harman target. Honestly, it frustrates me to see that we as a community allowed the industry to reach a state where any headphone that doesn’t conform to the Harman target gets misconceived as flawed. Please don’t get me wrong, I understand its place as an industry standard, but what’s up with crucifying sound profiles that aim for something else? The idea of all headphones aiming for the same sound has always been profoundly depressing to me. I wonder how many people even understand what the Harman Target is and how it was created. But we’re past the questioning phase, we’ve reached a point of no return. The comments I’ve seen made toward Yamaha and YH-5000SE can only be described as abominable. They ranged from shameless insults to claiming inexperienced engineers created the tuning. To entertain such a theory is to ignore logic entirely—asinine in its disregard of the country these headphones are from, the factory they are made in, and the company that makes them. Please don’t take that out of context! This is a flagship “Made in Japan” headphone from Yamaha, marking the company’s return to a technology it abandoned 33 years ago. It comes from the same Yamaha that handled the acoustic design of a car engine. Remember Lexus LFA’s 1LR-GUE engine I mentioned earlier? That engine is regarded as one of the best-sounding engines of all time, and Yamaha is behind its sound.

So, where does the fallacy that the YH-5000SE is a bad-sounding headphone stem from? Measurements, for the most part. Instead of attacking people and controversial figures responsible for real damage to our industry, I will attack the limitations of headphone measurements. Let’s narrow it down to frequency response graphs. What does a headphone frequency response even tell you? Its sound, right? Not quite. Over the years, we have been fed with educational content about learning how to read such measurement graphs, yet these guides conveniently omit to acknowledge that the measurements are made using professional-grade equipment. The truth is, industry headphone measurements are fundamentally limited by their reliance on what’s essentially idealized laboratory equipment. How many reviewers or measurement databases have their measurement system analysis published? Lack of transparency aside, an offense of even greater severity is to present these frequency response graphs as a de facto representation of what a headphone sounds like. For one, without the measurement rig disclosed, consumers can’t accurately extrapolate these measurements to their own use cases. For two, even if disclosed, this data would only allow for objective comparisons between headphones when isolated from gear variables (assuming the measurement system remains controlled). For three, no consumer equipment matches the performance of the industry-grade equipment used during the measurements. Does this render all headphone frequency response graphs useless to the consumer? Useless would be a harsh term to use, but let’s say their validity relies on the consumers’ blind assumption that gear variations won’t cause the headphone’s performance to deviate far from the measured one. Last I checked, the absence of assumption was a violation of foundational scientific principles. If we’re going to talk about science, at least make sure it’s actual science.

We are at a time where listening is done with eyes instead of ears. The worst of all is that this was normalized by people who display severe signs of the Danning-Kruger effect, followed by confirmation bias and backfire effect. Pseudoscientists who present themselves as objectivists. Preaching flawed and limited representation of data as gospel while burying the caveats. It’s toxic and it fuels this absurd war in our industry. The only way we as an industry can move forward is if we unite as a community, understand the limitations and flaws of subjective experience, and do the same for measurements. We don’t need to complicate things so much, we just have to remain open-minded and recognize things for what they are. I think measurements should start coming with disclaimers. It’s standard practice for reviews, so I don’t see a reason why it hasn’t been standardized for measurement data. A map without a scale and a legend can neither be trusted for its accuracy nor relied upon for navigation.

I apologize for opening Pandora’s box, but some things had to be addressed. I care way too much about this industry to let this negligence slide. It’s an important topic, and it shouldn’t be a taboo.

