Preamble
I first heard about this cable from a friend of mine who happened to have an early prototype model back when it was still undergoing production of the final samples. I had heard great impressions left by both revered and experienced audiophiles that I just had to take the chance and contact Effect Audio to see if I can get a demo unit myself. That was a few weeks ago, which was made possible by the grace of
@JordonEA who gave me this opportunity to write this review.
I’ve now had this cable for a little over two weeks to collectively gather my thoughts. My first impression left me impressed by what a $600 cable was able to achieve - but soon after diving into comparisons, I was surprised to find that this is more than just a “value” cable but a competent one that objectively performs on par with more expensive offerings by the likes of PWA and Eletech. From a quick synopsis, I can safely say Code 23 does not falter behind the likes of 1950s and Ode to Laura. It would be more correct for me to say Code 23 takes the technical points we expect from 1k+ territory, but has its strength redistributed to different criterias that denotes to being a flagship quality by Effect Audio’s standards.
Hence, their advertised statement -
“befitting of our flagship copper cable label, Code 23”
If this isn’t clear by now, Code 23 is already a win in my book. The cables I'll be comparing down below are all within the 1k+ territory (except Eros S) because I felt it was technically proficient enough to stand up against the upper-echelon category. And by utilizing today’s flagship cables for comparison, I hope to give readers a familiar point of reference to connect the dots and triangulate whether Code 23 will do the deeds they seek at the $600 price mark.
Ergonomics
Before dissecting its sound signature, I must emphasize that the manner in which we appreciate cables isn’t determined by sound quality alone. Cables are physical components with weight and ergonomics to take into consideration and Code 23 isn’t too forgiving in this regard. I already had in mind it was going to be a hefty cable with the 16.5 AWG wire that makes up its core, but it turned out to be stiffer than I expected that I’m still in the adjustment phase getting used to the ergonomics. The good news is that the entire structure of the cable is malleable from top to bottom, so you can shape it to whichever form you need. A few of my friends (all owners of Code 23) joked that it can stand in a right-angle without any support, and to my surprise this turned out to be true as I was able to shape it to stand by itself.
The cable I have is a demo unit that came in dystopian black, but the color is actually closer to dark brown in natural lighting. In the official retail version, the plastic covering of the ear-hook comes in black, so do note the minute differences in hardware compared to my photos here.
ConX is easily one of my favorite accessories to have as an audiophile and I’m happy to see it being implemented here as well. All you need to do is twist and turn the connector part of the cable and it will easily slide off for you to switch out to different connectors to your needs. It’s a nifty feature that will satiate the needs of audiophiles who don’t like to deal with the added length from using third-party adaptors. You can get any of your cables to ConX by reaching out to Effect Audio and Jane will be more than happy to service you as she has done for me.
TermX is another accessory that comes as a default with Code 23. It allows you to switch out its termination to any of your choosing from 2.5mm, 3.5mm, and 4.4mm. This is my first exposure to TermX through Code 23 and it’s a simple mechanic where you twist and turn the housing to reveal the inside connector, which you can then pull out and switch to other terminations of your desire. There is a little hole that you must match when doing this, so do keep in mind the orientation of the connector so that all 5 holes align as seen in the photo above.
Sound signature
Effect Audio has an uncanny ability to make silver cables sound like copper and copper cables sound like silver while retaining the core characteristics of its alloy timbre. Cleopatra II comes to mind where its lush analogue nature is reminiscent of the characteristics of copper, while preserving that bright and lively sound we associate with silver cables. Code 23 is similar in this regard in that it doesn’t retain the stereotypical copper warmth, but is very neutral in tonality that one could mistake it as a copper-based mixed alloy. I’ve spoken with Jordon in regards to this and apparently it’s the twelve proprietary smaller core bundles that keep its main core from getting too warm. So kudos to the architects of Effect Audio for inventing this geometry because it is unlike most copper cables out there that only prioritize warmth and fullness of sound as the basis of its signature.
