Introduction

If you've read a couple of my reviews, you'll see that most of them are for closed-back headphones. I prefer closed-backs because I mostly listen to music at work and I don't like to bother anyone. Anyway, I haven't had an open-back since the Shure SRH1840s/Senns HD600s and had never tried a HifiMan headphone and I figured this would be the time I got to try one. Had a great deal on them and decided to order. Mostly, I bought these expecting an underwhelming experience after reading so much about the HE400/500 and I'm glad to say that these headphones truly rock.
 
Quick impressions:
 

1. Excellent comfort
2. Superb clarity
3. Excellent sound

 
Simple huh?
 

 
Specs:
 

1. Driver Type: Planar Magnetic
2. Impedance @ 1kHz: 35 ohms
3. Sensitivity: 90 dB SPL/V
4. Connector Type: 1/4"
5. Cable Length: 2 m
6. Cable Style: Straight Y
7. Weight: 13.3 oz.

 
 
Package Contents:
 

1. Big Ass Wooden Box (very good looking)
2. Headphones
3. Dual-entry cable
4. Documentation

 

 
Design, Comfort and Build:

Design-wise, nothing ground-breaking. Similar to their past headphones but more "plasticky".  They seem well done and the cups are definitely tasty. Overall, they look very good but I think they couldn't withdstand any kind of abuse so it's best to treat them well.
 
Comfort with the HE560 is simply phenomenal! Very light, fit quite well and the earpads are excellent. 
 
 
Sound:
 
My first impression was... "WHERE IS THE BASS?!?!?!" It sounded far-off to my ears... then I discovered that my media player settings were messed up on my PC! After that was fixed, I was good to go and enjoy the cans. 
 
Non ear-piercing highs and very clean, clear and resolving but a bit bumped. Sibilance on bad recordings was not "enhanced" (i.e. like happens on some of my "Studio" headphones), excellent vocals reproduction, guitar crunch was excellent and overall very natural sounding with lots of air and space. I went through my usual playlist consisting of:
 
Thrice - Under a Killing Moon
Miguel Bose - Este Mundo Va
Kaskade - Fire in your Shoes
Blink 182 - Kaleidoscope
Jon Cleary - When you Get back
Mima - Oigo Voces
Esperanza Spalding - What a Friend
Sara Bareilles - Vegas
Killswitch Engage - Fixation on the Darkness
Juancho - Pillala
Boston - More than a Feeling
J-King y Maximan - Ella me Pide Something
Calvin Harris - Feel so Close
Three Six Mafia - Late Night Tip
Orquesta Macabeo - Me Repito
 

Does it have the slamming bass that I like and crave most times (errmm... I have Ultrasone Sig DJs, modded Denon D5000s, Dido's D901s, JVC SZ1000s, etc)? No! Of course not. They are not voiced to be "bass-head" or bass tilted headphones. Sub-bass doesn't seem elevated at all BUT it has great presence and most of all great speed (i.e. fast decay)! This is probably the cleanest most balanced headphones I have ever heard. Like most have mentioned on the boards though, a slight bump in the treble region is noticeable, even more so with these being so airy... bump seems to give it a certain crispness that I like though and it doesn't mess up vocals from my fave ladies. Of course, I used to have an SRH940 and have Spider Moonlight Studios so comparing treble energy to those is downright laughable (yeah those two can be shrill sometimes/most times...). 
 
Like I mentioned earlier, these are really "balanced" (neutral-ish) with just a tiny bit of warmth on the mids (but not LCD nor Alpha Dogs warmth). Mids are lovely as well and I can't believe the imaging of these. Soundtracks sound excellent, live songs are really involving. I have to say that I've been definitely surprised!

Frankly, I don't have as much experience as some other guys here, but I can definitely say that this is one of the best headphones (closed/open doesn't matter) I've heard with regards to overall sound, imaging and performance! It's like they were made up for the genres I listen to. Overall, HE560s >> all headphones in my profile in overall sound reproduction and experience (including Alpha Dogs, LFF Enigmas, D5000s, etc, etc, etc -- I don't have the T5p's to compare here but... I don't think I'd pick the Beyers anyway).
 
Does this mean that I prefer them over the ones in my profile? Ermmm... no. 

Even though these are the best sounding headphones I've tried and probably one of the most comfortable ones, I still love the closed-back "sound" (i.e. a bit more intimate, bass a bit slower and with more impact/thump, etc.)

But I wouldn't have a problem recommending these to anyone looking for GREAT sounding cans.
 
               
 
Now, my main "con", these puppies LOVE POWER!!! 
Right now I'm driving them as: PC --> NuForce Icon HDP --> Burson Soloist SL (High Gain)
I'm pretty sure that with better gear, these might even be end game material for some! Really, can't imagine these on better gear! (they probably give more expensive headphones a run for their money...)
 
Other "misses": Good quality cable BUT a bit short. Box looks lovely but... well, not really usable. It becomes difficult getting the headphones in and out every time due to the way the foam cut-out is.
And that's it about cons! Not many really.
 
Comparison summary:
 
Here's the part where I list a bunch of headphones and try to "rank" them... so let's say that the HE-560s only lose in Bass Quantity... yeah... that's it.
 
Bass quantity: HE-560s losses to most my closed backs and even my previous open-backs
Bass quality: HE-560s better than all my hp's.
Mids presentation: HE-560s better than all my hp's.
Soundstage/imaging: HE-560s better than all my hp's.
Highs: HE-560s better than all my hp's.
Sound Isolation/Leakage: Open-back... well... you know...
Fun Factor: Middle of the pack.
Price: EXCELLENT
 
 
Summary:
 
So, if I were to choose a favorite from all my headphones and/or the headphones I have tried, I would definitely pick these HifiMan's. They are just, almost perfect. I had said something similar about the Alpha Dogs, and I still feel the same in the closed-back cans category, but I feel that HifiMan just created an almost perfect experience whether open-back/closed-back. Yes, to my ears, they are just that good.
 
 
Conclusion:
 
Props to HifiMan for making a kick-ass set of headphones. I'm definitely a fan!
If you like a bit of a bass-tilt, then be aware that these might not be for you. Just be sure of what you really want and make your selection based on your tastes and gear.
But like I mentioned on the title/Summary, The HE-560s are one of the best listening experience I've had with a headphone (open/closed-back)
 
 
Now... where is the HE-XC?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!? (a closed-back sounding like these... I'd probably sell most of my gear...) LOL  

 
 
Thanks.
 
 
 
 
A couple of extra pics... 
 

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER
This X5 is a pre-production unit that is part of a FiiO organized US tour. We are not being paid for this nor are we being “forced” to sing praises. The following review are my views and opinions on this DAP compared to my current stable.
 
 
Introduction:
 
In my head-fi journey there is something that has always been constant and that is a whole lot of music being bought, ripped and enjoyed. A few years ago, the company I work for decided that they were not going to let us use “tablets” as our personal MP3 players due to security issues. I had a crappy Archos 7 Internet Media player with 160GB of disc space where I put all my songs and movies and although quality was NOT that great, I valued disc space and something more important to ME, battery life. From that moment on I started looking into different options, from the traditional iPod Classics, to the Touch, to the Sansa’s, etc. Most of them failed in one area, memory, with the exception of the Classic but I didn’t liked iTunes, have never bought a single song through their store and in fact I haven’t liked Apple a lot either so that left me with few options. Decided then on a simple Cowon C2 because battery life was excellent, I could use 64gb microSD cards and I had used their players before (plus I was already Ok with crappy UIs using Archos players such a long time – owned a 604, 605, etc.) Soon I noticed that my HD tracks were growing in numbers and I needed even more space but not only that, my headphone collection was growing bigger, better and I needed a bump in sound quality. So last year I began the search, the search for the “perfect” DAP… now, what do I think it’s a perfect DAP? Easy, one that:
 
1)Offers great battery life
2)Has enough space for my songs (or supports 64gb microSD cards)
3)Can play my WHOLE collection via Shuffle mode without problems
4)Easy to use UI
5)Offers a sound upgrade on previously owned DAPs.
 
 Is the X5 MY perfect DAP? Let’s find out:
 
    
 
Specs:
 
Too much info to fill this review so, just go here:
 
http://www.fiio.com.cn/products/index.aspx?ID=100000055517771
 

 
 
Package Contents:
 
Just like the X3 before it, the new X5 brings us in its compact case:
 

1. FiiO X5 (of course)
2. Documentation (Quick Start + Warranty, etc.)
3. USB charging / data cable
4. Rubber/silicone protective case
5. Protector plugs for inputs/outputs
6. Digital out to coax cable
7. USB micro SD card reader
8. Screen protectors

 
  
 
Not sure if this is the “Final” content that will arrive to us on March, but seems pretty complete to me!
 
