Tuco1965
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2012
- Posts
- 4,545
- Likes
- 192
Quote:
You mean the bear necessities!
They should be wearing headphones
You mean the bear necessities!
They should be wearing headphones
They should be wearing headphones
EDIT: Oh to my surprise, there's also the little dot mk3 available!
http://winnipeg.kijiji.ca/c-buy-and-sell-electronics-Little-Dot-MKIII-Tube-Headphone-Amplifier-Pre-Amplifier-W0QQAdIdZ475414047
I'm curious what site it is that we're not allowed to mention
I've seen vague mention of the Kingrex, but not enough to know anything about it. It seems ones of the features is the 384kHz capability... but are you ever going to use that? I found a couple more reviews:
http://www.headfonia.com/black-holes-and-revelations-kingrex-ud384-dac-and-upower-psu/
http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/kingrex9/1.html
http://www.tnt-audio.com/sorgenti/kingrex_ud384_e.html
http://www.stereomojo.com/Kingrex%20UD384%20DAC%20Review.htm/KingrexUD384DACReview.htm
Something else to consider is that since you have the e10 which can act as a usb-coax bridge, you don't necessarily have to get a usb capable dac (or get the Bifrost without usb and save the $100 that way).
My personal opinion is that between headphone/speakers vs amps vs dacs, the dacs suffer from the greatest diminishing returns.
Personally, I don't find DACs have a lot of differences unless you're looking for a certain sound signature nor if all the current technologies for USB DACs have any significant or audible difference. A good DAC will always be a good DAC even aged like my EAD DPS-1000 as long it does the job you want it to be. With Nathan, amplifiers and speakers make the biggest difference. Now that doesn't mean a DAC can throw out a large sound stage and what not. but, given some of their price points, I find investing in an amplifier is more money well spent.
However, another DAC that I've been interested in due to sheer flexibility is the Grant Fidelity TubeDac11.