Artti R2

Artti R2 is a lot different than the Artti R1. It houses only one DD whereas R1 used 3 of them. But how it is compared to the R1 is something to question, read my full review to find out.

This unit was provided to me by ConceptKart without asking for any review. All thoughts and opinions are mine.

Fit & Build

The design of this IEM is pretty simple. It is made out of plastic. The build of the IEM is small, so it fits almost everyone with no problem. This IEM is also very comfortable to listen to while sleeping. The IEM feels super light. The weight of both the buds without cable is 7 gms, whereas R1 weighs 15 gms. Nonetheless, it is very comfortable to wear daily.

The IEM could look better, but the handling makes up for it. The cable is also quite average for the price. I would’ve liked a more well-built cable like R1. Ultimately there is nothing to be wowed about this IEM.

The wow factor

The most impressive thing about this IEM is, how well-tuned it is. R2 is tuned, unlike R1 where subbass is the show's star. In R2 the midbass is forward instead of the subbass, which gives most of the genres a thump that they require, making most of the songs more enjoyable than R1.



The song above projected a very authoritative low end to my ears. The midbass was very good. The vocals didn’t feel too recessed or dry. The treble was not offensive even at mid-high volume.

The desired factor

The most desired thing about this IEM was micro details. Resolution on this IEM is pretty average but the micro details are not up to the mark. Although the level of detail is not necessary while commuting nor at this Price point can we expect much. But a bit of resolution boost is needed to feel complete about this set.


In the following song, instruments can be heard quite clearly but the textural information is not there to make it realistic enough.

The Tuning

As I already mentioned the sub-bass of this IEM is there not flaunting itself to get most of the addiction but it just sits confidently giving base to the midbass. The proportion between mid-bass and sub-bass makes the lower quite satisfying although I am missing the air that was getting pushed by the R1.


The following song sounded full with low-end. Although again the texture was not fully resolved but it gave quite a good sound, which may be enough for a neutral listener.


In the following music where sub-bass is the focus, you will miss a lot of the authority. This proves that this IEM only works when the recording consists of a proper distribution of low. High subbass/ lower midbass in recordings won’t do justice to the set.


In the following song, there is no bleed in the mids. Nor do the male vocals sound lush/thick but they also never make them feel separated in the mix. They follow quite a linear tuning.


In the following song, the female singer is presented in a very linear fashion too. The airiness and sparkles are missing which I love. But it is very beneficial for people with low treble tolerance and also it made me listen to the IEM for a lot of time.


By listening to the above album you will notice how safely the treble is tuned. There is no sibilance nor can you feel the treble is subdued a lot. I think they did a very well job with the treble here. Higher treble are airy and never feel colliding with each other, the lower treble elevation is very tasteful too.

Soundstage


The soundstage of this is not huge. Nor that everything feels claustrophobic or extremely concise in your head. It is not as wide as R1 but not as close as something like Blon Z300. And it also doesn’t have the same issue as R1.

Imaging


The Imaging on this IEM is above average. The separation is not only limited to left and right. It utilised the stage it offered well.

Conclusion

Artti R2 is a pretty neat IEM. It is a very safe IEM, to say the least. I prefer it over the Artti R1. It can work well with modern Pop genres. Making it a worthy contender to look out for while making your next IEM purchase.

Review Of The ARTTI R2​

Introduction​

Artti, a rising star in the realm of electro-acoustic technology, has quickly gained popularity for offering exceptional value at an affordable price point. Their range of in-ear monitors (IEMs) has drawn significant attention from audiophiles, with the launch of four distinct models - the R1, R2, R3, and T10. I recently had the opportunity to experience the impressive sound quality and compelling pricing of the Artti R1 and T10, leading me to eagerly anticipate evaluating their latest offering, the R2. Fortunately I got hands on a pair for review but before proceeding further I would like to clarify some points.

Disclaimer​

*This is a review unit, courtesy of Concept Kart. All thanks to them for providing. And as I've said in all of my evaluations, the same is true for this one: all of the concepts I've expressed below are entirely my own, original ideas that haven't been influenced by anyone else. If interested, go to thislink.
*I am not associated with the connection, and I receive no financial assistance from anyone.
*For the remainder of the review, I will refer to these IEMs as “R2.”
*I am using different Ear-tips for convenience and better versatility.
*Finally, I will only evaluate the R2 based on their performance, even though I will explain how it feels and seems physically and aesthetically.

Specification​

Unlike its sister R1, the R2 features a single dynamic driver arrangement. The R2 employs medical-grade resin to 3D print a tiny shell that contains a 10mm beryllium diaphragm driver. Thank goodness, audiophiles with small ears won't have any problems with fit or comfort. The small factor nearly makes the R2 disappear on the ear, and because of the simple comfort and isolated fit, they have become the most pleasant IEMs for me. The word ARTTI is written in the center of the geometric design faceplate. The OFC cable that comes with the IEM is a high-quality, silver-plated cable that terminates in a 3.5mm L-shaped termination plug on one side and two pin connections on the other. Six sets of eartips in two different types and three sizes, as well as a safe storage container, are the additional accessories offered. Regarding the technical details, the sensitivity is 106dB and the impedance is 15 Ohms. The range of the frequency response is 20 Hz to 40 kHz.

