For what it's worth, that review is referencing the Ares II enyo, not the Ares 12th. I can't say how the two Ares compare, though.My sweet smooth SMSL M400 suddenly no power... and sent for overseas repair which may take months....
Contemplating to purchase this R2R 12th anniversary for I2S input from SMSL SD-9 streamer and to Topping A90 Discrete pre-amp/headphone, lastly Willsenton R300B tube amp.
A lot good reviews for ARES is accurate, natural, separation and airiness etc
Only worry is ARES 12th anniversary may not sound as sweet smooth like SMSL M400 but thinner and colder/dryer as mentioned in the last 2 paragraph
https://www.denafrips.com/single-post/its-just-so-musical
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Denafrips Ares 12th speculation/discussion/impressions
- Thread starter Tubewin
- Start date
JerryLeeds
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2015
- Posts
- 819
- Likes
- 199
I’m enjoying the ‘12th’ version.. can anyone compare the SQ difference between the new ‘12th’ and the older Ares II model? Since there aren’t many reviews out yet on the ‘12th’ I’ve been reading and watching reviews on the prior model and it seems there would be a difference
Thanks
Thanks
borkenarrou
500+ Head-Fier
Are they making a Pontus II 12th as well? I see them for sale from a Chinese seller on eBay labeled as 12th (even has a picture with 12th clearly labels on the front panel) but see nothing about a Pontus II 12th on Denafrips' or Vinshine's sites.
It seems they send you the 12th if you buy the Pontus now.
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/denafrips-pontus-r2r-ladder-dac-close-up-view.853050/post-17280233
Last edited:
Hi
After 3 weeks of burning with playing Ben Rizzi Ultimate test CD 24/7, I decide to put my favorite playlist in.
My setup is Pi2AES I2S out—-> Ares II 12th RCA OUT —-> LSA VT-70 —-> tekton lore
My first impression was as a real shock
The records sound really different from the Delta Sigma chips I was used to. The main difference I found is that Delta sigma sound is not balance at all. Their is a kind of signature that change the original records. I found that a specific sound on the record either it’s mid range, high range, bass is predominating. I don’t know on what criteria delta sigma choose to put a range at a higher level when rendering. Sometimes in delta sigma it’s Guitar, piano, drums… It feel like delta sigma sublime bad sound or bad recording by attenuating everything. It’s a kind of lukewarm water.
With denafrips Ares II 12th, what your hear is what you get. If the record is bad, it’s sound bad whereas delta sigma chip tend to attenuate that. This statement is simple but that change a lot of things about music listening. I’m convince that ARES II 12th is what HIFI should be without any specific color or biais sound signature.
The sound in denafrips is well rounded balanced and sound AS IS. The dac is really transparent.
I am kind of force to unlike some of my favorite tracks because denafrips reveals the truth. It’s kind of here is the truth about that record.
And then this R2R approach is more align with my conviction. I don’t get why a delta sigma dac with a 25$ chips cost hundred, thousands of dollars and OEM has to over engineering so much stuff around it.
This denafrips dac is a kind of experience, I am in still in the process of understand regarding delta sigma dac, why in the same record, this particular note is running so high at the front and masking everything else.
After 3 weeks of burning with playing Ben Rizzi Ultimate test CD 24/7, I decide to put my favorite playlist in.
My setup is Pi2AES I2S out—-> Ares II 12th RCA OUT —-> LSA VT-70 —-> tekton lore
My first impression was as a real shock
The records sound really different from the Delta Sigma chips I was used to. The main difference I found is that Delta sigma sound is not balance at all. Their is a kind of signature that change the original records. I found that a specific sound on the record either it’s mid range, high range, bass is predominating. I don’t know on what criteria delta sigma choose to put a range at a higher level when rendering. Sometimes in delta sigma it’s Guitar, piano, drums… It feel like delta sigma sublime bad sound or bad recording by attenuating everything. It’s a kind of lukewarm water.
With denafrips Ares II 12th, what your hear is what you get. If the record is bad, it’s sound bad whereas delta sigma chip tend to attenuate that. This statement is simple but that change a lot of things about music listening. I’m convince that ARES II 12th is what HIFI should be without any specific color or biais sound signature.
The sound in denafrips is well rounded balanced and sound AS IS. The dac is really transparent.
I am kind of force to unlike some of my favorite tracks because denafrips reveals the truth. It’s kind of here is the truth about that record.
And then this R2R approach is more align with my conviction. I don’t get why a delta sigma dac with a 25$ chips cost hundred, thousands of dollars and OEM has to over engineering so much stuff around it.
This denafrips dac is a kind of experience, I am in still in the process of understand regarding delta sigma dac, why in the same record, this particular note is running so high at the front and masking everything else.
Last edited:
Deleeh
Headphoneus Supremus
Hello,Hi
After 3 weeks of burning with playing Ben Rizzi Ultimate test CD 24/7, I decide to put my favorite playlist in.
My setup is Pi2AES I2S out—-> Ares II 12th RCA OUT —-> LSA VT-70 —-> tekton lore
My first impression was as a real shock
The records sound really different from the Delta Sigma chips I was used to. The main difference I found is that Delta sigma sound is not balance at all. Their is a kind of signature that change the original records. I found that a specific sound on the record either it’s mid range, high range, bass is predominating. I don’t know on what criteria delta sigma choose to put a range at a higher level when rendering. Sometimes in delta sigma it’s Guitar, piano, drums… It feel like delta sigma sublime bad sound or bad recording by attenuating everything. It’s a kind of lukewarm water.
