Reviews by sanakimpro

sanakimpro

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Balanced sound profile with even tonality. Aesthetically pleasing.
Cons: Bluetooth connectivity and touch controls still needs work. Lack of 3D stage depth.
Recently, I went on a quest to update my audio equipment to 2019 standards. My last purchase was my Astell & Kern T8ie MKII back in 2016 and so far I have been satisfied and still wowed by what it can do. There has been a lot of buzz about true wireless earphones (TWE) and how much Bluetooth technology and codecs have improved to the point where it is virtually indistinguishable to wired sound quality. Curious, I started my research two months back and I've read hundreds of threads, forums, reviews and tried as many earphone samples I could in nearby stores.

I received my pair of Momentum True Wireless (MTW) at an authorised Sennheiser store yesterday and so far the MTW has been great! My use case is as a walk-around IEM to work, on the subway, at the mall, at lunch/dinner. If and when the batteries run out or I'm sitting still at a desk, my A&K T8ie MK II are ready to take over. I am a fan of German headphones/IEMs sound tuning and previously used Beyerdynamic and Astell & Kern equipment.

This is meant to be a short comparison and not a full-hand-on-sit-down-with-10-headphones-10-DAC-AMPS review. I purchased it recently and went on a journey to find the best true wireless earphone in the market as of June 2019 and I'm here to share it with you.

Table of Contents:
MTW First Impressions
MTW Bluetooth
MTW Sound Quality
MTW Smart Control App
MTW Headphone Comparables
MTW Conclusions


Momentum True Wireless First Impressions
I gave it 4.5/5 and kept the last 0.5 because the Bluetooth connection and touch controls still needs work. I frequently need to restart pairing instead of the MTW automatically reconnecting to the phone after a charge.

Touch control for previous track (3 tap on left earbud) is not yet perfect. Instead it will go Next Track (2 taps) and Pause (1 tap). Super annoying. But these are teething issues to me and I can overlook them for now and instead choose the next track or restart pairing with my phone.

I only care about SQ and so far it has exceeded expectations. To be fair, I am not comparing it against $300 full sized headphones or wired IEMs. I think value wise, $150 is for the IEM SQ, $50 for the Sennheiser brand and $100 for the portability, Bluetooth technology, Smart Control app etc.

No problems with batteries thus far. 4 hours is about right. Case takes 1.5hrs to charge and all working as advertised. One thing I learnt is to carry a spare case and keep the IEM in the spare case if the battery is not yet <20% (or just keep it in your pocket if you don't mind some scratches). This way, you don't waste the charge in the Charging Case until you absolutely need to recharge the IEMs and you can get the advertised 12 hours battery life.

Trying to get a good fit can be challenging but the MTWs come with 4 pairs of earbuds (XS/S/M/L) and you should be able to get a decent fit. Otherwise, consider getting Comply foam tips to fit your ears. Oh, you also have to learn how to twist the MTW every time you wear it. This is something that I miss coming from my dear AKT8ie where FIT was one of the key selling points of the IEM. You could go the whole day wearing the IEM and not feel fatigue. With the MTW, it is bearable but it does get a bit painful after 4 hours of continuous listening.

Oh yes, you also get 2 years worldwide warranty from Sennheiser.

Momentum True Wireless Bluetooth
I am playing it on AptX codec on BT 4.2 and firmware version 1.25.00 via my S7Edge using Spotify or Foobar2K with FLAC. Volume is loud enough once the correct settings are picked. Note though that I prefer to listen on the louder side so I constantly max out the volume on the MTW. Best to test at a store if it's loud enough for your preference.

MTW supports SBC, AAC, AptX, AptX Low Latency. AFAIK, most phones don't have AptX-LL (see Qualcomm's website) so I wouldn't count on it much. Some complain about the lack of AptX HD or LDAC but AptX is plenty good enough for my portable needs. Maybe for the DSD/PCM folks, they need to consider something else.

You can watch movies/play games with these but it depends whether you can stand the slight lag. Using AptX, it seems the codec knows how to resync the video and audio for Youtube videos. For games however, it depends if your game has a bluetooth delay feature. I got my game to time perfectly with a 500ms delay although the AptX is reported to only have a 200ms delay. I suppose 300ms was for the game to render the graphics, but don't quote me on this.

Some people complain about drop outs here and there which they said is unacceptable. For me, as long as its infrequent (once or twice an hour) and is short (< 1 or 2 secs) and can be fixed with pressing play on the phone, I don't mind it too much.

Momentum True Wireless Sound Quality
For me, the MTW has a balanced sound profile with a small bass boost towards the mid and sub bass thus giving a slight U/V- sound signature. By no means is it a basshead IEM but it carries good mid-bass and good sub-bass rumble when called for. Bass quantity is just enough, without being muddy (Sony XB series) or being bass-shy (like ER4 series) while bass quantity it makes up in bass quality, with fast bass decay and good precision. However, if you like to be enveloped by world-class IEM bass like in the AKT8ieMKII or Xelentos, these still fall a bit short but it can be improved using the Smart Control EQ.

The mids are smooth and transitions well from the upper bass. Vocals are well represented. Female and male vocals sound natural with good realism without coming across as sibilant or shrill. It is important to note here that the midtones are smooth without discernible peaks which would lead to unnatural audio.

Treble extends well and you won't be disappointed with the detail revival, especially at lower volumes.

The background of the MTW is quite dark (not noisy) and thus there is good L/R stereo instrumental separation as what I'd expect for a closed back high-grade Sennheiser 7mm TWE IEM.

