Ourart Wine

General Information

Specifications
  • Driver Configuration: Beryllium & Titanium Composite Dynamic
  • Impedance: 32Ω
  • Frequency Response: 10hz-35khz

Latest reviews

cqtek

1000+ Head-Fier
Pros: Quality of the Low Zone.
- Design and construction.
- Comfortable, free and easy adjustment.
- Presentation and variety of tips.
Cons: Trebles not very extensive.
- Cable MMCX connectors must be cylindrical, of a specific size.
- Absence of transport bag/box.
Introduction

Again, I review another product of the always surprising brand Ourart. Its name is Wine and, as might be expected, its design does not leave anyone indifferent. These IEMs, honoring their name, evoke the typical drink of my country. Based on their colours, burgundy and black, a capsule has been designed, with a simple appearance, but which, standing up, simulates a bottle of wine.

As a transducer, a dynamic driver has been chosen, composed of beryllium and titanium, which has a wide frequency response. Although the external shape is very simple: two cylinders of different diameters joined together, their external coating has been treated to prevent scratching. This simplicity has nothing to do with the complexity of the interior that the wines hide, as they have been specially designed to offer maximum sound quality. Among other technologies, the Wine has the ability to readjust its sound depending on the volume, guaranteeing maximum fidelity.

Ourart Wine 01_resize.jpg Ourart Wine 02_resize.jpg

Specifications

  • Driver: Dinamic Driver Beryllium & Titanium Composite Dynamic
  • Frequency range: 10Hz - 35kHz
  • Sensitivity: 120dB
  • Impedance: 32Ω
  • Channel Difference: <±1dB
  • Distortion Ratio: < 0.5% Mean (Not 1KHZ) 126mV
  • Cable: 115cm, jack 3.5mm gold plated
  • Type of capsule connection: MMCX
Ourart Wine 03_resize.jpg Ourart Wine 04_resize.jpg


Packaging

The Wine box, as usual, is the same as that of its cousins, the earbuds Ti7 and ACG. Its dimensions are 100x100x75mm. On the back of the cardboard cover that surrounds the chest, is attached a label, with the full name of the model "Wine Tasting Music" (Wine for friends ...) and the rest of specifications, in Chinese.

After opening the box, you can see the capsules inside an oval mould, which protects them. The sensation is pure: it looks like two mini bottles of wine. After removing the upper mould, it can be found:

  • The MMCX cable.
  • A zip bag with two white tips tri-flange large size.
  • A zip bag with two white tri-flange tips small size.
  • A zip bag with three pairs of black tips, with red core, sizes SxMxL.
  • Two plastic rings for easy adjustment over the ear.
  • A large clothespin.

The warranty card is located in an inside pocket, located at the top of the box.
While the tip collection is adequate, there is no box or carrying bag, which I consider a negative point.
The presentation is very subtle and plays with the colors black and red, as well as with the arrangement of the capsules in the mold, to accentuate the idea of the model name.

Ourart Wine 05_resize.jpg Ourart Wine 06_resize.jpg

Construction and Design

The design, a priori, seems simple. But, in reality, Wine hides several details that take them away from that simplicity. The capsules are formed by two pieces, a black cylinder in the back, while the other piece, of burgundy color, are two cylinders of different diameter joined together, in a single body. The part with the largest diameter, 12mm, is attached to the rear cylinder and the part with the smallest diameter is the nozzle. It has horizontal grooves, its diameter is 5mm and its length 7mm. They may be too long for some tips and, depending on their inner diameter, the grooves will perform their stop function, or not. On the base of the nozzles there are engraved letters, with the name of the model "Wine Tasting Music". There is also a small hole.

On the rear black cylinder, on the flat outside, is the logo of the brand. And in the curved part there is a slightly larger hole of 6mm, where the MMCX connection is housed. This makes it difficult to replace the cable, because the connection is inside the hole. Thus, the connectors must be cylindrical and have a smaller diameter, otherwise the connection will not be possible.

It is clear that the capsule without cable imitates a bottle of wine.

