estreeter
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2009
- Posts
- 8,336
- Likes
- 480
Take it up with nwavguy - everyone else does
http://headphones.com.au/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5786
lol man... i joined just so i can sell some gear and get new gear... not this!
lol man... i joined just so i can sell some gear and get new gear... not this!
I still think nwavguy makes a good point about the rise of portable sources, and the high output impedance of more 'traditional' sources/speaker amp HP stages. The days of someone sitting in front of an ancient receiver with a pair of K340s are behind us.
I = V/R
I and R ...one goes up the other goes up... one goes down other goes down.
I and R... higher the current (I) higher the resistance (R)... lower the current (I) lower the resistance (R)
change in current (I) results a change in resistance (R)...... a change in R (what you stated) does not necessarily imply (I) has to change. physical factor like cable thickness, length, cable material, temp... all can change R
"opposing current" has nothing to do with this... are you trying to say AC power?
guys electrical resistance can be changed in many ways... changing the gauge of the wire, changing the wire eg from copper to silver to steel, changing the temperature of the conductance... so on and one of this is current.
we all know you can google ohm's law... ohm's law is based on relation between 3 factors 3!!! AHHHH!!! Voltage + current + resistance
but yes 250ohm is more ideal for portable use
Please explain that.
Very best,
600ohm headphones require a more powerful amp to drive them, powerful amp cost more in general, powerful amp are normally bigger, big brick of an amp is more cumbersome to carry
So you're saying 250ohm is ideal. Again, please explain how this is ideal over lower impedance offerings for portable use. By what you're saying, 250ohm is superior to anything lower. So again, please justify that.
Very best,