However, I do note that in terms of 3D staging, it is rather narrow, especially at high volumes, leading to a very intimate sound system rather than a laid-back sound. Most of the bass and sound seems to come within the skull and doesn't extend further outward unlike in the AKT8ie / IE800 / Katana / K10 / ER4 (disregard if you find the comparison not meaningful) or full sized headphones or stereo systems. This would be one of the few drawbacks for the MTW.

In general I agree with the rtings.com frequency response chart and the MTW represents a balanced natural sound well with a rather intimate sound.

For reference, I'd consider the IE800 to be balanced with bass de-emphasis and treble emphasis (can be a bit piercing and sibilant sometimes). The Xelentos/AKT8ie to be balanced with bass emphasis (can be muddy sometimes) and slight treble roll-off. The Noble Katana's will get 10/10 for being balanced with excellent frequency response, detail revival and instrument separation albeit at twice the cost.

I typically listen to Korean pop, Spotify Global Top 50, some Ariana Grande, Lana Del Rey, and then some rock/heavy metal (Rammstein/Linkin Park/Metallica). MTW is versatile enough to do all these genres though with rock you can find it a bit claustrophobic. I believe for most people, they would find the MTW's SQ to be acceptable, if not excellent. Otherwise, you can tune it with the Smart Control App's EQ.

Momentum True Wireless Smart Control App
Interestingly, the MTW comes with a free app called Smart Control, developed by Sennheiser. In it, you can update the firmware over the air (OTA). The latest FW as of June is 1.25.00.

The app allows you several more options but I only cared for Transparent Hearing (which allows you listen to your surroundings using real-time audio recorded from the mic) and the EQ. The Smart Control EQ is aesthetically pleasing but a bit confusing to use at first. I've laid out what it means in general here.

Upper left quadrant: ++ bass - mids + treble (basshead preference but warning: it get's boxy/boomy!)
Lower left quadrant: -- bass + mids - treble (unnatural to me, sounds thin)
Upper right quadrant: + bass - mids ++ treble. (my preference for slight U/V signature)
Lower right quadrant: - bass + mids -- treble. (unnatural to me, sounds thin)

In general, I'd advice against moving more than 3 cm away from the the center (neutral/balanced/default) because it quickly gets out of hand and the frequency response deviates from balanced. Because of the slight U/V signature of the IEM, using the upper quadrants enhances its signature, while using the lower quadrants makes the sound signature too thin/flat/analytical for my preference. Of course, your mileage may vary but I prefer leaving the EQ at default or just 1cm 45 degree in the upper right quadrant.

For me, this EQ is worth a lot and is a unique selling point for the MTW as it allows different customers to personalise their MTW sound. I am not sure what happens behind the scenes but I like the flexibility it gives us and how much it truly affects the resulting sound from the MTW.

Momentum True Wireless Headphones Comparables
I think of true wireless headphones (TWE) SQ not as a direct comparable to wired headphones/IEMs because there's a lot of scale with wired IEMs (think IE800, Xelento, Noble Katana, etc.) Rather, can you accept 10% SQ loss for the portability, the hands-free, the lack of need to worry about DACs, AMPs, SPC/OCC/OFC cables, bla bla bla. If you can, then, TWEs are a good enough solution.

VS Bose SoundSport Free: SSF has a larger package and sticks out of the ear more. Granted, it has twice the battery life (5hrs +20hrs from case). SQ wise, since these are designed for sports, they are open-back and wouldn't be suitable for commutes or flights. Consequently, they have a wider, airier sound stage amid a softer bass response. Mids and treble are OK but nothing special. There is treble rolloff IIRC. My takeaway was that the sound was OK but not amazing. It was a form over SQ sort of design. No ANC though which is disappointing since Bose is well known for ANC. So I ruled it out as SQ was the main focus for me.

VS Sony 1000XM3: A bit unfair, I know, but at the same price point, I think the full sized XM3 is a fair competitor. First off, it has a whopping 30 hours of battery life which makes the MTW's battery life look like a joke. Then it comes with ANC and adaptive modes. It is also frequently on discount and is constantly being updated (3rd version now). But what bothers me is the SQ on the XM3. While many reviews shout about the SQ, I personally find the sound to be.. "boxy". What I mean is that the sound is not smooth. There is a clear bass segment and a clear mid segment but the trebles are strongly rolled off. And then there is a disconnect between the bass and mids segment. Even so, there is a strong mid/upper bass emphasis and little sub-bass rumble. Strong vocal tracks are distorted by strong uneven bass making it a disappointment for the discerning audiophile. Soundstaging is narrow and instruments sound claustrophic. Weirdly, the frequency response charts do not reflect what I hear. Be that as it may, the XM3 is aimed at the typical consumer requiring good battery life and portability, above average SQ and a reasonable price and that's the reason it is a successful Sony product. Still a good choice for those who don't mind bluetooth headphones.

VS Sony WF-1000x: A bit dated, but I tried this TWE for a while and it sounds great. It has the typical Sony bass-boost sound quality with rolled off treble. Sounds quite muddy in the bass/lower mids area. What it misses in sound, it makes for with ANC, a small package and half the price of the MTW. I would say skip this just because I suspect the Gen 2 is coming out soon as they have started going on a 20% sale in my location. Good for people looking for TWEs on a budget and who appreciates good ANC.

VS Sony WI-1000x: More recent than the WF-1000x, the WI's price range is comparable to the MTW; has 10 hours battery life and ANC. It really intrigued me and the sound quality was nearer to Hi-Res balanced. It boasts plenty of detail and has good sound staging and separation. There is a slight mid bass boost as expected but overall it sounds very pleasing. However, I ruled it out because I thought, for that price I might as well get a true wireless such as the MTW. See, I am lazy and prefer to keep the IEMs in a case instead of having a perma-neckband.