The standard MMCX cable has the cylindrical sleeves of the connectors in glossy black. It also has an unpainted groove around it, which is at the edge of the junction with the capsule. The channel letters are white. The cable's protective sheath is flexible black plastic. It has a slight microphonic effect. The divider and the Jack connector sleeve are two somewhat oval cylinders of equal size. The connector is 3.5mm gold plated and there is a small plastic piece to adjust the cable under the chin.

Personally I don't like the cables covered in black rubber. I prefer braided. And I think it's not just personal, but a trend that benefits sound, avoids tangles, the memory effect and eliminates microphones.

Ourart Wine 07_resize.jpg Ourart Wine 08_resize.jpg

Adjustment and Ergonomics

The adjustment is quite simple, since the cylinders are not very large in diameter, they fit perfectly in the ears. Their long nozzles and their medium diameter, allow the use of multiple types of tips, making it easier to find the most suitable fit, with the best sound.

Its use can be with the cable down or, easily, can be used with the cable above the ears.

Its external micro roughness offers a very pleasant softness, any rubbing with the parts of our ears is never unpleasant or annoying.

Depending on the tips used, the level of insulation can vary: using tri-flange tips the soundproofing and immersion is remarkable.

Ourart Wine 09_resize.jpg Ourart Wine 10_resize.jpg

Sound

Profile

The profile of Ourart Wine is in moderate V, with enhancement in the lower mids and, above all, in the upper mids.

Ourart Wine.png

Bass

The low-zone enjoys a curious depth, although the sub-bass is not very pronounced, this range is executed with a very compact energy, which extends the notes in a very physical way. The hit is born in the mid-low and quickly spreads downward, to decay significantly deep. This remarkable virtue gives the lows a wide and descriptive path, which deserves detailed attention, for their particular enjoyment.

But as a whole, the low zone does not have a predominance over the rest of the zones, but it remains behind the high mids, since the incipient highs are perceived above. In spite of this, the mid-low hits hard, but without knocking, allowing each of its layers to be tasted before disappearing. Of course, all this generates that the level of detail of the bass is quite good, remarkably defined and stratified.

Ourart Wine 11_resize.jpg Ourart Wine 12_resize.jpg

Mids

The lower mid zone, coming from the emphasis of the mid-lows, continues to enjoy good presence. This gives the sound warmth, but I would not speak of darkness, because the upper mids prevents it. But it is true that the central zone is polarized, almost divided. Male voices have a body that dilutes as frequencies rise. This fact causes them to show themselves displaced to a second plane, without their clarity being penalized. However, the greater emphasis of the upper-mids, lengthens the notes of the voices more than desired. Female voices lengthen in the same way, but in a more natural way, as their range seems to have passed the gain valley.

Instrumentally speaking, the sensation is very similar, it is something that can be appreciated, for example, between male voices and guitars: each one belongs to a different side. This fact can be harmful, but nevertheless, in many occasions, it is beneficial, because it provides an extra clarity and a particular dual focus, which favors the protagonism of both.

As a whole, the mid zone has a warmer, more emotional part and a more energetic, vibrant, dynamic, incisive and sometimes more aggressive part. A whole waste of complexity well resolved.

Ourart Wine 13_resize.jpg Ourart Wine 14_resize.jpg

Treble

The first highs are on the crest of the wave, as are the upper mids: it is the right side of the V, whose emphasis is greater. In this way, the incipient brightness is remarkable, but focused, like a small, crisp flash. Its incidence in the rest of the ranks is clearly perceived, sometimes for the better, sometimes causing an unnecessary hiss. On the good side, detail and definition benefit considerably from it. On the other hand, there is a rapid drop in gain, above 6kHz. This limits the extent, causing a feeling of shortness of breath, without leading to congestion. This sudden drop in the following highs can generate that perception of relative darkness, but I still think that this sensation is mild, compared to other really dark models in my collection.

Ourart Wine 15_resize.jpg Ourart Wine 16_resize.jpg

Soundstage, Separation

The scene has an average width, represented in a concave shape. There is more proximity at the ends, but greater stratification in the central part, propitiated by the generous depth of its sound. The relative remoteness of the voices also contributes to this sense of length in the mid-zone. The instrumental recreation is subordinated to this sensation, generating an orchestra director's vision, but in a not very big stage.