The Setup​

YH-5000SE w/leather ear-pads & stock 4.4mm balanced cable
Amplifier: Yamaha HA-L7A
Power Cable: VIABLUE X-60
Interconnect Cable: VIABLUE NF-S1 T6 RCA
Interconnect Adaptor Cable: custom order by SOMMER CABLE
Feet: VIABLUE TRI Spikes
Sources: iBasso DX320MAX Ti (referred to as the first option), iBasso DX340 (referred to as the second option)

Lows

Despite having such an open physical design, the YH-5000SE stands its ground and delivers a remarkable bass performance. I’m particularly impressed with its reproduction of acoustic instruments. They have that authentic acoustic quality to them. I’ve referred to this as “sound texture” in the past, and it’s something indicative of TOTL performance. This is that extra dimension of sound that one seeks to experience that last 1% that audiophiles chase. Honestly, I was blown away by hearing the slightest changes in air pressure picked up by the microphone. The kind of nuance that tingles your ears. A finger sliding on a string, the decay of harmonic overtones, shuffling in the background, these types of things. The overall ambiance is carried over, the movement. It’s more so feeling this nuance than hearing it, and it captures that lifelike quality of sound. Revisiting tracks that you’ve been listening to your whole life only to discover a newfound depth in them is quite the experience, to say the least.

It’s impossible not to attribute this performance to the Orthodynamic driver design. Put on a track with intense transitions and it will show you how smooth it is, or put on some aggressive fast-paced drums and it will show you its agility. Sudden, explosive bass attacks? That’s YH-5000SE’s home territory. It’s a dynamics monster. Digital instruments are light work for this headphone. It’s the acoustic instruments that put it to the test. I am a fanatic for stringed acoustic instruments. A fundamental part of their timbre lies in the lower frequency range, so for a headphone to capture their complete complexity, it must reproduce those nuances in the lows. Yamaha’s know-how shows, as this is the most natural strings ever sounded through headphones. Hearing the sinewy, fibrous texture of strings is to die for! I also listen to a lot of percussion-heavy genres like rock, alternative rock, metal, and post-metal. In some drumming is more intense than others, but for the most part, it’s present throughout the whole track. I was amazed by YH-5000SE’s ability to produce intense drumming with such definition and speed. This is the second time that the drum’s physical tension of the drumhead is audibly replicated through a headphone. It’s this physical characteristic of instruments that fascinates me the most, even though the speed is the highlight.

Neither the sub-bass nor the mid-bass are heavily pushed forward. However, both can reach an impressive level of intensity. I stumbled upon some people saying that the YH-5000SE is lacking in sub-bass, but having listened to multiple cinema-featured movie OSTs myself, I’m confused by this claim. There was one track for which I wrote a note that read “scared the living crap out of me”, and I listened to this track three times in one day—each time the track scared the living crap out of me. It’s convincing, that’s the thing about it. When it comes to sub-bass, it’s full, it’s dense, it rumbles. As expected, mid-bassexcels in technicalities. From my judgment, bass as a whole is far from being lacking, but it also doesn’t reach a point where it’s overwhelming.

When changing out the source, I noticed a notable difference in the transient speed and bass definition. Transient speed can range from softer, analog-like to analytical. Bass definition is very similar, it ranges from less defined and softer to more defined and sharper. Since the definition also affects the perceived size, the former sounds bigger, and the latter sounds smaller but more precise.

Mids

My experience with the YH-5000SE out of the box was a little scary. Playing some instrumental tracks was enough to make me fall in love with it, as they sounded really good, but as soon as I put on some vocal tracks, I realized there was a problem. They were too hot and peaky, just as some described the mids to be. Well, that motivated me to start pairing it with different gear. First DAP, second DAP, an amplifier, another amplifier, and another amplifier—same. The tuning fork company messing up the tuning? Impossible! That couldn’t be this headphone’s true sound, and I refused to accept it as such. I put it aside and started thinking about how I could make the most of the gear I had with me. The only remaining option was to use my DAPs as sources with the Yamaha HA-L7A headphone amplifier. The problem? I neither had an adaptor to use my existing RCA interconnect cables nor a proprietary 3.5 mm>RCA interconnect cable that I could directly plug into the DAPs. Since I wanted to use my RCA cables, I searched for an adaptor. Well, as it turns out, I would’ve been better off finding blinker fluid, because there wasn’t a single high-end option available. So, I reached out to a leader in the professional audio cabling sector, SOMMER CABLE. The French mastermind behind their cables, Miguet Pascal, lent me a patient ear and generously crafted a custom adaptor cable for me. When it finally arrived, I immediately connected my DAP to the amplifier and started listening. Mind you, I haven’t listened to the headphones in the meanwhile, so there was no brain burn-in at play, and especially no physical break-in of the driver. I immediately noticed a difference, but to make sure what I was hearing was indeed true, I listened to my previous pairings. The YH-5000SE retained its original character but got rid of the sharpness that was so problematic at first. I thought that’s the most I’d extract out of this headphone—until I connected my second DAP. I kid you not, I was utterly flabbergasted. It turned it into a completely different headphone.