VS Sony WI-C600N: This is a Dec 2018 model and it actually was a solid contender at $120 and costs less than half the price of the MTW. It sounded more like the WF-1000x with a strong bass emphasis, shallow sound stage etc. Typical easy-to-like modern consumer sound. 1/2 price, 6 hrs battery life, flexible band etc made it a strong contender to the MTW but in the end I chose to go fully wireless instead of having a neckband. But worth a serious consideration for anyone frequenting gyms or planning to use these for a workout. Between these and the WI-1000x, which you choose depends on your budget and your sound signature preference. WI-1000x is overall technically a better headphone, but you have to pay double the price and you can't fold it and keep it in your jeans pocket.

VS XiaoMi Neckband: They retail for $80 and offer great value for those of us who can accept good enough SQ. It boasts 8hrs of battery life and has a flexible neckband. But I didn't care much for the SQ as the mids and vocals were quite harsh and treble was all over the place. For the price, I'd recommend saving up for the WI-C600N unless you're really on a tight budget.

VS Master & Dynamic MW07, RHA TrueConnect, Beoplay E8: Sorry, the stores in my location didn't allow me to try these.

Others have suggested to consider keeping my current IEM and use the Shanling M0 and ES100 as portable bluetooth DAC/AMPs but I personally dislike the idea because I might as well keep using my phone or a portable DAP. I don't see much of an upgrade in terms of portability which was the whole point of this quest anyway.

Alternatively, I also considered the Shure RMCE-BT2 and Sony MUC-M2BT1 wireless neckbands with MMCX connectors. The RMCE is reported to have excellent sound but I never saw it in any of the stores I've visited. However, I can personally vouch for the M2BT1. The M2BT1 with my AKT8ieMKII sounded phenomenal and to my ears, rivalled the wire. It has LDAC and AptX codec, features about 7hrs of battery life.

However, for the price of $185, you have to start wondering if getting a new set of TWE IEMs might be the better option. Just top up another $100 and you have another top-tier product from Sennheiser.

I only had a chance to test these few before the time I gave myself to decide ran out and I decided what the heck, let's get the MTW. Overall, from the few wireless options I've tried, the MTW indeed has the best sound quality and let's be honest, it's expected from Sennheiser. No dealbreakers that made me regret the purchase or wish I could return it.


Momentum True Wireless Conclusion

Great value for money if you care most about SQ and are looking for a premium SQ in a true wireless form factor. I bought it knowing Id have to be patient with the bluetooth/touch control issues and I wanted portability and a completely wireless package for an excellent sound, and that's exactly what I got with the Momentum True Wireless.

Ask me anything and I'll try to respond. Appreciate all the help from headfi, reddit and other reviews I've seen so far; thought I'd return the favor.

P.S. I asked the Sennheiser sales rep and he said there isn't going to be a product update (MTW 2.0) soon. Apparently MTW is Momentum 3.0 and people are waiting for the full line up to be released first. So MTW 2.0 will be Momentum 4.0 and I guess it will come in 2021.

P.S. Photos available upon request but I think others have covered it pretty well. You get a 2 earbuds, 1 charging case, 4 pairs of tips (XS, S, M, L) and a short (25cm?) USB-A to USB-C cable and 2 years Sennheiser international warranty.

2 Weeks Update:
So, a quick update:

Negatives
1. You can't wear these to sleep. If you sleep on the right side, it goes "VOLUME MAX" on repeat. On the left side, the volume is decreased and it goes "VOLUME MIN" on repeat.

2. The bluetooth on these are questionable. Maybe it's my S7 Edge being a bit old, but when I am on the go, walking around the city or on the way to the commute, there is quite significant disruptions to the point it annoys me. Of course this problem is situational and you can't replicate it to a sales rep; so consider if you can accept this should it occur.


Positives
1. Despite that, the bluetooth pairing is instantaneous. The trick is to turn on BT on your phone before removing the right earpiece from the case. Or if you leave the BT permanently on, then that's better (but worse for your phone's battery life). Phone battery also doesn't seem to take a big hit. I also make it a habit to turn off the BT so that the MTWs go to sleep mode after 15 minutes. Otherwise they will wait up to 60 minutes before going to sleep. Otherwise, place both buds back into the case for trickle charging.

2. Loving the sound from these MTW bad boys more and more, using my preferred 1cm 45 degrees upper right quadrant on the internal EQ, I appreciate how the bass is present with excellent clarity and weight, while treble is crisper than the average IEM. It is no IE800, but plenty of treble detail to keep you satisfied that unless you do an A/B I won't miss the extra detail.

3. Battery has been a non-issue. Ran dead on the pair once after 4hrs of use as advertised. Never had the battery case dying on me, knock on wood. But my habit is to charge it every single night.

4. Good build quality. Dropped one earpiece when I was at the checkout, and my heart stopped. Luckily when I picked it up, there were no visible markings on the unit.

5. Volume has been very good. All my Spotify Extreme Quality songs, FLACs and 320kpbs MP3s have more than enough volume. This was a primary concern for me when purchasing the IEMs.