The separation is perceived very similar, the sound has good cohesion, sufficient clarity, but is limited in its amount of air. Thus, the notes do not enjoy a great distance, but are characterized by having a greater smoothness, which provides a more mellow and emotional character on the one hand, vivid and detailed on the other.

Ourart Wine 17_resize.jpg Ourart Wine 18_resize.jpg

Comparisons

Anew U1

The general profile of the Anew U1 is bassier than that of the Wine. But it is also in V, although the U1 incline their emphasis in the low zone, while the Wine, in the high mids.

The Anew have a low zone similar to that of the Wine, although they have a greater presence in general and the sub bass is deeper. The mid-low authority level is very similar in both, but the extension tends towards the Anew side. The rest of the characteristics of the low-zone maintain equality, at the level of detail, stratification and layers. I only find differences in the drier and more compact Anew hit.

In the mid zone the sonority is much more different. Warmth is more noticeable in the Anew, with a certain comparative veil. The means in the Wine are fresher and more vivid. The voices sound more complete in the Wine, with more body, more natural. In the Anew, sometimes a certain hollow is perceived in them. Thus, the voices, in general, have better realism, more closeness and are more vibrant in the Wine.

The upper mids and first highs of the Wine, have a clear presence over the U1. The cymbals are characterized by a more perfectly audible sound and are not as mitigated as in the U1. This range has more sparkle, color and better resolved complexity, sounding more natural. This feature brings more light and overall clarity, especially in dance genres and electronic themes. Anew feel comparatively duller, darker. Then, the trebles in the U1 have a point of greater extension.

At the level of detail, there are differences of appreciation. The level is similar, perhaps the Wine are more descriptive in general. But the Anew also enjoy good resolution, offering a more immersive sound, more extensive in both limits. In this way, the scene is seen wider in the Anew, more spherical. The separation is similar, but there is more air in the U1 and a darker background.

Ourart Wine vs Anew U1.png

1More Triple Driver

The 1More are a clear example of bassy, warm, high contained and dark IEMs. Despite this, their frequency response, up to 1500Hz, is very similar to that of the Wine. After that point is where the differences start. Wine's high mids have more emphasis, and that's something that totally polarizes their sound and profile.

Although the curve is quite similar in the low end, the execution of the bass is not equal, the definition, the detail, the depth and the color are better in the Wine. The 1More offer a more diffuse bass, less descriptive, thicker, with less stratification.

In the mid zone the difference is evident: the 1More offer an excessive warmth compared to the Wine, which turns into darkness. The voices, in the Triple Driver, are excessively nuanced, with a body too blunt and round, devoid of brightness and detail. Unlike the Wine, where they are presented with a more natural and dynamic sonority, they are more vivid and with better color. However, their presence in the 1More is closer.

The highs fall even earlier in the 1More, but their descent is not so great. So there is some more air, comparatively speaking. But the first highs are smoother than in the Wine.

The darkness, the lack of brightness, the containment in the highs, makes the scene and separation of the Triple Driver behind the Wine.

Ourart Wine vs 1More Triple Driver.png

Conclusion

The Ourart Wine are almost conceptual IEMs. From their design to their sound, they are based on the idea of wine: the capsules are two bottles, their colours are burgundy and black, their sound is almost red, but endowed with a certain ambivalence, warmth and sparkle, softness and energy, depth and dynamics. The wines are soft and emotional in the lower part, abrupt and incisive in the upper mid part. While their trebles have been contained to maintain the color of the concept. The presentation rounds off the idea and the ergonomics take advantage of it, offering great freedom in this aspect, so that everything flows as it should. The result is a glass of red wine from my country, which can be enjoyed without haste, at dusk on the long, warm days of this summer, which looks like it is going to be endless.