The mids can range from really open, airy to congested, and dense. As far as vocals are concerned, on one DAP they’re more distant and hollow, while on the other, they’re forward and very natural. The difference in tonality is drastic! With that second DAP, I was also able to almost fully eliminate the peaks that scared so many off. To get the slightest hint of these peaks to come through, I had to push the volume some 30%–40% past my usual listening level. And even in that case, all these peaks were barely more forward “s”, “t”, and “sh” sounds in vocals. They were nowhere near sibilance, brilliance, or piercing levels. I just wanted to clear that up. With the first DAP, at normal listening levels, peaks can come through in some vocals. They aren’t as subtle as on the other DAP, but they’re also not hot. When I wanted to listen to vocal-focused music, I used the second DAP.

I had the choice of enjoying a more familiar mids presentation or going for a very unique mids presentation. That authentic character that you can extract from it makes for a one-of-a-kind listening experience, and it’s the sound I prefer for instruments. But what about you? If you are only used to one sound profile, your ears will naturally be opposed to anything very different. YH-5000SE’s unique sound profile is an acquired taste. To appreciate it, you must be open to new flavors. I don’t have the problem of enjoying vastly different-sounding headphones, and that’s because I try to explore sound and find joy in it. That’s not to say that I force finding joy. That would be something different, something I consider dishonest.

No headphones in my collection can replace the YH-5000SE, so I know Yamaha was successful in creating a flagship that has its own, original sound.

Highs

Treble is the reason I’ve become inseparable from these headphones. Many already repeated the same words, “This is the most resolving headphone I’ve ever listened to,” and I joined them. At its core, it’s bright. It’s a trait that persisted across all my pairings. I am not saying that it can’t sound warm, but that I didn’t attain that quality in any of my setups. Not having any tubes on me might partially explain that. Regardless, I am a treblehead, so it fits my preference anyway. Being one, I can only describe the treble response as heavenly. It has a crystal-clear quality and is consistent across every track. No, it does not cut through the mix. Snares, hi-hats, cymbals, guitars, violins, you name it, it all comes to life thanks to the extended highs. You can hear the snappy and explosive speed of the driver in elements like snares and cymbals. Despite such rich treble quantity, its level of control is commendable. I failed to push it over into glare land, even at extremes.

Of the three frequency ranges, treble is dearest to my heart. Conversely, my ears are hypersensitive to high frequencies, making me brutally intolerable of poorly tuned treble. You’d think this would drive me toward warm signatures, but no. Treble is my perverse pleasure. I long for sparkle that tingles my ears, for notes that send shivers down my spine. That’s the itch I need scratched to emotionally bond with sound. Without it, music feels like a conversation through glass.

The treble level can range from sparkle to shimmer. Shimmer is the first tier below sparkle, so there isn’t much you’re missing out on. One is analytical and the other is less analytical. For treble lovers like myself, it’s a win-win situation.

Soundstage, Imaging, and Separation

A driver baffle as large as YH-5000SE’s is a luxury many can only dream of, but square footage alone doesn’t guarantee a grand soundstage. That depends on how effectively all that acoustic real estate is utilized. After tonality, spatial presentation is the most affected by gear changes. The soundstage can range from exceptionally open and airy to very intimate and dense. In the first configuration, it’s spacious and large in a very natural way; it reaches a colossal width without that artificial quality that some headphones suffer from. Imaging remains accurate, but interestingly, it’s more distinct on the second DAP, especially when it comes to vertical positioning. The same extends to separation, where it’s also noticeably clearer on the second DAP.