5.Overall, pretty happy with the purchase. They have dominated my music use on the go and I rarely miss my T8ieMKII since the SQ is about 80% although the sound stage is a bit compressed (it is left-right wide not front-back deep). The only time was during a 6 hr drive where I decided to go with a wired IEM.
G_T_J
G_T_J
They are cerainly way better than Jabra Elite Active 65t and Pantronics Bacbeat Fit and Backbeat Go I had previously as well as they are miles better than any generic bluetooth TWS being sold atm. I just believe they are tuned with a very consumer-frinedly approach in mind that won't suit anyone's taste. Good uplifiting listen for the gym but a bit of a.... ''BEATS'' quality sound for serious listening.
sanakimpro
sanakimpro
No worries, I can see your point that it is not balanced. But it depends on which side of the spectrum you are coming from. I consider the cheaper IEMS like the RHA MA650 or T20, or the Shure SE215 etc as bassy. I consider the ER4PT and IE800 to be treble oriented. So in the middle ground, there is the Xelentos, the Prophile 8, the Noble Katana, etc. To me, the MTW is among those IEMS.
sanakimpro
sanakimpro
But I would argue that you can make it "balanced" if that is your liking; just some tweaking with the internal EQ with the Smart Control app to reduce the bass (lower left or right quadrant) should clear things up. I personally prefer U/V shape sound so my setting has been the upper right (1cm away, 45 degrees).

I can see how you think the B&O E8 is balanced, but to me that is bass-shy / treble heavy. So it's a matter of preference and definition, IMO.

sanakimpro

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: All rounder, slight V, Bluetooth + ANC, long battery life
Cons: Sub bass distortion, sibilance, pricey (if you don't need ANC + Bluetooth)
Reason for Purchase:
I bought the Sony MDR-1000x mainly for Bluetooth and hands-free operation and most of my judgements are using Samsung S7 Edge's Bluetooth connection with Spotify to the MDR-1000x.
For me, the main concern for purchasing a new headphone is ease of use and sound quality.
 
Ease of Use:
I bought the MDR-1000x to move away from wired operation to wireless and in that aspect the MDR-1000x paired with my S7 Edge's NFC with no issues on the first try. It was seamless and I could immediately starting rocking out to the Global Top 50 a minute after I unboxed her.
Battery life was never an issue with quoted 20 hours on Bluetooth and NFC. I never ran it out of battery as I charged it every night.
Impressive innovation and progress in battery technology indeed!
It comes with a slim pouch and can be folded flat. This is a huge convenience in the portability department.
I do not use the 1000x farther than 2m from my headphone so I can't comment on the range.
 
Oh, and for the Quick Listen mode, where you put your hand on the right cup and you can hear surrounding sounds, it is an amazing feature! I was able to grocery shop and work in college without having to fully take them pair off. I also can share that if you lie on the right cup when sleeping, it does not turn off the music. I was quite worried it would pause the music, but to my pleasant surprise, it was all well and good. I wouldn't recommend them for sleeping because of the sound pressure changes causing weird gaps and beeps when you turn in bed. An trusty pair of IEMs are much better off.
 
Sound Signature:
The MDR-1000x performs well and leaves a great impression for modern-pop music. Her V sound signature pleases the general audience, with a wide but shallow soundstage. For many pop tracks in the Global Top 50, it performed well under testing. Vocals were clear and present, but she has a few bumps and notches in the midrange and bass department if one listen closely enough.
 
Bass:
Lorde - Royals: There is solid air swing and movement during bass drops in this track and here you can feel the drivers pushing air waves through your skull. It is magnificently pleasant until you realize that if you push the volume high enough, it starts to distort horribly. This happened to be in wires operation where the source volume was loud enough. In wireless / BT  mode, you shouldn't be able to raise the volume to that level so this might not affect you. However, for those who love to listen on the louder side, do check for bass distortion before proceeding
 
Daft Punk - Doin' it Right - Same observation. Bass goes deep and strong. It envelops you in a warm ooze of audio bliss but when it goes low and deep, you can find the drivers slipping up and distorting.
Jessie J/ Nicki Minaj / Arianna Grande -Bang Bang: Great singer movement, great bass kicks, awesome test track. The subwoofer is in the center and goes low and deep. This song is well done by the 1000x.
 
Midrange:
Lorde - Royals: Vocals are somewhat enveloped by the bass in this track. Lorde's sparking vocal seems to melt into the deep dark bass but doesn't shine through. Ideally, the bass is deep and low and Lorde's alternate reality comes out sharp and moving.
Lana Del Rey - National Anthem: Vocals on the mdr-1000x here pierces with sibilance on the Sz and Tz sounds. Try it out!
Rebecca Pidgeon - Spanish Harlem: Amazing vocals here with no instrument obstruction so she sings really well through the 1000x.
 
Treble:
Daft Punk - Moroder: Cymbal strikes come out clear and realistic.
Metallica - One: Sound stage is not wide enough to separate instruments in the treble range, so it sounded a bit cramped in my head.
Lorde - A World Alone: The bell rings and chimes were reproduced quite convincingly and complemented Lorde's small world and fairy dreams.
 
Value:
​A week ago, the retail price for the MDR-1000x in the UK was £329.99 in Currys and Amazon UK. But suddenly this week, they have raised the price to £349.99 on these common marketplaces. I'm not sure what caused them to jump but if you could get them for £329.99 I'd say go for it. They cost around £289.99 in Dixons in the UK airports.
If you value Bluetooth and hands-free operation and are willing to pay for the Active Noise Cancelling feature, then the asking price is well worth it. Otherwise, if you are happy with wired operation and are usually in a quiet environment, there is definitely better valued headphones in the market.
 