Ourart Wine 19_resize.jpg Ourart Wine 20_resize.jpg

Sources Used During the Analysis

  • Burson Audio Playmate
  • xDuoo X3II

Ratings

  • Construction and Design: 90
  • Adjustment/Ergonomics: 85
  • Accessories: 75
  • Bass: 80
  • Mids: 75
  • Treble: 70
  • Separation: 70
  • Soundstage: 70
  • Quality/Price: 75

Purchase link

https://penonaudio.com/ourart-wine.html

You can read the full review in Spanish here:

https://hiendportable.com/2019/07/07/ourart-wine-review/
  • Like
Reactions: HungryPanda

IryxBRO

500+ Head-Fier
Pros: great build and first impression, great fit, good bass
Cons: limited treble
Starting a series of reviews for Ourart brand with their most expensive IEMs — Wine. Heard a lot of positive feedback about other Ourart models of earphones, such as Ti7 and ACG, and the picture in my mind now is that this brand is one of the leaders in this segment. That makes it even more interesting to evaluate Ourart Wine IEMs and to see how good are those in comparison to various similar products from other brands in the same price brackets. Earphones are harder for me to review since I don’t have this much of experience and the sound is usually less revealing because of less tight fit but there would still be a review for ACG from me as well. Wine, which is more familiar by shape and sturcture, is the product to start with.

dsc1566.jpg


Ourart Wine technical specifications:
  • Drivers: dynamic beryllium & titanium composite driver
  • Frequency response: 10 — 35000HZ
  • Sound pressure: 120dB
  • Impedance: 32Ω
  • Total Harmonic Distortion: <0.5% Mean (Not 1KHZ) 126mV
  • Balance Degree: <±1dB
  • Cable Length: 115cm
  • Audio Jack: 3.5mm
  • Cable connection: MMCX (pin shell diameter is less than 6.05mm)
dsc1541.jpg


Packaging and design:

Ourart are masters of creating positive vibrations upon receiving their products. Traditionally, Wine comes in strict matt black square box and outer slipcover, both with the shiny metallic brand logo and name imprints.

dsc1542.jpg


Top box cover is foldable. Inner box compartment reveals neat packing: IEMs rest on a special soft podium with all the additional accessories underneath.

dsc1549.jpg


There was one more foamy insert in the top cover from inside to secure IEMs from falling out of its openings. Box walls are quite thick and the whole structure feels stiff and reliable.

Box contents:
  • Ourart Wine IEMs
  • audio cable
  • 2 pairs of two-flange eartips
  • 1 pair of memory foam eartips
  • 3 pairs of silicone eartips
  • plastic cable clip
  • a pair of removable silicone earguides
dsc1555.jpg


Unfortunately, no storage case was inside… But the choice of different types of eartips and presence of the additional earguides make Wine box contents stand out a bit from the crowd.

dsc1557.jpg


IEM shells are made of two parts of CNC-aluminum. Parts are almost equal in size, painted in black and crimson red. Top part (with the output nozzles) contains slogan imprint «Wine tasting music» and one compensational opening close to the output nozzle.

dsc1561.jpg


Nozzles form one piece with the body, reach quite far in length and covered with the aluminum grills. Several sockets on nozzle body help to retain eartips securely.

dsc1560.jpg


Base (black) parts have a couple of design elements: shiny beveled edges of the bottom cavity and brand logo imprint at the center there. One more compensational opening is located on the side of the base together with the MMCX ports.

dsc1559.jpg


Not sure what Ourart means by declaring smalled MMCX diameter but I was able to connect other MMCX cables like Penon Audio Custom with 2.5mm and 4.4mm balanced audio jacks. Both went in, fit the shell openings and clicked to place.

dsc1569.jpg


Stock audio cable consists of aluminum jack, Y-splitter and MMCX connector housings, have channel indication and 3.5mm SE gold-plated jack. The only concern goes to straight thin wire in silicone braid that tends to mess up more than thick twisted wires. Clever design from Ourart is that MMCX ports are recessed into the body of IEMs — this would hold better against side force and make the connections last longer.

Fit:

Fite-wise I would say that Wine IEMs are protruding quite par from the ear and feel a bit heavy due to the overall size and additional weight of aluminum MMCX connectors but, at the end, even the smallest silicone eartips do a good job for me concerning tight and secure fit. I never had any troubles wearing «Bullet» type shaped IEMs and Wine are not an exception. If the weight would bother you — try earguides that would support IEMs and remove the weight entirely.

dsc1597.jpg


Sound quality:

Tested with HiBy R6Pro DAP

Lows and midbass:

dsc1572.jpg


Lows in Wine are quite exposed and showing up in some big amounts. Texturing of bass is moderate but the reach of deep bass is surprisingly good. The amount of bass here forces to say that IEMs are tending to darker sound with warm timbre in overall. Using it with DAPs that emphasize bass even more is not welcomed. It is much better off to go with something very detailed, neutral or even a bit cold like Dethonray DTR1.