 
Design and build:
 
Now, this is something that I was afraid of. The X3, even though is a very capable player, had such a horrible design. Not from a “looks” standpoint but from a usability standpoint. The button layout was just too confusing. Of course, you get used to it after a while, but it was definitely flawed. I’m happy to say “not so” with the X5. Not only does it sport kind of like an “old-school” design, but this thing is built like a tank! Button placement is definitely an improvement and the inclusion of the scroll wheel was an excellent choice. Navigating through folders with the X3 is a nightmare, really, especially if you have LOTS and LOTS of files but with the X5 not only is it faster, it feels natural.
 
Didn’t see anything out of place, nor badly constructed in this “pre-production” unit, my only critiques: possible issues with the scroll wheel and SD card rubber protectors. These are PROBABLY the only Achilles-heel I think regarding longevity but of course, that’s just an assumption. I also found the “Volume” buttons to be a bit difficult to press, not sure if this was on purpose or not but thank God for the capability of the middle button and scroll-wheel combo as another option to increase volume. (Edit: Joe stated that the volume buttons are stiffer on your preview units than the production units.) Love the feel of the device, the color and matte finish, the all “metal” enclosure it looks and feels like a high-end device.
 

 
UI:
 
This is always something that I’ve been concerned with on all of these new DAPs. We (the community) have discussed this on the forums a whole lot. Why are we paying for players with incomplete software implementation and horrible UIs? (Studio V, I’m looking at you!) The X3 actually does a good job regarding UI, the AK100 MK2 has a simple (read: “Ok”) software implementation but I have to say, the X5 takes the cake!
 
Configuration menus are clean, well-organized, easy to navigate and straight-forward. System Settings include options for: Language, Media Library updating, Key-lock setting (important, once you press “Power” to “lock” the device, NONE OF THE BUTTONS work (this is the default "lockscreen 1" option)! But a second key-lock setting actually lets you forward a track, change volume… Nice!), Screen timeout, brightness, etc. You also have Play Settings where you select your Play Mode (long live Shuffle!), turn On/Off Gapless playback, select between Low and High gain, etc. Again a bevy of options at hand, all working as they should. Also, did I mention that there’s a 10 band equalizer as well? Well, there is (with presets and optional “Custom” entry. )
 
Navigating through the menus with the scroll wheel, although it feels natural and easy, is a bit confusing at first (i.e. the animations are a bit jerky and I got confused if I was actually going up or down when scrolling) but you get used to it. You can go to a “Browse Folders” menu which lets you select the microSD card you want to navigate through or you can browse by Categories which includes: Artist, Albums, Genre or my favorite the “All Songs” one.
 
Of course, browsing by Categories (tags) is good and all if it works… One of the roadblocks for me was that every time I tried updating the Media Library with my 2 64GB microSD cards, it hung… It seems the player either has problems reading OTHER files (i.e. not music files), or problems with specific characters in tags, long filenames, etc. because it always failed for me at a specific number. FiiO mentioned that they are aware of the problem and a future firmware issue will/might fix this. (Edit: Joe stated that the library scan problem will/might be fixed before international launch in late March.)
 
As mentioned in the “design” section, button layout and usability is very good so the UI seems “in-sync” with the hardware, we are talking Apple-like good here (and yes, that’s a compliment!).
 
 
Extra Features:
 
The X5 not only provides headphone-out (duh, right!?) but also has Coaxial out and Line-out. Only tested Line-out to my Schiit Magni and my Lehman BCL and have to say that output is clean, powerful, I don’t feel I missed anything at all. This DAP also has a DAC option and again, same results, excellent implementation and if it wasn’t that I already “know” how my Nuforce Icon HDP sound, it would have been a bit difficult to select which I liked best.
 
 
Sound:
 
And here it comes, what I was waiting for. Now, I have to say that I expected a slightly better version of the X3 but no, I was wrong. The X5 crushes the X3 regarding resolution/detail/clarity. It provides a slight warm signature in the bass through mids without obscuring nor hiding any details. It feels it has less lower-end quantity than the X3 (I felt it had lower impact in the sub-bass region) and it feels a bit less “airy” than the AK100 MK2 but somehow every one of my test tracks sounded better through it!
 
  
 
Directly comparing the AK100 MK2 to it, I just found it … “soft” as if lacking energy. Meanwhile the X3 even sounded a bit “muffled” and closed in sometimes compared to both. For testing I used: Beyerdynamic T5p, Perfect Sound Dido D901, Ultrasone Signature DJs and MrSpeakers Alpha Dogs. And yes, the X5 did not have any problems driving all of these cans, even the Alpha Dogs in High gain… it lacked a bit Oomph but it did better than both the X3 and the AK100.
 
My usual test tracks were used:
 
Thrice - Under a Killing Moon
Miguel Bose - Este Mundo Va
Kaskade - One Heart
Blink 182 - Kaleidoscope
Jon Cleary - So Damn Good
Mima - Oigo Voces
Esperanza Spalding - What a Friend
Sara Bareilles - King of Anything
Killswitch Engage - Fixation on the Darkness
Juancho - Amor en la Mesa
Boston - More than a Feeling
J-King y Maximan - Ella me Pide Something
Calvin Harris - Feel so Close
Three Six Mafia - Late Night Tip
Orquesta Macabeo - Me Repito
Amber Rubarth – Tundra and Washing Day
 
Loved how the X5 sounded “wider” (sound stage) in tracks such as “Me Repito” and Jon Cleary’s “So Damn Good”. Metal-core tracks sounded energetic/fast even with that hint of warmth (I thought it was going to be a problem especially for guitar driven tracks but nope.) Could not really find faults with sound reproduction as it was effective with my current gear and that’s what’s important here. As a whole I would rank X5 > AK100 MK2 > X3.
 
Good synergy, good sound, can’t ask for more. (ok ok, I can… Keep reading )
 
  
 
 
Extra Notes:
 
Battery life test, it took me 10.5 hours to drain the battery from full charge until the player turned off by itself. For most people, 10.5 hours is good, but not enough for me (the X3 can provide almost 16 hours, the same with the AK100 MK2 using the same 2 microSD cards). But I have to reiterate that this is a pre-production/not final unit. So... battery life MIGHT change via Firmware updates, or not…
 
Also, THIS HAS BEEN THE ONLY DAP THAT HASN’T FROZEN on me while playing tracks. Yes, from the Archos to the AK100, ALL of them have frozen on me at one time or another. After almost 40hours+ of play time, the X5 only froze when updating the library (as mentioned before) but other than that, very stable (and I’m VERY impressed with that!)
 
 
Summary/Conclusion:
 
So, to answer the question posed, is the X5 my perfect DAP?
ALMOST!
It is robust, easy to use, sports one of the best UIs and functionality out there, gives me the ability of Shuffling all of my songs but, until the media library thing is fixed and maybe battery life improved, it is NOT my perfect DAP. SO I might say, not yet… but close.
 
Will it be the “perfect” DAP for others? Probably. Not everyone has the same needs and although I might see battery life as short, others will see it as sufficient, while I might see library issues as unacceptable, others might live by the “Browse by Folder” capability, etc.
 
I do have to say that FiiO is looking mighty serious in the DAP landscape. Not only is the X5 the better sounding DAP I have heard yet, but they are not charging an arm and a leg for them. 2014 will definitely be a good year for us enthusiasts. I’m just hoping that future firmware updates provide fixes to my “nitpicks” and if they do, I’ll be selling my other DAPs and just get an X5.
 

 
Finally just want to give a big THANK YOU to James and Joe for preparing this tour, and providing us the opportunity to “test the waters”.
 
 
Thanks!
 
 
 
Wishlist:
 
It might sound selfish but I would like in future updates:
 
1)Better battery life
2)FiiO to provide Internal memory (at least 32GBs?) I mean, I’m already using my 2 microSD cards plus like 7GBs of the AK100 MK2 internal memory.
 

Introduction:
 
Shure oh, Shure. Have to reiterate, I'm a Shure Fan. Like their microphones, loved their headphones. Was a fan of the SRH440/940 combo when I had them, liked (but did not own) their SRH840 offering and definitely needed to try their open-back "flagship" SRH1840s and did for a while last year. So of course when I read that a new closed-back flagship was about to be released, I got pumped and waited for availability. As soon as they were "In-Stock", I placed the order. It just sounded like a promising entry, you know, SRH1840 style and design, alcantara earpads, and the only thing I was questioning was: are these going to sound as excellent as their previous cans???
 

 

Specs:
 

 
 
Package Contents

As usual, Shure doesn't skimp on accessories. It's sad seeing a barebones package like those provided with the old Denon series, most Audio Technica headphones, etc. and paying "premium" prices where all you get is the headphone and... well, nothing else.
 