Conclusion:
This was a short review for one of the latest offering in the Bluetooth/Wireless range. My background from the wired IEMs raise my expectations high and overall, the MDR-1000x did exceed my expectations. I was quite critical in my review but I would readily recommend this headphone to anyone looking for a solid pair of cans on the way to work or for travelling on long commutes, as it was designed for.

sanakimpro

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Warm, smooth sound signature, Full Bodied Sound, Easily Driven, Deep Subbass Rumble, Wide Frequency Extension, Wide 3D Sound Stage, No Sibilance
Cons: Updated: None

[size=24.57px]Quest to the Beyerdynamic Astell & Kern T8iE (AKT8iE):[/size]



2018 Update:
It's been almost two years with these bad boys, I must say they have been all I've been using. For more precise, analytical sound, I turn to the Beyerdynamic T1. I have to admit that the T1 are another class altogether, especially in resolving power and layer separation. But obviously you can't carry the T1 on the plane, into lectures, when walking around London, when waiting in the Tube or when waiting to pick up your friend. It is also loud enough that my S7 Edge can drive it sufficiently well (70% is usually loud enough). To me, portability > SQ, and a certain tradeoff is unavoidable, and the best headphone is the one you bring around 16 hours a day. For me, that's my T8.

I pair my T8 with the Chord Mojo and stream most music through Spotify or FLACs, and I managed to survive two years without more gear acquisition syndrome (GAS). Hah! I got the AKTie-MKII and the story is quite similar, with improved bass response (deeper and faster, in fact I read somewhere that it is the fastest bass decay for Dynamic Driver IEMs and from my testing, it is) and a cleaner soundstage with slightly better instrument separation (maybe I grew accustomed to the MK-II sound sig).

The only IEMs I am even interested in is the Noble flagship line. I consider the T8 in that league and thus would consider these a sidegrade. Katana is too bass shy for me, so I dismissed it.

However, I found that at a recent Headroom London show that the T8's bass is better than K10, in that its reverb and depth is more reminiscent of subwoofers, rending K10's bass a bit flat. K10 wins in upper midrange and treble in resolving power, but to most of my pop and electronic dance music, I prefer the T8.

The Encore is interesting, as it slightly upgrades on the K10 but costs an extra £1699 in UK. Cost aside, I did not find the value proposition much better than the T8 for my music. Upgrades were clear: wider soundstage (T8 has deep soundstage, especially shown during bass kicks but narrower), better instrument and layer separation. Downsides were weight (once you wear the T8 for months, anything else is heavy and bulky, especially true with Noble flagship line), expensive pricing, higher impedance (can't drive with phone) and less natural bass.

Hence, I kept the T8 MK-II. To be honest, find good bass tracks, with good bass transitions, and try them on the T8. This alone was sufficient to convince me that T8 is my end game. Did I also mention the sweet natural midrange? If anything was a kink, it would be that the treble is not sparkly enough, but I found that sparkly treble tend to prevent long listening sessions, especially true with the Etymotic IEMs, so I'm happy with the T8's treble response.

I hope this helps you make an informed choice. I think for its current price, it's worth it. Check out the Xelento! I heard good things and I guess it should not be too far from the T8.
End of Update.

Back to the original review:

My journey began with a quest to complement my ER4S which I've used exclusively for 1 year. I loved the ER4S and it was one of the best headphones I've used for critical listening with prominent treble
and vocal response. However, I found myself listening less and less to modern pop, house music, trance and dubstep because the ER4S sounded flat and boring with those genres without the lean bass and sparkly treble.
Sometimes, the sparkly treble works against these genres as they were recorded for dance clubs where treble response was considerably rolled off.

So, I desired more subbass, more body to instruments and a more forgiving headphone. I wanted an IEM for portability reasons and closed back so that I could use it with my friends in the room.

I searched Head-Fi, Trusted Reviews, What Hi-Fi and so on and shortlisted 3 phones, AKT8iE, SE846 and IE800.

I didn't quite like the SE846 tuning at Selfridges as I found it very treble oriented and I didn't like that it was quite huge. It was an immediate gut feeling of NO.

Then the battle between IE800 and AKT8iE started and I took around an hour to finally decide in favour if the T8.

I preferred the sweet vocals on the T8 with the simple push in ear concha design and it reminded me very much of my T1 + subbass boost.

The IE800 was no slouch of course, but I felt that the presentation wasn't right. In some tracks the vocals felt pushed far behind, in some tracks there was sibilance I wanted something to complement the treble rich headphones that I had. I must give credit where it's due to the wide and large soundstage of the IE800 which the T8 might seem to have less.

Simply put, the bass response of the T8 and reduced treble emphasis creates a perception of a slightly smaller soundstage. In return, we are well rewarded with many perks of the T8 which I will review below.

So, I went home with the AKT8iE.

Introduction

I'm a student who loves audio, electroics and the technicalities behind it. I mostly listen to modern pop, stuff on Billboard Top 100, trance, electronica, rock, heavy metal but I also love female vocalists and most importantly, well recorded tracks.

Some artists that I'm a fan of include Lorde, Meghan Trainor, Taylor Swift, Kygo, Skrillex, Rammstein, Metallica, Avenged Sevenfold, London Philharmonic Orchestra, Deutsche Grammophon, etc.

I'm a junior reviewer who loves music and wish that through my writings you get a picture of what it's like to listen through the AKT8iE (T8 from here on). Hence, my language tends to be mixed with layman terms and a bit of technical jargon.


Unboxing

I didn't expect much special packaging from Beyerdynamic since I have had previous products like the Tesla T1 and Beyerdynamic's packaging is pretty much "let's get down to business". I could upload pictures on request or you can find them on other website reviews.
IMG_1737.jpg

Sources & Amplification

For my review, I have used the T8 with O2/ODAC, Mojo and DX90. I mostly use the T8 on the go, so for most of my listening, my source is the DX 90 for portability.

