I need help. A lot of it. I live in Canada, Toronto, and there's no ZMF dealer here. I can't hear to Zach's cans by myself before purchase, so I need as much detail as I can on them.
I'm looking into getting the Aeolus now (likely the LTD Camphor Burl edition), and I'd love to have a few questions answered. Before that...I have heard for about an hour the Audeze LCD2C and the LCDX these days at a couple audio store. I have right now a Sennheiser HD6XX and DCA AEON 2 Closed Back. I'm pointing these out just for comparisons to be made by those who have them and the Aeolus.
Comfort (It's as important as sound quality to me. Not being able to have a headphone on my had for hours defeats the purpose of it):
- Given the Aeolus pictures I've seen, there's now a head strap under the headband, which I don't think there was in the first iterations of the headphones. Does it fix any kind of hot spots the head would get? A few users complained about this problem in the early production models.
- In terms of pads size, what am I looking into? The Audezes LCD2C, LCDX and the AEON 2 have very good pads that didn't bother me at all. I'd give them comfort 9 out of 10. (Audezes LCD1 bother me a bit, they'd be a no go). The Senns HD6XX would get a comfort of 6 out of 10 for not having enough depth to avoid the ears touching the drivers, nor enough height to avoid touching the top and bottom of the ears. The Aeolus needs to have AT least the same spacing for the ear as the original pads of the HD6XX.
I wear the AEON 2 for hours at work and it never bothers me. In the end, how does the Aeolus fair into that regard?
I've read some people saying that the Aeolus can sound a bit muffled. Would that be related to the ear cup pads used + lack of amp synergy? I own both an Asgard 3 and Drop THX 789. It will be driven mostly by the Asgard though, since that's the one I have at home because I need it's pre amp function to make my life easier.
A bit about my sound preferences:
I like a sound that feels warm (not a volcano) and full, but not crazy smooth like the Meze Empyreans. I didn't like those.
I quite enjoy the sound of both my HD6XX (neutral with a bit of sparkle) and AEON 2 CB (I use the thicker and white inner padding that comes with it for a warmer sound, and the whole FR sounds pleasing to me).
I hate with all my heart the HD700. That person. I could drop a nuclear bomb on top of the factories that built these cans without a shame in the world. They made me hate bright headphones with an intensity that is crazy. Properly equalized, they are listenable, but still not my thing really. I have no problem with detailed cans, I just can't handle uncontrolled brightness. For instance, the Focal Stellia handles treble beautifully to my ears.
I was certain to go with the Audeze LCD2C by Zeos review, but them I heard them and found two problems that were bothering me. The treble was very recessed, and there was some harshness on voices. I heard the LCD2 Fazor fixes that, but I couldn't find one single dealer near me with them. I could very well consider the fazor model if these problems are indeed gone. The LCDX was weird. I heard two pairs, latest revision both. They sounded different. One was VERY neutral, a perfect HD600 made by Audeze. The second had to much treble on my face. How the hell is that even a thing I wonder, if not lack of quality control.
I considered the Auteur, but it may be too neutral for me. I wanted something with enough punch on the low, warm middles, a bit of sparkle on the treble without throwing me off with harshness.
If anyone got to the end of this wall of text and can give me some of your thoughts, I thank thee in advance.