olddude
Headphoneus Supremus
Sound quality is better through the Line Out and C5. I can't see why it would drain the batter faster, the load is on the amp, not the DX50
DOC2008 does it again ... here is the DX90 firmware ported to DX50
Here is the google translation from the original post on player.ru
DX90 FW 2.0.5 PORT FOR DX50 FINAL BY DOC2008
- Based on DX90 v2.0.5 firmware
- The final version of the firmware porting DX90 and IMHO the sound of the most successful (something else to do with the firmware no longer plan DX90)
- Installation through factory rekaveri
DOWNLOAD
http://yadi.sk/d/IzPKNqd7Qkv82
DOC2008 does it again ... here is the DX90 firmware ported to DX50
Here is the google translation from the original post on player.ru
DX90 FW 2.0.5 PORT FOR DX50 FINAL BY DOC2008
- Based on DX90 v2.0.5 firmware
- The final version of the firmware porting DX90 and IMHO the sound of the most successful (something else to do with the firmware no longer plan DX90)
- Installation through factory rekaveri
DOWNLOAD
http://yadi.sk/d/IzPKNqd7Qkv82
DOC2008 does it again ... here is the DX90 firmware ported to DX50
Here is the google translation from the original post on player.ru
DX90 FW 2.0.5 PORT FOR DX50 FINAL BY DOC2008
- Based on DX90 v2.0.5 firmware
- The final version of the firmware porting DX90 and IMHO the sound of the most successful (something else to do with the firmware no longer plan DX90)
- Installation through factory rekaveri
The final version of the firmware porting DX90 and IMHO the sound of the most successful
So if you are on Windows 32bit then this would bring you DAC function? Too bad most are on 64bit.
Any other benefits of using this port?
I don't understand, surely he doesn't meen this firmware brings sound character of DX-90 to DX-50?
Wishful thinking having the DX90 double dac ESS9018M with plethora of op amps to DX50 lol yeah that would be something