- Joined
- Feb 5, 2005
- Posts
- 3,870
- Likes
- 1,150
Like others...I'm giving this a lukewarm repsonse...certainly not tempted by the UK pricetag. Also, I'm eligible for a student discount on Apple's webshop...hmmm
Originally Posted by JETninja While the price seems high at first, if you configure an Ipod Photo with the same built in features and accessories that come with the "M"....you now have a $500+ Ipod vs a $369 "M".......don't look so bad now if those features are important to you. (are to me) Things that really stand out, a display that blows away the Apple (260M vs 65M colors) and many more useful codecs.... The minus for me is I don't see a line-out unless its built into the dock....I really want Line-out on my next Dap..... The thickness? No biggie....neither one would live in my pocket. |
Originally Posted by skudmunky you guys keep whining about the thickness of these mp3 players. Cmon, just a few years ago we had CD players! And I don't see you guys complaining about the thickness of MD players either. As long as it's less than half an inch thick, I'm fine with it. Half of you guys will get the iPod, loving the thinness, then slap it onto a portable amp and dac, and put it into a bag. Kinda defeats the purpose of having it thin, right? /rant. |
Originally Posted by yyoo It's also about the weight. The iPod is about an ounce lighter. We head-fi geeks tend to be lacking in the muscle department. I had to hire someone to carry my gear around for me. |