From the O2/ODAC or Mojo, I found that there was a wider, more 3D soundstage, more controlled, tighter bass and instruments were more pin point precise compared to DX 90. This is to be expected a cleaner, faster source.

My listening volumes:
DX90 Low Gain 200-210 volume.
Mojo: Red-Red for modern tracks, Blue-Blue for orchestral

Note, I find that the T8 prefers low impedance outputs and pairs well with clean, neutral sources since its response is quite ideal for the music I listen to.
Specifically, I found that the bass was muddy on my laptop output.

Key Technical Specifications from Astell & Kern website


  1. 8Hz -> 40kHz frequency response (Subbass-> Ultrasonic range!)
  2. 16 Ohm Impedance (Easily driven from mobile devices)
  3. 10mW power handling capacity
  4. 109dB SPL
  5. Connection: MMCX at earphones, with 3.5mm TRS or 2.5mm balanced. Detachable cables
  6. Weight without cables: 7 g per pair (feather light)

Sidenote, the housing is made of some unspecified alloy but seems to be quite strong but light. All units are hand made and tested in Germany.

Sound Signature

Speed

I judge the T8 to be a very quick and fast IEM, which is probably why AK and Beyer market it as a bridge between the dynamic driver and balanced armature headphone.
You are rewarded with agility and speed when admiring decay of piano notes, guitar strums and wood instruments, the sustained rhythms in complicated tracks, and the echoes in recording.

I tend to judge my headphones based on how they present the parts of the track to me. Each headphone tends to emphasis some thing and after a week or two, you learn the sound signature of the headphones.

For T8, it's definitely bass -> vocals & midrange -> treble.

This might explain why some forum members have reported a less detailed experience, which for me, is half-true.
Actually, the micro-details are there, but they are not prominent and you have to search for them. I've heard people say that macro detail is the focus than micro detail.
The effect is a smoother, laid back listening experience. It depends on the user whether they want details in presented directly or not.
I personally like both and use ER4S and T8 in complement for this.

Bass

I find the T8 to be an ideal signature for modern pop music, where there is a lot of low frequency content and bass response and quality is rewarded.
Sibilance is easily found in modern recordings due to consumer grade headphone response.
The most prominent is easily the mid-bass region. The bass slam effect is REAL! The subbass is not rolled off but not over emphasized.
One thing very clear to me is that bass reproduction on the T8 is no joke. There is subwoofer quality and quantity to the bass department which sets it apart from many competitors and even the bigger brother, T1.

Vocals & Midrange

You know how some headphones are clean and "clinical" and yeah, they are well separated but it doesn't make you wanna sing or tap your feet?
Well with the T8, there has been countless times when I was taking a walk on the streets and suddenly burst out with emotion and a few words spew out because I am overwhelmed by the emotions in the song!
I love the way vocals are presently so warm and supported by the bass, it gives a sense of realism to the vocals.
Vocals are critical to many genres I love, and T8 is very enjoyable and musical. It distinctly gives each artist their voice and shows off their potential.
I'm still struggling to define what midrange is, but if it's the 250Hz -> 2kHz region, I find that the midrange is pretty sweet and presents a part of the coherent picture without being overpowering.
I don't find any lower midrange bleed from the bass department.

Treble:

This section might split hairs. Let me preface by saying that my issue is always with sibilance. I can sacrifice details for non-sibilance but not the other way around.
T8's treble isn't so much "In your face!", as opposed to "I'm here if you need me". When you're sitting back and chilling, it's there as an integrated whole with the rest of the music but not the main focus.
When you're walking on streets it doesn't distract you and say "Hey! Listen to me!". I prefer this as it's less fatiguing and more suitable for portable use.

Personally, I pretty much love the way treble is presented here. Perhaps it's because the ER4S is always there to inject the treble if I feel like it, but it allows me to listen to a wider variety of my music album which is mostly FLAC and 320kbps MP3s with the occasional old stuff which isn't so well recorded, and not feel like I have to pull out the T8 from the sibilance or harsh treble.

Bell rings, cymbal and high hats all come out crystal clear if recorded properly. Synthesized notes from mixers are also reproduced well with precision without sibilance.

On the other hand, there will definitely be some users who wish for a sharper, cleaner, articulate sound. To be clear, if the track is treble-oriented, then the T8 presents treble very nicely without the bass response intruding. But on an all-round track where all frequency components are present, then treble is the one that's pushed back on the T8.

Comparison

I'd say that the ER4S and IE800 were tuned with clarity in mind which gives them a nice treble response, true. However, since modern pop that appear on the top 100 charts seem to rarely be audiophile grade mixes (and Loudness War issues), I find the mixes treble rich which easily cause fatigue without a good amount of bass to complement.
Using the same source and amplification, which easily cause sibilance with T1 or ER4S and IE800, in the T8, I don't find. It gives a coherent, relaxed sound which allows long, non-fatiguing listening sessions. I always thought that Billboard music and audiophile grade headphones weren't a good match until I found T8.

This is where, for me, the T8 shines, as it has a mild U shaped response with a sweet midrange and a slight midbass boost and you can hear and feel each sub-bass notes in recordings.
Also, T8 is very good at dealing with well recorded tracks and awards good sources as it displays the whole frequency spectrum for me.
For example in orchestral music, or Daft Punk's Random Access Memories, Lorde's Pure Heroine, the T8 gives the subbass which I find lacking in the T1.
I note that T8 tends to push back the treble slightly, but in a quiet listening room, all these elements are actually there, but not the main focus.
The focus seems to be a whole, coherent sound signature with details present but not in your face.

