tinyman392
Be nice to noobs, we were all noobs at one point in our life.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2011
- Posts
- 8,707
- Likes
- 1,698
They came in today. The graph about is a graphical representation of the use of cables on the T-Peos H-200. People have stated hearing differences. I didn't hear any, neither did my microphone unfortunately. Both left and right plots are shown, lighter plots are the black cable, darker plots are the red cable. Differences are extremely minor if any.
Impressions so far are positive overall so far. Remind me a lot of the SuperDarts with more controlled bass (something that turned me off from them in the first place). There is a hint of sibilance in vocals. Detailing is a aggressive, similar to detailing stylings of an Ety, and clarity is very strong as are vocals. Midrange is done beautifully except for that slight sibilance. The dip you see around the 6 kHz isn't as audible as it seems partially due to the resonance at the 4 kHz making up for some of the instrumentals (lower treble) while the 10 kHz makes up a bit for the upper treble. The formation does lead to more of a metallic sound though that can be a bit sibilant as well (on certain recordings). That said, the dip is masked quite a bit overall. That's about all for now.
I am using the translucent grey tips right now. I do hear differences between the tips, that's inevitable really. I'll graph them when I have more time... For now, it's time to eat.
EDIT: last note, grey tips were used throughout for measurement. Smalls were the size that was used (they are the size I use personally).
EDIT 2: no problems with comfort or fit for me. I can wear these over the ear fine and the form factor has no problems with me. The elliptical protrusion on the buds help keep them stable if used properly. Driver flex, however, does show itself. It's stronger in my right ear (IEMs tend to seal better with that ear for me for some reason). So release air pressure as you insert them and you shouldn't have problems.
EDIT 3: the graph T-Peos has is accurate assuming you are using GoldenEars' compensation. It highly resembles my graph (same dips and everything). Since GoldenEars requires a boost in the bass, and mine compensation doesn't, that would be the reasoning for the bass boost.
EDIT 4: before anyone asks, my measuring system has an early roll off in the bass. I've created a compensation for it, using Rin's past graphs as a reference (as well as Tyll's), in the colored graphs. Then use the standard DF compensation.