bartlett
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Posts
- 73
- Likes
- 15
Okay I think the X00s are technically better, but the coloration the MT220 provides could make for a more enjoyable listening experience. The X00s are maybe 20-30% technically better tops, mainly in terms of airiness, weightiness, and resolution. They also are ever so slightly less sibilant.
So I think in that respect the X00s are not a substantial upgrade to the MT220s. Yes, an upgrade but I don't think anything worth longing for. They also offer different sound signatures, but not super different. EQ can bring them pretty close.
I think the MT220s are just a tad too intimate and forward but the X00s are definitely too laid back for me.
I'll wait to break in the X00s for another 100 hours before further comments. That might take a week or two.
I'm not 100% sure how the PHs compare to the Mahoganies, I just know that overall they are better but only slightly. The Ebony model soon to release is supposed to also be slightly better than both of these. I know that the X900s are technically better than the PHs but they have weaknesses that make it quite a compromise to pick either over the other, considering the price.
So I think in that respect the X00s are not a substantial upgrade to the MT220s. Yes, an upgrade but I don't think anything worth longing for. They also offer different sound signatures, but not super different. EQ can bring them pretty close.
I think the MT220s are just a tad too intimate and forward but the X00s are definitely too laid back for me.
I'll wait to break in the X00s for another 100 hours before further comments. That might take a week or two.
I'm not 100% sure how the PHs compare to the Mahoganies, I just know that overall they are better but only slightly. The Ebony model soon to release is supposed to also be slightly better than both of these. I know that the X900s are technically better than the PHs but they have weaknesses that make it quite a compromise to pick either over the other, considering the price.