General Information

SPECIFICATIONS
Brand: KZ
Model: ZAX
Drive Unit: 7BA+1DD
Compatible System: ANDROID/Windows/Phone iOS
Connectivity:Wired
Wear:Ear hook
Earphone type: In-Ear
Plug type: 3.5mm plug
Pin type : 0.75mm 2PIN
Sensitivity: 113dB/mW
Impedance: 24Ω
Frequency range: 10Hz-40kHz
Weight: 27±3g
Color: Silver/Black
Cable Length: 125±5cm
Detachable cable: Yes
Microphone: Optional

Latest reviews

iceperry

New Head-Fier
Pros: Soundstage, Crowd-pleasing timbre, Fit, Improved Treble
Cons: Overpowering bass, Cable, Bass resolution, Recessed Lower Mids
Intro

e65eb0_428a7147ea4840d487c5388ef5cadea8~mv2.webp

Disclaimer: This review set is a demo set graciously lent to me by Daniel at Oardio when I reached out to ask if I could try the ZAX out. This review is written of my own accord and all thoughts are my own. For more reviews like this, check out our website www.perrivanaudio.com

Accessories and Build Quality (Score: 7/10)

e65eb0_cb8060158a5040d7b64961fb6987e717~mv2.webp


Build Quality is an improvement, albeit a subtle one. Aesthetics is also improved a little, and while the KZ ZAX comes in another Blue/Silver colourway, I very much prefer the all-black one. It still preserves the look of KZ IEMs, but I really dig the black matte aluminium faceplate and the understated vented design. As can be seen from the meshes, the ZAX is quite vented and isolates noticeably poorer than your typical KZ IEM so take note if you were considering using this as a musician.

e65eb0_6056783afb1d41c686bb2b9f327d4721~mv2.webp


The included cable is a small step up from the ones included on their lower-end models. KZ states that the cable is made from silver-plated, high purity, oxygen-free copper with 4 strands of 25-core wires. However, the build of the cable is similar to the infamous brown one and is prone to tangle. However, it seems to hold up well and aren't too fragile.

Fit (Score: 8/10)

e65eb0_a71005b4d0f9489d88d40020244c3fe7~mv2.webp


I must say I was pleasantly surprised with the fit. It has improved curves that sit more snugly in the aural cavities than other KZ IEMs I've tried such as the EDX and ZS10 Pro. I had no issues using these while moving around and didn't need to constantly adjust them.

Sound (Score: 8.0/10)

e65eb0_92104f113ecf4f1db7155f5a0465a3cc~mv2.webp

Frequency Response of the ZAX

Sources Used
  • Hiby R5
  • Lotoo Paw S1
Albums and Tracks tested with
  • Gryffin - Gravity
  • Ragtime Broadway Musical
  • BORNS - Dopamine
  • Spinners - Essentials
  • Queen Great Pretender
  • Itzhak Perlman Carmen Fantasy
  • Taylor Swift - All Too Well
  • Martin Frost - Mozart’s Clarinet Concerto in A
Bass (Score: 7.5/10)

What's a KZ earphone without its bass, right? Staying true to their house sound, or some may call it "speciality", the ZAX's bass response is full of oomph and takes centerstage whenever the song calls for it. There is decent nice sub-bass extension on the ZAX and less of the mid-bass bloat that plagues many KZ IEMs. I really enjoyed the resolution of the sub-bass listening to Spinners' "Cupid/I've Loved You for a Long Time". However, I would say that the Achilles heel of the bass is that the speed and resolution of the midbass can still be improved. The snare drums on the Spinners' album seemed to be lacking in punch and attack. Personally, the quantity of bass is still too much, and the bassline is a little too forward at times, though some may appreciate this tuning better.

Mids (Score: 8/10)

Mids have a much better timbre in the ZAX as compared to the typical KZ house sound. They are still a little recessed and laid back as expected of the V-shape sound signature. I would have wished that the ZAX cut back a bit on the bass to give the lower mids and male vocals a little more room to shine.

