Cayin N5 DAP - Product Info (Post #2), Resources (Post #3) and Discussion
Mar 11, 2016 at 4:17 AM Post #1,651 of 2,546
Reference to posts #1232 and #1235 on page 83, regarding the non-linear battery reading below 20%, now I discovered something about the upper range... I'm not sure if this is actually the first time I observed on fw3.0... my impression is so. On fw 2.0, I'm pretty sure it wasn't like that because a large part of my N5 burn-in (~150hrs so far) was with 2.0, and I have been checking quite regularly and have established a general trend of the reading dropping about 10% per hour. My impression is that by the time 3.0 came, I have slowed down the burn-in frequency and ramped up DX80's, hence I may not have observed the battery level drop trend of 3.0.

Today I happened to check the battery level after running for 6hrs and I was shocked to see 71% remaining. This couldn't be. Unfortunately I didn't manage to catch the battery flat as I was out.

I have since recharged and started another run. As of 5hrs, I'm looking at 76%. If it still lasts 9hrs (means the reading really screwed up big time), it should end around 3am later (1130pm now, GMT+8). I will be staying up till around 2am and will check again. If it is still running, I won't be too worried about the battery's physical condition. But however it would mean a probable issue in fw3.0 compared to 2.0.


Update + consolidate:
- At 5hrs, battery reads 76%.
- 6hr 00min --- 71%.
- 8hr 30min --- 61%.
- Once it falls below 60%, it's speeding up. At ~8hr 40min onwards, it dropped 5% in 3mins.
- 8hr 45min --- 48%.
- 8hr 50min --- 42%.
- 8hr 55min --- 32%, now it's dropping 2% by 2%.
- 9hr 00min --- 17%.
- 9hr 05min --- 5%.

Exercise cut. Stop before player poof lol...

So battery is still ok. Could it be fw3.0? I'm tempted to flash back to 2.0 to try...


Sidetrack... btw how do I export the playlist and later import back? I've been doing firmware flashing for both N5 and DX80 recently and really dreading each time gotta setup my playlist again :frowning2:  



Update:
- Flashed to 2.0 and running now. After 2hrs, reading is 91%. Ohno... looks like this behavior unlikely to be 3.0 related :frowning2:  
- 6.5hrs --- 70%. I stopped the exercise and flashed back to 3.0. :frowning2:  


I have promised to follow up on the non-linear battery reading issue raised by samuelboy, it takes longer then expected, but we kind of having a preliminary understanding of the issue by now.

FIrst of all, we have conducted a battery consumption test on a large sample set of N5. We setup the testing condition as follows:

(1) New N5 from production line, never been used, firmware v3.0
(2) Backlight set to maximum, and screen always on
(3) 36ohm Transistor at Balanced phone out to stimulate Headphone loading
(4) Volume at 80%

We take the battery reading of each machine at 10 minutes intervals, and the result are as follows:


Based on the result of the test, we consider the reading as fairly linear from 90% to 20% range, so the cause of nonlinear battery reading might not be related to firmware v3.0

We take this result and samuelboy's data and consult various related suppliers including the MCU Solution provider and we finally worked out a hypothesis. Within the Power Management module of N5, we have a table to store the Battery parameter and we work out the battery reading base on the battery parameter and a certain algorithm that we constantly refined to maintain the linearity of battery reading. We now assume that the battery parameter table is damaged for unknown reason, it can be caused by software malfunction or hardware crashed, we just can't be sure at this moment, we need to get hold of a problematic N5 sample before we can investigate the cost of the event. WIth a damaged parameter table, all the battery level computation become unreliable.

This actually explained samuelboy's obseration.
On fw 2.0, I'm pretty sure it wasn't like that because a large part of my N5 burn-in (~150hrs so far) was with 2.0, and I have been checking quite regularly and have established a general trend of the reading dropping about 10% per hour.


But when Samuelboy refreshed his N5 to v2.0 and crosscheck again, he notice the battery level become nonlinear now. That's because the previous observation was gathering before the battery parameter was damaged, and the recent battery test on V2.0 was after the battery parameter was damaged.

We shall further our investigation to proof our assumption, and develop solution to rectify the situation. One of the solution under discussion is to include "rewritten of battery parameter" as a standard step in a firmware update, so if the issue happen again, user can simply refreshed the firmware of the player and the battery level computation should be reset to normal after that.