Improvements

I've started a habit of asking myself what I'd like to improve in my headphone before going out into a the big catalogue of IEMs.
Some compromises I've considered to address T8's sound signature:
Pushing the treble forward would cause sibilance.
Pushing the mid-bass less would give a flatter sound but less "fun" sounding experience which I love.
So, I struggle to find an improvement for the sound signature of the T8.

Here, I think that it's best to have two headphones dedicated for different response. T8 generally handles most music well but due to the laid-back treble require a trebly, bright complement. There's where my ER4S and T1 comes to the fill the gap.

Perhaps I'd add that sometimes I use a -1dB equalizer at about 100Hz to tame the midbass and that usually restores the well-balanced soundscape of the T8.

Comfort & Ergonomics:

1. I must warn that using T8 in an ideal, quiet environment and when using on commute (buses, trains, etc) gives a very different experience because the high noise floor masks the already laid-back
finer details which make the T8 special and also masks the sub-bass rumble which I love. The T8 is still very detailed and musical in these situations, but for the full appreciation, a quiet room, a warm cup of coffee and a soft chair is very much recommended.

2. I love the concha design of the T8. The T8 weighs 7g per pair and I find it pretty much put them on and forget. Super light weight, super easy to wear. Unroll it, put it on the ear and push in. Simple! No twisting and turning for seal in IE800 and ER4S.

3. I use the leather box that came with the T8 for storage and it's such an elegant pouch! It turns heads as people see me pulling out my IEMs from a leather pouch.

4. I still haven't figured out how to use the shirt clip with the T8. Never had to use it though, as there is virtually no microphonics with the T8 with it's over ear design and Kevlar-reinforced cable.

5. I've used T8 up to 10 hours a day while travelling around and haven't found any issues with comfort or fit. My ER4S would usually cause soreness in the ear canal after several hours of use but I'm glad to say that my T8 has not given such issues.

6. There is a groove in the right ear piece to indicate the correct piece for the correct ear, but I find that due to the concha design, if you try to put the wrong piece into the wrong ear, then it would not fit well. It is then easy to just swap the ear pieces and put them on.

7. Eartips are replaceable with Comply Tips. The original set comes with a myriad of ear tips but replacement with Comply Tx-200 is provided. This means no worries of using the IEM for years and replacing the ear tips.

Reliability:

Regarding the reliability issues on T8. I have had mine for 1 month now (10xxx) and constantly use it on the go. It's going strong and I've accidentally scratched the cable but after a light rub, the
cable is as good as new. I'd recommend purchasing it from a local retailer since I've heard reports of defects in some units so a convenient replacement policy is highly recommended!

Summary:

In a nutshell, T8 is great for most music, including modern pop, house and electronica and female vocals, and present you with an easy, laid back listen.
I find the bass department most prominent but the midrange and treble is ever present. No sibilance.
Thus, I completed my quest for a non-sibilant, full bodied and U-shaped IEM for my use.

Please leave a comment if you like this review or if you didn't, or if you want to ask a question about the AKT8iE.

I really enjoy my AKT8iE and hope you benefit from it too!
citiboi
citiboi
Great review.  Of the three IEMs I have, the Sony Z5, Audio 64 U12 and the T8, I love the sweet sounding T8 the most.
Subhakar
Subhakar
Nice review. Thanks. The one you reviewed is the original Mk-I or Mk-II? Has many of the AKT8iE Mk-I units showed build and sound quality issues or just the first batch or two before they quickly launched AKT8iE Mk-II?
sanakimpro
sanakimpro
Hi, Subhakar, sorry I'm more than a year late.. I bought the MK-1 but I accidentally broke it physically when changing tips, the nice people at Selfridges offered a free MK-II, so I got best of both worlds!

As far as MK-II goes, it is pretty similar story to MK-I, but with deeper more controlled bass and clearer sound, as in more instrumental separation. I don't think QC is an issue with respect to MK-II, even my MK-I was not QC issue.

sanakimpro

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Fun sound, very solid build, excellent customer service from RHA
Cons: Not superbly detailed, lacking separation, some sound leakage.
RHA T10i Review
 
I got mine second hand, so no pretty pictures, unfortunately. I am writing this review based on my experience with these and I am not related to RHA or any audio company for that matter. Basically, I’m a music enthusiast.
I’m here to write a short newbie review. So, please excuse the informality.
 
Conclusion
In my experience, many reviews are TL;DR, so I post the conclusion first as it seems like a good preface as well.
IMO, the engineers behind the T10i were trying to offer the consumers an excellent build quality IEM, with the sound signature that most consumers are used to. I think they bet of people using Spotify and listening to modern recorded music, which I heard, are brightly recorded, so the T10i complements these nicely.
Other audiophiles who are looking for clarity, flat response, etc. might be disappointed, but hey, let’s give credit where it’s due. RHA managed to create a classy IEM which also feels high class when held, with customizable filters, etc, which I think is superb!
 