• HPACC3 (Zippered, hard storage case)
• HPAEC1540 (Extra set of Alcantara Ear Pads)
• HPAQA1 (Threaded 1/4" Adapter)
• HPASCA3 (Extra Dual-exit, detachable cable)

 

 
 
Design, Comfort and Build:
 
If you are familiar with the SRH1840s, then you shouldn't have problems loving the build of the 1540s. They are just excellent. I mean, "aircraft-grade" aluminum alloy, steel, carbon fiber construction, they might seem like buzz words but once you hold them in your hands you cannot deny that they feel like a premium headset. Best of all, they are EXTREMELY light! I don't doubt that these could withstand abuse and the test of time. Really. Design, again similar to their previous offerings. These look good without going extremely utilitarian nor too flashy. But I'm pretty sure that people will still talk about how they look once on your head. Shure still uses the same system when extending the headband and it looks like instead of extending down, they extend sideways and you look like a dork with them on! LOL sorry, but that's what I think anyway but maybe it's just me since I really have more of a long-ish head than round-ish... Even with this caveat though, comfort is top-notch. They made a great decision by going with the Alcantara pads. Trust me, going from something like the Alpha Dogs to the Shure's is like night and day. I rate the Alpha's very high in comfort factor but the 1540s take the cake because of their light weight!
 

 
 
Sound:

As always, the important bits... The sound. As soon as I felt the great comfort, I turned "On" my X3, pressed "Play", closed my eyes and I knew I was in for something... different. Being used to the 440/940 sound and very familiar with the 1840/SennHD600 sound, what was coming out of the SRH1540s caught me by surprise. Why? Well previous Shure's were lean on the low-end. Bass presence has been "there" forever in all of them but not really powerful nor particularly impactful. The 1540s are ALMOST basshead levels to these ears. Bass has definitely been increased so the good thing is that they don't sound as "boring" as most of their previous entries. The bad news, I feel that bass overpowers and smear a bit into the lower mids. This "heft" especially in the mid-bass region gave the overall tuning a bit of warmth. So initial impressions were:
 
1) "Oh, these are surprinsingly bassy!"
2) "a bit of instrusion but still lovely mids as always"
3) "Salsa sounds excellent, love the separation, let's play this track on the Alpha Dogs... yep very nice!"
4) "Highs a bit tamed..."
 
Went through my usual suspects after that of course and definitely the bass was the main player in ALL of them. Mids were in Shure fashion, EXCELLENT. Guitars crunch, vocals come through effortlessly my ska/punk records make me want to get up and dance, I thoroughly enjoyed every song I was playing but noticed that a bit of "air" up top was missing. Not sure if highs have been "muted" to maintain a more even frecuency throughout or if it's that whole "we are bassy/fun and don't want to do like Ultrasone and blow your ears with emphasis on highs as well" mode these cans have going on. I think Jude mentioned something about a "safe" sound signature and this is basically what these are. Elevated bass, a bit thick/warm but lovely mids and "safe" highs. List of songs played for the review:
 
Thrice - Under a Killing Moon
Miguel Bose - Este Mundo Va
Kaskade - One Heart
Blink 182 - Kaleidoscope
Jon Cleary - So Damn Good
Mima - Oigo Voces
Esperanza Spalding - What a Friend
Sara Bareilles - King of Anything
Killswitch Engage - Fixation on the Darkness
Juancho - Amor en la Mesa
Boston - More than a Feeling
J-King y Maximan - Ella me Pide Something
Calvin Harris - Feel so Close
Three Six Mafia - Late Night Tip
Orquesta Macabeo - Me Repito
 
I listen to different genres because I get bored easily and what I have liked about the Shure's is that they play well with most genres every time. And this one is no exception. Love the clarity in the mids, the detail and separation especially with my favorite Salsa and Merengue tracks.
 

 
But I do have to say that, I miss a bit of the sound signature of the "old" SRH940s... Heck, even the SRH840s. In fact, I mentioned in board discussions that these new 1540s are REFINED SRH840s. They share A LOT of similarities but the 1540s have better imaging and sound stage, more mid-bass, more evenness overall and of course are more comfortable. 
 
How do they compare?
Well, the latest headphones I've been using a lot are MrSpeakers Alpha Dogs and Beyerdynamic T5p's and I believe I mentioned everything in the Alpha Dogs review...
 

Compared directly to the Alpha Dogs, 1540s offer more bass, a bit boomy, mids not as forward but clear and good sounding, non-offensive highs, excellent imaging (similar to the 1840s and ADs), wider sounding. These Shure actually leak a bit of sound though and they are more comfortable (lighter as well) than the ADs.
 

Click to expand...

 
And this was actually disappointing, the 1540s leak what I believe is A LOT of sound when volume is increased to "enjoyable" levels (for me). At least I saw my co-worker head-bopping to one of the songs I had playing... lol. I asked her if she actually knew what song it was and yeah, she knew... So that's a fail for me there.
 
 

 
The Beyerdynamic T5p with Blue Dragon cables highlight is definitely their mids, very clear, forward and excellent. Due to their more "treble-forward" approach, they sound colder than the Shure's. Soundstage and imaging are very good as well but their highs are a bit too much sometimes (maybe too revealing to my tastes or maybe they are too peaky?). Bass is actually quite anemic in comparison with both the ADs and 1540s but what it shows it's good quality. Also, straight from the X3, I didn't found them that anemic and through the Burson Soloist SL, I actually enjoyed them more than the Shure's These are very comfortable as well, good isolation and no leakage.
 
Comparison summary, 
 
Bass quantity: SRH1540 --> Alpha Dogs --> Beyer T5p
Bass quality: Alpha Dogs --> Beyer T5p --> SRH1540
Mids presentation: Beyer T5p --> Alpha Dogs --> SRH1540
Soundstage/imaging: Beyer T5p --> Alpha Dogs == SRH1540
Highs: Alpha Dogs --> SRH1540 --> Beyer T5p
Sound Isolation/Leakage: Alpha Dogs --> Beyer T5p --> SRH1540
Fun Factor: SRH1540 --> Alpha Dogs --> Beyer T5p
Price: Alpha Dogs == SRH1540 --> Beyer T5p
 
Finally, just wanted to mention that I tested these guys with my usual setup:
 
Astel Kern AK100 MK2 --> Schiit Magni
FiiO X3 --> Schiit Magni
PC --> NuForce Icon HDP --> Lehman BCL
Straight from the FiiO X3 and AK100 MK2
(These are fairly easy to drive, did not have a problem with my gear.)
 
 
Summary/Conclusion:

So, Shure 1540s, excellent mids, very good imaging, just "Ok" isolation and leakage control, but a little bit too much bass. They are indeed enjoyable headphones and one of the most comfortable headphones I have ever put on BUT sadly, at this point in time, they are not for me. I'm still a fan though. Shure knows how to create products and cater to specific audiences. I just hope that on their next headphone they do something with their presentation (i.e. tame the lows a bit, more clarity up top) and change the design a bit so that one doesn't look weird wearing their headphones!
 
For $500 retail (you can probably get them at $400 if you skulk enough), they seem to be a good buy due to their accessories, the build, the comfort, etc. but sound-wise I'm not sold, especially when the range of headphones on the $200-$400 bracket is so competitive and newcomers seem to also pack their boxes with accessories as well. Still prefer the Alpha Dogs over these as well as other lower priced options such as the Yamaha MT-220 (not because of their build nor comfort, just based on sound preference).
 
So all in all, if you are a fan of Shure, enjoyed their SRH840, love comfortable headphones and ear pads, don't care about leakage and prefer a bassier signature with even mids and highs, these should be a good buy for the RIGHT price. As always, just be sure of what you really want and make your selection based on your tastes and gear.


Thanks.
 
 
 
Extra Pics:
 

I love these connectors!!
 

Pads, extremely comfortable but probably the reason why isolation is not super great and sounds leaks.
 

Even though there's not a lot of padding, there's not a lot of pressure up top, so they feel good.
 

Top view

Introduction

First I want to start with an "I'm sorry" because I took so long to write this and to top it off, I feel as if the review was a "waste of time" because, well, I don't see it as very in-depth, my first impressions still stand (mostly), and everything has been mentioned to death but I thought I at least should record it for posterity
 
Anyway I've been a fan of the Mad Dogs since I got them on June/July 2012 and I've definitely been very vocal about them. They just hit all the right buttons I was looking for on a closed-back headphone:
 

1. good comfort
2. isolation
3. no leakage
4. excellent mids and good bass response

 
I remember the first time I got the Mad Dogs, I put them up to test and noticed something was "off". Bass response and extension wasn't what I was expecting and indeed the headphones couldn't properly reproduce sound below 40Hz (as far as I remember). Dan noticed my post in the thread, contacted me, requested the headphones back, and after a few days I got the properly tuned headphone (all at his expense of course). So now, not only did I had an excellent sounding headphone in my arsenal, the best thing, it kept getting better with updates. Moved from the Shure pads to the Dog and Alpha's (but did not perform the final 3.2 tuning as I felt they were great as they were.) Then... big news, Jude introduced a video talking in length about these new 3D-printed headphones... MrSpeakers Alpha Dogs.
 