I hope we can establish the solution promptly, but for the meantime, please don't panic because we are quite certain that if your N5 can run for around 9 hours between charge, the battery and the battery management function of your N5 is intact, it is the reading that screwed up, please establish a regular charging patter instead of trusting the battery reading.

That's all for now, we'll flying to LA early next week for the CanJam SoCal. This is our first appearance in CanJam so I am completed jammed up right now and there are loads of thing I need to complete before the Show. Please pardon I can't join the discussion or respond to request/PM promptly as before, I'll try to catch up. :beerchug:
 
Cayin Stay updated on Cayin at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
http://en.cayin.cn/
Mar 11, 2016 at 4:51 AM Post #1,652 of 2,546
Here is what a got from Amazon Extreme Audio 2.5mm Stereo Balanced Out Audio Adapter (2.5mm Balanced Male to 3.5mm Stereo Female Audio Adapter) for Astell&Kern AK100II, AK120II, AK240, AK380, AK320, Lotoo Paw 5000, Cayin N5 .


Are you referring to this adapter cable?

http://www.amazon.com/Extreme-Audio-Premium-Balanced-Connection/dp/B01AFEBR4I

From what I understand, this is an adapter cable between 2.5mm balanced IEM and 3.5mm single ended IEM, it cannot be used with 3.5mm Balanced IEM from HiFiman.

If someone plan to use this adapter cable to convert the 3.5mm TRRS from Hifiman balanced IEM to the 2.5mm balanced headphone input of N5, please make sure you check with the seller and clarify the issue specifically, the description doesn't seem to support this.
 
Cayin Stay updated on Cayin at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
http://en.cayin.cn/
Mar 11, 2016 at 4:59 AM Post #1,653 of 2,546
Can you post a few links of such adapter? I'm aiming to use my RE400B with the N5 on balanced mode..


Sorry, I didn't express myself correctly, I mean to say a lot of the 2.5mm TRRS to 3.5mm TRRS converter does not support 3.5mm balanced headphone from HiFiman, so please check with the seller specifically before you go for such an adapter.

Several N5 users has tried that route and to the best of my knowledge, no luck so far.
 
Cayin Stay updated on Cayin at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
http://en.cayin.cn/
Mar 11, 2016 at 6:20 AM Post #1,654 of 2,546
I have promised to follow up on the non-linear battery reading issue raised by samuelboy, it takes longer then expected, but we kind of having a preliminary understanding of the issue by now.

FIrst of all, we have conducted a battery consumption test on a large sample set of N5. We setup the testing condition as follows:

(1) New N5 from production line, never been used, firmware v3.0
(2) Backlight set to maximum, and screen always on
(3) 36ohm Transistor at Balanced phone out to stimulate Headphone loading
(4) Volume at 80%

We take the battery reading of each machine at 10 minutes intervals, and the result are as follows:


Based on the result of the test, we consider the reading as fairly linear from 90% to 20% range, so the cause of nonlinear battery reading might not be related to firmware v3.0

We take this result and samuelboy's data and consult various related suppliers including the MCU Solution provider and we finally worked out a hypothesis. Within the Power Management module of N5, we have a table to store the Battery parameter and we work out the battery reading base on the battery parameter and a certain algorithm that we constantly refined to maintain the linearity of battery reading. We now assume that the battery parameter table is damaged for unknown reason, it can be caused by software malfunction or hardware crashed, we just can't be sure at this moment, we need to get hold of a problematic N5 sample before we can investigate the cost of the event. WIth a damaged parameter table, all the battery level computation become unreliable.

This actually explained samuelboy's obseration.
But when Samuelboy refreshed his N5 to v2.0 and crosscheck again, he notice the battery level become nonlinear now. That's because the previous observation was gathering before the battery parameter was damaged, and the recent battery test on V2.0 was after the battery parameter was damaged.

We shall further our investigation to proof our assumption, and develop solution to rectify the situation. One of the solution under discussion is to include "rewritten of battery parameter" as a standard step in a firmware update, so if the issue happen again, user can simply refreshed the firmware of the player and the battery level computation should be reset to normal after that.

I hope we can establish the solution promptly, but for the meantime, please don't panic because we are quite certain that if your N5 can run for around 9 hours between charge, the battery and the battery management function of your N5 is intact, it is the reading that screwed up, please establish a regular charging patter instead of trusting the battery reading.