Code 23 is unapologetically a reference-like tuning with strict neutrality in mind. It’s neither warm nor bright, but stays right in the middle to provide a balanced tone with just a smidge hint of copper timbre-related warmth. I must emphasize that this warmth is only timbre-related as the general characteristic of copper, and I find it to add just the right amount of musicality to keep it from getting sterile. Code 23 is also more akin to a transparent cable that takes the intrinsic qualities of its connected transducer and elevates the technical performance without drastically changing its tonal character. This made it easy to match up with any iems without worrying about potential mishap in synergy. I’ve tried it with Odin, Xe6, Kr5, Viking Ragnar, and Nodachi and found its pairing to all work well without encountering any issues.
This already makes it a very easy and forgiving cable to work with, which would make it one of the easiest recommendations I can give towards newcomers who aren’t sure what they are looking for but are curious about trying out a high-performance cable.
The technical performance of Code 23 is very impressive and performs right below Cleopatra II OCTA within Effect Audio’s lineup. The stage is enveloping in a sense that you’re sucked into the center of an orchestra and have instruments playing in a spherical field all around you. To reiterate, you’re not placed five rows behind a concert to observe the music in a fan shape. Rather, this is a presentation that brings you close and upfront into the music with a holographic imaging to accentuate a three dimensional field. I do not say “holographic” loosely as there is a clear delineation of foreground, background, and all layers in between to give a sensation of space that is beyond the conventional X and Y axis. This is commonly seen in more expensive cables and certainly rare within the mid-ranged price territory. This is a stage that is more comparable to the industry standard 8-wire flagship cables than 4-wires. It may not be competing with the heavyweight champions like the Orpheus Shielding or Chiron, but you’re essentially getting about 90% of its performance at a fraction of its price – plus, a very forgiving and neutral tonality that is easy to pair with more iems.
Code 23 has just the right amount of grit and body in note weight that you’ll feel anchored to the music without any feeling of evanescence. It’s muscular in its dynamic swing, but not overpowering to make it fatiguing. I love how well its bodied signature works well with its crisp and tactile transient. It’s not the sharpest and most incisive I’ve heard, but there is a sort of magic that comes to fruition when the two harmonize together to create a sound that is simultaneously filling and punchy.
Comparison Review Cables:
I’ve had numerous visits to different audio stores (more often than what the photos justify) to gather samples of high-end audio cables and do a side-by-side comparison. I was curious to see how it performed next to Effect Audio’s own flagship cables and with the likes of PWA and Eletech.
- Magnus 4-wire
- Orpheus Shielding
- Chiron
- Centurion
- Cleopatra II
- Cleopatra II OCTA
- Eros S
- 1950s
- Ode to Laura
To take into consideration of the fallacy of human memory and primarily utilizing the notes I've written during my audition, this will be a summarized note-style comparison review so I apologize ahead of time if it will sound too pedantic or anemic.
Gears used for comparison: Sony WM1ZM2 -> [insert cable] -> Viking Ragnar -> Azla Crystal
Noble Audio Magnus 4-wire (~$1200 msrp) :
This is the stock cable that comes with my Viking Ragnar and its transients are incisive and addicting. Highs are a bit piercing as there are hints of sibilance with certain songs and genres (most notably in EDM). But this sibilance can be mitigated by switching up the source or ear tip rather than it being a flawed characteristic of Magnus 4-wire itself.
Transitioning from Magnus 4-wire to Code 23 –
There's an immediate expansion of soundstage in every direction. The aforementioned sibilance is mitigated and there is slightly more weight throughout the overall frequency. Its brightness is slightly tamed as the forward treble of Magnus 4-wire is reigned back to neutral in quantity. I can hear the familiar copper timbre coming through but without any added warmth. That's a huge plus on my side. Vocals sound closer and more revealing with a hint of romance that melds well with the old-time warmth of Sony M2.
I'm a strong proponent of synergy and can most definitely find myself preferring one over the other based on how I weave them into my setup. But the one objective remains in that Code 23 is the technically more proficient cable.