It comes down to what sound you’re after: airy and open or cinematic and immersive.

Conclusion

Yamaha dared to dream—something that’s become vanishingly rare in our industry. It knowingly decided not to go for the most preferred sound profile, even though it would’ve been the most logical thing to do from a business perspective. Authenticity was prioritized over mainstream appeal because that wasn’t its target audience to begin with. Did anyone seriously think that Yamaha, an industry veteran, would make its return just to give us some generic sugar? Sure, it would’ve pleased everyone’s taste buds, but that wasn’t and isn’t its style. Instead, a very dedicated team of people worked together to create a complex flavor. Not for rebellion’s sake, but to prove sound could mean something again.

This flavor, however, isn’t something you taste effortlessly. Yes, you can taste it by itself, but is that what you are going to base your opinion on? Can you even say you tasted it when it gets so drastically altered by the utensils you eat it with, what you pair it with, and even what you eat it out of? It’s no living being, so it sees no price tag. You can eat it with a 24K gold spoon, it holds no meaning. As far as I’m concerned, it could have the richest flavor when eaten off a cotton shirt! That will either humble you or expose your elitism. The journey to understand this flavor’s complexity is arduous, requiring patience, curiosity, and a willingness to keep experimenting without giving up. If you want to get it to match your preference, you better get to cooking. You are the chef!

YH-5000SE’s sound variability is its philosophy, it’s at the core of what makes it so special. To assume otherwise is to misunderstand the essence of expression. The same applies to its unique tuning. I see it as an instrument in the purest sense: you can play it, and sound will come out, but that doesn’t mean you played it. It comes with no manual or instructions on how to play it correctly. We don’t have Isawa Shūji to teach us the instrument’s language, so we have to figure it out on our own. Imagine if the public labeled the organ as a bad instrument based on Torakusu’s un-tuned version. Here, you are the tuner. This headphone punishes plug-and-play expectations. You might strike luck on your first pairing and achieve what I did, but that’s not the point. The moment you accept its sound variability as an inherent quality is the starting point of understanding this headphone. From that point onward, it’s all about how badly you want to hear it.

I recommend everyone to give this headphone a listen. Ideally in the comfort of your home, but at the very least in a quiet, isolated environment. If you don’t hear what you’re looking for, document your entire chain, and try again. Keep tweaking until it sings. There’s no embarrassment in discovering it sounds better on a cheaper chain. At the end of the day, I understand that some of you don’t have the patience nor can justify doing all this work for a flagship headphone. The only way to find out whether you like it is to experience it firsthand.

If you are already deep into this hobby and own a big collection of audio gear, or you have a habit of frequently switching it out, you’ll get to hear many YH-5000SEs. I got a taste of its greatness after hearing just two of its voices, and that’s just a glimpse into what this headphone is truly capable of. Each setup reveals another voice. How many are there? We don’t know. We’ll only get closer to mapping its complete range by experimenting relentlessly and sharing our observations.

Which YH-5000SE did you listen to?
Last edited:
HiFiDJ
HiFiDJ
Still loving every bit of these headphones!

They are my top-dog, my king, and frankly the only headphones that have offered me a high degree of musical satisfaction.

If you ever get a chance to try them with a Brise cable, I strongly encourage you to do so. It's a worthwhile experience.

Cheers to the yammy gang!! 🥂
  • Like
Reactions: voja

Comments

voja

1000+ Head-Fier
So excited for this Japanese
I know, right? Same here. Also, am generally excited to see Yamaha return. "Excited" is an understatement, because Yamaha stands for something different for me. These guys did it a long time ago in the headphone industry, and now they are making a genuine return and taking it seriously.
 

h2oglasses

Head-Fier
Very interested in the performance, however the pricing in $US is quite marked up,
it's says JPY498,000 in the Japanese site, which is equivalent to $3471 at the current rate. :(
 
Back
Top