Louisiana
500+ Head-Fier
Because the tube is labeled like this?
I have a pair of Raythons, and 5 RCAs.

I have a pair of Raythons, and 5 RCAs.

Because the tube is labeled like this?
I have a pair of Raythons, and 5 RCAs.![]()
Exactly. Labelling doesn't mean much when it comes to old tubes. Cross-labelling and licensing happened all over the place. Most of all it is the internal structure of the tube that matters, and then the factory where it was made. Labels can be misleading.While they are most likely Ratheons, that isn't a guarantee in the world of tubes. I've seen plenty of Mullards with Amperex labeling and Amperexes with Mullard labeling for the same tube type. It was all over the place back then.
Of course.Construction and date codes are the more reliable way of telling.
I have never seen getter flashing like that on a Raytheon tube, and I bet those are actually Sylvania made. That said, I have yet to see any acid etched codes on any 7F7 to confirm that.Of course.
I have a few Mullards myself that are relabeled as Philips.
From what I can tell visually, they are completely different from the RCAs in terms of internal construction.
When I have more time, I'll see if I can find any manufacturer codes.
Unfortunately, I don't currently have as much time for Head-Fi as I'd like.
@Wes S
With the Raythons, there is at least the possibility that they are genuine, as Raython produced 7F7s.
Since RCA didn't produce any, at least according to the article I linked to, the question arises as to who produced them.
I hope I was able to express myself better now.![]()
Those look like Sylvanias to me. A quick search pulled up a 7f7 Raytheon that looks different.Because the tube is labeled like this?
I have a pair of Raythons, and 5 RCAs.![]()
.... vary by weekday? by day-shift / night-shift?I have a quite a few 7F7’s now, and I swear there are at least 8-10 different versions. I even have slightly different versions of the copper rod 7F7. I’ve managed put together 5-6 pairs so far, and I think only two of those pairs are the same style. It’s crazy how much variation there was on this tube over the years, especially considering Sylvania made most of them.
Haha, I haven’t even had the chance to try them all yet. So far, I’ve stuck to the copper rod pair and the other pair I’ve got with the carbonized black plates and oval micas..... vary by weekday? by day-shift / night-shift?![]()
I really have enjoyed the Aegis with the stock tubes. Just rolled in the TAD bundle to compare and it's pretty evident why people love this amp for tube rolling. It's certainly responsive to changes.
Is there a good online source to learn what (as in what numeric value) constitutes lower output in the power tubes? I've found some interesting data on frank.pocnet.net, for example. So I can better understand which output tubes work best with which rectifier. @L0rdGwyn's spreadsheet is super helpful, but I'd like to understand it more fully.
Quick question for the group: Is there any appreciable difference between the GZ34 and GZ34S? I didn't see the S-variant on the spreadsheet. A friend passed along a new, unopened JJ GZ34S that he wasn't using, and I thought I'd try it sometime if it's safe to use.
.... only with: Carpenters, Captain & Tenille, Mantovani & Strings, Marilyn MansonForza cable sounds worse joke hehe