Now, I didn't have access to the video at work so I didn't even noticed Jude's enthusiasm until later but I went to the order page on the spot and just ordered blindly!

And I'm glad I did!
 


Specs:
 

1. Frequency response (+/- 3dB): 16Hz to 18KHz
2. Efficiency: 90dB/mW
3. Weight (without cable): 440g
4. Cable: Dual entry

 
 
Package Contents:
 

1. Alpha Dog's black Box (very good looking actually).
2. Headphones
3. MrSpeakers Stand
4. Dual-entry cable
5. Black pouch
6. 3M Cleaning Cloth

 
 
Design, Comfort and Build:

Design-wise, the Alpha Dogs still look like the original T50RP. I guess this is due to the unchanged headband design (although MrSpeakers adds a leather strap just as he did with the Mad Dogs). The new 3d-Printed cups though are a treat. They seem well constructed, and they are definitely well painted. Overall, they look very professional and in fact shares a bit of similarity with Fostex TH900s regarding color choice and form. Just like the original T50RP, I think they could withdstand a bit of abuse but I'm not sure how prone to scratches or marks the paint job is (and I don't want to find out willingly! ) nor how durable the plastic used for the cups is but they feel sturdy enough for usual and even portable use.
 
Comfort with the Mad Dogs has always been great and when the Alpha Pads were introduced, they were like pillows on your ears. I'm glad to say that this feeling was not lost with the Alpha Dogs. You can put the headphones on your head and the comfort is excellent BUT after a few hours you start noticing the weight the new cups and the cable is exerting, especially if you use lighter headphones as well.
 

 
I find the Mad Dogs more comfortable in the end due to the weight factor but if you like the MDs and don't mind the extra weight, then you should be good to go!
 
 
Sound:
 
Now the most important part. The sound.
As usual, the first time I put the Alpha Dogs over my ears I knew I had to give it a bit of time so my brain
could play "catch-up". For some reason, every time I use any dynamic headphone (be it the Momentum, Signature DJ, Dido D901, etc.) and jump to the Mad Dogs or Alpha Dogs I ALWAYS find the headphones underwhelming!!! I have mentioned this a few times before on the Mad Dog threads and I think this is very important because even though I've had the Mad Dogs for a year plus now, I still experience the same thing (this doesn't really happen when I compare or use other headphones). So I don't think "quick 5 minute impressions" work well with these 2 cans. Anyway, first few times I used the Alpha Dogs the first impressions were:
 
1) "Oh, they sound very clear..." (i.e. the "warmth" of the Mad Dogs was not as present)
2) "Wait, where is the bass?"
3) Love my girl Sara Bareilles on this!
4) "Amber Rubarth. Are you singing to me?"
5) "but highs sound weird..."
 
Then I remembered, "let's spend at least 20 minutes with these..." and there it was... Non ear-piercing clear highs, sibilance on bad recordings was not "enhanced" (i.e. like happens on some of my "Studio" headphones), vocals were shining through (male and female), guitar crunch was splendid on some of the metal I listen to, basically the mids were mostly left untouched as-in it is still fairly "neutral", but that added "air", that "clean-up" did make most genres more enjoyable and in fact most instruments sound more "natural" to me. Listening to something like "Basin Street Blues" is a total treat on these. Changing gears, I went through my usual playlist consisting of:
 
Thrice - Under a Killing Moon
Miguel Bose - Este Mundo Va
Kaskade - Fire in your Shoes
Blink 182 - Kaleidoscope
Jon Cleary - When you Get back
Mima - Oigo Voces
Esperanza Spalding - What a Friend
Sara Bareilles - Vegas
Killswitch Engage - Fixation on the Darkness
Juancho - Pillala
Boston - More than a Feeling
J-King y Maximan - Ella me Pide Something
Calvin Harris - Feel so Close
Three Six Mafia - Late Night Tip
Orquesta Macabeo - Me Repito
 

 
Just like the Mad Dogs before it, the Alpha Dogs can play most of these genres without breaking a sweat. But again I noticed something missing. So let's get into a head-to-head comparison.

How do the Alpha Dogs compare to the Mad Dogs? As mentioned their sound is different and it is actually quite surprising how the drivers can behave with different enclosure and/or tuning. The Alpha Dogs added that something the Mad Dogs really lacked and that's a bit more treble energy, a bit more "air" in the upper-mids and highs. Not only that, but the Bass bump of the Mad Dogs was tamed a bit and it is more refined and faster. What this does is give the illusion that there is less bass presence and elevated mids/highs. And this is basically my main "nitpick". For genres that rely on bass SLAM and presence (sub-bass), the clean sound of the Alpha Dogs and tamed lower-end is not the best match (my preference though). So while the bass indeed goes low, the lack of impact extracts a bit of the "fun" factor in songs like Kaskade's "Fire in your New Shoes"/"One Heart"/"Room for Happiness" or even Jon Cleary's "When You get Back". On the other hand, all of these sound very good with their forward mids and controlled highs (something a couple of headphones cannot do either!). Oh my! ...
 
Soundstage is actually one of those topics that were discussed a few months ago in detail and quite frankly I don't find it as a huge upgrade to the Mad Dogs, but again, the "clearer" sound make it sound like it is a bit wider. Imaging though is actually improved and it's probably one of the upgrades I like the most! This is what I liked the most from the open-back Shure SRH1840s and now I can get it on a closed-back headphone! Yay! In the months that followed, I acquired a few other headphones and, what the heck, decided to compare them as well. 
 
First the Shure SRH1540s. I've been a fan of Shure for a few years now and have had in my posession the 440s, 840s, 940s, 1840s and now 1540s. I was surprised at their departure for their sound on this new flagship. Surprisingly these are almost borderline basshead. After coming from the 940s (bright, boosted highs, cold-ish sounding) and the 1840s (warm, laid back mids and highs with good bass presence, similar to HD600s by Sennheiser) these sound weird, but in a good way. Compared directly to the Alpha Dogs, 1540s offer more bass, a bit boomy, mids not as forward but clear and good sounding, non-offensive highs, excellent imaging (similar to the 1840s and ADs), wider sounding. These Shure actually leak a bit of sound though and they are more comfortable (lighter as well) than the ADs.
 

 
Also got some Beyerdynamic T5p with Blue Dragon cables, bought used. The only other Beyer I had was the DT770 Pro 80s which are basshead preferred and they don't sound anything alike. Anyway, I have to say that the T5p's are "Ok". Their highlight is definitely their mids, very clear, forward and just excellent. Soundstage and imaging are very good as well but their highs are a bit too much sometimes (maybe too revealing to my tastes or maybe they are too peaky?). Bass is actually quite anemic (surprising since the DT770s were so powerful) but what it shows it's good quality. These are very comfortable as well, good isolation and no leakage.
 
Comparison summary, 
 
Bass quantity: SRH1540 --> Alpha Dogs --> Beyer T5p
Bass quality: Alpha Dogs --> Beyer T5p --> SRH1540
Mids presentation: Beyer T5p --> Alpha Dogs --> SRH1540
Soundstage/imaging: Beyer T5p --> Alpha Dogs == SRH1540
Highs: Alpha Dogs --> SRH1540 --> Beyer T5p
Sound Isolation/Leakage: Alpha Dogs --> Beyer T5p --> SRH1540
Fun Factor: SRH1540 --> Alpha Dogs --> Beyer T5p
Price: Alpha Dogs == SRH1540 --> Beyer T5p
 
In case you were wondering, one of the features of the Alpha Dogs is the inclusion of a feature called "Very-Bass" tuning which as it's name implies it can modify bass output on the headphones. So, (copy+paste from an earlier post) I followed Dan's instructions in order to perform them tuning changes correctly (and to get back to "standard tuning" after I played with the settings) and I have to say, I did NOT like it. It seems to adjust the mid-bass quite a bit (not sub-bass) and I felt the mids being a bit muddied as well. Listened to about 4 hours straight with tracks I know by heart or that I play on the guitar, etc. etc. and, well, went back to original settings. Still, the added "weight" to the mid-bass didn't come as "slam" or "impact", it was just that, weight... as in coloring the sound with a sucky EQ app (I don't like EQ'ing) so I really didn't like it as much. Maybe it was my ears, or maybe changes on the tuning indeed affect it as I heard it but since there doesn't seem to be many people that have tried this, I guess I wont know unless Dan himself tells us and/or maybe provide updated charts with the "normal tuned" frequency of one of his Alphas and comparisons against their "tuned" selves! Love the natural tone and response at it's default setting, and if I really want bass impact/slam/basshead-worthy, I think I'll just switch headphones!
 
