Reviews by pileman

pileman

New Head-Fier
Pros: Good isolation, good midrange, quite nice soundstage for a closed back headphone, price/performance, sturdy, rotating cups, great looks? , portable
Cons: Heavy non detachable cable, horrible earpads, high clamping pressure, muffled and overemphasised bass, metallic treble
The ATH-M50 headphones are one of the most recommended headphones on the Internet. Sure they do sound quite good as for a 200$ headphone, but there are far better sounding headphones in the same price range. In my opinion coiled cable headphone version is more bulky than the straight cable version and adds an unnecessary weight. I have both versions of these headphones and I can say that the straight cable version is much much nicer.
 
Sound:
Bass: bass is overemphasised, muffled, loose I would rate it 6/10 and use EQ to bring it down a bit.
Midrange: the midrange is very nice when bass is EQ'd down, I would rate midrange 9.5/10.
Treble: treble has poor detail, quite harsh sounding, after 100 hour burn in it does improve. Overall I would rate it 6/10
 
comfortability:
 
Clamping pressure really makes it, impossible to listen to these headphones for long periods. Also the earpads warm ears up. I would rate comfortability 7/10
 
Conclusion:
Even though these headphones have problems with comfortability, bass, treble and non detachable cable I would really recommend these headphones for portable use and getting straight cable version, instead of coil cable, as it adds unnecessary weight. Overall I would rate these headphones 8/10
Kunlun
Kunlun
Hi, could you outline in a few sentences the qualities of some of the other headphones in the $115 range that you feel clearly outperform the ath-50?
Thanks!
autoteleology
autoteleology
I really hope you didn't actually pay $200 for these. They can be had new for about $110, and used for less than a hundred dollars. They might not be the most competitive in the two Benjamin range, but for a hundred bucks you'd be hard pressed to find a lot of legitimate competition.

pileman

New Head-Fier
Pros: Very balanced, great mids, great highs, classy looks, bass is balanced
Cons: headband, sub-bass is a bit lacking, sound-stage could be better
I'll make this really short (because of my poor writhing skills)
 
Bass - bass is good but I find sub-bass a bit lacking. 9.5/10
 
MIDS - Wow, incredible mids. But sometimes it feels that there is to much of mids. 11/10
 
Highs - really smooth and detailed and not as harsh as other headphones like DT990 or DT880. 10/10
 
Sound-stage - I find sound-stage to be lacking :frowning2: and probably not as quick as I expected when I first bought them. 8/10
 
Comfort - really great comfort, no issues except for the adjustment part. 9.5/10
 
Overall: I find these headphones to be amazing, but they are quite picky, and I find it hard to listen to mp3s.
headphonatic
headphonatic
Wow, you got them for 526, I hope that includes shipping.
XxDobermanxX
XxDobermanxX
Nice review
Lorspeaker
Lorspeaker
good review !
think i got my first set for 200, but i need to sun the pads...de-smoke the drivers..wipe the moulds off the box. :p
then add 150 for a new set of cables...and its the best can ever for enjoyment.
it doesnt have the widest soundstage the clearestdrivers yadayadayada...doesnt matter.

pileman

New Head-Fier
Pros: None
Cons: horrible sound, clarity, price, cable quality. overrated
Had a chance to test these headphones from a friend. Nothing good to say about these headphones, they sound horrible, like a plastic speaker.
mad.gif
I myself owned beats solo HD which are really horrible sounding headphones.
D
daveIT
Nah, they are garbage. Dr Dre should be ashamed putting his name on them.
XxDobermanxX
XxDobermanxX
Good review
HolyCheese
HolyCheese
The studio's don't sound that bad.. They are just way overpriced.
The solo hd's however suck prety hard. SQ wise a bit better then the senn hd 201's
That's 20 euro vs 150 lol

pileman

New Head-Fier
Pros: Great value, smooth mids, quite neutral, great build quality, punchy bass, nice soundstage, easy to drive, nice design, details, can be EQ'd
Cons: Loosy bass response, very overpowering lower and upper bass response, METALLIC HIGHS, clamping pressure, quite heavy, detachable cable would be nice
Audio-Technica ATH-M50S are really great headphones for the price, but are definitely not the best cans out there. In my opinion these headphones have a lot flaws. Biggest flaw is the bass response. It's great for metal and hip hop, but even though I'm quite of a BASSHEAD, I find the bass to be too lossy, and really overpowering the mids and the highs, especially when listening to Pink Floyd
do1C2f7DpvCDPnAAgtqU3ndrS4iKO6X1gEoqo78mcf0K6sKdacyr4hS49mmsosF-vVW_DKdzd_kirhYVOzMDGUZAlFONs8rkOj8v9s30dUy4exsoM24
. Sure if you are listening through a computer or a phone or any source that has an EQ it can be easily fixed by lowering the low frequencies. But there is one thing that I couldn't fix is the harsh, metallic treble. Even after 300 hours usage these cans still have treble problem which is unbearable when listening to "Drum and Bass".

Verdict:

Audio-Technica ATH-M50S has a lot of bass, which is great for hardcore bassheads, but lacks clarity in high frequencies, and despite that these cans doesn't have a detachable cable, Audio-Technica ATH-M50S are foldable, easy to drive, great for hip-hop, metal, rock, and has an incredible value, and boosting really good sound quality.

 
XxDobermanxX
XxDobermanxX
Cons: Loosy bass response, very overpowering lower and upper bass response, METALLIC HIGHS, clamping pressure, quite heavy, detachable cable would be nice,recessed mids, no soundstage, overrated :)
jeffdachef
jeffdachef
i'm sorry but to say this headphone is good for bassheads is a joke, i think your more on the lines of a rock enthusiast that emphasizes clean bass rather than the skull numbing bass associated with bassheads.
Back
Top