Listening to female vocals on Taylor Swift tracks, they avoid sounding sibilant or overly bright. It is a little more laid back and remains authoritative but doesn't come across as overly aggressive.

Treble (Score: 8.5/10)

On Itzhak Perlman's performance of Carmen Fantasy, highs were quite present but remained stable and never out of control. Instruments on the lower treble like violins and upper woodwinds had very nice air and timbre to them. The upwards extension of the treble gave a very nice sense of space. Detail retrieval and layering impressed, and I could only wish I could say the same for the bass.

Overall

The ZAX has a very pleasing tuning and timbre. However, the slow and overpowering bass is the only thing I can really fault it for, especially for its price point. It has enjoyable imaging and soundstage, probably owing to its vented design. This certainly has its place in the KZ lineup, and that is saying a lot given their far-from-consistent track record.

Conclusion

e65eb0_99d791d2f3494935a8705884d92ee805~mv2.webp


Quite recently, I said the ZS10 Pro was the best KZ I had heard to date and had the best bang for the buck. The ZAX potentially shakes things up, giving more for a small increase in price tag. It has proven itself to be a very relevant update. Small improvements like the better fit, cable and aesthetics also go a long way.

There are still many things I find hard to love and can be improved upon. However, I cannot deny that the ZAX has managed to pleasantly surprise me and I managed to enjoy multiple genres on these earphones.
iceperry
iceperry
@CT007 I'd say it was best among those I've tried! I've tried the ZSN Pro, EDX, ASX. But now I would definitely pick the ZAX over the ZS10 Pro between the two.
  • Like
Reactions: CT007
Plumbus the Wise
Plumbus the Wise
What KZ's do you prefer over the ZAX and why? (I would assume more controlled lower bass)
iceperry
iceperry
@Dr Rez I only have tried a few KZs and so far ZAX would be my personal favourite, even over the ZA10 Pro. Admittedly they still have an overpowering bass, but I quite like the imaging and overall tonality of these. They are quite pleasant for listening to Vocals and Classical music

B9Scrambler

Headphoneus Supremus
KZ ZAX: 8 Drivers For Under 100 Bucks?!
Pros: Awesome new cable – Class leading build quality – Impressive detail and clarity
Cons: Open back is a detriment; loose bass, lowered isolation, no improvements to sound stage
Greetings!

Today we're checking out one of KZ's newest releases, the ZAX.

Knowledge Zenith, the mother of all budget brands, has been slowly but steadily moving themselves upscale ever since the release of their first hybrid, the ZST. The ZAX is part of their newest crop of X-branded releases and has some pretty eye-watering specs that we could never have imagined being present in a sub-100 earphone just a few short years ago. Silver-plated, braided, removable 2-pin cable, 8 driver hybrid setup with a dual-magnet dynamic, open back, and a high quality, low profile, metal and acrylic build. It all looks very, very impressive, at least to someone that has been reviewing products for the better part of a decade. Newbies to the hobby have it good right now, jumping in at a time where the vast majority of releases are quite competent and generally quite affordable.

While the ZAX certainly looks good and impresses on paper, does it hold up in the real world as a daily driver? Yes, yes it does. Let's take a closer look, shall we?

P1080261.JPGP1080257.JPGP1080262.JPG

What I Hear There is a sense of familiarity to the ZAX, though enough change from the typical KZ formula is present to make it a worthy entry. More refined drivers and a more prominent midrange work wonders.

Bass is a little loose and bloomy, suggesting the driver was not intended to be used with an open back design. Still sounds good, just not as tight as it could. Extension is quite impressive giving the low end plenty of visceral feedback. A midbass hump is noticeable and provides plenty of slam on drops. Texture is smooth but doesn't filter out detail and information enough to be a detriment. The dual magnet driver is also reasonably quick and able to handle rapid transitions fairly well. Unfortunately the looseness present hinders performance leading to mild congestion on particularly busy bass lines.