Finally, just wanted to mention that I tested these guys with my usual setup:
 
Cowon C2 --> Schiit Magni
FiiO X3 --> Schiit Magni
PC --> NuForce Icon HDP --> Lehman BCL
Straight from the FiiO X3 (and yes, the Alpha Dogs sound good from the X3)
 
 
Summary:
 
So, if I were to choose a favorite from these three overall, I would pick the Alpha Dogs based on their excellent mids, good imaging, Ok bass presence, excellent isolation and leakage control, and very good price/performance. Let's not forget about Dan's customer service as well. Now, does this automatically says the other two are bad?
Not at all. I've had fun every time I listen ot the Shure's and actually enjoy some Radiohead and acoustic performances on the T5p's but I don't feel these two particularly blast away the ADs.
 
I also would like to mention, I wouldn't spend $1300 on the Beyer's.
 

 

Conclusion:
 
So after writing all of this and taking my sweet time I can finally say that I'm definitely a fan of the Alpha Dogs.
Sadly I haven't compared it to other orthodynamics or flagships, but I'm only limited to closed-back headphones since I mostly use them in my workplace. Now, are the Alpha Dogs the BEST closed-back headphone I have ever tried soundwise? No, I actually prefer Ultrasone Signature DJs/Pros over them... but let's re-phrase the question.
Are the Alpha Dogs one of the most comfortable, very good sounding closed-back headphone I've tried? As of today, yes they are. Couple that with excellent customer support, excellent perks (removable pads, cables, etc.) and excellent price and you definitely have a winner!!
 
So all in all, unless you are a basshead or just want more slam, the Alpha Dogs are an EXCELLENT buy. Just be sure of what you really want and make your selection based on your tastes and gear.
 
 
Thanks.

Introduction:
 
I still don't know why I keep buying headphones, really! I thought I was done but no, headphones like this one have to pop up on my radar and I'm weak enough that I have to buy them! Even though I already had what I considered my prefered headphones (Ultrasone Signature Pro/DJ and MrSpeakers Mad Dogs) I still wanted to try these just because I read they were very bassy. Being a Signature DJ owner (and a Denon D5000 owner as well), I wanted to try them and verify if indeed it would satisfy my "basshead" needs from time to time.
Let's get this out of the way, I'm happy to report that they do indeed satisfy! 
 
 

 
Perfect Sound Dido D901 Stats:
 
 
Package Contents:
 

1. Headphones
2. Good looking usable stand
3. Green 3.5mm to 3.5mm cable
4. 3.5mm Stereo Female to 6.35mm (1/4) converter

 

 
 
Design, Comfort and build:
 

 
Before delving into the sound, let's talk a bit about the headphone's looks. I have to say that, to me at least, they LOOK STUNNING. All metal construction, ear cups look spectacular from any angle, the white color gives it a nice contrast, it has a bunch of different etchings with the perfect sound name, spiders, shapes, etc. and they look a bit different from other headphones, that is until you really step in close and tell yourself: "heeeeyyy wait a minute! These are basically Beats made with metal/chrome parts and a cool comfortable headband!" I mean, the cups (and earpads) look similar, yokes as well, etc. Yeah, a bit disappointing. Even more disappointing is that they fold "incorrectly" (the wrong way). Maybe they just wanted to not make them TOO SIMILAR to the Beats! 

 
 
Like a lot of headphones lately, these guys also have dual inputs so you can use either side which is cool depending on your arrangement.
 

 
So in my eyes, although good looking, the design is not a strong suit for these...
 
One of my main nitpicks with MOST headphones is the comfort factor. If they are NOT comfortable I don't care how awesome they sound, I wont keep them. Even though these are mostly made of metal and the earpads don't really articulate that much, they are actually comfortable (at least I find them more comfortable than the Ultrasone line.) They don't clamp as much so that's probably why they feel good while wearing them. No pressure up top (unlike headphones such as Yamaha Pro 500) either. Overall I like how they feel and I can listen to them for hours!
 
Now regarding build... shake, rattle and roll... I guess one of the downsides of building a mostly all metal headphone is that every time you move harshly you will hear clicks and bangs all over the place. Heck, when you pick them up you might think you broke something since they make all sorts of sounds. I have to say though at the same time they feel robust, and look like they seem to be built to last. Time will tell! (at least I don't expect to break like the usual Beats do!)
 
 
Sound:
 
Now to the most important thing... These impressions are done using/listening my usual test songs with my usual home setup consisting of: Nuforce Icon HDP --> Lehman BCL
 
Damian Marley - Welcome to Jamrock
Thrice - To Awake and Avenge the Dead
Miguel Bose - Este Mundo Va
Kaskade - Fire in your Shoes
Blink182 - Kaleidoscope
Jon Cleary - When you Get back
Mima - Oigo Voces
Esperanza Spalding - What a Friend
Sara Bareilles - Vegas
Killswitch Engage - Fixation on the Darkness
Juancho - Pillala
Boston - More than a Feeling
J-King y Maximan - Ella me Pide Something
Calvin Harris - Feel so Close
Three Six Mafia - Late Night Tip
Orquesta Macabeo - Me Repito
 
Let's start by saying: Daaaaamn! Be careful when using these cans. They are SENSITIVE AS HECK! At times I thought that these guys wanted to blow up my ear drums! They go loud pretty fast from either my set-up, straight from a FiiO X3 or my phone! SO again, just a warning if you are planning on getting these! LOL
 
These have MONSTER BASS! Extension is superb (I can "feel" these rumble at 15Hz), sub-bass is plenty powerful (almost headache inducing when playing Three Six Mafia - Late Night Tip) and mid-bass has enough impact to take care of low bass notes, double kick drums, etc.! Reggaeton music excels on these headphones, as well as Hip Hop and bass heavy songs. They definitely are boosted (i.e. mid-bass with respect to sub-bass) and I feel that they are not super fast since there's definitely a bit of "smearing" into the mid range. Still completely understandable though, these were made for bass-heads so I wont cry too much about that. 
 
Even though bass is indeed boosted, I don't find the mids too recessed at all, upper mids in particular (since I feel lower mids are a bit "laid-back" possibly due to the bass eating a bit of it up!). Playing tracks from Esperanza Spalding, Sara Bareilles, Fiona Apple, and other singer/songwriters, I don't feel I miss either any detail, clarity, or resolution. They sound splendid which is a bit surprising. In fact, I can say that mids on the Dido's are more up-front and in-your-face than my Signature DJs. Tracks such as "When you get back" by Jon Cleary sound very very good and fun. Piano notes are rendered beautifully to my ears, so I have listened to a lot of Ms. Bareilles as well. And talking about "in-your-face", I feel the highs have more air as well (compared to the Sig DJs). It seems there is also a bit of a boost in treble (2-4Khz) as well since sometimes violins sound a bit, I dare say, unnatural, but other than that, highs are NOT ear-piercing, they are NOT shrill, they don't "introduce" sibilance, they are detailed, extended and make the headphones just fun overall. Having these qualities (bit of a boost up-top, air) actually helps with imaging as I feel they also excel on that front and on some non-bassy tracks I actually prefer these over the Signature DJs.
 

 
Summary:
 
Very good bassy presentation, Good upper mids (female vocals sound excellent and so do pianos, acoustic guitars, etc.), Good highs (no sibilance, energetic but never shrill) and Sound Stage/sound separation is very good (I find them better than the Signature DJs in non-bassy tracks) and all of these traits make the Perfect Sound Dido D901s one of the best basshead headphones I've tried!
 
If I were to order closed BASSHEAD cans by preference (the ones I have tried)
 
 
Comfort: Denon D5000 (modded or not) --> Denon D600 --> Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro80 --> Perfect Sound D901 Dido --> Ultrasone Signature DJ --> Monster N-Pulse --> M-Audio Q40 (with Beyer pads) --> JVC HA-SZ2000 --> Spider PowerForce --> Panasonic RP-HTF600-S --> V-MODA M100 --> Yamaha Pro 500 --> Skullcandy Mix Master Mike
(this is taking into consideration both earpad and headband feel)
 
Sound Quality: Ultrasone Signature DJ == Denon D5000 with Lawton Mods --> Perfect Sound D901 Dido --> Yamaha Pro 500 --> V-MODA M100 --> Monster N-Pulse --> Denon D600 --> M-Audio Q40 --> Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro80 --> Panasonic RP-HTF600-S --> JVC HA-SZ2000 --> Skullcandy Mix Master Mike --> Spider PowerForce
(note, ALL of these have from good to great sound and some are "special" on specific genres, but when nitpicking, this is how I would choose them)
 
 
Conclusion:
 
If you are indeed reading this is probably because you are bored, or a basshead so that means that you are not looking for neutral, for analytical or cold sound, you are looking for BASS BASS BASS! Again I say, these cans deliver!
 
