[Marados]

To complement my ATH AD700's. Obviously not as nice as my AD700's, but these seem to be some nice portable phones. Cheap, too.

 

[fraseyboy]

Yeah I like mine. Bought them when they were FOTM and everyone recommended them to me. 2 weeks later everyone was saying how crap they were...

But they're good for the price IMO.

 

[appophylite]

Good headphones, to be sure, but, IMO, they badly needed an amp to start shining.

 

[Iron_Dreamer]

Welcome to the best value in all headphonedom!

 

[ADD]

Yeh, amazing phones for the price - they just don't put a foot wrong. A friendly, warm sound that keeps listening fatique well and truly at bay. As an aside, I can't understand the totally different character of the HD202. With the latter, I can now experience what it is like to have severe high frequency hearing loss combined with a catastrophic head cold.

 

[QQQ]

They're awful. Absolutely no dynamics and can't handle anything below 50hz. Poor comfort too.
KCS-75 are 10x better. HD 201 are good looking though...
Quote:

Welcome to the best value in all headphonedom!

Try KSC-75

 

[guyx1992]

Nice

I'm thinking about buying a Sen' HD202 to replace my EP-630 (at home).

 

[REB]

I like mine too. Still use them sometimes when I'm behind the computer, because they're so comfy. And it feels kinda nice knowing that they didn't cost a thing really. Great value for money.

 

[gtp]

Great value phones, BUT you need to amp them. Without an amp, they sound flat and just plain bad. With an amp, they really blossom.

 

[nc8000]

I bought a 5-pack from headroom when they first came out for my kids to use instead of the supplied earbuds with mp3 players and gameboy's. Being so cheap it didn't matter all that much that they didn't treat them well so when one broke I just took another from the store. The oldest is now 15 coming on 16 and have just bought himself a decent set of closed AudioTechnica phones so he is on the right track