The midrange of the ZAX is more forward than on prior KZ hybrids giving vocals plenty of presence amid the heavy bass. I found tonality and timbre to be another step in the right direction for the brand. Still a hint bright, but nothing I found particularly distracting. Sibilance is also kept in check, unlike another recent release that ended up bring quite the disappointment, the ZSN Pro X. Where the ZAX really steps up here is in terms of detail which is quite plentiful. This is one of those uncommon earphones that can be both traditionally entertaining (big bass, bright treble), while offering up analytic qualities that can satisfy those looking to analyze lyrics and fine details while they listen.

Treble out of the ZAX is boosted with a presence region bias. This helps drive the detail forward presentation of the ZAX while giving cymbals, chimes, etc. a pleasant amount of shimmer. I haven't been finding it as overbearing and fatiguing as some other recent releases from competing brands, such as the Blon BL-05 or FiiO FH1s. Notes attack and decay quickly with a clean, tight presentation leaving the ZAX in good standing once tracks get particularly busy and congested. King Crimson's “Starless and Bible Black” is reproduced wonderfully out of the thing.

I had high hopes for the ZAX's sound stage, so colour me disappointed when the open back design didn't deliver. Instead of a wide open, deep stage, it sounds quite normal. Sounds are tossed effectively enough into the distance and I'm reasonably well immersed into whatever I'm listening to, or the game I'm playing, I was just hoping for more. Instead, the open back design only seems to produce negatives like the aforementioned loose bass, as well as reduced isolation. On the plus side, imaging is pretty good with nuanced channel-to-channel movement that is competitive with others in the price range. Instrument layering and separation is also a plus, though the wily low end does hinder things somewhat when heavy bass is present.

Overall I quite like the ZAX and find it to be one of KZ's better, more interesting releases of late. If the low end was tighter and the open back design provided some benefit, it would be more impressive.

KZ ZAX.jpgKZ ZAX & Friends.jpg

Compared To A Peer (volumes matched with Dayton iMM-6)

Shozy Form 1.1 (74.99 USD): Both earphones are plenty bassy with a mid-bass focus, though less so on the 1.1. Shozy's entry sounds a bit more linear when moving from sub to mid and upper bass regions. The ZAX provides more texture and a more visceral experience, but lacks the control of the 1.1. As a result it doesn't handle rapid bass notes as well. The ZAX's mids are more forward with a leaner, cooler presentation to them. Detail goes to the ZAX, but the 1.1 is more natural with a more accurate timbre, though the ZAX is still quite decent, especially compared to older KZ hybrids. Treble on both is quite energetic with the Form 1.1 having a more even presentation with no real bias towards brilliance or presence regions. The ZAX on the other hand is similarly emphasized in the lower treble, with less energy up top. The Form 1.1 provides just as much detail and even more air between notes, despite running with a much less exciting 1+1 hybrid setup. When it comes to sound stage, the Form 1.1 sounds wider with a similar depth. Imaging quality on the 1.1 is more accurate while the ZAX offers more competent layering and separation qualities. Overall, I prefer the Form 1.1, but not by a huge margin.

BGVP DMS (159.00 USD): Bass has a similarly boosted, smooth, feel. DMS is a bit less midbassy. You also get less texture and impact/visceral feedback from the DMS. KZ is less well controlled. DMS' midrange is more recessed, though this does help give the presentation a better impression of space. At the same time it sounds less natural and there is a slight hollowness that isn't heard in the KZ. The ZAX is more detailed too. Treble out of the KZ is a bit more aggressive and forward with additional energy in the brilliance region. It sounds more complete, but is also more fatiguing. The ZAX also improves upon the DMS in terms of overall detail and texturing in the treble as well. Sound stage is clearly in the DMS' camp feeling notably wider and mildly deeper. Imaging, layering, and separation qualities are all similarly good, though I'll give the ZAX the edge. Overall I much prefer the ZAX which can basically replace the DMS for me in more aspects. The nice sound stage is about all I'll miss from the DMS.

IMGP5016.JPGIMGP5023.JPGP1080256.JPG

In The Ear The ZAX uses the same high quality acrylic shell as a number of recent KZ models and as such feels like a more upscale device than the low price tag (for the number of drivers + feature set) would suggest. The new face plate design, which is very much open as you can see when holding the ZAX up to the light, is still metal and both looks and feels excellent in the hand. I still think KZ makes some of the nicest built earphones on the market, particularly in the budget realms. Further adding to the quality construction is the protruding 2-pin setup which is secured in place internally via compact screws, as visible through the clear acrylic body. Also visible through the shells is the plethora of drivers KZ somehow managed to cram into a shell originally designed for a simple 1+1 hybrid setup. 6 tiny armatures surround a 10mm dynamic with one more nestled comfortably within the nozzle. Equally minuscule channels are visible guiding sound from each armature to where sound can be experienced by the listener. I have a feeling they stuck with a familiar shell and selected clear acrylic to avoid a repeat of the “fake driver” fiasco that occurred when an original ZS5 was, uh....“carefully” dissected by a salty Youtuber.

Moving onto the cable, we see the same excellent upgraded offering that comes with the ZSN Pro X and ZST X. The sheath is thicker, more plush, and less prone to tangling above the y-split than past cables included by the brand. The silver-plated wiring within has a nice sheen to it too. It looks and feels quite nice. The hardware falls into the “same old, same old” category though. The VSonic inspired y-split and jack carry over from the ZSN Pro, as do the excellent preformed ear guides. Overall a great stock cable and worthy of the ZAX.

Comfort is outstanding. This earpiece has been a staple for a few different brands with mild tweaks being made to the nozzle angle and quality of the plastics. As with other KZ models that use it, like the ZSN, ZSN Pro X, ZST, ZS10 Pro, etc. , it fits perfectly with little to no effort required to get and maintain a good seal. The preformed guides hold the cable securely around the ear resulting in an earphone that is stable under pretty extreme movement. If you have teensy ears or they're a particularly odd shape you might have issues with fit and comfort, but I expect basically everyone else to find these a pleasant product to wear.

Isolation is pretty poor, and for that we can blame the open back design. With music playing, I can still hear happenings around me. Taking the ZAX out for my nightly stroll results in the sound of cars passing by cutting through pretty clearly. You can compensate with MOAR VOLUME!!! and somewhat with foam tips, but even so, these are best used indoors or somewhat calm areas. On the plus side, they don't bleed much sound out, so the leakage issues seem to be one-way only.
IMGP5005.JPGIMGP5007.JPGIMGP5010.JPG

In The Box The ZAX arrives in the same compact, slightly more upscale packaging as the AS06. A glossy KZ logo can be found on the lid while the left panel contains a couple stickers with model info and contact information for KZ. The lid is still weighted with a dense cardboard plate containing the following slogan that I love; “Don't forget. The original intention is to use headphones to enjoy music.” KZ kept the cool metal plaque they included with the AS10 and BA10, though now it is tailored to the ZAX. While it doesn't add any real value to the package, it does serve to elevate the earphones that utilize this packaging style as the most premium of products in KZ's dense catalogue.

Lifting out the foam insert the ZAX's earpieces are nestled into, I noticed that the earpieces were situated left on the left, right on the right, with small cutouts in the cardboard insert below to make room for the nozzles with medium tips installed. Past versions of this packaging had the left earpiece on the right, right on the left, which is more visually appealing in my humble opinion, and didn't require additional cutouts to accommodate the nozzles. But alas, some of KZ's stronger skeptics took the previous design to mean they didn't know left from right. It seems KZ gave in to please the heathens. Beneath the foam insert you find the accessories beneath. In all you get:
  • ZAX earphones
  • 0.75mm 2-pin cable
  • Single flange silicone ear tips (s/m/l)
  • Instruction manual
  • Warranty card
This is the same accessory kit KZ has been including with their products since they started integrating removable cables into their designs. While I think this is fine, if not only because their 'Starline' tips are some of the best in the business (in my opinion), I get why some are getting tired of a lack of extras, such as a simple carrying case. They're not expensive and would add to the already great value. No matter how you look at it, this is a nice unboxing experience with a fairly barren accessory kit that provides only what you need to get going and little else beyond that.