Just like on my Yamaha Pro 500 review, If you ask: "well, why should I choose these instead of the M100s, Denon D600s or any other "bassy" headphone?
And the answer is always, depends on what you are looking for... Some people like different styles, some people have different ear/head shapes, some people like more/different accessories, some people might value comfort more than anything else, etc. As above, if only interested in the best sound, I WOULD rate these VERY HIGHLY over most basshead headphones I've tried with the exception of the Ultrasone Signature DJs and the Denon D5000.
 

 
The other usual question would be: "So should I pay $800 for basshead headphones?"
And I would say... if you can get the Ultrasone Signature DJs for similar price, well... go for those!
But in reality the law of diminishing returns is VERY real and you might find similar enjoyment from the V-moda M100s or even the Monster N-Pulse headphones (which I do liked QUITE A LOT and got them cheap!), it's up to each individual to choose whether they like the design, whether they can actually hear the differences and then decide if the difference in price is worth it or not.
 
I have to say though, to me, and after side by side compares, THESE ARE WORTH every penny!
 
 
As always YMMV, it all depends on taste! Hopefully I could provide an idea with these impressions and whenever one has a chance to test all or any of these headphones I have mentioned, do it!!!
Always trust your ears.
 
 
Bye.

Introduction:
 
Hello.
 
Had a thread for these long ago and decided to make the "review" official here.
I got these babies pretty cheap from a friend of mine. It seems he got them from a musician pal he has and when I got them they weren't even opened! The first thing I remember when opening the case was: "HOLY SHHHH THESE ARE HUGE!!!!" lol.
 
Anyway, for my impressions:
 
Pros:
 

1. Very Nice looking (IMO)
2. Nice big and padded case
3. Fast sound
4. Detailed mids
5. Excellent sound stage and instrument separation
6. Cable seems good quality but...

 
Cons:
 

1. Cable is long, stiff and slightly microphonic. It also weighs a lot. Also... after using "single-sided" cans, this dual one is just... ugh!
2. Pads are comfortable but TOO big! So big that the top of the headband actually causes a bit of discomfort.
3. Sound is airy but it feels that the upper mids and highs are boosted. Can't listen at more than 11 o'clock on the Schiit Magni...
4. Seems the pads help with soundstage but wide soundstage + boosted highs... meh!
5. Where is the bass? Definitely missing it (after listening to the Mad Dogs and Signature Pro/DJs plus all my other headphones)

 
Stats:
 

1. 10-26,000 Hz frequency response reproduces the full audio spectrum
2. Unparalleled clarity and presence with wide dynamic range
3. Engineers can pick out each individual instrument, even in large ensembles
4. Panoramic, multi-dimensional soundstage
5. One-of-a-kind look and feel
6. All-aluminum lightweight frame affords maximum comfort, even after hours of continuous use.
7. Superior isolation and noise-canceling
8. Premium leather ear pads with memory foam
9. Specially engineered and modulated detachable connecting cable made from highly conductive, Kevlar-reinforced, braided oxygen-free copper
10. Premium gold-plated connectors
11. Elegant and stylish zippered case with removable over-the-shoulder strap

 
 
Comfort and Build:
 
These monsters of a headphone are DEFINITELY made to withstand torture in a "Studio" environment if need be. Frame seems sturdy enough and seems to be made with excellent materials. Now, comfort is a bit weird. The ear pads are soft and comfortable but the headphones are SO big that sometimes I have to extend them a bit more for they to comform to my head. Not only that, but the included cable weighs a ton and it seems to pull down the headphones a bit more and since this is not a single-ended headphone, you get tugging from both ear cups. Overall comfort is NOT excellent, but it's not that bad either. If you have a more "rounded" face, you'll probably fare better.
 
 
Sound Impressions:
 
Sound signature kind of reminds me of the Shure SRH940 and KRK 8400s, but I feel that these two sound more "natural" than the Moonlight (this is of course based on memory). Listening right now to something like Calvin Harris - "We'll be Coming Back" (a track I found quite engaging and makes me want to get up fist pump and dance) it's quite underwhelming on this headphone. It's probably all that missing bass/mid-bass.. Listening to Alison Krauss and Union Station - "Sinking Stone" which is an acoustic/vocal drive song is actually quite pleasant BUT still sound artificial... too bad I no longer have the Shures, I would have loved to compare them. Same type of comparisons done with songs different genres like
 
- Mexican pop, Paty Cantu - "Afortunadamente No eres tu" (no bass presence, vocals alright, boosted highs all the way, artificial sounding)
- Metalcore (or whatever lol), Killswitch Engage - "The Forgotten" and "Rose of Sharyn" (ouch... ears... are... bleeding... Guitars are way forward -- not bass I guess -- but the attack is just too much for my ears. Again, where is the bass guitar? I can't even discern it!!)
- Emo (or post-hardcore... again... whatever ), Mineral - "& Serenading" (doesn't sound too bad actually... but it's probably because I like the sound even if it's coming out of AM radio! hehehe)
- Merengue, Blanco y Negro - "Pido y Rezo" (Good instrument separation and wide sound stage. Horns and Trumpets feel quite alive, can quite discern the piano, CANNOT hear the bass guitar presence as with other cans, vocals are quite forward BUT again, it sounds too "in your face" and unnatural compared to both the Sig Pros and the Mad Dogs which is probably a more appropriate comparison due to price range...)
 
I can say though, if these are aimed for Home and Studio use, I don't remember having monitors that lack that much "body" and warmth even if just a little. (I had some Tapco/Mackie/KRK monitors at home for recording tracks/ideas I came up with and to, of course, listen to a couple of tracks and "steal" chords and stuff like that and I found them quite good.). I guess they boosted it up to make it more "unforgiving" maybe? To maybe TRY and do both (mixing and tracking at home?)? Not sure.
 
 
Conclusion:
 
For $350 these retail, I think they are asking too much... I'd be content with KRK 8400, Shure SRH840/940, etc. (i.e. That price-range should do much better for these... they do look good though and come with a great case and good quality pads and cable but...). Right now I'm using other "Monitoring" headphones (the Yamaha MT220s) and there is a night/day difference (but I will perform more A/B between them)
 
At full retail I CANNOT recommend them.
If you get a good deal on them ($260 down), then I guess they're an "Ok" buy. 
Still I'd recommend Shure SRH940s and Yamaha MT220s to it... you can find these two cheaper (both from $250 and down).
 
 
Hope this helps.
 
Thanks.
 
 
 
**** UPDATE **** Increased the rating because these absolutely ROCK paired with the Burson Soloist SL! Using them right now, bass has come alive a bit, still forward in upper-mids and highs but it's more enjoyable now! **** *****
 
 
 
PICTURE TIME
 
This is how they look in their huge-ass case! LOL

 
Extreme pads!

 
The writing saying "Stereo Headphones" look like something out of the 70s!

 
Dual entry.

 
Similar motif, both are "Professional Monitors"... Guess which one I like more... .... ....

 
HAHAHA look at the pad difference in size!!!! Still, find the Yamaha's more comfortable... ...

Note: Ok, so I took time to write a couple of things regarding these guys. This is mostly "preliminary" as I'm one of those that feel sound signature grows once you give a lot of listening time to gear. Anyway, mini review.
 


Introduction:

THIS HOBBY SUCKS!!!
You read this right! lol

I thought I was done buying headphones for a while as I think I found what I was after with MrSpeakers Mad Dogs and Ultrasone Signature Pros but, as always, new ones come along that you just get the "itch" to try and this is exactly what happened and why I got these (and why I still want to try the Ultrasone Signature DJs and the Paradox )
 
Anyway, on with the show.

Yamaha Pro 500
Stats:
 
Circumaural
Closed 50 mm neodymium drivers
Adjustable headband
20 – 20,000 Hz frequency response
106 dB/mW sensitivity
23 ohms impedance
 


Package Contents:
* 1/4th adapter
* 2 detachable cables (1 with controls)
* Sturdy good looking case
* Stickers and a wipe
* Manual
 

 


 
Comfort and build:
 
As listed on top, one of the "cons" (at least for me) is that the headphones are HUGE! In fact, I haven't even used the "adjustable" part of the headband. Basically, without extending it, it fits good for me (I'm thinking that someone with a tiny head, or maybe a woman, will not be able to enjoy listening to these! Maybe they'll fit a bit loose? Not sure). Bear in mind though, that this may happen only to me? I'm kind of long-faced (lol), pinhead type or something like that. What this does though is put pressure on top of my head It becomes uncomfortable after a few songs so I have to keep adjusting them to mitigate the pressure. Extending the headband makes the headphones loose so, Gelocks is Sad!
 