Why I keep these:
1. Excellent customer support
2. Can sleep in these as they fit in my ear pinna
3. Superb build quality & durability for frequently moving people like me
4. Great sound for genres I like (EDM, rock, metal)
 
Why I might sell them:
Times when I prefer:
1. More detail and clarity
2. Flatter response
3. Need for extreme noise isolation
 
Customer Service
What urged me to write this review is the exemplary customer service I received from RHA.
I am extremely impressed with their superior customer service. I bought my pair second hand from Ebay a few weeks ago and was happy with the T10i. It was fitted with the bass filter when it arrived, so I assumed the seller was using that filter. I proceeded to try the treble filter and was shocked to hear the difference (read below).
Then, I put on the reference filter and noticed that something was fishy, that somehow there was volume imbalance. When I rechecked the filters, I noticed that one of the filters had not been cut! Nervous, I wrote RHA an email and they promptly replied, offering a free replacement by Royal Mail First Class. I was over the moon! Impressive!
Just in case you are curious what happened:
IMG_4354.jpg
 
I received the complementary filter by RHA: 
IMG_4402.jpg
 
clip_image002.jpg

clip_image004.jpg

Build Quality & Accessories:
I have nothing but respect for the MIM (metal injection moulding) process used to make the shell of these IEMs; they feel premium and solid in my hands. I absolutely love the finish!
There are also ear hooks which retain their shape after you take them off. I find them useful as I can easily distinguish the left and right drivers immediately.
Not to mention the red and blue colour coding beneath the drivers; but for times in the dark, when I am are fiddling with the T10i and going to sleep with them, the ear hooks help . Yes, these were moulded in such a way that I can sleep on the side of my pillow and not feel them poking at my ear canals; another plus!
Other accessories such as bi-flange, foam tips, etc are very useful but I find myself using bi-flange + foam tips.
 
Isolation:
Owning a pair of ER4S for the times when I prefer a more analytical sound, I find the isolation of the T10i not close to the ER4S. It does isolate well and I usually cannot external sounds when I listen to music, but when music is off, I can tell that the ER4S isolates way, way better.
 
Sound based on “Reference Filter”
Firstly, as this is my first review, I am not sure how good my reference is to other reviewers. I tend to own both bright and warm headphones for different listening moods. These are what I’d consider warm (or dark?)
 
I got here last because I think that the above points were more salient features of the T10i. In terms of SQ, I’d say that the T10i is for those who love warm, thick sound, it tends to cover the stage with macro details beautifully and leave those details you heard with analytical phones like the HD 600 or my ER4S missing.
 
Source: iBasso DX 90, Epiphany Acoustics O2/ODAC + Spotify Premium or 320kbps MP3
For me, that means that for the days when I want to hear music, and rock my head to the bass lines, or to the drums and toms, then I’d grab the T10is. I find that I use them for modern pop, EDM, rock, etc and they fit the bill nicely. I’m now listening to Avenged Sevenfold while typing this and the bass remind me of the DT 770 and Custom One Pro by Beyerdynamic.
 
What I notice is that for rock or metal, the vocals seem a bit more pushed back, but still I can discern the lyrics. The lead singer seems to stand pretty close to the band, giving the perspective that I am further away from the stage. To me, I think this means that the lower midrange seems suppressed due to the lifted highs and lows.
Male vocals come out pretty nicely because the added bass gives more masculine, baritone sound, which I prefer when listening to Rammstein. It gives a feeling of aggression, grave dark voice which I think is the best part of Rammstein, although I don’t speak German. Ich Will and Sonne are best heard with the T10i. These song comes out a bit hazy in the midrange, with emphasis on the vocals, on the bass, which is great in this genre, IMO.
 
For electronica, I am now listening to House Music by Benny Bernassi and the initial intro bass beats are so punch, while the treble tilt means that I still can enjoy the highs. I also used the T10i and kept rocking on to Skrillex; very satisfied.
 
One comment I have is on female vocalists, even on modern pop like Meghan Trainor and Taylor Swift. Due to the enhanced bass, I must admit that I find that the vocals come out a bit meaty and unnatural for female vocalists. If I just want a good beat to sing to, then it is fine and I love the beats in their tracks with the T10i, as I said, the T10i seems to be engineered for modern pop tracks. But for the moments when the audio critic emerges, I can clearly say that the bass emphasis removes some of the sparkliness I love from these singers.
 
Soundstage is above average, instrumental separation is fine for IEMs of this price, I guess. I used to love headphones and IEMs have not impressed me with their sound stage and instrumental separation, even the JH Layla. Again, all these are IMO.
I think as a result of the lifted bass and treble, the midrange seems pushed back, and meant that sometimes instruments seemed mashed / blended together. It’s not noticeable in tracks with a few instruments but when you have metal with many instruments, then it might be as I described.
 
To end the section on reference sound, I want to say this, if you are looking for IEMs with great DROP, DROP DROP, T10is are awesome! Geez, makes you want to replay the DROP again and again. Awesome, man!
 
Filters (relative to “reference”):
Why I put “reference” is because I expected reference to be flat response, but apparently, the tuning of the reference is RHA’s reference. Which is quite enjoyable, but not flat response, per se.
These filters do alter the sound at certain corner frequencies, but the general signature is quite similar to the “reference” filter.
Bass Filter:
 
These have some black material behind the filter. Even more than the reference filter, as I can see. Mid-bass hump is very obvious, IMO relative to the reference. I think there is some loss in highs extension, but the resultant sound becomes boomy due to the elevated mid-bass hump.
 
Treble Filter:
Initially when I was waiting for the replacement filters, I thought the treble filter gave a pretty good sonic balance to the T10i because of the reduced bass response, but after I received the reference filters, I stuck to them. There was so shrillness or harshness since the treble wasn’t too screamy in the first place. The treble filter reduced the bass further, but the bass was still very present, and I didn’t perceive any benefit from the treble filter, IMO. However, the treble became too enhanced and sometimes too piercing for my liking. So, I stuck to the treble filters.
 
Conclusion:
See above :wink:
  • Like
Reactions: gilangax
Back
Top