Final Thoughts While Knowledge Zenith seems to have moved away from the unpredictable and creative nature that I fell in love with in their pre-ZST days, those qualities have been replaced with consistency and quality. The ZAX doesn't really bring much new to the table in terms of general tuning. It again just iterates and improves upon past hybrid offerings with more refined, capable drivers, and greatly improved detail and clarity. Unfortunately, the decision to go open back has not really benefited the ZAX at all, leaving the low end feeling loose and slightly uncontrolled. This is particularly unfortunate given the stellar low end performance of the much more affordable EDX and ZST X models. That looseness, and an averagely sized but still competent sound stage are about my only complaints surrounding the sound. The amount of detail and impressive clarity on offer makes up for it, as does the pushed up midrange which is a refreshing alteration to what is otherwise a fairly typical KZ sound.

The outstanding build quality of the ZAX continues KZ's tradition of shaming the competition. High quality plastics, nicely formed metal face plates, clean internal construction. It's all there, and it looks great. It fits beautifully too, nestling snugly into the ear with a level of stability I have come to expect from earphones using this style of shell. The new cable is also a plus thanks to a noticeable bump in thickness, along with a softer, more plush and tangle resistant sheath. The only thing missing is a new accessory kit. You still only get a basic tip set and the cable. No carrying case or other frills. I'm looking forward to the day when KZ goes all out with the included extras.

Overall, I quite like what KZ has done here. I've been getting tired of their same-old same-old hybrid releases that just rehash the same thing time and time again. While there are elements of this in the ZAX, enough is new and different for it to be refreshing to an old fan of the brand. KZ is back on my radar.

Thanks for reading!

- B9

Disclaimer Thanks to OPA Audio Store for reaching out and offering a sample of the ZAX for review. The thoughts within this review are my own subjective opinions based on time spent listening to the ZAX. They do not represent OPA, KZ, or any other entity. At the time of writing the ZAX was retaining for around 85 USD/117 CAD, depending on the colour and selected cable setup (mic or no mic). You can snag a set for yourself here: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005001353584911.html

Specifications
  • Drivers: 10mm dual-magnet 10mm dynamic + 7 balanced armatures
  • Impedance: 24 ohms
  • Sensitivity: 113 dB/mW
  • Frequency Response: 10-40,000Hz
  • Cable: 0.75mm 2-pin, braided, silver-plated
Gear Used For Testing LG Q70, FiiO BTR3K, Earstudio HUD100, Earmen TR-Amp, Asus FX53V, TEAC HA-501, ADC Sound Shaper Two Mk II

Some Test Tunes
Supertramp – Crime of the Century
Slipknot – Vol 3 (The Subliminal Verses)
Daft Punk – Random Access Memories
Aesop Rock – The Impossible Kid
King Crimson – Lark’s Tongues in Aspic
King Crimson – Starless and Bible Black
Infected Mushroom – Legend of the Black Shawarma
The Prodigy – The Day is My Enemy
Steely Dan – The Royal Scam
Porcupine Tree – Stupid Dreams
Fleetwood Mac – Rumors
Tobacco – screw*d Up Friends

Attachments

  • P1080079.JPG
    P1080079.JPG
    960 KB · Views: 0
  • P1080094.JPG
    P1080094.JPG
    4 MB · Views: 0
  • P1080107.JPG
    P1080107.JPG
    2.6 MB · Views: 0
  • P1080108.JPG
    P1080108.JPG
    3.1 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
E
Eaglehawk
Your observation is quite interesting that the bass is a little loose and bloomy, suggesting the driver was not intended to be used with an open back design. I suspect that if the bass is indeed loose, it's probably due to poor tuning, not due to the open back design. The open back design should also improve sound stage.