 
Even though the headphones as a whole are Huge, the ear pads are tiny. Comparing them side by side (I'll try to include photos once I get home or later on during the day) to my Signature Pros and my Mad Dogs, it is very apparent. BUT I do have to say that they feel very good once touching the ears. For someone with big ears it might actually feel like an on-ear headphone though but at least to me they feel better than the V-Moda M100s.
 


 
Build quality seems top-notch. Not sure how much pressure the plastic can widthstand but they seem to be sturdy enough. Paint quality (I have the blue ones) is great! Really lights up the room and everyone ask which brand it is . They DO look like Beats clones though which might be a problem for some and as mentioned earlier, the size makes you feel like you have a "Halo" or something.
 

 
I guess that's all I have to say about that so let's go to...

Sound:
 
These impressions are done using/listening my usual test songs:
 
Damian Marley - Welcome to Jamrock
Thrice - To Awake and Avenge the Dead
Miguel Bose - Este Mundo Va
Kaskade - Fire in your Shoes
Blink182 - Kaleidoscope
Jon Cleary - When you Get back
Mima - Oigo Voces
Esperanza Spalding - What a Friend
Sara Bareilles - Vegas
Killswitch Engage - Fixation on the Darkness
Juancho - Pillala
Boston - More than a Feeling
J-King y Maximan - Ella me Pide Something
Calvin Harris - Feel so Close
Tenacious D - The Metal
Three Six Mafia - Late Night Tip

First off... These guys GO LOUD!!!!! I'm using: Cowon C2 --> Schiit Magni --> phones.
IMPACTFUL bass! Lots of Quantity and good quality actually. Listening to Jon Cleary's "When you Get Back" it's actually a treat and I think this track shows the abilities of the Pro 500s. Stepping to something more "club-like" such as Kaskade's "Fire in your Shoes" and Calvin Harris "Feel so Close" is actually a very good experience carrying enough bass and sub-bass to make the headphones shake and rattle a bit at high volumes. And talking about sub-bass, "Late Night Tip" by Three Six Mafia is one track with CONSTANT bass and sub-bass attack and the Pro 500s handle it quite well, no complaints (very similar to how the Denon D600s and V-Moda M100s handle it... this is from memory of course.)
 
Falling Down to a more laid back type of track, "Oigo Voces" by Mima, her voice stands out as it should in the recording, once the bass line starts it again provides good presence, separation is very good. Continuing with Esperanza Spalding's "What a Friend" piano doesn't sound as natural to me in comparison with the Mad Dogs or Sig Pros, not sure if it is because of the bass response not being as fast or a recess in the mids. And speaking about that, some tracks with male vocals don't sound as forward but again, not sure if it's due to the Bass being a bit boosted/boomy, or slow decay/response, or recessed mids. Maybe it's a combination. Either way, it's NOT unpleasant! So don't get me wrong.

In conclusion:
 
Big bass,
Ok mids/upper mids (female vocals sound better and more forward than males, so might have a bit of a recess),
Good highs (I could not detect not even a good deal of sibilance, on some tracks they were just a BIT harsh or at least reaching the limits in which I would say that the highs hurt my ears...).
Sound Stage/sound separation is very good (I find it a bit better than the Mad Dogs and on-par with the Sig Pros!)

If I were to order closed cans by preference (the ones I have tried)
 
Comfort: Mad Dogs --> D5000s --> Sony MDR-1R --> Denon D600 --> Yamaha Pro 500 --> Signature Pro --> SRH940 --> A900X --> V-MODA M100
(this is taking into consideration both earpad and headband feel)
 
Build: Signature Pro --> Mad Dogs --> A900X --> Denon D600 --> Sony MDR-1R --> V-MODA M100 -->  Yamaha Pro 500 --> D5000s --> SRH940
(if you wonder why the M100s ranked low, cracked wing-tips on supposedly indestructible headphones! BAH!)
 
Sound Quality: Signature Pro --> Mad Dogs --> D5000s --> Yamaha Pro 500 --> Sony MDR-1R --> V-Moda M100 --> Denon D600 --> A900X --> SRH940s (note, ALL of these have a GREAT sound and some are "special" on specific genres, but when nitpicking, this is how I would choose them)
 
Contents: V-Moda M100 --> Signature Pro --> Yamaha Pro 500 --> Denon D600 --> SRH940 --> Sony MDR-1R --> Mad Dogs --> D5000 == A900x
 
 
 
Conclusion:
 
All in all, the final verdict is what counts, either YAY or NAY... Sound-wise these are definitely a YAY!!! Someone looking for "good sounding big bass having headphones" can see these Yamahas as a very good purchase! Not only is the bass at full throttle but the whole spectrum seems alright to my ears except some "unnaturalness" and recess in the mids/lower mids (probably due to boost in bass).
 

 
If you ask: "well, why should I choose these instead of the M100s, Denon D600s or any other "bassy" headphone?
And the answer is... depends on what you are looking for... Some people like different styles, some people have different ear/head shapes, some people might value comfort more than anything else. If it were to sound and only sound, I WOULD take these over the D600s and M100s!
(M100s would be second, D600s would be third)

The other usual question would be: "Is the price right for these Yamahas?" And here it gets tricky. I FEEL the cost of these headphones is quite
alright for what they bring to the table:
 
- Good Sound
- Good (if similar to other brand) style
- Great deal of accessories
- Proven name brand
 
Current prices put the M100s as cheaper by $100 and the D600s cheaper by $60 or so (if you get them through fumfie.com new). Bearing in mind this, would I still choose the Yamahas? I would say Yes.
 
As always YMMV, it all depends on your taste! Hopefully I could provide an idea with these impressions and whenever one has a chance to test all or any of these headphones I have mentioned, do it!!! Always trust your ears.
 

 
 
Good luck to whoever reads this.
Check.

 

While having a random conversation with Forum member Dsnuts via Private Messaging, he suggested that I listen to these babies (I believe we were actually discussing the Monoprice cans!) because he was surprised with the bass produced by them. I went ahead and bit and I have to say, I'm glad I did.
 
I was actually looking for "bassy" cans to listen to EDM, dubstep, etc. and thought I would like the cheap Monoprice cans but I found them lacking and uncomfortable. These quickly replaced the Monoprice headphones and sound way better in ALL spectrums. Great bass, mids are audible and highs are Ok. For being this cheap, I am surprised how much fun they are! I even got 2 and plan on selling my AD700s and Shures 440 with 840 pads!
 
I do have "better" more "technical" headphones, but for the price, you cannot go wrong with these!!
 
My biggest con with these... sound leakage.
I use my headphones at work and people actually know which songs I'm listening to when
I use 'em! lol (my Shure 940s, being closed, don't leak like the Pannies!).
 
 
Try them.!

[size=medium]Introduction:[/size]
 
[size=medium]After a whole lot of browsing, reading, testing, etc., a couple of years ago I decided on getting new cans. This resulted in me acquiring the Shure SRH440s. At the time I had not listened to such type of headphones, meaning quite balanced with great mids providing a complete package that actually made you want to keep listening and enjoying music. (I.e. most headphones I had were cheap Koss or Sony’s, etc.) These cans opened up a new world for me. Yes I had good audio equipment, cheap but good sounding, for my home theater, “recording” room (I’m not a musician, it’s just a hobby to create some song snippets.), etc. but never thought much about headphones. It all went “downhill” after that… Started buying headphones just to compare but still I was attracted to my 440s. When I read that Shure was planning on releasing an updated pair, I quickly jumped on them.[/size]
 
[size=medium][/size]
 
[size=medium][size=medium]My main concern with the 440s in the start was what I praised them for now. Mids were kind of anemic… I don’t know if it was “burn-in” or my ears getting used to the sound but after a while I couldn’t get them away from my ears, I loved the mids! Bass was something that quite never settled with me. They were kind of lacking (when compared to a couple of other closed cans) but the upgrade to 840 pads made some sonic changes for the better (especially bass region!). So for the 940s I was expecting more great things (including better bass…). I was wrong… (more in a bit )[/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]SRH-940[/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]First let’s talk about the headphones.[/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]When I saw them I was surprised. The industrial-like silver/gray color was great looking and a departure for the whole black-motif of the earlier series (except the “DJ” one). The velour pads were another departure (I live in hot-ass Puerto Rico and I was just thinking of sweaty ears/head lol!!) which I wasn’t sure about (after getting used to the 840 pads). The complete package was complete enough that gave me the security I made a good purchase. But it all hinged on the sound…[/size][/size]
 
[size=medium][/size]
 