That's all for now, we'll flying to LA early next week for the CanJam SoCal. This is our first appearance in CanJam so I am completed jammed up right now and there are loads of thing I need to complete before the Show. Please pardon I can't join the discussion or respond to request/PM promptly as before, I'll try to catch up. :beerchug:


Hi Andy, thank you for the update. The level of details and transparency given in this update has proven beyond any doubt that Cayin stand by their products and will support them in a professional manner.

KUDO.
 
Mar 11, 2016 at 10:36 AM Post #1,655 of 2,546
 
Can you post a few links of such adapter? I'm aiming to use my RE400B with the N5 on balanced mode..


Sorry, I didn't express myself correctly, I mean to say a lot of the 2.5mm TRRS to 3.5mm TRRS converter does not support 3.5mm balanced headphone from HiFiman, so please check with the seller specifically before you go for such an adapter.

Several N5 users has tried that route and to the best of my knowledge, no luck so far.

 
Hi Andy, I just would like to mention that Fidue recently released universal mmcx SPC cable (the same wires and finish as their original A83 cable), and this particular cable is terminated with 2.5mm TRRS (standard A&K wiring) and comes with 2.5mm TRRS to 3.5mm TRRS (HFM wired) adapter.  I know, the whole thing cost $59 and some might prefer adapter alone, but the cable itself is a very high quality and great for those who use mmcx connector based IEMs (Westone, Shure, UE, Fidue, Oriveti, etc), and you get the coverage of both 2.5mm TRRS and 3.5mm TRRS balanced connections.
 
Penon has it: http://penonaudio.com/FIDUE-A83-2.5-3.5mm-MMCX-Cable and I also did an overview here: http://www.head-fi.org/t/725161/fidue-a83-impressions-and-discussion-thread/2865#post_12343101
 
This one is definitely properly wired and supports both balanced standards.
 

 

 
Mar 11, 2016 at 10:46 AM Post #1,656 of 2,546
Hi Andy, I just would like to mention that Fidue recently released universal mmcx SPC cable (the same wires and finish as their original A83 cable), and this particular cable is terminated with 2.5mm TRRS (standard A&K wiring) and comes with 2.5mm TRRS to 3.5mm TRRS (HFM wired) adapter.  I know, the whole thing cost $59 and some might prefer adapter alone, but the cable itself is a very high quality and great for those who use mmcx connector based IEMs (Westone, Shure, UE, Fidue, Oriveti, etc), and you get the coverage of both 2.5mm TRRS and 3.5mm TRRS balanced connections.

Penon has it: http://penonaudio.com/FIDUE-A83-2.5-3.5mm-MMCX-Cable and I also did an overview here: http://www.head-fi.org/t/725161/fidue-a83-impressions-and-discussion-thread/2865#post_12343101

This one is definitely properly wired and supports both balanced standards.








Interesting.

Unfortunately, I think the adapter is "the other way round" from what we are currently discussing.

We have a few friends trying to use HiFiman 3.5mm balanced headphone with N5,, so they need an adapter cable that is 3.5mm female TRRS (HiFiman terminated) to 2.5mm male TRRS (Cayin/AK/Paw5000 terminated).

From what I understand, the adapter from Fidue is a 2.5mm female TRRS to 3.5mm male TRRS, am I correct?
 
Cayin Stay updated on Cayin at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
http://en.cayin.cn/
Mar 11, 2016 at 11:00 AM Post #1,657 of 2,546
   
Hi Andy, I just would like to mention that Fidue recently released universal mmcx SPC cable (the same wires and finish as their original A83 cable), and this particular cable is terminated with 2.5mm TRRS (standard A&K wiring) and comes with 2.5mm TRRS to 3.5mm TRRS (HFM wired) adapter.  I know, the whole thing cost $59 and some might prefer adapter alone, but the cable itself is a very high quality and great for those who use mmcx connector based IEMs (Westone, Shure, UE, Fidue, Oriveti, etc), and you get the coverage of both 2.5mm TRRS and 3.5mm TRRS balanced connections.

Penon has it: http://penonaudio.com/FIDUE-A83-2.5-3.5mm-MMCX-Cable and I also did an overview here: http://www.head-fi.org/t/725161/fidue-a83-impressions-and-discussion-thread/2865#post_12343101

This one is definitely properly wired and supports both balanced standards.





Interesting.

Unfortunately, I think the adapter is "the other way round" from what we are currently discussing.