***Above Credit Image***

Sound​

According to my understanding, the R2 is designed to generate a neutral sound with a boost in sub-bass frequencies. This sound characteristic produces a warmer and more pleasing tonal quality than related IEMs, such as the EPZ G10. EPZ has recently made a huge impression on the audio community, demonstrating that emerging companies can produce exceptional sound quality. ARTTI is another brand that is becoming famous among audiophiles. When compared to the EPZ G10, I believe the R2 has higher tonal accuracy and coherence. Furthermore, the R1, the older IEMs, has seen substantial advances in tuning across the frequency spectrum, making it a far superior option overall. Let's go further into sound and learn more about it.

Treble​

Between 9k and 15k Hz, the treble of R1 and R2 varies dramatically. The R2 features a more pronounced treble as a result of the muted mid-bass, producing a crisper and more detailed sound. The treble leans darker, although it is quite close to the G10 tuning, just with more clarity and openness in the upper treble. The high treble has strong extension, resulting in an open and expansive sound with a clear feeling of note fidelity. The lower treble energy is suitable for producing tonally appealing and detailed vocalists and instruments. However, the notes are smoother and broader, resulting in a well-rounded sound, rather than sparkling or glossy. The voices are upfront and vibrant, making them stand out, but the supporting instruments mix in seamlessly due to greater vocal-instrument separation. Overall, R2's treble area is clean, extensive, and upfront, making for a delightful listening experience.

Mid Range​

The middle range sound is prominent and dynamic, due to the lessened focus on the mid bass, which results in a cleaner, lighter tone that improves vocal clarity. In comparison to the R1 model, its response is leaner, but it has a more precise tonal balance, resulting in a refreshing listening experience. Moving into the upper midrange, the energy from the lower treble is carried over, but with better note weight and presence, resulting in a bright and open sound with detailed singers and instruments. Female vocals sound wide and airy, perfectly expressing their character, whilst masculine vocals present a forceful and robust lower range. This balance is accomplished by tweaking the lower midrange, which produces an organic yet clear sound while avoiding the muddiness that may dull upper frequencies, as heard in the R1 model. Warm undertones in the lower midrange offer depth to the entire sound without overloading it with bass, enabling upper frequencies to remain crisp and enjoyable. Overall, the midrange presentation is distinguished by its openness, lightness, and clarity.

Bass​

When it comes to the bass, I wanted for this type of shelf in the tuning of the R1 or any other IEM with a comparable response, which allows for a touch of warmth in the overall response, resulting in a natural and unified response throughout the whole mix. The focus is on the subbass area, with deep extension providing a solid sense of rumble and excellent punches. The heaviness and weight of the notes are prominent in the midbass range, which adds body to the entire response. The mid bass has good smashes and thumps, but they're not that impacting, and the same is true for the sub bass. As a result, the texture and detail are satisfactory. As a result, the bass is presented in a controlled, rumbly, and punchy manner.

Technical Performance​

Regarding the technical features of the R2, the response is very decent for an IEM that is tonally appealing and enjoyable to listen to, with no harsh or lean responses. I mean it fits the criteria for being among its peers by having beautiful details, a strong stage and depth, as well as good imaging skills. Let's be more specific.

Soundstage, Sound Imaging & Separation​

When it comes to note placement, the stage is wide spread from left to right and more in front than in the rear, implying that the response is wide enough to sound expansive. The notes have a reasonable feeling of quality and layering, allowing for a somewhat crisp and clear response, which is excellent for this tune. Even the gap between the notes is apparent and far enough away for me to determine where the music is coming from.

Speed & Resolution​

The details are actually good for the price, even if the micro details aren't as revealing, but the macro elements are well articulated, and the overall resolution is rather decent. The notes' onset and decay are well-paced, resulting in a clear sound throughout the mix.

Sound Impressions ​

Sources​

Sony WM1A - When I listened to R2 with the WM1A, the response was more spread out, allowing the vocals to come across more forward and the instruments to sound separate and more resolving, but the details aren't as expressive, though the rounded notes do provide a pleasing tonality that is enjoyable to listen to, particularly the instruments, which have more room to breathe and sound fuller and richer. Even in terms of bass response, it does not sound overly controlled or lean, but rather warmer and bigger, making for a really delightful and fulfilling response.



Tempotec V6 - When I listened to R2 paired with the V6, the response was clear, with a concentration on sounding more forward, particularly in the midrange. The bass and treble sound little subdued in the expansion. However, the bass is really effective.