PWA Orpheus Shielding (~$$$ msrp) :
Orpheus sounds lush and romantic. Noticeably smoother than Code 23 that some may seek a more articulate transient if they're used to crisper presentations. Its smoothness doesn't smother any details, but provides a different presentation that's more laid back for a comfortable listening session. It's warm, but definitely not "hot". Synergy is key as is applicable to every cable out there. It'll benefit most from iems with a sharp and energetic presentation that could use some smoothening to relax some hot upper-end treble (Ragnar for example). It has the blackest background I've heard in any cable right next to Murakumo 2 with an enveloping soundstage that literally swallows you whole. Compared to Code 23, it has a clearer and more revealing midrange. The positioning of vocals doesn't come closer and remains where it's situated, but becomes so clear and resolving that you can hear and "see" the details better.
Code 23 has a smaller stage in comparison and its imaging falls short on par against Orpheus Shielding. However, it comes competitively close from a value standpoint that I find myself more amused than disappointed how well Code 23 performs next to a significantly more expensive cable. On the bright side, Code 23 is more articulate in attack and decay, giving a more satisfactory punch in comparison to the smoother listening session of Orpheus Shielding.
EA Chiron (~$3000 msrp) :
It's hard to be biased as Chiron is undoubtedly one of my favorite cables out there. Like Orpheus, Chiron has a significantly larger soundstage in all axes with an incredibly holographic presentation that has layers and depth expected of a summit-fi cable. Being a GPS alloy, it has an added sweetness especially in female vocals which I attribute as a property of gold. Chiron is brighter, cleaner, and sweeter in presentation with a slightly less note-weight than Code 23. Code 23 is fuller in comparison with a bit more midbass quantity, while Chiron is faster and leaner in presentation with an articulate transient that is crisper in attack and decay.
EA Centurion (~$5000 msrp) :
Centurion has a slightly wider soundstage than the already massive stage of Chiron, but I hear Chiron to have a tad better depth in comparison. Centurion sounds bright and very transparent across the entire frequency spectrum and there is a sense of holographic imaging that rivals some of the best I've heard – e.g. Orpheus Shielding, Rhapsodio Evolution Hybrid Wizard, Brise Murakumo 2 cable.
It's undoubtedly Effect Audio's flagship cable and I must humbly admit that Code 23 has much more to improve to get to Centurion’s level in the technical aspect.
Compared to Code 23, Centurion has a leaner presentation with similar note weight as Chiron but with less midbass, focusing all its attention from upper-mids and above. It gives you a feeling like you're floating above the clouds. Code 23 is much more neutral and sounds tamed in comparison to the very bright Centurion. Code 23 is the much easier cable to work with as Centurion can come across too bright with some pairings. Centurion is more of a collector’s cable that has the potential to synergize outstandingly with a specific setup, but could render as being fatiguing without a cohesive pairing.
EA Cleopatra II & OCTA (~$1000 & $1600 msrp) :
Cleopatra II and OCTA are essentially the same tonality with a notable difference in soundstage, imaging, and resolution – with the 8-wire being the technically more proficient one. Its general sound signature is slightly bright, but strangely organic and lush that you’d be surprised how analog it sounds for a pure silver-based geometry. It is a slightly warm presentation for a silver cable, but certainly brighter than Code 23 in a side-by-side comparison.
The technical difference between the 4-wire and 8-wire is very noticeable that I would recommend the 8-wire between the two without any hesitation. Code 23 is technically superior over the 4-wire with a better soundstage and clearer image that the 4-wire comes across slightly veiled in a side-by-side comparison. However, the story changes when compared to the 8-wire, as the OCTA is noticeably more enveloping with a larger soundstage that takes you a few rows back behind a concert to give you a wide cinematic experience. Code 23 places you more upfront within the center stage to give you a more forward presentation in comparison.
Cleopatra has an added sweetness that injects an appreciative amount of emotive vitality. Code 23 sounds neutral and clean in comparison, but certainly not sterile or lacking in emotive flavor. I found the OCTA to be slightly better in depth and imaging than Code 23, but the 4-wire unfortunately falls slightly behind in this regard. Code 23 transient is surprisingly crisper than the OCTA. There is a sense of tactility and weight to it that I find very engaging, in spite of the neutral and reference-tone signature.