[size=medium][size=medium]Stats:[/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* Transducer type: Dynamic neodymium magnet [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* Driver size: 40 mm [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* Sensitivity (1kHz): 100 dB/mW [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* Impedance (1kHz): 42 Ω [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* Max. input power (1kHz): 1000 mW [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* Frequency range” 5 Hz - 30 kHz [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* Net weight (without cable): 11 oz (320 g) [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* Length of cable: Coiled: 9.84 ft (3 meters), detachable, Straight: 8.2 ft (2.5 meters)[/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* Type of cable: Detachable oxygen-free copper [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* Plug: Gold-plated 1/8" (3.5 mm) stereo mini jack[/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]Package Contents:[/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* Replaceable velour ear pads [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* Two included detachable cables (coiled & straight) [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* Zippered hard travel case [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]* 1/4th adapter [/size][/size]
 
[size=medium][/size]
 
[size=medium][size=medium]Sound:[/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]And we got here… even though I was expecting more low-end presence on these headphones, it was actually the opposite. I have to say that high-end band and mids were more forward than the 440s (or any other I have ever heard) and still bass light (even more so than the 440s with 840 pads!). Was I disappointed? Shure! ( ) But I also had to keep in mind that these were “recording” headphones. Started breaking them in and using them everyday and then I started noticing.[/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]

1. [size=medium][size=medium]Crisp sound! Crystalline in fact![/size][/size]
2. [size=medium][size=medium]Mids were even tastier. Vocals on this thing were surprising (women performers in particular!)[/size][/size]
3. [size=medium][size=medium]Even though it is a bit bass-light can (compared to AT-M50s, 840s, some Senns) the low-end extended well and was pretty clear! [/size][/size]

[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]Began modifying my playlists, added a couple of Jazz, techno, electro-pop, etc. and felt in love back again! Highs were not fatiguing, mids were the best I have heard (still is! Love vocals and acoustic guitars on this thing!), and the bass… it does goes low but it depends… and that’s my other point. These headphones LIVE OR DIE BY THE SOURCE!!! If a recording is poor, these will be a pain to use and listen to all day. Due to the high-end being so forward, you will not be happy when you start listening to hiss, distortion, etc. Again NOT the headphones fault, but take note! Finally, soundstage, it’s great for a closed headphone. It will definitely not beat HD600s nor cheaper AD700s soundstage but it’s good. Tested with indie and jazz you can actually pay attention to the music and instruments without being disappointed in them being panned way to your left or right, etc. (unless the recording is actually like that! Lol). [/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium]Overall, I grew to like them and it’s now my preferred “portable” cans![/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Conclusion:[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]I really think that for music recording these are a great addition to your arsenal since you will be able to clearly listen to any defects you might have (being brought due to those forward highs!). If you play your cards right, you can even mix a bit with these just have in mind that these are not bassy so don’t overdue the bass quantity! Isolation is not the best ever so I wouldn’t record vocals with these on just in case any sound leaks. But I was really surprised with how “listenable” they are. Yes they are a bit heavier than the 440s but sound is so tasty that you’ll forget about them being in your head and start rocking out. [/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]I trusted Shure and I was not disappointed! [/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]If they break apart, would I buy them again?[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]HELL YES!! (along with Hifiman HE500s… yes… these hobby is like a drug! Lol ).[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Hope you liked this mini-review.[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Some bonus pics…[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][/size][/size]
[size=medium] [/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Thanks.[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Update: Just testing out with JDSLabs CmoyBB amp and… WHAT A GREAT COMBINATION! Soundstage a bit expanded, and I HEAR MORE BASS!! Is it my mind?!? Naaah, made some notes, time coded, on a couple of songs. Bass presence is definitely there![/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Update 2: If you are wondering what I used to drive the headphones: Archos 7, Archos 605, my main PC through Icon HDP and Lexicon Omega Recording interface.[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Update 3: Have I adequately burned these in? Although I don’t believe in burn-in (to me is just your ears/mind getting used to the sound signature) yes, I have had a couple of months using these for 6 or more hours 5 days a week so… hundreds and hundreds of hours! [/size][/size][/size]
 
 

[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Note: I wrote this almost 2 years ago! [/size][/size][/size]
 
 
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Introduction[/size][/size][/size]
 
Last year, after using open Sony cans that served me well for
what seemed to be a lifetime, I decided that it was time to look
for new cans, ones that would let me get lost in my world while I
was at work and to use for recording ideas that sometimes hit my
head. The search was long and hard. I read hundreds of reviews
from different sites, different types of headsets (i.e. in-ear,
closed, open, etc.) and in the end I still did not know what I
wanted. Enter Shure:
 

 
Now, this company is no stranger to the audio business. Anyone
that has seen ANY concert knows their presence since the SM57
is one of the most-used microphones ever. It seems they are
gathering a strong presence also in the earphone business,
something I did NOT know of. When I looked at the SRH series, I
felt in love. Then I read some of the reviews and it was a given, I
NEEDED TO OWN ONE OF THESE.
 
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]SRH-440[/size][/size][/size]
 
 
Now, remember on that first paragraph when I said I wanted new
headphones to use at work/home? Well, I bring back that note
because these cans are BIG. Really big! Also, these cans are
HEAVY and these cans make use of a 10 foot long COILED cable!!!
Trust me, you wouldn't want to use these while walking in the mall
or wherever... get some cheap in-ears for that.
 

 
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Stats:[/size][/size][/size]
 
* Transducer type: Dynamic neodymium magnet
* Driver size: 40 mm
* Sensitivity (1kHz): 105 dB
* Impedance (1kHz): 44 Ω
* Max. input power (1kHz): 500 mW
* Frequency range: 10 Hz - 22 kHz
* Net weight (without cable): 181 g
* Length of cable: 3 meters
* Type of cable: Detachable coiled oxygen-free copper
* Plug: Gold-plated 1/8" (3.5 mm) stereo mini jack
 
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Package Contents[/size][/size][/size]
 
* Shure SRH440 Professional Closed Back Headphones
* Replacement ear cushions
* Threaded 6.35mm gold-plated adapter
 
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]* Detachable Coiled cable[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]* Travel pouch[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium][/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size][/size]
 
 
Even though these are intended for musicians, and they even
mention the word "MONITOR" when describing these, they do not
have a flat response, meaning there is some "coloring" when
listening to music and that does not a good pair of monitors
make... but that doesn't mean they don't sound AWESOME!!!!!!!!
And that's the best thing, you get immersed with the sound they
produce.
 
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium][size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Sound[/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size]
 
 
[size=x-small]Let me start by saying that I'm no expert. I'm no musician (at least not good! ) nor an[/size]
enthusiast! I'm just an end user with very distinct tastes. I can
listen everything from Chopin to freaking Dillinger Escape Plan but I
want them to sound good and believe me, these pair sounds
great. Pop in the "****** Buttons" and you'll hear every effect,
every beat perfectly! Put on some Underoath, Killswitch Engage,
etc. and you'll hear every bass line more clearly, every lick sounds
tasty and that's what's important. Definitely the sound is
what puts this headset on the map! The only negatives with the
sound... vocals and bass!! I mean, the whole mid-range is kind of weak, but
other than that the balance is quite good.
 
*UPDATE* After a few more hours, mids settled in quite Ok. Maybe it wasme
getting used to the cans.
 
*UPDATE_2* Replaced earpads with Shure 840 ones and sound changed for the
better. I can actually enjoy them EVEN more now as it sounds fuller, even the low-end
enjoyed a bit of a boost.. so I recommend getting a pair of 840 pads (they are more
comfortable too!)
 
 
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium][/size][/size][/size]
 
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Sure, the headphones do have its cons, but overall, these are the[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]best pair my ears have had the pleasure of hearing (and I've had[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]some Seinheisers, Grados, etc... they are all good, but they also[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]have their differences and if you give me some SR60s, I'll pick the[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Shures!)[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium][size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Conclusion[/size][/size][/size][/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]Shure did enter the headphone arena with a bang! Love[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]the sound produced by the SRH-440 and the design is good (I don't like the[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]exposed driver cables though). Being closed earphones, you can indeed use [/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]them for recording on a studio but be aware of the slight coloration. [/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]The best part about all of this, that I had not mentioned, these cans only cost $100[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]bucks. Heck, if you go to amazon.com, you'll probably find them[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]cheaper now!! (they were a hundred when I bought them like 6[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]months ago!!)[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium] [/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]So if you are looking for great closed headphones and are on a budget,[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]my vote is for the Shure SRH-440 and no other. If you are looking[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]for great headphones, are on a budget, but you don't record, or don't care for[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]tonal balance, then get the Grados SR60s. If you don't like open/close and are[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]looking for in-ear ones... then do whatever, I don't really care for[/size][/size][/size]
[size=medium][size=medium][size=medium]those! hehehehe [/size][/size][/size]