Midbass is totally ok, sounds natural and perfectly weighted. There are some minor influence of treble part in upper midbass portion that would sometimes place more accent on track leading rythm but not too much to sound distructing.

Mids and vocals:

dsc1582.jpg


Mids are standing in a line with bass, well-exposed and moderately detailed. Some difference in gain between the upper and lower mids does show up and making male voices a bit laid back and distant while female vocals are having very good expression and brought to front. Same goes to the instruments — strings and bows are more apparent and better resolved. Interesting that female voices don’t get too shouting at higher volume even with such scewness in tuning.

Treble:

dsc1589.jpg


Treble is quite laid back, especially the upper part. Lower treble is more or less balanced to the rest of the ranges. Such presentation is free of any piercing sounds but it also leads to less extended and transparent perception. The part of the treble that is perfectly audible is accurate and detailed while the tiny sounds roll off very fast and get shadowed by bass or mids. This also makes Wine sound warmer and darker.

Soundstage:

dsc1600.jpg


Soundstage perception is a bit contradictory here as the high volume of bass and some scewness in mids create and good feel of width and depth but what is missed out is the clarity and transparency of the sound that might have helped with the precise location of the instruments on stage. Little more gain on upper treble — and everything would be fine. Again, that is why Wine are better off with brighter sources.

Sound in overall:

Ourart Wine sound might be described as dark and warm with big bass presence, good bass depth, engaging midbass, moderately detailed mids with some extra expression on female vocals and laid back treble. Instrument separation and stage are moderate.

Compared to Rose Mini2 MKII:

dsc0013.jpg


Rose Mini2 MKII have quite different nature due to BA drivers. The resolution is higher in overall, instrument separation is better and the treble is more crisp and exposed. At the same time — less extension and presence of bass, less natural midbass… I would say that Rose is better for music with lots of instrumetns (like orchestra, rock, etc) whereas Wine are better for slow and mellow genres like blues.

Compared to Tanchjim Darkside:

dsc8707.jpg


Tanchjim Darkside also belong to dark sounding and bassy IEMs. If I were to choose from the two — Darkside have almost similar sound picture with less scewness in mids and less bass presencet. Wine are more comfortable in terms of fit, have deeper bass, more expression on vocals and less accent on treble.

Compared to TFZ No.3:

dsc9955.jpg


Another dynamic IEMs with warm timbre and tending to dark sound. Very comfortable in terms of fit, have better resolution and less scewness on mids. Treble is similarly limited in extension and clarity, plus less deep bass reach and volumetric feel. But in overall Wine and No.3 are very close to each other soundwise.

Conclusion:

dsc1591.jpg


Let’s say that Ourart Wine are interesting pair of IEMs, at least in the correspoding price segment when directly compared to its competitors. Fit, build quality, first impression, packaging design are great. In terms of sound — pros are the deep bass reach, engaging midbass and emotional vocals. Ourart could have worked more on the overall resolution and balance but the other contenders show quite similar results. Therefore, the goal is met and now there is another good option among the respected class rivals, especially for the bassheads or dark sound fans. The only advice is to combine with bright and resolving DAPs instead of warm sources or a mere smartphone.

Ourart Wine IEMs are available at PenonAudio store

audio123

Reviewer at audio123
Pros: Punchy Bass, Vibrant Midrange
Cons: Average Soundstage, Lack Treble Crisp
Introduction

Ourart is a Chinese company that specializes in in-ear monitors (IEMs) and earbuds. I would like to thank Ourart and Penon for the review unit of the Ourart Wine. At the moment, you can purchase the Ourart Wine from Penon .

photo_2018-09-14_23-37-52.jpg


Specifications

  • Driver Configuration: Beryllium & Titanium Composite Dynamic
  • Impedance: 32Ω
  • Frequency Response: 10hz-35khz
Unboxing & Accessories

The Wine comes in a black package with protective cover that sports the brand name and logo. After opening the package, there are the Wine, detachable MMCX cable, packs of tips, shirt clip and warranty card.

