guys one question   Is it possible that the yenona earpads do not cover my ears completely ?   i got the size of them and the innner circle is 5.2 cm   i measured my ears from the earlobe up with a ruler and they are around 6 cm by looking them in the mirror.   Would you like to share...

    ok i got it thanks!

      you ask and you get. So indeed there is a U shape. but its not too bad. and definitely not bright/sibilant at all.   up to 1Khz YENONA are better than the maratz.   maratz wins on the treble side. Overall seems bassier than the maratz   According to this graph and your input about...

    oh ok. i didnt know that the one side is 3.5 but slimmer.   how about this one?     http://www.ebay.com/itm/3-5mm-Right-Angle-Mini-Plug-Jack-Stereo-Aux-Audio-Headphone-Extension-Cable-Wire-/141718241375?var=&hash=item20ff10c05f:m:mlWHGgBrzQ8QNePE3G0Jw7Q     how much thinner the one...

    will this work?     http://www.ebay.com/itm/REPLACEMENT-AUDIO-CABLE-LEAD-FOR-TECHNICA-ATH-M50X-ATH-M40X-/142279575035?hash=item21208605fb:g:re8AAOSwdIFXyD8C     or this    ...

    i dont think this is the correct cable as i can see 3 stripes instead of 2. the third one includes the mic.   does it make any difference?

    yes i know   the only problem is that i live in europe :p   that is why i asked in the first place   i couldnt find replacement cables on amazon.co.uk

at last, nailed it !     HF2010 top HP2011 bottom     the MDH9000 and HF2010 must be similar. One closed, the other semi open      

      i cannot find an FR.     i can tell you the specs     Features ◆ Unique professional design, light in weight and durable; ◆ Autoregulable headband, superior comfort for extended wearing; ◆ Closed-back, exacted acoustic cavity, which can achieve the best monitoring effect; ◆...

      the maratz cable is only the straight one. this is the one that produces the best sound.   the coiled one is worse as it increases the impedance. i am saying that for the other clones that include 2 cables instead of one and only the straight is required.   i talked about...

    thanks for the input concerning the cables. I will have a search on them.     Regarding SPL i think you got it wrong. Sensitivity and SPL are correlated         so the SPL that i referred to is for the sensitivity rating

      please share your thoughts when you get them and have them tested

i asked the yenona aliexpress seller for an FR graph disclosure.     I will let you know if i get one :)

hey guys     i think this is better than the MDH9000     https://www.aliexpress.com/item/ISK-MDH8500-Professional-Monitoring-Headphones-Fully-Enclosed-Dynamic-Stereo-Earphone-Headset-Studio-Headphone-Noise-Canceling/32784627886.html     look at the FR same as the ISK MDH9000   but...

      If the YENONA have a U shape is close to a V. I would say maybe its worse than a V because more mid frequency is at the bottom.   The maratz also do a very little U if you check the FR. But from your take the YENONA have U capital letter in contrast to the maratz with a u small letter...