davei
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2001
- Posts
- 620
- Likes
- 1
Quote:
My point is that if you need to use two different programs to constantly maintain the stability of your system, you should seriously consider re-evaluating your system. Personally, I would find that sort of maintenance unacceptable. I used to do this with 98 (re-imaging my drive with a known good backup every week or so), which obviously was a major pain in the *ss and led to my upgrading/switching OSes.
If you have a system that works the way you want it, great, but if it's idiosyncratic and non-standard (and technically obsolete, since Microsoft has stopped supporting 98) more power to you. I run my XP system hard (RAID, firewire video capture and editing, constantly installing/uninstalling software, etc.) and it works fine for me. No external utilities required. I don't even run an anti-virus program.
Originally posted by fredpb What speaks for what? LOL. Just about every program hits the registry in some way or another. The registry is fine usually. But applications corrupt the registry. So you have to prepare for that. MS gives you tools to do that. |
My point is that if you need to use two different programs to constantly maintain the stability of your system, you should seriously consider re-evaluating your system. Personally, I would find that sort of maintenance unacceptable. I used to do this with 98 (re-imaging my drive with a known good backup every week or so), which obviously was a major pain in the *ss and led to my upgrading/switching OSes.
If you have a system that works the way you want it, great, but if it's idiosyncratic and non-standard (and technically obsolete, since Microsoft has stopped supporting 98) more power to you. I run my XP system hard (RAID, firewire video capture and editing, constantly installing/uninstalling software, etc.) and it works fine for me. No external utilities required. I don't even run an anti-virus program.