With denafrips Ares II 12th, what your hear is what you get. If the record is bad, it’s sound bad whereas delta sigma chip tend to attenuate that. This statement is simple but that change a lot of things about music listening. I’m convince that ARES II 12th is what HIFI should be without any specific color or biais sound signature.
The sound in denafrips is well rounded balanced and sound AS IS. The dac is really transparent.
I am kind of force to unlike some of my favorite tracks because denafrips reveals the truth. It’s kind of here is the truth about that record.
And then this R2R approach is more align with my conviction. I don’t get why a delta sigma dac with a 25$ chips cost hundred, thousands of dollars and OEM has to over engineering so much stuff around it.
This denafrips dac is a kind of experience, I am in still in the process of understand regarding delta sigma dac, why in the same record, this particular note is running so high at the front and masking everything else.
I agree with you and I totally agree with you in what you said.
Unfortunately I hadn't heard of the R2R dac until now.
But I can tell you one thing.
I'm currently testing the Ifi Phono stage on my turntable.
And when I go back to my D/S Dac and listen to the same album streamed, I'm missing certain parts of the music I heard on the record before.
So I think an R2R Dac is probably closer to vinyl than any other Dac could possibly be, regardless of the price.
Your words encourage me to try the Ares 12 anyway.
Even if I personally have something against it.
dexterwinter
New Head-Fier
I have had the Ares 12th for about a month. My impressions are posted on the Denafrips website.
https://www.denafrips.com/single-post/ares-12th-the-improvements-are-even-greater-than-i-expected
https://www.denafrips.com/single-post/ares-12th-the-improvements-are-even-greater-than-i-expected
Deleeh
Headphoneus Supremus
Hello,I have had the Ares 12th for about a month. My impressions are posted on the Denafrips website.
https://www.denafrips.com/single-post/ares-12th-the-improvements-are-even-greater-than-i-expected
Thanks for your report and great setup you have.
One question for you would you say that the 12 th performs better than its predecessor?
Or are they both the same and your chain makes the difference?
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2016
- Posts
- 1,712
- Likes
- 1,865
I2S input elevates it above Ares II.Hello,
Thanks for your report and great setup you have.
One question for you would you say that the 12 th performs better than its predecessor?
Or are they both the same and your chain makes the difference?
dexterwinter
New Head-Fier
I did not compare the Ares 12th directly with the Ares II. I can only say with the Iris and the I2S connection to the Ares 12th, there was considerable difference compared to the Iris connected to the Ares II with the coaxial input.Hello,
Thanks for your report and great setup you have.
One question for you would you say that the 12 th performs better than its predecessor?
Or are they both the same and your chain makes the difference?
ThatStKildaGuy
Previously known as ScuseMe
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2012
- Posts
- 39
- Likes
- 13
I currently use a Bitfost 2/64 and have a Mercury V2 on it's way, they will be connected to a Jot 2 or a Burson 3X GT. I intend to connect the Streamer to the DAC via a supra 75Ohm coax and XLR's to the amps If I change the Bitfost 2/64with a Denafrips 12th via I2S, will I get a better performance from the source or am I wishing too much? I understand YMMV
Last edited:
sajunky
Headphoneus Supremus
I give 90% chance you will be happy. Even a cheaper Audio GD R2R-11Mk2 ($690) sounds better than BF2. However with R2R DAC you will be in a long run looking for an amp sans opamps (Class A, zero feedback) or a tube amp. I warn you about, Burson is not end game.I currently use a Bitfost 2/64 and have a Mercury V2 on it's way, they will be connected to a Jot 2 or a Burson 3X GT. I intend to connect the Streamer to the DAC via a supra 75Ohm coax and XLR's to the amps If I change the Bitfost 2/64with a Denafrips 12th via I2S, will I get a better performance from the source or am I wishing too much? I understand YMMV
JerryLeeds
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2015
- Posts
- 819
- Likes
- 199
I have a BF 2/64 and SMSL D400 ES and Topping D70S and an Denafrips Ares 12th .. I am extremely happy with the Ares12th via I2S input as compared to the I2S into my the D400ES, D70S or usb into the BF 2/64
I’m now thinking of selling everything else and just keeping the Ares 12th
Don’t ask me to explain other then it just sounds better in my setup .. it just feels more ‘real’ in its sounding
I’m now thinking of selling everything else and just keeping the Ares 12th
Don’t ask me to explain other then it just sounds better in my setup .. it just feels more ‘real’ in its sounding
Last edited:
dexterwinter
New Head-Fier
Well said. Descriptions could be about measurements or with the attempt to cloak them with any number of audiophile terms. Ultimately, it boils down to the fact that in my stereo system, the Ares 12th just sounds right. I know the term musical is vague and subjective, but it’s the best I can use in describing the Ares 12th/Iris combination using the I2S connection.I have a BF 2/64 and SMSL D400 ES and Topping D70S and an Denafrips Ares 12th .. I am extremely happy with the Ares12th via I2S input as compared to the I2S into my the D400ES, D70S or usb into the BF 2/64
I’m now thinking of selling everything else and just keeping the Ares 12th
Don’t ask me to explain other the it just sounds better in my setup .., it just feels more ‘real’ in its sounding
The only supplier for US is vinshineaudio afaik
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)