We have a few friends trying to use HiFiman 3.5mm balanced headphone with N5,, so they need an adapter cable that is 3.5mm female TRRS (HiFiman terminated) to 2.5mm male TRRS (Cayin/AK/Paw5000 terminated).

From what I understand, the adapter from Fidue is a 2.5mm female TRRS to 3.5mm male TRRS, am I correct?

 
Oh, I see.  Yes, you are absolutely correct.  For those going from 3.5mm balanced to 2.5mm balanced Fidue adapter is not applicable.
 
I went through a similar issue last year when I got Oppo PM-3 headphones.  Even though they come with a single earcup 3.5mm TRS single ended cable, apparently Oppo wired that connector according to HFM 3.5mm balanced standard.  So, I went on an adventure to find cables.  I actually found a quality $8 3.5mm TRRS to 3.5mm TRRS cable on Amazon and then purchased half a dozen of different 3.5mm TRRS to 2.5mm TRRS adapters from ebay.  Cable worked great, but every adapter FAILED because they had a straight balanced wiring, meaning 2.5mm TRRS side was wired in the same order as 3.5mm HFM TRRS side, while those are NOT the same.  I ended up asking Whiplash to make me a custom adapter.  Bottom line, most of those connector-capsule sealed "adapters" on amazon and ebay that promise 3.5mm TRRS to 2.5mm TRRS will not work converting HFM balanced wiring to A&K balanced wiring.
 
Captured it in my mini review here: http://www.head-fi.org/t/756828/oppo-pm-3-the-portable-planar-impressions/2535#post_11937560
 

 
Mar 12, 2016 at 11:05 PM Post #1,659 of 2,546
A quick question, does the speed of the microSD affect the overall operation of the N5? Is Class 4 sufficient? Or requires at least a class 10 card?


Only effects transfer speed rates between your pc to the card. Not a concern when playing, navigating music. It can be helpful however for HD video recording and photography.

You can google up about it.
 
Mar 13, 2016 at 2:00 PM Post #1,661 of 2,546
A quick question, does the speed of the microSD affect the overall operation of the N5? Is Class 4 sufficient? Or requires at least a class 10 card?


Class 4 standy for Minimum Access (Read/Write) speed to sequential data is 4MBps, since this is a minimum performance benchmark, so in reality, this will be the requirement of write speed, and read speed normally is faster then that.

Class 10 is under similar condition, the performance benchmark is raised to 10 MBps



For audio playback, we normally need only 1MBps only, 2MBps can safely covered DSD128 and 32Bit/384kHz already, therefore for DAP application, Class 4 is good enough. The main advantage of a faster card is when you want to copy files to the card, the extra performance become an important issue.
 
Cayin Stay updated on Cayin at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
http://en.cayin.cn/
Mar 14, 2016 at 7:41 AM Post #1,663 of 2,546
Andykong
Thanks for the explanation on the different SD speed class.
I do have one more question, I hope you can help to answer.
Is it necessary to use FAT32 for music files or better to use exFAT?
(I understand that we normally need FAT32 format for firmware update.)
 
Mar 14, 2016 at 12:45 PM Post #1,664 of 2,546
I have promised to follow up on the non-linear battery reading issue raised by samuelboy, it takes longer then expected, but we kind of having a preliminary understanding of the issue by now.......

 
beerchug.gif

Wow I wasn't expecting this, really. Thanks for the follow up! Looking forward to the conclusion and fix. Meanwhile I'm calibrating myself to see when to recharge the player lol...
 
Mar 14, 2016 at 1:08 PM Post #1,665 of 2,546
Andykong
Thanks for the explanation on the different SD speed class.
I do have one more question, I hope you can help to answer.
Is it necessary to use FAT32 for music files or better to use exFAT?
(I understand that we normally need FAT32 format for firmware update.)


If you are using Cayin N5 only, I'll advice you stick with exFAT for regular music playback and keep a small card (4G or 8G) in FAT32 for firmware upgrade, that will be the most efficient arrangement.

If you were to hop around and trying out new DAPs as they show up, stick with FAT32 all the way, this will minimize incompatibility problem with new models. The biggest problem with FAT32 is not performance but the limitation to hold big file (4GB or above), occasionally there are some SACD-ISO file will go beyond this limit, but very occasionally to the best of my knowledge.
 
Cayin Stay updated on Cayin at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
http://en.cayin.cn/

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top