Simgot DEW4X - After pairing the R2 with the DEW4X, I was struck by the amount of accuracy in the notes' attack as well as the device's ability to reveal minor subtleties. The DEW4X is a really clean and precise source, which helped us bring out the finer nuances of each note and brought a degree of clarity that other DAPs typically lack. What impressed me about the DEW4X was its ability to properly recreate the speed of each note. This improved the transience of the music, resulting in a more detailed and clear mix. Furthermore, I noticed that the R2's presentation was well-balanced, with no single frequency or area taking precedence over the others. Overall, I was extremely pleased with the DEW4X's performance and would strongly suggest it to anybody searching for a clear, detailed, and accurate source for their music.

Tracks​

Millet - Anytime Anywhere
Anri - I can’t stop the loneliness
Kohana Lam - A Few Sentimental
Kohana Lam - Loving Me, Loving You
Uru - Kimino Shiawasewo
Uru - Kamihitoe
Kujira Yumemi - Kenka
Majiko - Kokoronashi
Anly - Sukinishinayo
Kohama Lam - A Few Sentimental
Kohana Lam - Loving Me, Loving You
Miliyah - Kono Yumega Samerumade
Rokudenashi - The Flame Of Love
Yu-Peng Chen - A New Day with Hope
Yu-Peng Chen - Another Hopeful Tomorrow
Yu-Peng Chen - For Riddles, for Wonders
Valentino Khan - Satellite
Kai Wachi - Happier By Now
Jawns - Erotica
ISOxo - how2fly
Kai Wachi - Happier By Now
Weeknd - Popular
YUNGBLUD - When We Die(Can We Still Get High)
Bring to Horizon - Kool-Aid
Middle Kids - Bend
FLETCHER - Leads Me On
Loathe - Aggressive Evolution
The Weeknd - Save Your Tears
Sigrid - Burning BridgesAURORA - Black Water Lilies
AURORA -
X Ambassadors - Renegades
Lupe Fiasco - Words I Never Said
Macklemore & Ryan Lewis - Can’t Hold Us
Goyte - Somebody That I Used To Know
Jay-Z - Run This Town
Lady Gaga - Poker Face
Lady Gaga - Just Dance
Ladytron - Ghost
Travis - Love Will Come Through
LINKIN PARK - Somewhere I Belong
DJ Shadow - Six Days (Remix)
Hoobastank - The Reason
Ricky Martin - I Don’t Care
Tool - 7empest
Tool - Vicarious
A Flock Of Seagulls - Space Age Love Song
Zack Hemsey - Vengeance
Elton John - I’m Still Standing
The Moody Blues - Nights In White Satin
Micheal Sembello - Maniac
Guns N’ Roses - Sweet Child O’ Mine
A.R. Rahman - Kun Faya Kun

Conclusion​

To summarize my review, the Artti R2 provides a pleasant and engaging sound thanks to its crisp treble, open midrange, and powerful bass, giving it a V-shaped sound. For the price and form aspect, they are the best in Artti's line. I really enjoyed the R2, thus this gets my recommendation.

Thanks to Concept Kart and gadgetgod for organising the tour of the Artti iems. Below is the review of the Artti R2.
All views of the iem are my own and have no incentives of any sort for the same.

Artti is a relatively new brand to hit the market with a set of iems that have gathered positive reviews quickly.

Build and fit

The R2 is a fairly small iem that dissappears into the ears fairly easily. The shell is resin based with a nice tesseract like faceplate in brown.

The R2 comes with a 2pin detachable cable and the the cable is a nice sturdy brown cable, but I dislike the L shaped taper.
The review unit came with a 3.5mm SE termination. The nozzles are fairly short and slightly above average in diameter, and did give me a fair bit of tip rolling
to get a semi decent fit. I wish the nozzles were a bit longer, and help get a deeper insert. This could be an overall dampener as the fit could be a bit of a compromise for people.

The driver is a beryllium DD. Wow, a BE diaphragm driver at this budget price is definitely welcome! Without going into the controversies in the annals of BE driver history (kbear believe et al),
the driver at this price is definitely an option to try atleast.

Sound impressions

While the iems drive alright at low volumes, I "believe" this will scale better with more power.

The sound is quite balanced, and quite reminiscent of the other BE iems that i mentioned earlier. Warmish neutral is how I would put it.

It is not a basshead or treblehead iem. The tuning is fairly neutral with very good detail retrieval and imaging. If I had a deeper fit with longer nozzles, I believe this iem has very good potential. Maybe a V2 will sort it out.

Bass - 3/5 - I was unable to get a deep fit and hence the bass was light overall. I think the bass body will definitely be helped with a longer nozzle.

Mids - 4/5 - Excellent textures and upfront presentation the vocals. Both male and female vocals are well represented

Treble - 4/5 - The treble speed is very good as expected from a BE based drivers. The iems are very nuanced on the treble end, without getting too bright.

Imaging - Above average imaging provides a very nicely done instrument presentation. Precise presentation of vocals and instruments are a highlight

Conclusions

The R2 is so full of potential, if only the nozzles were extended a little bit more. So close!