EA Eros S (~$300 msrp) :
Eros S may be a competent cable at its price range, but there is a clear reduction in soundstage when compared next to the Code 23. It sounds as if the walls of sound are more caved into my own head instead of expanding out to give a wide field-like presentation. Eros S sounds closer to the typical SPC (silver-plated copper) cable, but its actual geometry is a hybrid setup composed of pure silver litz and pure copper litz. Eros S retains the characteristic of copper-timbre grit, but has a brighter and more elevated treble compared to Code 23. Code 23 has a more natural extension in treble that sounds clear and organic without needing brightness to give it an artificial perception of extension.
I enjoy the tonal signature of Eros S, but Code 23 is the more capable cable by a large margin.
PWA 1950s (~$2150 msrp) :
PWA left a large impression to audiophiles back when it first introduced the Century Series in 2018. And within the Century Series, 1950s captivated the most number of audience that it still holds a special place in many audiophiles’ hearts. Having owned one myself for a significant amount of time, I like to see the 1950s as the younger brother of Orpheus Shielding as they share similar tonality but with a notable difference in technical prowess.
With that being said, I’m happy to announce that Code 23 is not only competent with the 1950s, but has a wider and more holographic soundstage in every direction possible. They both have similar transparent midrange, but Code 23 is positioned a hair back without losing any of its details. Code 23 has a slightly more tactile treble compared to the more organic treble of 1950s and everything sounds a tad more crisp in its articulation. I can see the transient working in favor of Code 23, but the highlight of 1950s is in the romantic warmth that is not overdone and is tasteful in tonality.
I do think Code 23 is the technically more proficient cable, but the tone of the 1950s romance is hard to ignore that I can see audiophiles favoring one over the other by the virtue of tonal preferences.
Eletech Ode to Laura (~$2800 msrp) :
OTL (Ode to Laura) is one of “the” flagship copper cables of 2022 and still holds an appreciative place in many audiophiles' collections. It specializes in providing texture and details in spades with a tremendous holographic imaging that delineates each spatial layer with finesse and precision. There is a sense of grittiness that is palpable and enduring with sparkly highs that isn’t subdued as you may find in Rhapsodio’s flagship copper lineup. It’s a very engaging signature, which comes to show why it has a home in many audiophiles' inventory.
With that being said, its biggest drawback is in the soundstage width, because next to Code 23, OTL has a more conical signature that is narrower in width but deeper in depth. There are layers within layers that you’ll be able to pick apart instruments with greater precision, but it doesn’t expand as far out horizontally as Code 23 is able to do so. OTL is tad warmer with more elevated treble in comparison. Midrange is slightly pulled back as Code 23 sounds more revealing in female vocal rendition.
Code 23 brings you closer to the music, with the stage expanding and surrounding you. OTL is more holographic in its conical presentation that makes it easier to analyze spatial and positioning cues. Code 23 has more note weight that sounds fuller and weightier, anchoring you down to the music. OTL is grittier and more textured that makes it a fun listening session to experience.
Finale
Code 23 screams value within the $600 mark that the only dissuader I can think of is its cumbersome ergonomics. Having spoken with several owners of this cable and lending it out to my friends during my weekly audiophile congregations, there have most certainly been a divided fanbase in how it had been received due to the weight and ergonomics. However, if you're a purist at heart with sound being the only focus of your attention, this is a highly technical cable that should most certainly be in your shortlist if you're not interested in breaking the bank and emptying your wallet.
I’m delighted to see Effect Audio offer a highly technical cable that is made accessible to hobbyists who aren’t keen on spending over a thousand dollars on cables that are worth more than their iems. This is a win for both the manufacturer and consumers, which I hope would inspire other companies to follow suit and offer cheaper flagship cables to make it more accessible for the general audiophile consumers.
Thank you
Thank you Ben!
Hope you receive your cable soon!!