DallaPo

New Head-Fier
And daily the marmot greets
Pros: entertaining sound
punchy, tight bass
good detail reproduction
Cons: artificial
big V
metallic timbre
Rate: 7.9
Sound: 7.8

Intro
Slowly I am getting tired of reviewing KZ, or CCA-IEMs. Basically I can take any review of the last time (C12, ZSX, ZS10 Pro, C10 Pro ...) and adjust two or three little things. Done. Okay, this is perhaps a bit exaggerated, because if you take a closer look at the individual IEMs, you can see some small differences in sound, but these are more likely to be due to the different driver characteristics, because KZ has a house sound and they don't want to deviate from that. So they juggle with the number of drivers, as well as the combination of these and bring out again and again an (admittedly rarely bad) IEM, which is only a sidegrade, if at all, but still pulls the money out of the buyers' pockets every time.

Handling
A typical KZ. Silver plated 4-core cable, which only serves its purpose, with a selection of silicone tips. Only the faceplate changes on the chassis, otherwise it would be impossible to tell which of the abundant models it would be.

Isolation and wearing comfort is good, to very good, as with almost all models of the company, depending on the space available in the ear, which should not be too small.

Sound
8 drivers. I would never think of it if I didn't know. With the KZ house sound it is actually almost irrelevant whether I have 3, 5, or 8 drivers. If you like this sound, you will like ZAX and if not, ZAX won't change that.

The dynamic driver does its job quite well. I found the bass of the CCA C10 PRO to be a step in the right direction and the bass of the ZAX is in no way inferior. Compared to the ZSX, or ZS10 PRO, it is firmer and more responsive. The punch is fun and the depth is also a plus. For me the bass is the best thing about the ZAX.

The "V" is also part of the ZAX program and so the mids are reduced, especially in the lower range. In the upper range, however, they are quite pronounced, which brings voices to the fore and causes fatigue in my case. The mids are solid and especially with assorted music they have some nice details. But when it gets hectic, they break in a bit.

I think it is again a local (Europe, Asia etc.) discussion why the highs always have to have this subliminal aggressiveness with KZ. Personally, I'm slowly getting tired of it and long for more relaxation and real quality, instead of always simulating it with an artificial build-up. The trebles have this basic metallic character, which almost always resonates with KZ. You get used to it, but BA drivers can also do differently. The trebles provide a very good transparency and details, but the naturalness is a bit lost. In addition the sibilants are annoying and I can't attest the ZAX a fatigue-free audibility.

The stage is pleasantly large and the imaging is also quite good, as long as you look at the stereo image. However, it is also strongly concentrated on left | center | right. The spaces in between are occupied a bit more sparsely.

Outro
I would take a more customer-oriented approach to KZ, if they did not want to prove this every month in the form of a new IEM. It's good to fine-tune products, as well as to rework them and take into account the customer's wishes, but we are not test rabbits and I certainly won't pay 50€ again, just for a new faceplate and a slightly adapted sound. I will certainly not be able to change KZ's attitude towards this, but maybe I can sensitize the buyer not to have to buy every new model of the company, especially if you already own the models mentioned at the beginning. The KZ ZAX is a good IEM, without question and if you are new to the Knowledge Zenith world, you will find a cheap and competitive IEM here. All others should keep their feet still for 2 years, then you might get a real added value to the previous models.

KZ ZAX.jpg
KZ_CCA (ZAX).jpg

Rating in Letters
S:
9.5 - 10
A: 9.0 - 9.4
B: 8.0 - 8.9
C: 7.0 - 7.9
D: 6.0 - 6.9
E: 5.0 - 5.9
F: 0.0 - 4.9
___________________________________________________________
More reviews: CHI-FIEAR
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CHIFIEAR/

Comments

There are no comments to display.
Back
Top