photo_2018-09-14_21-41-19.jpg


IEM Build & Design

The Wine has purple and black shells with vents at the top and below the nozzle. It has a circular shape. At the back of the iem, there is a black faceplate with the Ourart logo and silver outer edge. The nozzle is straight with mesh for earwax prevention. The iem is light weight and there is a comfortable fit.

photo_2018-09-14_21-55-09.jpg


photo_2018-09-14_21-55-09-2.jpg


photo_2018-09-14_21-55-10.jpg


Cable Build & Design

The cable uses MMCX connectors and on each connector, there is a L & R marking on the left and right respectively. The connectors have black housing with strain relief. There is no memory wire area section. There is chin slider and the y-splitter has a black housing. Lastly, the jack is straight 3.5mm gold plated with strain relief. The jack has a black housing.

photo_2018-09-14_21-53-04.jpg


Sound Analysis

Lows

The Wine has moderate sub-bass quantity with good extension. The sub-bass reproduction takes on an authoritative approach and impact is brought out well. The bass decay has moderate pace. The bass texture is rendered in a moderately smooth manner. The mid-bass has great quantity and the slam is delivered with density. Each bass note is articulated with a good punch.

Mids

The midrange takes on a smooth presentation. The lower mids has good amount of body and male vocals are presented well without any signs of hollow feeling. The upper mids has some forwardness and there is a slightly aggressive bite which adds character. The midrange is expressed rather fully with liveliness .

Highs

The treble has an average extension and the amount of air rendered is moderate. There is no sibilance and harshness. The Wine is able to showcase a smooth execution of its treble. There is little crisp and lack of sparkle. The treble body is good with a slightly dense feeling. The level of details retrieval is moderate.

Soundstage

The soundstage has a good natural expansion and the width magnitude is average. The depth is slightly closed in. There is some congestion when tackling busier tracks.

photo_2018-09-14_22-01-32.jpg


Comparisons

Ourart Wine vs Oriveti Basic

The Basic has more sub-bass quantity than the Wine and the extension on the Wine is slightly greater. The sub-bass reproduction is stronger on the Basic. The mid-bass on the Basic has additional amount and it gives a more weighted feeling. The Basic delivers a more impactful slam. The bass texture on the Wine is rendered with additional smoothness. Bass decay is quicker on the Wine. The midrange on the Wine has higher transparency level and it is more energetic while the Basic has additional body. The lower mids on the Basic has more quantity which makes male vocals sound thick. The upper mids on both has similar forwardness. Moving on to the treble section, the Wine has greater extension and there is an airier feeling. The treble on the Basic has extra body and the articulation on the Wine is more precise. There is lack of sparkle for both. The crisp is better on the Wine. In terms of soundstage, the expansion on both is rather natural and the Wine has a greater width magnitude. Depth on the Basic is more closed in.

Ourart Wine vs Mee Audio Pinnacle P2

The Wine has more sub-bass quantity than the P2 and the extension on the P2 has slightly more magnitude. The sub-bass reproduction on the Wine is fuller. The mid-bass on the Wine has slightly quantity than the P2. The Wine is able to deliver the slam with more impact. Bass texture on the Wine is rendered with additional smoothness. The bass decay on the P2 is quicker with agility. The midrange on the P2 is leaner than the Wine and it is expressed in a cleaner manner. The Wine has a fuller midrange which benefits vocals reproduction. The lower mids on the Wine has more body and male vocals are presented in a thicker manner. The upper mids on the P2 is more forward which contributes to the intimacy of female vocals. There is additional presence of energy on the P2. Next, in the treble section, the P2 has more extension and the Wine has additional body. The amount of air rendered on the P2 is greater. The P2 has more crisp and sparkle. For the soundstage, both expands naturally and the P2 has greater width. The depth on the Wine is more closed in.

Conclusion

The Wine is a fun sounding iem that is able to produce a lively bass performance, vibrant midrange with a slightly aggressive bite and smooth treble. It is able to captivate listeners with its engaging lows. In addition, it comes with a detachable MMCX cable. The Ourart Wine packs a punch.

photo_2018-09-14_22-06-15.jpg


For more reviews, visit https://audio123blog.wordpress.com/ .
  • Like
Reactions: HungryPanda

Comments

There are no comments to display.
Back
Top