unfitstew
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2016
- Posts
- 332
- Likes
- 1,207
The main reason why I think people find the 6xx/600 not optimal for metal/rock is because of its super forward upper midrange. Metal especially needs a bit recessed upper mids because with the very aggressive guitars and such it gets shouty (and too aggressive) with forward upper mids. AO doesn't have as much upper mids to my ears. So at the very least it is a good amount more suited for rock tuning wise than the 6xx for rock. I would be curious if say the AO had Verite speed with its tuning. How it would compare pure tuning wise for rock/metal specifically vs how the VO/VC is now.Interesting. Part of the issue is that the Atrium drivers are slower than the Verite drivers. This is why the AO is good for slower and more lush music, but rock and metal are very quick and aggressive. I'm sure the AO is fine for rock and metal, I just don't think that is its specialty. The Verite drivers are very quick, which is why they should be a better match for rock and metal. Also, the AO tuning is more mid focused, which is why people consider it to have a similar focus as the HD6XX, but few consider the HD6XX an optimal fit for rock/metal. The hardwood AC I have is much better for rock and metal than the AO I used to have, since its tuning is more V-shaped, and the hard wood causes the transients to decay quicker, but even then I would say the VO/VC are better for rock and metal since their driver is so much quicker.
Edit: Admittedly I haven't compared the 6xx directly to my AO and AO for sure has more forward upper mids than not. So I could be wrong there. I also have the Camphur Burl VO which is a softer wood with 950 lbf janka hardness. Gorgeous wood though for sure.
Last edited: